Curt Doolittle

Theme: Responsibility

  • I Don’t Hate Anyone: It Abandons Responsibility – But Paternalism Produces Frustration and Retains Responsibility

    I DON’T HATE ANYONE: IT ABANDONS RESPONSIBILTY – WHILE PATERNALISM PRODUCES ONLY FRUSTRATION AND RETAINS RESPONSIBILITY

    [O]nce you gasp the miracle that we humans achieve anything at all with the animal instincts and the limited ability and knowlege at our disposal, the sheer terror of the reality of it, converts you from being angry with the world, to desperately wanting to parent as much of it as possible

    But we differ in i) what we should parent people in favor of: say harmony, poverty, and dysgenia vs stress, prosperity, and eugenia. ii) whether than can be done by truth, conveinient half truths, or utter deceits. iii) whether it must be done by fast or slow, iv) whether by authoritarian stick or market carrot. v) whether we can bear the truth of the necessity of controllling reproduction at the bottom.

    Yes european civ is superior because european civilization is most consious of reality, european sense making has the highest correspondence to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and europeans have institutionalized those physical, natural, and evolutionary laws – except for our abandonement of market eugenics.

    It is possible japanese-korean civ, are now the most superior civilization having retained their ethnocentrism, superior demographics, internal high trust, martial discipline, and self control. And incorporated european science and finance, if not our heroic aesthetics (asian aesthetics are childlike).

    Why?

    The christians intentionally destroyed Stoicism and Epicureanism which would have provided us truthful mindfuless that and made us immune to the the false promsies of supernatural religion.

    We have lost the self discipline required for church, court, and commons because the postwar jewish attack on our civilization. We have lost majority male participation in the military and the requirement that political persons at the highest level have served in the military. We have lost the majority farmer as small businessman and therefore majority commercial ethics – and we are just wealtheir peasants working as tax, credit, and consumption serfs.

    So, a majority-serf population enjoying middle class consumption, who are insulated from the market by corporate size or government size, and a minority middle class of responsibilty for capital and production, and an ever growing underclass of under and unemployables, because they cannot produce anything of sufficient complexity, nor compete in the world economy to compete for status and consumption.

    And so, all but a few are lacking emotional, mental, and physical self control and fitness to do anything about it. The civilization is full of emotionally, socially, economically, politically and militarily infantile serfs whose primary hyperconsumption is the abandonment of responsibility for anything.

    So, one can ‘hate’ and share in the abandonement of responsiblity, or one can ‘parent’, and accept the responsibilty.

    My undestanding of the world is that most of it needs parenting, but most of the world can’t tolerate it, organize it, or decide how to do it.

    That’s what P-Law gives us. It tells us how to talk about and to do those things: teach, organize, and bring it into being parentally – without hate.

    So no I don’t hate people. They just frustrate me.

    That includes every group from the leftists, to the j’s to muslims, the xians, wn, ns, and beyond.

    Hate means you fall for the fallacy of equality and don’t know what to do and aren’t wiling to do it. Frustration means you you accept the necessity of hierarchy and know what to do and are willing to do it – but it’s terribly hard work.

  • I Don’t Hate Anyone: It Abandons Responsibility – But Paternalism Produces Frustration and Retains Responsibility

    I DON’T HATE ANYONE: IT ABANDONS RESPONSIBILTY – WHILE PATERNALISM PRODUCES ONLY FRUSTRATION AND RETAINS RESPONSIBILITY

    [O]nce you gasp the miracle that we humans achieve anything at all with the animal instincts and the limited ability and knowlege at our disposal, the sheer terror of the reality of it, converts you from being angry with the world, to desperately wanting to parent as much of it as possible

    But we differ in i) what we should parent people in favor of: say harmony, poverty, and dysgenia vs stress, prosperity, and eugenia. ii) whether than can be done by truth, conveinient half truths, or utter deceits. iii) whether it must be done by fast or slow, iv) whether by authoritarian stick or market carrot. v) whether we can bear the truth of the necessity of controllling reproduction at the bottom.

    Yes european civ is superior because european civilization is most consious of reality, european sense making has the highest correspondence to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and europeans have institutionalized those physical, natural, and evolutionary laws – except for our abandonement of market eugenics.

    It is possible japanese-korean civ, are now the most superior civilization having retained their ethnocentrism, superior demographics, internal high trust, martial discipline, and self control. And incorporated european science and finance, if not our heroic aesthetics (asian aesthetics are childlike).

    Why?

    The christians intentionally destroyed Stoicism and Epicureanism which would have provided us truthful mindfuless that and made us immune to the the false promsies of supernatural religion.

