Theme: Responsibility

  • I do also. But we can either choose to carry the water for the rest of humanity

    I do also. But we can either choose to carry the water for the rest of humanity or we can leave it to those with less moral interests to continue to abuse humanity.
    “Truth is enough” is what I’ve been saying all along. It’s just that no small scope of truth is uncomfortable because it means we must adapt and some adaptations we perceive as a psychological loss at best, and at worst, an unbearable behavioral cost of relearning.
    Unfortunately, ‘moral’ to much of humanity – very likely half or more – is insulating them from adaptation and learning and letting them suffer in their ignorance until it imposes such costs on us that we cannot tolerate them.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-12-26 23:48:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2004700939538547079

  • What one cares about, what one worries about, and what one has any reason to car

    What one cares about, what one worries about, and what one has any reason to care and worry about, is limited by one’s agency to act on what to care and worry about. That’s the rule. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2025-11-18 23:35:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1990926900827729976

  • AS I SAID ALL ALONG – THE VACCINE WAS UNNECESSARY FOR ALL BUT THE FRAIL, AND SHO

    AS I SAID ALL ALONG – THE VACCINE WAS UNNECESSARY FOR ALL BUT THE FRAIL, AND SHOULD HAVE BEEN VOLUNTARY

    –“A 2024 JAMA Health Forum analysis estimates COVID vaccines saved just 0.07% of U.S. lives among young adults aged 20-29, versus over 50% in those over 65, supporting the post’s view that benefits were marginal for healthy low-risk people while rare side effects like myocarditis occurred at rates of 1-10 per 100,000 doses per CDC data.”–

    They killed our economy, and ruined a generation of children’s education despite the statistical evidence being obvious to any of us who specialize in such matters.

    IMO it had political rather than health objectives. And it destroyed what little trust the population had in the government.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-11-18 18:08:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1990844475221160328

  • If the patients asked for the service and he provided it then no. If the patient

    If the patients asked for the service and he provided it then no. If the patients did not know then yes. Why? There were and are serious risks from the vaccines, versus the abiilty of some people to avoid high contagion areas, and the ability of otherwise healthy people to recover from covid quickly and well. As such the shots were only really necessary for retirement homes, hospitals, emergency service personnel, and those with exposure to large numbers of random members of the public, and worse, those same with less diligent self care.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-11-18 18:04:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1990843604794003697

  • BTW: FWIW: –“If a man works an honest job instead of doing crime, he should rec

    BTW: FWIW:

    –“If a man works an honest job instead of doing crime, he should receive respect regardless of the pay.”–

    This is the military ethic of doing one’s duty is sufficient for respect.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-11-18 17:44:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1990838588511301857

  • And we judge you for your ignorable and irresponsibility

    And we judge you for your ignorable and irresponsibility.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-11-12 10:35:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1988556344119693818

  • Far right means ignoring consequences that would be cumulatively deleterious, ra

    Far right means ignoring consequences that would be cumulatively deleterious, raise resistance that would be impossible to overcome, in favor of expediency because one’s lack of knowledge, understanding, competency, or skill in organizing large numbers of people using beneficial incentives rather than indoctrination or force, and especially demanding shared belief and values rather than utilitarian laws that produce cooperation without parasitism, sedition, or defection, despite differences in belief and values.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-11-12 02:59:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1988441521633583465

  • The problem is serious however since female cognitive emotional bias is strong a

    The problem is serious however since female cognitive emotional bias is strong and pre-rational, and women rely on emotion (empathy) and discount or ignore responsibility, cost, and consequence under the instinct not to be left behind, particularly necessary for children. However like all female neuroticism it is merely projection more so than empathy.

    So the question isnt rights because one has no right to harm just because of projection, empathy, ore feelings. Instead, how can women learn reason over instinct and reason. We know the answer: three or more children.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-11-09 00:43:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1987320052820201483

  • ASKED TO COMMENT BY OUR TEAM: (a) morality is a positive assert of a negative pr

    ASKED TO COMMENT BY OUR TEAM:
    (a) morality is a positive assert of a negative prohibition: impose no indirect costs on the demonstrated interests of others in the polity whether private, common, or public. But, we assert this negative with positive assertions (that which we wish people to imitate). Why? Imitation is easy to remember, and prohibition requires reasoning. Therefore we express cultural morals. positively (prescriptions) even though the moral foundation is a negative (proscription). (b) practical cooperation(reciprocity), ethics (direct imposition), morals (indirect imposition) within a people who share the same group evolutionary strategy, and subsequent wisdom literature, traditions, norms, and manners, is possible by this prescription (rules) that produce the proscriptions (violations) necessary in the group evolutionary strategy. (c) group evolutionary strategies were geographic dependencies based on under.a dozen causal dimensions. They resulted in different path dependencies of their three possible foundational institutions (state, religion, law). So the major civilizations operate by different foundations, and those foundations are all but immutable. And whatever those foundations, the combination determines the rate of evolutionary computation and therefore relative development of the civilization. As such while immorality is universal in principle, moral differences vary by civilization (race) and ethnicity (locality), and therefore morals are incompatible between populations (races, civilizations, ethnicities) and even classes and sexes – especially sexes since women’s morals are nearly the opposite of males.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-11-02 20:30:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1985082169786880439

  • NO. Empathy requires information necessary to judge the difference between subsi

    NO. Empathy requires information necessary to judge the difference between subsidy of free riding, parasitism, and predation vs incapacity, incompetence, or emergency. Empathy doesn’t scale because human interests and abilities don’t scale. The best we can achieve is meritocracy independent of subsidy of malincentives. At present the number of people on ‘benefits’ whether children, adult, or senior citizen is making every other investment nearly impossible. How many people are we subsidizing their bad behavior vs how many are we protecting from harm despite their good behavior. We can and do know these things. Because subsidy ‘baits people into the hazard of not changing their behavior to suit their needs.’


    Source date (UTC): 2025-10-30 16:24:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1983933039706300848