Theme: Religion

  • RT @aldafa_ir: I’d like to bring some attention to an opportunity to help our pe

    RT @aldafa_ir: I’d like to bring some attention to an opportunity to help our people and strengthen our men. For those who have a christian…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-07 02:55:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1743828644550656448

  • I have the two studies but I can’t recall off the top of my head. In general, th

    I have the two studies but I can’t recall off the top of my head. In general, there isn’t a big difference, with ashkenazis and church of england at the top, catholics in the middle and jehovah’s witnesses and the other very literal group at the bottom. The more fundamentalist the lower the IQ is a good rule of thumb. But no one is over 110 or 114 if I remember correctly. 110 would be far too high a number I think.

    Reply addressees: @RussellJohnston


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-05 19:31:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1743354605407293440

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1743344089968623764

  • Research has been done. It’s aristotle and everyone else isn’t even close. If yo

    Research has been done. It’s aristotle and everyone else isn’t even close. If you account prophets then it’s jesus. And no they aren’t the same thing.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-04 03:10:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742745282436067346

    Reply addressees: @philosophytweet

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742712403035341297

  • Depends on the standards. Southern blacks raised in the church and taught southe

    Depends on the standards. Southern blacks raised in the church and taught southern manners are much better gentelment than their undisciplined white northern men.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-03 22:02:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742667840497557767

    Reply addressees: @EricMorganCoach

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742656691840352416

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @DiggingInTheDi1 SHORT LIST OF FEMININE ABRAHAMIC LEFTIST TAC

    RT @curtdoolittle: @DiggingInTheDi1 SHORT LIST OF FEMININE ABRAHAMIC LEFTIST TACTICS
    Loading, Framing, Obscuring
    Fiction, the Fictionalism…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-03 16:19:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742581568806252886

  • NO RELIGION CAN HAVE IT ALL ONE WAY. Better to say that the feminine christianit

    NO RELIGION CAN HAVE IT ALL ONE WAY.
    Better to say that the feminine christianity and the masculine aristocracy and are both useful, because the minds of humans vary from feminine empathic neurotic needing social and emotional containment, to the masculine systematizing and… https://twitter.com/zarathustra5150/status/1742125441714954254


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-03 00:19:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742339844980789376

  • That’s interesting because every sect says the same thing of every other sect. I

    That’s interesting because every sect says the same thing of every other sect. In particular large numbers of protestants claim catholics aren’t christians. Or those christians that are spiritual or traditional but no theological in their disposition.

    Unfortunately you aren’t the arbiter of what constitutes christianity any more than any other person. Instead christianity like all other religions is disambiguated from others by what religions they are not. And that is a relatively simple task. 😉

    Furthermore given that christianity is a personal religion with low standards of testable conformance in behavior, then one of the benefits of chritsianity is “it is whatever I myself and my sect understand it to be.”

    For the rest of us christians demonstrate similar moral ethical and normative behaviors that differe from those who were raised (indoctrinated) into different cultures with different religions.

    You may think it matters what you think. But others only care about your demonstrated behavior. And you are judged in this world, and reap rewards, nothings, and punishments in this world by your actions, not your ‘beliefs’.

    Reply addressees: @JMh12061951


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-02 22:55:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742318664290844672

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742313511735243199

  • Well clearly, most of the founders were of this category of christian, and jeffe

    Well clearly, most of the founders were of this category of christian, and jefferson certainly the most so. So the question is more of, who can bear how much superstition?


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-02 22:18:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742309512701256108

    Reply addressees: @JMh12061951

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742291335275561083

  • “Faith is not a business transaction. Or at least it shouldn’t be. When it becom

    –“Faith is not a business transaction. Or at least it shouldn’t be. When it becomes a transaction, it’s worthless.”– Craig Gipson

    I would need this statement explained to me, because I’m not quite sure which argument you’re making. But I think I might be able to science it if I was sure – and then explain that as you mean it, I assume you are correct – despite stating “worthless at all” instead of worthless to whom.

    It was far easier to solve (science) every other problem I worked on than religion. Religion was the hardest problem in social science. It took me years. No other problem took more than a year or two.

    Because we are unequal in sex bias (empathizing systematizing), unequal in traits (personality and intelligence) and unequal in experience(upbringing and education) … and despite this inequality, chrstianity claims to be a universal religion despite that it’s a personal religion where it’s meaning is whatever an individual can justify it means within the very broad boundaries it establishes.

    Both islam and rabbinical judaism are far more rigorious innovations on top of christianity, just as christianity is an innovation on semitic cults to make them survivable against greco roman reason – which – unfortunately was a much higher burden on the mind and intuition than the semitic superstitions and mythicisms.

    But the flexibility of christian religion, because it is so ‘unspecific’ and so ‘personal’, and more of a collection of parables and subequent concepts (trinity etc), it was more able to adapt to more advanced european civilization that was aristocratic military realism (top down) rather than underclass peasant mysticism (bottom up).

    So given that in all aspects of life, we are free of previous survival, economic, social, and political constraints, with a vast scope of opportunities in each, we are diverging from one another more according to our sex biases, traits, class, experience, and ethnicity, than converging.

    This has put extraordinary pressure on our depenence on a common set of weights and measures, of both cognitive frame, values, expectations, and behavior.

    We have seen our people diverge into preference for a grammar (logic, narrative) that is within their cognitive ability and suits their traits and temperaments, reflecting our individual preference that grammar (logic) in the the spectrum of grammars available to man: myths, theology, ideology, philosophy, empiricism, science, and now operationalism made possible by our breadth of knowledge of the laws of the universe at all scales.

    Under agrarianism, all but a tiny fraction of us were largely indifferent. And just as in early urban areas, it was possible for people to diverge into a division of labor and separate classes of influence and responsibility given our abilities, we are seeing people cognitively diverge into a division of cognitive labor using whatever system of understanding (measurement) they can possibly manage given the equilibriuim or disequilibrium between the feminine empathizing to masculine systematizing, the combination of feminine empathizing with feminine neuroticism and the intellectual capacity of the individual to access (use and understand) a grammar that services any point on that spectrum. We are, we have, diverged. So faith is only accessible to a certain coincidence of genetic, personality, and intelligence traits. For the rest they need increasing self confidence in the precision of, unambiguity of, consistency, and correspondence with actionable reality of, whatevrer set of principles they use to guide themselves through the kaleidic experience of life.

    Spirit is intuition. It is fast. It is cheap. And we trust it more than our reason. Moreover, the more empathic, conforming, neurotic, and reactive vs systemic, disconforming, stable, and active one is, the more one requires dependence upon intuition, and the more one depends on a trained intuition to maintain self regulation.

    So what are we going to do given the divergence between our people? We must accomodate them all.

    Reply addressees: @tx_pilgrim


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-02 22:17:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742309115391598592

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742296436153204794

  • Mythology vs Philosophy. Inspiration is missing. 😉

    Mythology vs Philosophy.
    Inspiration is missing. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-02 17:45:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742240614022893602

    Reply addressees: @KelleyOser @Tomisla74291209

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742240384603038130