(FB 1546869191 Timestamp) NATURAL LAW ON RELIGION You can do what you want in your head, but you cannot do what you want in the commons. Under natural law we would close all temples and mosques, prohibit their literature, prohibit their evangelism, and prohibit all religious display (separatism). Under natural law we would restore the church by empowering churches (dramatically) in exchange for reform, and only those churches with reform, and those that reformed would take up new generations and those that not, end with the old.
Theme: Religion
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546971405 Timestamp) Curt Doolittle 1 – The first spirits: Ancestors (oldest gods – burials), 2 – The old gods (fertility,hearth – hunter gatherer), 3 – The heroic gods (indo european – archetypes), 4 – The race’s gods (ascendent man, germanic, nordic) 5 – The imperial gods (semitic and medieval.) 6 – The new gods (man)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546970640 Timestamp) Sacred > Sacrosanct sac·ro·sanct [ËsakrÅËsaNG(k)t] ADJECTIVE (especially of a principle, place, or routine) regarded as too important or valuable to be interfered with. “the individual’s right to work has been upheld as sacrosanct” synonyms: sacred · hallowed · respected · inviolable · inviolate · unimpeachable · unchallengeable · invulnerable · untouchable · inalienable · set apart · protected · defended · secure · safe · unthreatened APPLY TO COMMONS: inviolable · inviolate · untouchable · inalienable · set apart · protected · defended · secure That which is prohibited from ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING: whether Display, Word, Or Deed. Whether thing, space, information, Tradition, Norm, institution …. whether ANY aspect of property in toto. one has no right of display, of speech, of action in relation to the sacred. In other words, non, consumption. And punishment for violation of that property is the most severe possible, and so severe that it prevents further encroachements.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546896172 Timestamp) Something must be both false, and immoral. Christian mythology may be ‘true’ to some portion of the faithful (at least ideally) but faith has no place in government, law, or war. However, there is nothing counter to the natural law in christian practice. So christianity passes the test of being not parasitic or counter to natural law. In fact, it is the OPTIMUM EXPRESSION of natural law. This NOT true of judaism and islam which are bothd estructive religions designed to destroy indo european aristocratic civilization. Moreover, while I see demand for a church at least in the protestant sense of participatory government of the commons, and while I consider myself a christian in the secular, and philosophical sense where christianity functions as a political religion, I also consider myself a heathen (pagan) and an advocate for ‘Natural Religion’ (Folk Religion of Nature, ancestors, family, and hearth) was well, and I consider myself an Aryan(or aristotelian) in the sense of the physical laws of nature, and the natural law of men. For these reasons my view of our future religion is along all THREE of these lines, incorporating the best aspects of all three traditions: heathen, aristotelian, and christian, and divesting those three systems of that which is false or harmful to our people.) I wrote the Oath of Transcendent man because I believe it is the optimum correspondence with the physical laws of the universe, and the natural laws of cooperation. Cheers https://propertarianinstitute.com/the-oath-of-transcendent-man/
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546971405 Timestamp) Curt Doolittle 1 – The first spirits: Ancestors (oldest gods – burials), 2 – The old gods (fertility,hearth – hunter gatherer), 3 – The heroic gods (indo european – archetypes), 4 – The race’s gods (ascendent man, germanic, nordic) 5 – The imperial gods (semitic and medieval.) 6 – The new gods (man)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546894798 Timestamp) by William Douglas Watson Since people are willing fight for religious beliefs (defend), they are considered property in toto. That means they should not be infringed upon if they are compatible with the rest of civilization. Curt has no interest in hindering our right to practice our religion, only in hindering the use of ANY METHOD to perform or advocate for theft (parasitism). He hasn’t always done a good job of making this clear (recently he has been trying to clarify) but that is not his job. His job is to write law. Our job is to make the law digestible for others. In a propertarian society we would have much greater religious freedom to actually live out our faith. Real freedom of association (positiva) would be restored because we would have freedom to disassociate (negativa). So, as an example, you could no longer be forced to bake cakes that advocated for “alternative lifestyles”. This is just a quick example of a current hot button issue but if you give it some thought I’m sure that you could find many other examples where we, as Christians, would benefit from the restoration of just this one aspect of natural law. (cd: approved)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546970640 Timestamp) Sacred > Sacrosanct sac·ro·sanct [ËsakrÅËsaNG(k)t] ADJECTIVE (especially of a principle, place, or routine) regarded as too important or valuable to be interfered with. “the individual’s right to work has been upheld as sacrosanct” synonyms: sacred · hallowed · respected · inviolable · inviolate · unimpeachable · unchallengeable · invulnerable · untouchable · inalienable · set apart · protected · defended · secure · safe · unthreatened APPLY TO COMMONS: inviolable · inviolate · untouchable · inalienable · set apart · protected · defended · secure That which is prohibited from ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING: whether Display, Word, Or Deed. Whether thing, space, information, Tradition, Norm, institution …. whether ANY aspect of property in toto. one has no right of display, of speech, of action in relation to the sacred. In other words, non, consumption. And punishment for violation of that property is the most severe possible, and so severe that it prevents further encroachements.