–“Banks produce few greenhouse-gas emissions themselves. But they fund a great deal of them”–
Our legal reforms include liability for every actor in the chain, including employees with awareness of or handling of any part of any transaction. We eliminate plausible deniability.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-11 17:15:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1337445951439560704
Reply addressees: @TheEconomist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1337444557273837573
There is a vast difference between attention seeking, cult seeking, rejection or self loathing, and sedition, treason, against the laws of the universe, including the physical law of scarcity, natural law of reciprocity,and evolutionary law of regression to the mean and dysgenia.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-11 15:28:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1337419083109765123
Reply addressees: @Quillette
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1337383633418661889
LUXURY BELIEFS By: @LukeWeinhagen The belief that the world is not a dangerous place or the belief that anyone but you is responsible for your safety are luxury beliefs. Even this article will be viewed far too narrowly by most. Compared to the rest of the world, the west are all “rich”. We have insulated ourselves so effectively from the consequences of stupidity and dishonesty, and created such a vast illusion of safety in the west that unless you are actively attempting to falsify your beliefs it is safe to assume they are all luxury beliefs. ‘Luxury beliefs’ are the latest status symbol for rich Americans …
A former classmate from Yale recently told me “monogamy is kind of outdated” and not good for society. So I asked her what her background is and if she planned to marry. She said she comes from an affluent family and works at a well-known technology company. Yes, she personally intends to have a monogamous marriage — but quickly added that marriage shouldn’t have to be for everyone. She was raised by a traditional family. She planned on having a traditional family. But she maintained that traditional families are old-fashioned and society should “evolve” beyond them. What could explain this? In the past, upper-class Americans used to display their social status with luxury goods. Today, they do it with luxury beliefs. https://nypost.com/2019/08/17/luxury-beliefs-are-the-latest-status-symbol-for-rich-americans/
Few apply even a minimal set of tests such as @ThomasSowell’s 3 questions
If it is important to you that your beliefs have value, I suggest you test them to make sure they derive their value from their quality rather than their luxury. I Call Them Luxurtarians By: @emblem21CEO My reeducation camp list includes: * middle class white women * academics & intellectuals * libertarians & libertines and liberals * the overeducated * the runaway enlightened They prefer liberty & luxury over reality. “Magic thinking is a luxury, only available to those with a buffer between themselves and the direct contact with a dangerous reality.” — @LukeWeinhagen “Democracy is not an intrinsic good, produces no goods, but is a risky emotional luxury [feeling righteous whilst acting degenerately] made possible by Full Integration into ‘Whiteness’” – @curtdoolittleQ&A: “Curt; Do You Have a Concise Definition for Testimonialism?” Colloquially: “The completion of the scientific method for the purpose of the conduct of law”. Testimonial Truth: Testimony (Speech) that is warrantied by the speaker through the performance of due diligence against imaginary content, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, deception and fraud. The only truth that can exist is that which is spoken. We can never speak the perfect truth because we can never know if we possess it. The most perfect truth we can speak is that which we have performed due diligence, that we do not speak in falsehood: fraud. Testimonialism: A set of tests of due diligence, the satisfaction of which allows us to warranty that to the best of our ability our speech (testimony) is free of the falsehoods: imaginary content, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, deceit, and fraud. Truth: That testimony we would give if we possessed perfect (complete) knowledge, perfect language, and an audience possessed of the same. And, at that point we speak a name, not a description. Everything has a true name. We seek that name. In seeking it we seek truth.
