RT @ThruTheHayes: EQUILIBRATION ISN’T FOUND ON BALANCE SHEETS
Justice requires being served to balance scales.
Source date (UTC): 2025-02-08 22:53:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1888360557591556498
RT @ThruTheHayes: EQUILIBRATION ISN’T FOUND ON BALANCE SHEETS
Justice requires being served to balance scales.
Source date (UTC): 2025-02-08 22:53:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1888360557591556498
RT @LukeWeinhagen: FEMININE RESPONSIBILITY (OR NOT)
Q: Presentations from the Natural Law Institute imply, or state, that the feminine isâŚ
Source date (UTC): 2025-02-05 04:03:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1886989063774986418
You are not making a positive argument, you’re just engaging in feminine, abrahamic, marxist critique WITHOUT proposing a positive argument that would be rational for members of a polity to agree to. Anyone can bitch about stuff. Ask every nitwit on the hard right. Ask any nitwit on the left. Ask any nitwit whatsoever. Complaints are admissions of incompetence ignorance and failure. Explanations and solutions are of value. Everything else is a waste of oxygen. Either you can propose a superior solution people would prefer or you can’t. So do it. Otherwise you’ll keep wasting my time. đ
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @calabrianvice
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-20 20:25:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881438036732600320
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881437246793875557
IS THE USA STILL A REPUBLIC AND NOT AN OLIGARCHY?
Assertion:–“The USA is an oligarchy. The democracy is just a mask for oligarchy.”– @AutistocratMS
Yes, elements of oligarchic influenceâlobbying, corporate donations, and elite power concentrationâare undeniable. However, these influences exist within the framework of a constitutional republic, where competing interests, public accountability, and the rule of law continue to hold significant sway. The presence of oligarchic tendencies does not erase the broader system of representative democracy, nor does it eliminate the checks and balances designed to prevent the consolidation of unaccountable power.
Oligarchy is defined by the dominance of a small, cohesive ruling class. In contrast, the U.S. operates as a vast marketplace of competing interestsâcorporations, unions, grassroots movements, NGOs, and factions of varying size and strength. These factions vie for influence in a contest that prevents any single oligarchy from consolidating unchecked power. This competition is further counterbalanced by electoral cycles, judicial independence, public opinion, and institutional safeguards.
The U.S. remains a constitutional republic. Its structureâseparation of powers, regular elections, judicial reviewâprevents the indefinite dominance of any single entity or group. While abuses occur, the system provides mechanisms for correction and redress over time, even if such redress escalates to the extreme, such as civil war.
The fragmentation of the population has exacerbated perceptions of oligarchic dominance. Immigration from lower-trust cultures, the incorporation of women whose preferences skew toward infantilism (evasion of responsibility framed as caretaking), the divisiveness of Marxist-feminist ideologies, and the resulting frustration of the citizenry have collectively weakened civic engagement and most importantly loyalty and trust. This decline, more than structural inevitability, explains the perception of oligarchy. Sedition, conflict, frustration, and apathyânot systemic inevitabilityâare the greater threats.
If one claims the U.S. is an oligarchy, one must demonstrate how it meets the criteriaâstatic, unaccountable, concentrated powerâand explain how competing interests and institutional safeguards fail to disqualify that claim. Ergo, it is insufficient to label the system an oligarchy without addressing the mechanisms that counterbalance elite power.
The U.S. remains a republic. It faces challenges from concentrated power but is fundamentally structured as a system of competing interests governed by laws and public accountability. By focusing on its mechanisms for correction and the ongoing contest of principles, we can clearly counter the claim that it has devolved into an oligarchy.
Cheers,
CD
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @Lord__Sousa
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-20 19:55:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881430336330178560
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881424525679882713
i dunno. It’s not an oligarchy. It’s not a democracy. It’s a failing republic because it broke the rule of responsibility in exchange for participation.
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-20 19:31:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881424238353305801
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @Lord__Sousa
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881418677347823682
I as an agent can invest on behalf of the government if I supply x% of the investment and absorb the losses first.
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-20 15:36:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881365171643539592
Reply addressees: @slenchy @RichardArion1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881352234459648104
Not if you take losses first.
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-20 13:09:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881328107698991305
Reply addressees: @slenchy @RichardArion1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881309448721072572
Evasion of responsibility for defense of the private and common. So ‘looking the other way’ is yes, hard to measure. Lawfare to undermine it is however very easy to measure, which is why we have to outlaw it.
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-17 19:50:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880341856783069361
Reply addressees: @Father_Speaking
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880334635676418195
Quite the opposite. I am correct. All human differences derive from sex differences. All sex differences derive from responsibility differences.
GIVEN
Sex Differences in Cognition:
Feminine vs Masculine
Prey vs Predator
In Time vs Over Time
Empathizing vs Systematizing⌠https://t.co/apw3XgoDkj


Source date (UTC): 2025-01-14 04:42:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1879026320245661712
Reply addressees: @strichtarn @whstancil
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1878992196378263752
Quite the opposite. I am correct. All human differences derive from sex differences. All sex differences derive from responsibility differences.
GIVEN
Sex Differences in Cognition:
Feminine vs Masculine
Prey vs Predator
In Time vs Over Time
Empathizing vs Systematizing
Consuming vs Capitalizing
Irresponsibility vs Responsibility
Devotion vs Loyalty
Small Scale vs Large Scale
Herd vs Packs
Global vs National
Dysgenic vs Eugenic
Devolutionary vs Evolutionary
Left (parasitic) vs Right (productive)
AND GIVEN
Sex Differences in Limits:
Masculine: There is a limit to what responsibility I can bear.
–vs–
Feminine: There is no limit to the consumption I can bear.
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-14 04:42:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1879026320136675328