    We have lost the self discipline required for church, court, and commons because the postwar jewish attack on our civilization. We have lost majority male participation in the military and the requirement that political persons at the highest level have served in the military. We have lost the majority farmer as small businessman and therefore majority commercial ethics – and we are just wealtheir peasants working as tax, credit, and consumption serfs.

    So, a majority-serf population enjoying middle class consumption, who are insulated from the market by corporate size or government size, and a minority middle class of responsibilty for capital and production, and an ever growing underclass of under and unemployables, because they cannot produce anything of sufficient complexity, nor compete in the world economy to compete for status and consumption.

    And so, all but a few are lacking emotional, mental, and physical self control and fitness to do anything about it. The civilization is full of emotionally, socially, economically, politically and militarily infantile serfs whose primary hyperconsumption is the abandonment of responsibility for anything.

    So, one can ‘hate’ and share in the abandonement of responsiblity, or one can ‘parent’, and accept the responsibilty.

    My undestanding of the world is that most of it needs parenting, but most of the world can’t tolerate it, organize it, or decide how to do it.

    That’s what P-Law gives us. It tells us how to talk about and to do those things: teach, organize, and bring it into being parentally – without hate.

    So no I don’t hate people. They just frustrate me.

    That includes every group from the leftists, to the j’s to muslims, the xians, wn, ns, and beyond.

    Hate means you fall for the fallacy of equality and don’t know what to do and aren’t wiling to do it. Frustration means you you accept the necessity of hierarchy and know what to do and are willing to do it – but it’s terribly hard work.

  • No. HA is sophistry; MES half so, that demonstrates a civilizational lack of res

    No. HA is sophistry; MES half so, that demonstrates a civilizational lack of responsibility for territory, economy, and commons; Bastiat an unempirical work of moral philosophy without prescription of how to achieve it. And Might is necessary to create rights vs beg for them. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-27 15:43:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287775715962888193

    Reply addressees: @joanlarma @billtalts @JulieBorowski

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287772981427687425

  • No. HA is sophistry; MES half so, that demonstrates a civilizational lack of res

    No. HA is sophistry; MES half so, that demonstrates a civilizational lack of responsibility for territory, economy, and commons; Bastiat an unempirical work of moral philosophy without prescription of how to achieve it. And Might is necessary to create rights vs beg for them. 😉

    Reply addressees: @joanlarma @billtalts @JulieBorowski

  • The structure of all Rights will be the same. Organized by Display, Word, and De

    The structure of all Rights will be the same. Organized by Display, Word, and Deed. The Right to [], the obligation to[], And any attempt at alienation by or of [] is punishable by []. Rights under war, rights under peace, rights under windfalls.

    Once you begin with citizens who defend the state (assets) own the state (assets), and hire (elect) governments manage the assets, and courts to resolve differences by self-determination, individual sovereignty, and reciprocity by display word and deed, where specific rights and obligations are articulated by display word and deed, and adapted under conditions of war, peace and windfall – and we pay special attention to the prohibition to extending fraud to false, unwarrantable, promise of violation of physical, natural and evolutionary laws, then IT GETS VERY HARD TO WEASEL WITH THE LAW.

    We are stuck with making contracts of reciprocity, because ‘majority rule’ doesn’t matter any longer. Positive legislation doesn’t exist.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-26 20:58:00 UTC

  • (Abortion is the ‘hard case’ since (a) child has no choice, (b) yes it’s murder

    (Abortion is the ‘hard case’ since (a) child has no choice, (b) yes it’s murder (b) women killed more children in history than men killed men (c) we execute people for cause (d) and our court has wrongly decided that ‘murder is ok’ rather than making a local preference.)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-25 04:09:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286876097532104704

    Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11 @Nationalist7346 @victorkfranco @Ozpin_88

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286871483172749312

  • (Abortion is the ‘hard case’ since (a) child has no choice, (b) yes it’s murder

    (Abortion is the ‘hard case’ since (a) child has no choice, (b) yes it’s murder (b) women killed more children in history than men killed men (c) we execute people for cause (d) and our court has wrongly decided that ‘murder is ok’ rather than making a local preference.)

    Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11 @Nationalist7346 @victorkfranco @Ozpin_88

  • Q&A: POSITION ON FEMINISM AND PATRIARCHY? (Note: Impulsive boys demand certainty

    Q&A: POSITION ON FEMINISM AND PATRIARCHY?

    (Note: Impulsive boys demand certainty – patient men understand human determinism)

    —“Where does P stand on feminism and patriarchy”—

    1) “FEMINISM: the advocacy of women’s rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes.”

    EQUALITY IN THE LAW:

    The only equality is in our necessary equality before the law, in matters of dispute resolution. This is the only equality that does and must exist.

    OTHERWISE INEQUALITY

    “Males and females divide the reproductive, sensory, perceptive, cognitive, advocacy, and labor of a civilization by population and time, with females in the shorter term and between individuals, and males in the longer term between polities.”

