Curt Doolittle

Theme: Religion

  • CHOOSE ARYAN CHRISTIAN OF KIN OR SEMITIC CHRISTIAN AGAINST THEM (updated) I am,

    CHOOSE ARYAN CHRISTIAN OF KIN OR SEMITIC CHRISTIAN AGAINST THEM
    (updated)

    I am, first, and foremost a follower of Natural Law.
    1) An Aryan(The primacy of man, heroism, excellence, reciprocity, truth before face, aristocratic egalitarianism),
    2) A Pagan (Student and debtor to the heroes of history)
    2) An Aristotelian(Naturalism, Truth regardless of cost), and
    3) A Heathen (Debt only to Nature and Ancestors, Ward of Nature).

    I cannot be those things, if I practice the supernatural over the natural, the irrational over the rational, and false debt over existential debt.

    I can however, be:
    4) a scientific and rational christian, if I have adopted the teaching of christianity:
    i) the eradication of hatred from the human heart.
    ii) the extension of kinship love to non-kin.
    iii) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost,
    iiii) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.
    iv) faith in the success of having done so, for me and my people despite the risk and cost.

    These are truths. And no claim of truth nor good can require I:
    a) abandon the difference between man and animal by abandoning reason;
    b) claim belief in a falsehood;
    c) owe debt, loyalty, or fealty to other than my kith and kin.

    Yet it is Abrahamic Semitism that asks
    (a) abandon reason,
    (b) claim belief in falsehood, and
    (c) owe debt loyalty or fealty to other than my kith and kin.

    The Semitic technique of Abrahamic lying is:
    (a) False promise(lying),
    (b) Sophism(lying),
    (c) Straw Manning(lying),
    (d) Critique (lying), GSRRM(avoiding truth),
    (e) Denial(lying),
    (f) in exchange for ‘membership’ in a false family whose common interests is propagation of the lie, false promise, sophism, straw manning, critique, GSRRM, and denial.

    There is no difference between:
    (a) Judaism, (c) Christianity, (c) Islam and;
    (b) Marx-Freud-Frankfurt-Derrida et al: the marxists, socialists, psychologists, sociologists, feminists, postmodernists, denialists, and politically corrects (truth suppression)

    The First wave of Abrahamists created
    (a) Judaism to undermine,
    (b) Christianity to undermine further, and
    (c) Islam to conquer the undermined and weakened.
    … Against Aristocracy Reciprocity, Law, Commerce, and Reason.

    The Second wave of Abrahamists replaced religion of the supernatural false promise, sophism, critique, and denial, with two attempts:
    (a) first Abrahamic pseudoscientific false promises sophism critique, and denial in marxism-socialism-freudianism-feminism.
    (b) then the Abrahamic sophistic false promises sophism critique, and denial with postmodernism, neo-liberalism, and political correctness.
    … Against Reciprocity, Law, Commerce, and (Darwin!).

    Why? “The desire for equality under poverty, monopoly under the herd, authority over markets, and feminine dysgenia over masculine eugenia.:
    “The Mindless Equalitarian Dysgenic Herd.”

    (more….)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:29:29 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508224120466758

  • ABRAHAMISM vs CHRISTIANITY vs ARISTOTELIANISM —“I don’t understand part of thi

    ABRAHAMISM vs CHRISTIANITY vs ARISTOTELIANISM

    —“I don’t understand part of this. You state that ‘I can be a rational Christian if….’ but also say later that there is ‘no difference between judaism and Christianity…’ (I am broadly paraphrasing) How can both sentences be true?
    Not disagreeing, just studying to understand.”—Castle Gate

    Understood. Followers tend to ‘get’ this by continuous exposure.

    The METHOD of Abrahamism (Judaism,Christianity, Islam)
    – versus –
    The CONTENT of christianity (the five laws of christian cooperation).

    The METHOD of Abrahamism:
    1 – False Promise (in this case of equality, life after death etc)
    2 – Baiting into Hazard (Undermining Civilization)
    3 – By the twin sophisms of Pilpul and Critique
    4 – Using Sophism, Pseudoscience, Magic, and Supernaturalism
    5 – For profiteering by the lying class (Priests, Public Intellectuals, Politicians, Bureaucrats, Marketers and Advertisers, and Financiers(Lenders, Userers).
    6 – Bringing about civilizational collapse and dysgenia.