LUXURY BELIEFS By: @LukeWeinhagen The belief that the world is not a dangerous place or the belief that anyone but you is responsible for your safety are luxury beliefs. Even this article will be viewed far too narrowly by most. Compared to the rest of the world, the west are all “rich”. We have insulated ourselves so effectively from the consequences of stupidity and dishonesty, and created such a vast illusion of safety in the west that unless you are actively attempting to falsify your beliefs it is safe to assume they are all luxury beliefs. ‘Luxury beliefs’ are the latest status symbol for rich Americans …
A former classmate from Yale recently told me “monogamy is kind of outdated” and not good for society. So I asked her what her background is and if she planned to marry. She said she comes from an affluent family and works at a well-known technology company. Yes, she personally intends to have a monogamous marriage — but quickly added that marriage shouldn’t have to be for everyone. She was raised by a traditional family. She planned on having a traditional family. But she maintained that traditional families are old-fashioned and society should “evolve” beyond them. What could explain this? In the past, upper-class Americans used to display their social status with luxury goods. Today, they do it with luxury beliefs. https://nypost.com/2019/08/17/luxury-beliefs-are-the-latest-status-symbol-for-rich-americans/
Few apply even a minimal set of tests such as @ThomasSowell’s 3 questions
If it is important to you that your beliefs have value, I suggest you test them to make sure they derive their value from their quality rather than their luxury. I Call Them Luxurtarians By: @emblem21CEO My reeducation camp list includes: * middle class white women * academics & intellectuals * libertarians & libertines and liberals * the overeducated * the runaway enlightened They prefer liberty & luxury over reality. “Magic thinking is a luxury, only available to those with a buffer between themselves and the direct contact with a dangerous reality.” — @LukeWeinhagen “Democracy is not an intrinsic good, produces no goods, but is a risky emotional luxury [feeling righteous whilst acting degenerately] made possible by Full Integration into ‘Whiteness’” – @curtdoolittleQ&A: “Curt; Do You Have a Concise Definition for Testimonialism?” Colloquially: “The completion of the scientific method for the purpose of the conduct of law”. Testimonial Truth: Testimony (Speech) that is warrantied by the speaker through the performance of due diligence against imaginary content, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, deception and fraud. The only truth that can exist is that which is spoken. We can never speak the perfect truth because we can never know if we possess it. The most perfect truth we can speak is that which we have performed due diligence, that we do not speak in falsehood: fraud. Testimonialism: A set of tests of due diligence, the satisfaction of which allows us to warranty that to the best of our ability our speech (testimony) is free of the falsehoods: imaginary content, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, deceit, and fraud. Truth: That testimony we would give if we possessed perfect (complete) knowledge, perfect language, and an audience possessed of the same. And, at that point we speak a name, not a description. Everything has a true name. We seek that name. In seeking it we seek truth.
RT @John_Rossomando: “If you don’t play by the rules you don’t deserve the protection of the rules” — Thomas Sowell
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-10 05:28:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1336905561561034752
Q: Curt: “How Do You Use P-Law To Evaluate the “Credibility” of Points of View”
This response answers the question – if you can understand it:
1) Non-Warranty (blame): a point of view constitutes an opinion in the absence of due diligence, which one is unwilling to warranty – an admission of ignorance, or a pretense of argument (deceit).
2) Warranty(blame): an argument constitutes a claim of undecidability, the possibility of truth, or falsehood which one is willing to warranty – a claim of knowledge, or a pretense of knowledge(deceit)
3) Truth or Falsehood: You can only make a truth claim if you can testify to it. And we can test whether you can Testify to it. And whether your Testimony is consistent under realism, naturalism, identity, internal consistency, operational possibility, external correspondence, rational choice, reciprocity in rational choice, with stated limits, full accounting within them, and parsimonious survival of competition against the market for alternatives. This suite of tests consists of the full set of dimensions to which humans can testify and therefore claim true.
4) Criminality: Furthermore, we can test means, motive, the opportunity for crimes by the test of Reciprocity: productive, exhaustively informed, voluntary transfer, warrantied for due diligence and within the limits of restitutability, to be free of imposition of costs against the demonstrated interests of others by externality. This suite of tests consists of the full set of dimensions to which humans can conduct crimes.
5) Completeness: By these two tests Reciprocity, and Testimony within Reciprocity, we can determine the undecidability, truth candidacy, or falsehood of any claim of testimony.
6) Measurement: The formal operational logic of analysis is called operationalism, and the principle technique is constructing systems of measurement out of language, by enumeration and disambiguation by serialization. Then fully expanding sentences into promissory, operational, complete, transactions absent the pretense of knowledge of the verb to be.
7) Systems of Measurement: We have formalized all speech into a table we call The Grammars, that disambiguates deflationary, normal, and inflationary speech into the full set of techniques from logic and math ant one and to normal speech in the center, to lies at the other end.
