Curt Doolittle

Theme: Religion

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550934023 Timestamp) NO MORE FAILURE REQUIRES NO MORE LIES It’s a truthful argument. The only valid criticism of modern christianity is the statement that it is truth and history rather than wisdom and parable, and the lie is preserved by the abrahamic means of lying – that I illustrate daily. Christians have no choice. They’re headed to 25% evangelical in 75% atheist polity, where the polity will be conquered by jews and muslims like all in the past if we don’t stop it. If christians and conservatives and libertarians hadn’t failed for over a century then we wouldn’t be in our current position. No more failure requires NO MORE LIES.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550931482 Timestamp) —I mean. you don’t get it. The game is up. The goyim know. And it will take a year, but I will popularize this criticism of christians as the enemy of our people just as I have popularized other arguments. And all you can do is provide me with a continuous stream of evidence that I am correct. The ruth is the most devastating weapon. We must only pay the high cost of using it.—

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551029191 Timestamp) AFAIK book Q is lost. This draft produced an oral tradition. The oral traditions spread and was modified and added to. The ability to rally the underclasses by it to violence against the romans and greeks spread revolutionary insurrection and resistance just like did Marxism in the present world using the same false promises. This new religion provided a revolutionary vehicle, and people piled onto it in revolt. Judaism > Revolt against the agrarian and metalsmithing peoples (fertile crescent empires). Christianity > Revolt against greeks and romans. By undermining the minority aristocracy of the west. Islam > revolt against ALL aristocratic civilizations – justifying destruction, conquest, and stealing everything not nailed down. Marxism > Libertarianism > Postmodernism > Feminism > Neoconservatism > Islamism : Revolt against ALL the great civilizations – in a desperate attempt to restore underclass rule. One continuous dysgenic, decivilizing, revolt against the indo europeans and their expansion, and their conversion from feminine underclass to masculine aristocratic rule. The war will continue until we name the war for what it is, and end it one way or another.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551021897 Timestamp) CULT (Religion) VERSUS CULT-LIKE (devotion) Curt Doolittle: Well. I mean, you’re saying I’m a cult leader and the work is religious. I am saying I would like to see if it is possible to produce the equivalent of a cult – but of the law. To some degree the law already is a secular priesthood. So in essence I am agreeing with you – by analogy. Heather Joi: [GSRM DELETED] So what you’re saying is….. … that you acknowledge that you are: (in your own words) “searching for a religion of the law” “produce the equivalent of a cult – but of the law.” ”a secular priesthood.” Curt Doolittle: Well, I’ll just say that you forced me to look at the question from your perspective, and from your perspective, I agreed. What I’d assumed you’d meant was that the law was nonsense, and that I am positioning myself as some sort of leader rather than a teacher of leaders who will be the antithesis of the frankfurt school’s defeat of our people. (So if you call the frankfurt school a cult then we are talking the same language. if not then we are not.) But you are right, I am trying to to build a law, and if possible develop a secular occupation of ‘cult like devotion’, wherein the law is sacred (inviolable regardless of self interest.) I think I am pretty clear that I”m trying to separately find a way to convert our set of religions back to something european rather than semitic, and that’s the ‘cult’ (religion) I am looking to produce. So if you think I’m being dishonest, I’m just looking for the truth and your general argument helped me do so. And as I have defined it I don’t disagree. Cult (reform our religion) vs Cult-like (Sacredness of the law). ANd I agree with both. I just don’t CONFLATE THEM in order to lie. So in this sense yes I want to produce a cult (religion without priests) and cult like occupation (secular priesthood of the law). (And yes I do understand that you tried to engage in CONFLATION(AMBIGUATION) and that I (as usual) engaged in DEFLATION(DISAMBIGUATION).) In other words, you were lying. But within that lie was enough truth that I agree with the truth content. One is not guilty by word-association. Sorry.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551020823 Timestamp) THE RETURNS ON INTOLERANCE End Christian Tolerance as cheap Virtue Signaling. Restore The VIrtue of Intolerance – and the high cost of intolerance. The returns on tolerance are suicidal. The returns on intolerance eternal.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550975970 Timestamp) NICEA They consolidated power in the most SEPARATIST religion they could control. They had ‘control’ over the jesus character, but not control over the god character. So they chose the most useful storyline: the one with no competitors, and such that they could ‘parasite’ upon existing ‘god’. ie: Jesus is a parasitic character on the narrative history of gods, taking his legitimacy from a god, but unbound by the previous (really horrible semitic) god. They couldn’t make him a god, but wanted him to have the power of a god. So they made a parasitic character dependent upon these gods. This provided the priests with the control they needed to displace not only the previous religions, but through mass militant adoption, the aristocratic peoples (military and law) with a priesthood.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551030934 Timestamp) (from elsewhere) —…it is very hard for much of the world, and in particular the muslim world, to grasp the function of ‘heroism’ and ‘truth before face’. It is contra-ethical to their intuition. It is however what makes us adapt and innovate thru continuous competition – and them not.—CD

