Curt Doolittle

Theme: Responsibility

  • PATERNAL REBUKE OF THE INFANTILIZED (worth repeating) (rebuke) We are not equal.

    PATERNAL REBUKE OF THE INFANTILIZED

    (worth repeating) (rebuke)

    We are not equal. We can engage in reciprocity. In doing so we can engage in reciprocal loyalty and insurance. But the weak are not equal to the strong, the woman to the man, the child to the adult. That is why we must have reciprocity to cooperate despite our differences.

    The purpose of what you [theology, philosophy, ideology] and those like you desire is to use saturation in falsehood to socially construct emotional cognitive political and military arrested development. And to drag mankind down to your level of infantile primitivism.

    Where the aristocracy took the opposite position: can we drag mankind kicking and screaming from easily manipulable female infantilism to maintain her ability to cheaply manipulate, into young adulthood to question her with philosophy, to agency with which we can rule with evidence and action, over the infants, infantile, young, limited, and those of arrested development.

    And yes I realize that indoctrination, choice, and truth constitute of spectrum of child, young adult, mature adult. And I recognize that there is value in theology for children, reason for young adults, and truth for adults – because mirrors the possible intellectual development of the mind. I also know that I am working in the language of adults, not young adults and women, or child.

    If you can calculate it’s science, if you can’t it’s philosophy. I do operational law. It’s calculable. Just as mathematics is the formal logic of the physical, operational law is the formal logic of sentient life.

    The only reason I use the framework of philosophy is, by design, to destroy philosophy with operationalism, as our ancestors destroyed theology empiricism. The only thing for philosophy now is choice within the limits of truth. The only thing left for theology is indoctrination into mindfulness within the group strategy independent of choice or truth. As far as I know philosophy is done. What remains as philosophy is but the history of the development of secular theology. If you understand that paragraph you will understand what I have done.

    Are these statements arrogant as if between equals, or truth from parent to youth, or teacher to student? One is only arrogant if he both errs and is equal. One is merely disciplining if one is parent and unequal.

    -Quod Erat Demonstrandum

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-17 11:01:00 UTC

  • I don’t feel shame because I’m calling you out, because I’ve offered a pretty co

    I don’t feel shame because I’m calling you out, because I’ve offered a pretty complete solution – the most complete solution existing – and neither you nor anyone else has. And you can’t because the numbers would be immediately falsified. Last peaceful chance we had was 92.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-15 19:46:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250510929072177153

    Reply addressees: @readomain @MattPirkowski @ThruTheHayes

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250485233973067776

  • I went to a small liberal arts college which is what all should do. I spent my i

    I went to a small liberal arts college which is what all should do. I spent my inheritance young. I live off of money I made selling businesses. I take care of my mother because she’d die in a home quickly and continuing my playboy lifestyle while doing that was unacceptable. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-15 17:58:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250483665676705792

    Reply addressees: @heraclitean11 @jim_rutt

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250482746654437377

  • The Choice – Episode 4 – The Dog, the Cake, and You in Three Lessons

    The Choice – Episode 4 – The Dog, the Cake, and You in Three Lessons https://propertarianism.com/2020/04/13/the-choice-episode-4-the-dog-the-cake-and-you-in-three-lessons/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-13 14:41:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1249709197895307266

  • The Choice – Episode 0004 – The Dog, the Cake, and You in Three Lessons

    The Choice – Episode 4 – The dog, the cake, and you in three lessons(conspiracy, meaning, responsibility, the law)

    (Audio: Download) ( Script: +E0004 – The Dog The Cake and You )

    CONTENTS

    THE FIRST LESSON: WHO IS TO BLAME? The Parable of the Dog, The Cake, And You. Man up, shut up, show up, win. THE SECOND LESSON: WHO IS TO BLAME? With Three Examples. Who’s responsible? Man up, shut up, show up, win. THE THIRD LESSON: WHO IS TO BLAME? How the world works. The Power Economy. Symptoms: Posturing, Conspiracy, Uncertainty, Rage Power Distance, Agency, Power, Meaning, What’s wrong with the world How we will fix it. Who’s responsible? Man up, shut up, show up, win. (end)

  • The Choice – Episode 0004 – The Dog, the Cake, and You in Three Lessons

    The Choice – Episode 4 – The dog, the cake, and you in three lessons(conspiracy, meaning, responsibility, the law)