    This division of labor is rather obvious because men generally allow women to control their female relative’s reproduction, and men’s reproduction is limited by the pool of available females in the polity, and the male polity’s ability to maintain a quality stock of females, who will happily defect to other men or polities (hypergamy) if it’s in their individual advantage, regardless of the cost to the polity (males).

    CONSEQUENCES

    We demonstrate inequality in our abilities, preference, and interests, and this inequality of ability, preference, and interests favors empathy, consumption, the interpersonal, and social among females, versus empiricism, capitalization, the economic, political, and military among males – and the more liberty we have to express those inequalities in our abilities, interests, and preferences the more we bias to pursue them.

    The evolutionary and competitive value of adversarial competition is demonstrably a majority male bias, reinforced by loyalty at the cost of adaptability to different groups.. The evolutionary and competitive value of consensus-seeking internally to any group is demonstrably a majority female bias – though lacking any loyalty, but grater individual adaptability to different groups.

    Men and women coddle women for evolutionary reasons. And Women drive down adversarial competition in all organizations so that they can tolerate participation. This is why women drive down the competitive advantage of innovative and capitalizing organizations, and drive up the uncompetitive costs of accommodation and consumption. This is why any industry women enter into and become a majority declines in innovation, income, and associated prestige.

    It’s why women are generally put in charge of organizations where the men can’t agree on a direction (holding place), are or in organizations in decline (provide cover), or are purely symbolic (appearances). And so few women (though they do exist) are at the top.

    In the military, in any non-administrative, non-medical role – women drive down adversarial competition, largely put men at risk in combat, in jobs better done by men, have more job opportunities elsewhere, and so consume resources and jobs for men without those opportunities, and are wasting prime reproductive value. (period).

    CONCLUSION

    Forced integration prevents market from doing its job of teaching us the truth. The market solves these problems just fine if we let the market solve them. Forced integration of the sexes has been as damaging as forced integration of the races.

    Equality under the law is the only necessary or desirable equality.

    2) “PATRIARCHY: a system of society or government in which the father or eldest male is head of the family and descent is traced through the male line. Or, a system of society or government in which men hold the power and women are largely excluded from it.”

    My position is well documented, that there is value in a ‘house’ for any class with divergent interests, and that military, economic(biz, industry, capital), labor(salaried, hourly), and reproductive (female) houses force exchanges between the classes.

    So we identify the political problem of enfranchising both labor and women without providing them with separate houses, so that the classes can negotiate trades, rather than parties which race to the bottom.

    And that these differences are common sense and there is little evidence that constitutional monarchies hiring a professional cabinet, with voters limited to veto of appropriations, aren’t better than democracies – which as always, crash and burn.

    In our constitution, we lay out the options for government given the demographics and economy and the polity can choose.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-24 09:30:00 UTC

  • Q: WHAT TO DO WHEN THE MAN KNOCKS 😉

    Q: WHAT TO DO WHEN THE MAN KNOCKS 😉 Someone asked. Here is the answer. Two people have been contacted in the past month or so. Both for activities online that were unrelated to our movement, but were slips made in rage. We never do anything illegal or recommend anything illegal. It is counter-productive to do anything other than political activism that draws attention to our policies. We use a lot of devices to encourage the spread of our ideas. And to give our people courage that if push comes to shove they can win. But you will notice how very careful I am. And how I won’t even talk to troublemakers. I’m very deliberately following in the steps of the founders, and following settled federal law that licenses Americans almost uniquely in the world to propose political change in the model of the founders. If you are involved with our group at all and you get involved with other activities you are putting us at risk. We don’t need you to put us at risk. TESTOSTERONE IS A WONDERFUL DRUG. I realize there are a lot of young men with young men’s testosterone and that online bravado and sh-t talking is part of being one of today’s young men. On the other hand you can easily cross the line. And you are most likely to cross the line when you lose your temper. It is losing your temper that makes people worried – not your trash talking. THEY’RE DOING THEIR JOB This forces cops that would rather be solving ‘real crimes’ to do their job given the ‘escalations’ that happened last year. If you know someone who did or said something stupid you are likely to get a call. if you do something serious THEY SHOW UP and knock on your door. If you do something really really stupid a raid. It’s the economics of law enforcement: their effort follows your degree of stupidity. 😉 But 99.999999% of the time someone in some online group commented on, or said something that could be misinterpreted as a legitimate threat. That means they are trying to get dirt on someone else – not necessarily you. If you’re involved in other groups or other events or with other people then look there. Usually we know all what we did to attract attention, because we remember losing it, and usually its saying something ‘stupid’ in haste. Sometimes it’s venting by larping – and it’s possible to interpret your larping as a threat. You don’t have to learn more than once anything you tell law enforcement passes thru a telephone-game of continuous modification worse than the news media and workplace-gossip because the law enforcement just like the media frames everything in whatever institutional narrative they are familiar with – and these are ordinary guys not rocket scientists. Anything you say will not be interpreted or recorded or communicated as you said it. All human organizations do this. This is why I emphasize ‘man up, shut up, show up’. With ‘shut up’ being an imperative. Group political activism is safe. Larping online is more dangerous than showing up in large groups. BE POLITE. BE CALM. BE CLEAR. But If you DO get a call, either don’t answer it, or don’t return it. If it’s serious they state the question on the message or they show up. They don’t call. If you talk to them, be polite at all times (they are doing their job) do not be afraid or angry (they are doing their job) tell them that you won’t talk to them without a warrant and lawyer. And say absolutely nothing else. Don’t ever talk to them without a lawyer. Ever. They will take a normal person’s read on you. If you are scared of them, or threatening to them, or irrational, or even impolite, that means more bad than anything you can say good. Help them do their job: Just tell them that you are just an activist, never engage in anything other than activism, won’t talk to them without a warrant and a lawyer, and wish them good luck in their investigation. Unless there is imminent danger to someone’s life, then you will help. Unless they already have you for some crime or other they will go away because you aren’t worth the effort. If you are worth their effort then you did something stupid. lol Don’t do stupid things. 😉 Please.

