(offensive argument warning) (excerpt from section 6 “Gloom and Doom”…) —“But while the purpose of Abrahamism has always been to subvert society from the inside, undermining the aristocratic class with guilt and bad conscience while stirring up the underclasses, the strategy of Yoga and Buddhism has been different. The minority Hindu upper caste created a religion of submission for the teeming masses of India, the perfect factory of docile and indolent subjects. To the ever new warlike invaders the traditional system of rule in India, wrapped in the language of resignation and pre-emptive defeat, was the perfect tool of domination and in exchange the native ‘spiritual elite’ of the country managed to preserve their highly inflated social status. That is why India, while a deeply feminine civilization unable to maintain territory or develop technological civilization, and easily and repeatedly dominated by foreign elites, has maintained the same system of rule effectively forever. We may now compare the group survival strategies of India (I) and the West (W) and the results they produce: – Genetic homogeneity producing trust /W) vs Genetic heterogeneity producing mistrust (I) – Maximization of agency through self-improvement (W) vs Despondency and escapism (I) – Sovereignty/dominance (W) vs Servitude/submission (I) – Heroism (W) vs Buddha’s begging bowl (I) – Market rule (W) vs Arbitrary rule (I) – Truth of speech and science (W) vs Magic, obscurantism and fictionalism (I) – Reciprocity (W) vs Deceit (I) And as a consequence: wealth, health, knowledge, innovation and progress (W) vs poverty, sickness, ignorance and stasis or regress (I).”—
Theme: Religion
-
Comparison of Indian and Western Group Strategies
(offensive argument warning) (excerpt from section 6 “Gloom and Doom”…) —“But while the purpose of Abrahamism has always been to subvert society from the inside, undermining the aristocratic class with guilt and bad conscience while stirring up the underclasses, the strategy of Yoga and Buddhism has been different. The minority Hindu upper caste created a religion of submission for the teeming masses of India, the perfect factory of docile and indolent subjects. To the ever new warlike invaders the traditional system of rule in India, wrapped in the language of resignation and pre-emptive defeat, was the perfect tool of domination and in exchange the native ‘spiritual elite’ of the country managed to preserve their highly inflated social status. That is why India, while a deeply feminine civilization unable to maintain territory or develop technological civilization, and easily and repeatedly dominated by foreign elites, has maintained the same system of rule effectively forever. We may now compare the group survival strategies of India (I) and the West (W) and the results they produce: – Genetic homogeneity producing trust /W) vs Genetic heterogeneity producing mistrust (I) – Maximization of agency through self-improvement (W) vs Despondency and escapism (I) – Sovereignty/dominance (W) vs Servitude/submission (I) – Heroism (W) vs Buddha’s begging bowl (I) – Market rule (W) vs Arbitrary rule (I) – Truth of speech and science (W) vs Magic, obscurantism and fictionalism (I) – Reciprocity (W) vs Deceit (I) And as a consequence: wealth, health, knowledge, innovation and progress (W) vs poverty, sickness, ignorance and stasis or regress (I).”—
-
The Geometry of Meaning : The Demand for Narrative
From the series: math/logic > science > philosophy > religion we can construct the series: physical > mental > emotional, and the series: logic > description > fiction, and the series: associable > reasonable > calculable > computable. and we can use them to calculate the series: lack of agency > potential agency > demonstrated agency The weak of will want religion, to defend against others’ wills; The able of will want philosophy, to advocate their will and; The strong of will want science, to put their will to work; And those who are strongest will want Law: Because law is the means by which the strong impose their will. Because we want what our Agency demands.
-
In my Glossary (((Abrahamism))) refers to the argumentative technique of using P
In my Glossary (((Abrahamism))) refers to the argumentative technique of using Pilpul (positiva), and critique (negativa) to construct sophisms w/ loading, framing,suggestion, obscurantism,overloading, Fictionalism,appeals to reasonableness, and false promise, to create hazards.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-23 17:52:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1010581396769984513
-
THE GEOMETRY OF MEANING : THE DEMAND FOR NARRATIVE From the series: math/logic >
THE GEOMETRY OF MEANING : THE DEMAND FOR NARRATIVE
From the series:
math/logic > science > philosophy > religion
we can construct the series:
physical > mental > emotional,
and the series:
logic > description > fiction,
and the series:
associable > reasonable > calculable > computable.
and we can use them to calculate the series:
lack of agency > potential agency > demonstrated agency
The weak of will want religion, to defend against others’ wills;
The able of will want philosophy, to advocate their will and;
The strong of will want science, to put their will to work;
And those who are strongest will want Law:
Because law is the means by which the strong impose their will.
Because we want what our Agency demands.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-23 10:29:00 UTC
-
We Have No False Gods. We Are Becoming the Gods We Imagined.
The Albegensions were murdered for stating the obvious: that the god of the old Testament was Evil, and god of the new testament Good. The Evil false god of the Jews, and the good false god of the christians. We have no false gods. We are becoming the gods we imagined.
-
We Have No False Gods. We Are Becoming the Gods We Imagined.
The Albegensions were murdered for stating the obvious: that the god of the old Testament was Evil, and god of the new testament Good. The Evil false god of the Jews, and the good false god of the christians. We have no false gods. We are becoming the gods we imagined.
-
The Christian Desecration of Thor’s Oak
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donar%27s_Oak(Christians ‘burned the books’ of the pagans) Jove’s Oak ( interpretatio romana for Donar ‘s Oak and therefore sometimes referred to as Thor’s Oak ) was a sacred tree of the Germanic pagans located in an unclear location around what is now the region of Hesse , Germany . According to the 8th century Vita Bonifatii auctore Willibaldi , the Anglo-Saxon missionary Saint Boniface and his retinue cut down the tree earlier the same century. Donar’s Oak – Wikipedia -
The Christian Desecration of Thor’s Oak
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donar%27s_Oak(Christians ‘burned the books’ of the pagans) Jove’s Oak ( interpretatio romana for Donar ‘s Oak and therefore sometimes referred to as Thor’s Oak ) was a sacred tree of the Germanic pagans located in an unclear location around what is now the region of Hesse , Germany . According to the 8th century Vita Bonifatii auctore Willibaldi , the Anglo-Saxon missionary Saint Boniface and his retinue cut down the tree earlier the same century. Donar’s Oak – Wikipedia -
Sacred Groves: The Christian Desecration of The the Sacred.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred_grove—“Sacred groves have survived in the Baltic states longer than in other parts of Europe. The main Baltic Prussian sanctuary, which is also considered a sacred grove was Romowe. An important wave of destruction of sacred groves was carried out in the lands of present-day Lithuania after its Christianization in 1387, and in Samogitia in 1413. However, some groves, such as in Šventybrastis, still survive in Lithuania. A sacred grove is known as alka(s) in Lithuanian and svētbirz(i)s in Latvian. Conversely, in Estonia numerous sacred groves (hiis) have survived to the present day and have recently been protected by the government of the country.”—