    (Audio: Download) ( Script: +E0004 – The Dog The Cake and You )

    CONTENTS

    THE FIRST LESSON: WHO IS TO BLAME? The Parable of the Dog, The Cake, And You. Man up, shut up, show up, win. THE SECOND LESSON: WHO IS TO BLAME? With Three Examples. Who’s responsible? Man up, shut up, show up, win. THE THIRD LESSON: WHO IS TO BLAME? How the world works. The Power Economy. Symptoms: Posturing, Conspiracy, Uncertainty, Rage Power Distance, Agency, Power, Meaning, What’s wrong with the world How we will fix it. Who’s responsible? Man up, shut up, show up, win. (end)

  • NEW CONSTITUTION ON DEFENSE. In this constitution, all rights and obligations un

    https://propertarianism.com/revolution/constitution/rights-obligations/OUR NEW CONSTITUTION ON DEFENSE.

    In this constitution, all rights and obligations under all conditions are enumerated in “Article III – Rights and Obligations” – and it is this article and it’s structure that improves upon the bill of rights by organizing and consolidating rights so that they are all but impossible to violate. The failure to enumerate rights using this formal structure is why they were so easy to circumvent.

    The right and obligation for defense is under “Section IV – Reciprocity in Defense”.

    The primary work effort missing from this Article is the changes in rights and obligations under war or windfall. This will be an innovation in articulating the law where it hasn’t been articulated before. But that shouldn’t interfere with your discussion.

    https://propertarianism.com/revolution/constitution/rights-obligations/Updated Apr 13, 2020, 11:03 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-13 11:03:00 UTC

  • Choice – Episode 4 – The Dog, the Cake, and You in Three Lessons – A Parable. 😉

    https://propertarianism.com/2020/04/13/the-choice-episode-4-the-dog-the-cake-and-you-in-three-lessons/The Choice – Episode 4 – The Dog, the Cake, and You in Three Lessons – A Parable. 😉

    (conspiracy, meaning, responsibility, the law)

    I found myself laughing a bit while working on it so hopefully it’s not only informative but amusing.Updated Apr 13, 2020, 10:49 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-13 10:49:00 UTC

  • THE LESSON: THE DOG, THE CAKE, AND YOU I used to work in an art supply store bac

    THE LESSON: THE DOG, THE CAKE, AND YOU

    I used to work in an art supply store back in college in an exclusive city. There was a bakery next door. A woman parked in front of the store. She went into the bakery. She came back. She put the cake on the front seat. She closed the door. She went off to do something else. She came back. There was a large dog in the back seat. It’s face was covered with frosting. The cake was a disaster. She beat the dog. She cried. She went to the baker. She was angry. She wanted someone to blame.

    The cake is the government, economy, financial system, education and culture.

    The dog is people in the government, academy, media, and financial system.

    The woman is you.

    The box she didn’t put the cake in is the law.

    The trunk of the car is the militia.

    People are just animals. Animals follow incentives.

    Law creates a market for the suppression of malincentives.

    The militia defends the law that creates the market for the suppression of malincentives.

    The problem isn’t the people in the government, economy, financial system, education, academy, media.

    The problem is your failure to preserve a militia, to preserve the law, that preserves the market for the suppression of malincentives, suppresses the malincentives of the people who are animals following their intuitions.

    Conspiracy is your way of not taking responsibility for your civilization.

    Man up. Shut up. Show up. Win.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-11 23:18:00 UTC

  • PROSECUTION ONLINE I have for a decade now, taught the same strategy. 1. Return

    PROSECUTION ONLINE

    I have for a decade now, taught the same strategy.

    1. Return any taunt they made as dispassionately as possible.

    2. Call them a liar or failing due diligence.

    3. State your central argument

    4. repeat until they are exhausted.

    All they do with every cycle is provide you with opportunity to recite the same statements “you are lying, either by design, or by failure of due diligence, [this is the truth], you can either refute it by testimony and warranty within the limits of liability (… 1. Refutation), or offer an equally criticizable solution to the question so that we can judge it’s possibility costs and benefits (2. Competition.), or seek to understand what you clearly don’t (3. Question). But at present you are [lying, denying, fictionalizing, sophistry, pseusocience,mysticism, impossibility, irreciprocity].

    Just do the same thing over and over again and they will eventually expose themselves out of frustration – works every time if you stick with it over time.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-11 13:21:00 UTC