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546896172 Timestamp) Something must be both false, and immoral. Christian mythology may be ‘true’ to some portion of the faithful (at least ideally) but faith has no place in government, law, or war. However, there is nothing counter to the natural law in christian practice. So christianity passes the test of being not parasitic or counter to natural law. In fact, it is the OPTIMUM EXPRESSION of natural law. This NOT true of judaism and islam which are bothd estructive religions designed to destroy indo european aristocratic civilization. Moreover, while I see demand for a church at least in the protestant sense of participatory government of the commons, and while I consider myself a christian in the secular, and philosophical sense where christianity functions as a political religion, I also consider myself a heathen (pagan) and an advocate for ‘Natural Religion’ (Folk Religion of Nature, ancestors, family, and hearth) was well, and I consider myself an Aryan(or aristotelian) in the sense of the physical laws of nature, and the natural law of men. For these reasons my view of our future religion is along all THREE of these lines, incorporating the best aspects of all three traditions: heathen, aristotelian, and christian, and divesting those three systems of that which is false or harmful to our people.) I wrote the Oath of Transcendent man because I believe it is the optimum correspondence with the physical laws of the universe, and the natural laws of cooperation. Cheers https://propertarianinstitute.com/the-oath-of-transcendent-man/
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546894798 Timestamp) by William Douglas Watson Since people are willing fight for religious beliefs (defend), they are considered property in toto. That means they should not be infringed upon if they are compatible with the rest of civilization. Curt has no interest in hindering our right to practice our religion, only in hindering the use of ANY METHOD to perform or advocate for theft (parasitism). He hasn’t always done a good job of making this clear (recently he has been trying to clarify) but that is not his job. His job is to write law. Our job is to make the law digestible for others. In a propertarian society we would have much greater religious freedom to actually live out our faith. Real freedom of association (positiva) would be restored because we would have freedom to disassociate (negativa). So, as an example, you could no longer be forced to bake cakes that advocated for “alternative lifestyles”. This is just a quick example of a current hot button issue but if you give it some thought I’m sure that you could find many other examples where we, as Christians, would benefit from the restoration of just this one aspect of natural law. (cd: approved)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1547142386 Timestamp) ARISTOTLE AS OUR LAWGIVER, vs THE PROPHETS AND THEIR LIES. The first reason to reform Aristotle by translation of his works into operational language is to lionize him and make him the founder of western thought – the via negativa, to the Nihilism of Socrates and the Idealism of Plato, and the lies of the Abrahamists whether Abraham, Saul, or Mohammed. This form of heroic Idolization anthropomorphizes the character (and his military peer alexander) such that we can engage in hero-competition with competing civilizations and their advocates, and our own sophists within, (b) and anchor western civilization as a continuous tradition from our origins in European customary law of sovereignty and tort, to the present anglo common law of tort. The second reason is to falsify all the pseudo-philosophy and theology that exists between aristotle and the present. Now re-writing Aristotle in operational prose would be the equivalent of the work undertaken to produce the king james bible, and the basis of a western education – particularly the Ethics. When combined with the foundational myth of the Trial of Achilles (taught to children by dividing up the work and memorizing it by chanting – given that vast parts are repeated over and over again – and presented by classes as a holiday play). We would have the Hellenic tradition restored. Doing the same for each series of festivals for the old germanic and celtic in fall and winter, and preserving Easter for the christian and mayday would be relatively simple. We can re-ritualize our civilization as historical play. Because, as Nietzsche taught us, it is the participation of the chorus, whether in games, play, ritual, church, or prayer that provides the mindfulness of associating the sacred and collective with the mythos that binds them. If we have an education system (church limited by the natural law) that teaches mindfulness, history, the tools of calculation (reading, writing, numbers, economics, physics), reduce education to part time as soon as children are able to engage in part time work, and put as great an emphasis on apprenticeship as we do higher education, and limit ‘higher education’ to that which requires advanced calculation (stem+l) we can restore the civic society and eliminate the alienation and signal warfare endemic to consumer modernity. If this church, which provides education, also serves the function of consumer banking, savings, and investment, with near-zero interest on durable goods, then we will have restored the ancient order and destroyed the entire network of parasites and rent seekers in academy, finance, and state. We do not need to establish this church. We merely need to provide the economic incentives to do so, and the regulatory law that binds them to the construction of that common good. The most notable exception would be the use of successful retired people in the administration and teaching of these things rather than those who have been insulated from market forces, market competition, and demonstrated market achievement.