  • Q: WHAT TO DO WHEN THE MAN KNOCKS 😉

    Q: WHAT TO DO WHEN THE MAN KNOCKS 😉 Someone asked. Here is the answer. Two people have been contacted in the past month or so. Both for activities online that were unrelated to our movement, but were slips made in rage. We never do anything illegal or recommend anything illegal. It is counter-productive to do anything other than political activism that draws attention to our policies. We use a lot of devices to encourage the spread of our ideas. And to give our people courage that if push comes to shove they can win. But you will notice how very careful I am. And how I won’t even talk to troublemakers. I’m very deliberately following in the steps of the founders, and following settled federal law that licenses Americans almost uniquely in the world to propose political change in the model of the founders. If you are involved with our group at all and you get involved with other activities you are putting us at risk. We don’t need you to put us at risk. TESTOSTERONE IS A WONDERFUL DRUG. I realize there are a lot of young men with young men’s testosterone and that online bravado and sh-t talking is part of being one of today’s young men. On the other hand you can easily cross the line. And you are most likely to cross the line when you lose your temper. It is losing your temper that makes people worried – not your trash talking. THEY’RE DOING THEIR JOB This forces cops that would rather be solving ‘real crimes’ to do their job given the ‘escalations’ that happened last year. If you know someone who did or said something stupid you are likely to get a call. if you do something serious THEY SHOW UP and knock on your door. If you do something really really stupid a raid. It’s the economics of law enforcement: their effort follows your degree of stupidity. 😉 But 99.999999% of the time someone in some online group commented on, or said something that could be misinterpreted as a legitimate threat. That means they are trying to get dirt on someone else – not necessarily you. If you’re involved in other groups or other events or with other people then look there. Usually we know all what we did to attract attention, because we remember losing it, and usually its saying something ‘stupid’ in haste. Sometimes it’s venting by larping – and it’s possible to interpret your larping as a threat. You don’t have to learn more than once anything you tell law enforcement passes thru a telephone-game of continuous modification worse than the news media and workplace-gossip because the law enforcement just like the media frames everything in whatever institutional narrative they are familiar with – and these are ordinary guys not rocket scientists. Anything you say will not be interpreted or recorded or communicated as you said it. All human organizations do this. This is why I emphasize ‘man up, shut up, show up’. With ‘shut up’ being an imperative. Group political activism is safe. Larping online is more dangerous than showing up in large groups. BE POLITE. BE CALM. BE CLEAR. But If you DO get a call, either don’t answer it, or don’t return it. If it’s serious they state the question on the message or they show up. They don’t call. If you talk to them, be polite at all times (they are doing their job) do not be afraid or angry (they are doing their job) tell them that you won’t talk to them without a warrant and lawyer. And say absolutely nothing else. Don’t ever talk to them without a lawyer. Ever. They will take a normal person’s read on you. If you are scared of them, or threatening to them, or irrational, or even impolite, that means more bad than anything you can say good. Help them do their job: Just tell them that you are just an activist, never engage in anything other than activism, won’t talk to them without a warrant and a lawyer, and wish them good luck in their investigation. Unless there is imminent danger to someone’s life, then you will help. Unless they already have you for some crime or other they will go away because you aren’t worth the effort. If you are worth their effort then you did something stupid. lol Don’t do stupid things. 😉 Please.