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551029191 Timestamp) AFAIK book Q is lost. This draft produced an oral tradition. The oral traditions spread and was modified and added to. The ability to rally the underclasses by it to violence against the romans and greeks spread revolutionary insurrection and resistance just like did Marxism in the present world using the same false promises. This new religion provided a revolutionary vehicle, and people piled onto it in revolt. Judaism > Revolt against the agrarian and metalsmithing peoples (fertile crescent empires). Christianity > Revolt against greeks and romans. By undermining the minority aristocracy of the west. Islam > revolt against ALL aristocratic civilizations – justifying destruction, conquest, and stealing everything not nailed down. Marxism > Libertarianism > Postmodernism > Feminism > Neoconservatism > Islamism : Revolt against ALL the great civilizations – in a desperate attempt to restore underclass rule. One continuous dysgenic, decivilizing, revolt against the indo europeans and their expansion, and their conversion from feminine underclass to masculine aristocratic rule. The war will continue until we name the war for what it is, and end it one way or another.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551021897 Timestamp) CULT (Religion) VERSUS CULT-LIKE (devotion) Curt Doolittle: Well. I mean, you’re saying I’m a cult leader and the work is religious. I am saying I would like to see if it is possible to produce the equivalent of a cult – but of the law. To some degree the law already is a secular priesthood. So in essence I am agreeing with you – by analogy. Heather Joi: [GSRM DELETED] So what you’re saying is….. … that you acknowledge that you are: (in your own words) “searching for a religion of the law” “produce the equivalent of a cult – but of the law.” ”a secular priesthood.” Curt Doolittle: Well, I’ll just say that you forced me to look at the question from your perspective, and from your perspective, I agreed. What I’d assumed you’d meant was that the law was nonsense, and that I am positioning myself as some sort of leader rather than a teacher of leaders who will be the antithesis of the frankfurt school’s defeat of our people. (So if you call the frankfurt school a cult then we are talking the same language. if not then we are not.) But you are right, I am trying to to build a law, and if possible develop a secular occupation of ‘cult like devotion’, wherein the law is sacred (inviolable regardless of self interest.) I think I am pretty clear that I”m trying to separately find a way to convert our set of religions back to something european rather than semitic, and that’s the ‘cult’ (religion) I am looking to produce. So if you think I’m being dishonest, I’m just looking for the truth and your general argument helped me do so. And as I have defined it I don’t disagree. Cult (reform our religion) vs Cult-like (Sacredness of the law). ANd I agree with both. I just don’t CONFLATE THEM in order to lie. So in this sense yes I want to produce a cult (religion without priests) and cult like occupation (secular priesthood of the law). (And yes I do understand that you tried to engage in CONFLATION(AMBIGUATION) and that I (as usual) engaged in DEFLATION(DISAMBIGUATION).) In other words, you were lying. But within that lie was enough truth that I agree with the truth content. One is not guilty by word-association. Sorry.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551020823 Timestamp) THE RETURNS ON INTOLERANCE End Christian Tolerance as cheap Virtue Signaling. Restore The VIrtue of Intolerance – and the high cost of intolerance. The returns on tolerance are suicidal. The returns on intolerance eternal.