—Christianity is Not ‘false’, just figurative. Not literal. John Warner Mathisen has shown that the stories of the worlds religions are figurative stories(myths) describing the… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=289708204959410&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-02 13:53:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1036250795044429824
—“Q: What would you be if you were not a Muslim?”— A Quora User—“A: I shall try to be an either Marxist or Maoist.during my boyhood I am a very deep fan of above two scholars or leaders of the political concept. Once you take away the interest based economy for which Islam is targeted so much by the Illuminati type economist of the west there remain only a few superficial stigmas between Communism and Islam.”— Amanullah Kunja, doctorate in philosophy and comparative religion ^ Insightful and true. First Judaism -> Christianity -> Islam. Then Judaism -> Marxist Communism (Pseudoscience and sophism). Then Christianity -> French Postmodernism (Falsehood and Sophism).Meanwhile Islam -> Islam, Islam, Islam, all the way down. (Supernaturalism) But then, this is precisely why the developed world worked so hard to prevent the spread of militant communism to the middle east, and even without the spread of communism, we have seen that militant islam simply adopted the strategy of militant communism. And so our efforts have had to continue. Communism is just a pseudoscientific restatement of supernatural semiticism. Semiticism is simply the pastoralist tribal ethic at war with the agrarian technological ethic. It’s not complicated. Masculine (competition) Agrarian Group strategy vs Feminine (justification) pastoralist Herd Group Strategy. Masculine (indo european) method of argument vs feminine method of argument (semitic). Cain and Able.
—“Q: What would you be if you were not a Muslim?”— A Quora User—“A: I shall try to be an either Marxist or Maoist.during my boyhood I am a very deep fan of above two scholars or leaders of the political concept. Once you take away the interest based economy for which Islam is targeted so much by the Illuminati type economist of the west there remain only a few superficial stigmas between Communism and Islam.”— Amanullah Kunja, doctorate in philosophy and comparative religion ^ Insightful and true. First Judaism -> Christianity -> Islam. Then Judaism -> Marxist Communism (Pseudoscience and sophism). Then Christianity -> French Postmodernism (Falsehood and Sophism).Meanwhile Islam -> Islam, Islam, Islam, all the way down. (Supernaturalism) But then, this is precisely why the developed world worked so hard to prevent the spread of militant communism to the middle east, and even without the spread of communism, we have seen that militant islam simply adopted the strategy of militant communism. And so our efforts have had to continue. Communism is just a pseudoscientific restatement of supernatural semiticism. Semiticism is simply the pastoralist tribal ethic at war with the agrarian technological ethic. It’s not complicated. Masculine (competition) Agrarian Group strategy vs Feminine (justification) pastoralist Herd Group Strategy. Masculine (indo european) method of argument vs feminine method of argument (semitic). Cain and Able.
—Christianity is Not ‘false’, just figurative. Not literal. John Warner Mathisen has shown that the stories of the worlds religions are figurative stories(myths) describing the constellations of the night sky. This understanding is called Astro-Theology.”— A Friend
Correct in their origin, but two problems with that presumption:
1) A statement is figurative if used figuratively (meaning) and false if used argumentatively (truth). How are the jewish, christian, and islamic statements used? Figuratively (analogically) or argumentatively (persuasively)? In other words, how something is used determines its constitution. There is very little evidence it was used figuratively. Especially given the doubling down by fundamentalists after the empirical, scientific, and technological revolutions.
2) The content of those statements is true if the means produce the promised or even beneficial ends. The statments are false if the means do not produce promised or beneficial ends. Judaism contributed nothing to humanity despite the most educated population in caucasia. Christianity destroyed the aristocracy of the roman world just as it was designed to do. Islam destroyed the great civilizations of the ancient world. And together these three religions ushered in 1B deaths, and a thousand year dark age we have spent the last five hundred years trying to escape – with christianity dying off, but judaism and islam still working diligently to destroy western civilization, with only the chinese, japanese, and koreans holding out.
So The statements were and are not acted upon as figurative (analogies, myths) but wisdom, law, and civilizational objective. The outcome is not paradise in the afterlife, or under the pseudoscientific version of judaism (Marxism), christianity (libertarianism), Islam (neo-conservatism), prosperity and peace in this world. These three religions – all variations on abrahamism whether ancient semitic judaism, christianity, and islam, or modern marxism, feminism, and postmodernism – designed by intent to destroy “critique” the great civilizations by weaponizing the female competitive strategy of undermining and reputation destruction by disapproval, shaming, ridicule, gossip, and rallying, and doing so by taking advantage of the means of communication and immigration and publication created in the ancient world and the modern.
The are not just false in statement, false in promise, but malicious in intent.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-02 09:53:00 UTC
—Christianity is Not ‘false’, just figurative. Not literal. John Warner Mathisen has shown that the stories of the worlds religions are figurative stories(myths) describing the constellations of the night sky. This understanding is called Astro-Theology.”— A Friend Correct in their origin, but two problems with that presumption: 1) A statement is figurative if used figuratively (meaning) and false if used argumentatively (truth). How are the jewish, christian, and islamic statements used? Figuratively (analogically) or argumentatively (persuasively)? In other words, how something is used determines its constitution. There is very little evidence it was used figuratively. Especially given the doubling down by fundamentalists after the empirical, scientific, and technological revolutions. 2) The content of those statements is true if the means produce the promised or even beneficial ends. The statements are false if the means do not produce promised or beneficial ends. Judaism contributed nothing to humanity despite the most educated population in caucasia. Christianity destroyed the aristocracy of the roman world just as it was designed to do. Islam destroyed the great civilizations of the ancient world. And together these three religions ushered in 1B deaths, and a thousand year dark age we have spent the last five hundred years trying to escape – with christianity dying off, but judaism and islam still working diligently to destroy western civilization, with only the chinese, japanese, and koreans holding out. So The statements were and are not acted upon as figurative (analogies, myths) but wisdom, law, and civilizational objective. The outcome is not paradise in the afterlife, or under the pseudoscientific version of judaism (Marxism), christianity (libertarianism), Islam (neo-conservatism), prosperity and peace in this world. These three religions – all variations on abrahamism whether ancient semitic judaism, christianity, and islam, or modern marxism, feminism, and postmodernism – designed by intent to destroy “critique” the great civilizations by weaponizing the female competitive strategy of undermining and reputation destruction by disapproval, shaming, ridicule, gossip, and rallying, and doing so by taking advantage of the means of communication and immigration and publication created in the ancient world and the modern. The are not just false in statement, false in promise, but malicious in intent.
