(FB 1550537786 Timestamp) Loving y’all tonight. Even the pissed-off Christians. We all fight for the good by the means we understand and are available to us. If you’ll fight for our people that’s fine. that’s all that’s necessary. We all need to fight the good fight.
Theme: Religion
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550515618 Timestamp) by Noah J Revoy We were exceptional before christianity. We were exceptional, but far less so during early to mid christianity. We quickly became exceptional again when we dropped christian mysticism. We shall continue to be exceptional as christianity slowly fades.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550537192 Timestamp) Bill Joslin, can you please help me with the questions in “>>>” below???
By Bill Joslin Curt’s counter signalling Abrahamic faith serves one purpose – to demonstrate via the reactions of the faithful, their desire to maintain a political monopoly via religion while also forcing the distinction of political religion from natural religion. Further to that: Truth or “knowing” in a religious or mystical sense has a specific definition: an experience which has the following qualities. 1) intensity – a strongly moving experience which results in altered behavior 2) centrality in which the person undergoing the experience obtains a central position (not a spectator) 3) directness in that the experience was not intermediary and was intended towards them personally – a direct relationship between the person and God . Okay – that’s fine. But only if this remains in the domain of personal knowing. Crossing this into the political or public domain becomes an issue. That’s to say, claiming political clout based on religious experience becomes problematic. It becomes problematic because by the above definition a means to distinguish charlatan from prophet remains impossible (it’s undecidable) So the issue most have with Curt’s stand on religion pertains to: 1) conflating definitions of knowledge then attacking one form based on the criteria of the other (equivocation).
I don’t use knowledge but I can see how you might think so. I use experience open to testimony in operational language.
2) presuming how truth relates to interpersonal transactions where costs and damages are possible must be reified into some universal (big “T’) truth. In other words taking the political and legal function of truth out of context into universal presumptions
I think I only make the claim about the commons and commercial, financial, economic, legal, political, and pedagogical (academic) speech upon which others depend for truthful content. I think many dogmas can be restated in language that satisfies the criteria of truthful speech.
3) confuse constraints upon establishing monopolies writ large as justifications for religious persecution
I don’t understand this one?????
This last one is interesting because it reveals the underlying presumption and intention of political religions – the desire for and feeling of entitlement to a monopoly on: political power, truth, reality, faith, belief. Oddly, it’s not the propertarians who can’t live productively with Abrahamic faiths (political religions) but rather the other way around (monopolies are a bitch)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550515371 Timestamp) (Bring up religion and the IQ of the feed drops to room temperature.)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550519469 Timestamp) Notice the difference in pagan/heathen vs christian/jewish/muslim means of argument. Evidence.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550508827 Timestamp) See? —“…let me do my thing man. THere is method to the madness.”—Curt Doolittle —“The Experiment. Step 1) Reveal Xian flaws and lies – watch the battle that emerges. Step 2) Voice redeeming Xian qualities which are true and salvageable – watch the cuckery in contrast to heathens. Step 3) call out the cuckery – results are still pending) ;-)”— Bill Joslin Method to the madness. Create and moderate the argument. Use testimony by both sides and prosecute it. Cause defense of priors. Seed thought. People can’t help themselves but play the game. It’s so … beautiful … in a way. And humans think they have agency… lol.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550515618 Timestamp) by Noah J Revoy We were exceptional before christianity. We were exceptional, but far less so during early to mid christianity. We quickly became exceptional again when we dropped christian mysticism. We shall continue to be exceptional as christianity slowly fades.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550507923 Timestamp) ABRAHAMIC MONOPOLY DEATH CULTS I mean, more people are dead because of judaism, christianity,and islam than anything other than the great plagues and diseases. Islam is worse than the black plague, and possibly close to malaria – the deadliest disease of all. I mean, between Boaz, Freud, and Marx we have 100M dead in this century alone. Good numbers on christianity are impossible but trivial by comparison because most all are due to disease in the new world. Islam is the master of death cults with close to 1B dead, and a genetic decline worse than all but a few global volcanic catastrophes.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550515371 Timestamp) (Bring up religion and the IQ of the feed drops to room temperature.)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550505772 Timestamp) UM. NO, CHRISTIANITY INHIBITED OUR REVIVAL Aryanism built europe and still does. Christianity was at best an infantilizing nursemaid for the celtic holocaust, resulting migrations to fill the vacuum, and resulting fall of the old (greco) and new(Roman) european empire (Civilization). And had christians spread literacy and aristotle rather than illiteracy and magic…we would have recovered within a century. But no. christianity destroyed our civilization. The rate of productivity under the aryan(indo european) religion and the rate of productivity under the abrahamic (afro asiatic) religion is what it is. There is no comparison. The rate of innovation once we exited religious thought is what it is. Abrahamism=Darkness.