8) Systems of Deceit: We have formalized the techniques of deceit with equal depth, but I don’t feel like typing that much here because as in all things the means of falsehood are nearly infinite while the means of truth is nearly singular.
9) Learning the P-Law methodology is like learning three years of programming, economics, and law simultaneously, it takes a +130 IQ with education in the physical sciences, and basic familiarity with economics about six months, and talented people about three years. What does that mean? It means you’re probably overloaded with my answer. But this particular answer ends philosophy and completes the scientific method and the aristotelian project, and the five thousand years of evolution of european civilization’s nearly exclusive, gradual, discovery, adaptation to, and application of the formal (logical), physical, behavioral(natural), and evolutionary laws of the universe.
OnlineDummies Version (in progress) https://
Q: Curt: “How Do You Use P-Law To Evaluate the “Credibility” of Points of View”
This response answers the question – if you can understand it:
1) Non-Warranty (blame): a point of view constitutes an opinion in the absence of due diligence, which one is unwilling to warranty – an admission of ignorance, or a pretense of argument (deceit).
2) Warranty(blame): an argument constitutes a claim of undecidability, the possibility of truth, or falsehood which one is willing to warranty – a claim of knowledge, or a pretense of knowledge(deceit)
3) Truth or Falsehood: You can only make a truth claim if you can testify to it. And we can test whether you can Testify to it. And whether your Testimony is consistent under realism, naturalism, identity, internal consistency, operational possibility, external correspondence, rational choice, reciprocity in rational choice, with stated limits, full accounting within them, and parsimonious survival of competition against the market for alternatives. This suite of tests consists of the full set of dimensions to which humans can testify and therefore claim true.
4) Criminality: Furthermore, we can test means, motive, the opportunity for crimes by the test of Reciprocity: productive, exhaustively informed, voluntary transfer, warrantied for due diligence and within the limits of restitutability, to be free of imposition of costs against the demonstrated interests of others by externality. This suite of tests consists of the full set of dimensions to which humans can conduct crimes.
5) Completeness: By these two tests Reciprocity, and Testimony within Reciprocity, we can determine the undecidability, truth candidacy, or falsehood of any claim of testimony.
6) Measurement: The formal operational logic of analysis is called operationalism, and the principle technique is constructing systems of measurement out of language, by enumeration and disambiguation by serialization. Then fully expanding sentences into promissory, operational, complete, transactions absent the pretense of knowledge of the verb to be.
7) Systems of Measurement: We have formalized all speech into a table we call The Grammars, that disambiguates deflationary, normal, and inflationary speech into the full set of techniques from logic and math ant one and to normal speech in the center, to lies at the other end.
8) Systems of Deceit: We have formalized the techniques of deceit with equal depth, but I don’t feel like typing that much here because as in all things the means of falsehood are nearly infinite while the means of truth is nearly singular.
9) Learning the P-Law methodology is like learning three years of programming, economics, and law simultaneously, it takes a +130 IQ with education in the physical sciences, and basic familiarity with economics about six months, and talented people about three years. What does that mean? It means you’re probably overloaded with my answer. But this particular answer ends philosophy and completes the scientific method and the aristotelian project, and the five thousand years of evolution of european civilization’s nearly exclusive, gradual, discovery, adaptation to, and application of the formal (logical), physical, behavioral(natural), and evolutionary laws of the universe.
OnlineDummies Version (in progress) https://
The Natural Law (science) upon which our Constitution depends, dictates that punishment for crimes under that Natural Law, consist of 1. Restitution, 2. Punishment, and 3. Prevention: For your crimes you must pay restitution, suffer punishment severe enough to prevent repetition.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-09 16:49:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1336714720548704257
Reply addressees: @InscrutableKid @Jade22805149 @realDonaldTrump
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1336711992560771072
Sincerity is there. In tort law (natural law) you are guilty for failure of due diligence. In matters of the informational commons, platonism is a crime. I use math because it’s the example most are familiar with.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-09 01:55:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1336489519944765440
Reply addressees: @EuclidsPoint
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1336488927960686594
Peter. That’s nonsense. He’s guilty of the kind of entrapment than any of us who has been in a great deal of litigation have experience with.
Was he obscuring any crime? No.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-08 20:03:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1336400943798161408
Reply addressees: @PeterZeihan
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1336398420664324097