—Christianity is Not ‘false’, just figurative. Not literal. John Warner Mathisen has shown that the stories of the worlds religions are figurative stories(myths) describing the constellations of the night sky. This understanding is called Astro-Theology.”— A Friend Correct in their origin, but two problems with that presumption: 1) A statement is figurative if used figuratively (meaning) and false if used argumentatively (truth). How are the jewish, christian, and islamic statements used? Figuratively (analogically) or argumentatively (persuasively)? In other words, how something is used determines its constitution. There is very little evidence it was used figuratively. Especially given the doubling down by fundamentalists after the empirical, scientific, and technological revolutions. 2) The content of those statements is true if the means produce the promised or even beneficial ends. The statements are false if the means do not produce promised or beneficial ends. Judaism contributed nothing to humanity despite the most educated population in caucasia. Christianity destroyed the aristocracy of the roman world just as it was designed to do. Islam destroyed the great civilizations of the ancient world. And together these three religions ushered in 1B deaths, and a thousand year dark age we have spent the last five hundred years trying to escape – with christianity dying off, but judaism and islam still working diligently to destroy western civilization, with only the chinese, japanese, and koreans holding out. So The statements were and are not acted upon as figurative (analogies, myths) but wisdom, law, and civilizational objective. The outcome is not paradise in the afterlife, or under the pseudoscientific version of judaism (Marxism), christianity (libertarianism), Islam (neo-conservatism), prosperity and peace in this world. These three religions – all variations on abrahamism whether ancient semitic judaism, christianity, and islam, or modern marxism, feminism, and postmodernism – designed by intent to destroy “critique” the great civilizations by weaponizing the female competitive strategy of undermining and reputation destruction by disapproval, shaming, ridicule, gossip, and rallying, and doing so by taking advantage of the means of communication and immigration and publication created in the ancient world and the modern. The are not just false in statement, false in promise, but malicious in intent.
Yes, this is also is my understanding as long as we also take into account that ritual sacrifice was ancestral, killing scolds, harlots, non conformists, mischief makers, and thieves by casting them as possessed or a witch was ancestral, hanging was aggressive during the period, and the church simply ‘made use of’ the technique just as the church always had made use of whatever it could. —“A paper published in the August edition of the Economic Journal casts doubt on both theories. Peter Leeson and Jacob Russ, also of George Mason University, collected data for witch trials from 21 countries between 1300 and 1850, in which 43,240 people were prosecuted. They found that the weather had a statistically insignificant impact on the occurrence of witch trials. The impact of negative income shocks or governmental capacity was also very weak.When Mr Leeson and Mr Russ compared their witch-trial data to the timing and location of over 400 battles between Christian denominations, they found a much closer link. Where there was more conflict between Catholics and Protestants (in Britain, between Anglicans and Presbyterians), witch trials were widespread; in places where one creed dominated there were fewer. The authors conclude that churches engaged in a sort of “non-price competition”, gaining converts in confessional battlegrounds by advertising their commitment to fighting evil by trying witches.”— The Economists via Marginal Revolution
Yes, this is also is my understanding as long as we also take into account that ritual sacrifice was ancestral, killing scolds, harlots, non conformists, mischief makers, and thieves by casting them as possessed or a witch was ancestral, hanging was aggressive during the period, and the church simply ‘made use of’ the technique just as the church always had made use of whatever it could. —“A paper published in the August edition of the Economic Journal casts doubt on both theories. Peter Leeson and Jacob Russ, also of George Mason University, collected data for witch trials from 21 countries between 1300 and 1850, in which 43,240 people were prosecuted. They found that the weather had a statistically insignificant impact on the occurrence of witch trials. The impact of negative income shocks or governmental capacity was also very weak.When Mr Leeson and Mr Russ compared their witch-trial data to the timing and location of over 400 battles between Christian denominations, they found a much closer link. Where there was more conflict between Catholics and Protestants (in Britain, between Anglicans and Presbyterians), witch trials were widespread; in places where one creed dominated there were fewer. The authors conclude that churches engaged in a sort of “non-price competition”, gaining converts in confessional battlegrounds by advertising their commitment to fighting evil by trying witches.”— The Economists via Marginal Revolution
what you call spirituality I’ll call intuitionistic responses – and my understanding of spirituality is that the intuition must be trained just as the body and mind. It is possible to do so by multiple means and abrahamic lies are the worst possible means.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-01 21:27:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1036002709487411201
Reply addressees: @Roo12883907
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035986212996173824
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035986212996173824
Yes, this is also is my understanding as long as we also take into account that ritual sacrifice was ancestral, killing scolds, harlots, non conformists, mischief makers, and thieves by… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=289314314998799&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-01 12:40:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035869989969035264