    The CONTENT of Christianity
    1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart.
    2) the extension of familial love to kith and kin.
    3) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost,
    4) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war,
    5) and placing faith in doing so, despite the apparent risk and cost
    6) Bringing about the most exhaustive means of producing cooperation that is possible by man. (hence its success, and islams failure, and judaism’s justified persecution.)

    The METHOD of Aristotelianism
    1) Excellence and Heroism
    2) Truth and Duty
    3) Sovereignty and Reciprocity
    4) Judge and Jury of Peers
    5) Markets in everything
    6) Bringing about the most innovative and adaptive and prosperous organization of man possible by man.

    The CONTENT of Aristotelianism.
    1. Laws of Nature (physical – acted upon )
    2. Natural Law ( human – acted by )
    3. Bringing about continuous correspondence consistency and coherence of reality.
    4. Via Negativa eliminating ignorance, error, bias, fictionalism, and deceit,
    5. Producing Agency, Autonomy, and Sovereignty.

    PROPERTARIANISM IS THE METHOD OF ARISTOTELIANISM.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:28:14 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508219162179513

  • CHILDHOOD’S END (Grow up. It’s just natural law.) —“[Your natural law of coope

    CHILDHOOD’S END
    (Grow up. It’s just natural law.)

    —“[Your natural law of cooperation in five rules of christianity is just another form of ] Marshmallow Christianity: lacking any real substance or value, but tastes sweet and is beloved by children. Also known as Universalist or Nondenominational.”— Some Fool Who Shall Remain Nameless

    No, it means Growing Up Into A Rational Scientific Adult that takes responsibility for himself, his polity,and the world around him for no other reason than the good for himself, his kin, his people, and mankind – DESPITE THE COST AND RISK – without false promise of false reward, stated in lies, that make him his kin and his people vulnerable to predation by abrahamism wither supernatural, or pseudoscientific, or sophistry, in the form of equality, marxism, socialism, feminism, postmodernism, and that form of denialism we call political correctness.

    It means Grow The F*K Up and be A RESPONSIBLE adult.
    Stop pretending you’re moral when you just evade responsibility for defense of your people from superstition, ignorance, poverty, hard labor, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death,

    YOU GENERATE DEMAND FOR TYRANNY, IGNORANCE, AND SUPERSTITION

    Which is just what our ancient enemies want from you.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:27:05 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508214693726084

  • SIX HUNDRED YEARS OF CHRISTIAN DESTRUCTION OF CIVILIZATION by Steven Jackson The

    SIX HUNDRED YEARS OF CHRISTIAN DESTRUCTION OF CIVILIZATION
    by Steven Jackson

    The benedictine monks only restored a semblance of culture after 600 years of destruction.

    The monastic traditions predate Christianity, they were infiltrated by Christian thought and destroyed classical culture.

    Read “the Darkening Age” it outlines the Christian destruction of the Classical World from the view of the Greco-Romans.

    The roman persecution of the Christians was exaggerated.

    The persecution was BY the Christians.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:26:48 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508213580971120

  • ISLAM FOLLOWS THE SCRIPT OF THE CHRISTIANS WHO FOLLOWED THE SCRIPT OF THE JEWS –

    ISLAM FOLLOWS THE SCRIPT OF THE CHRISTIANS WHO FOLLOWED THE SCRIPT OF THE JEWS

    —“The similarities between early Christians and modern Islam is startling but not shocking.”—Rocco Ryan

    Read “The Darkening Age” by Nixey….

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:24:52 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508206016106137

  • “I’m curious of a similar breakdown of the teachings of other major religions or

    —“I’m curious of a similar breakdown of the teachings of other major religions or philosophies, as you did with stoicism and christianity. Say Islam or Confusianism in China?”— Carl Persson

    I did confucianism but it was really easy, because it’s not complicated structurally, has no lies or woo woo to overcome, and is limited only by their language, the early concentration of power possible by their martial aristocracy, their failure to solve the problem of politics, and therefore they directed the entirety of the society into a ‘harmonious hierarchy’. If you look at chinese philosophy as Sun Tzu (Rule), Confucian (Administration), and Lao Tzu (Labor) and Buddhsim (complacency), you see their tripartism+ very close to ours: Military and Scientific Epistemology ( Machiavelli-Clausewitz-Keegan, Aristotle-Hamilton-Adams-Jefferson, Locke-Smith-Hume-Darwin-Menger, and the christian theologians. Like most older civs the chinese started with a hierarchy ad river valley, but because they were homogenous, kin, they didn’t have the problems of the middle east. So the difference between west and east is agrarian concentration there and distribution here, our language which is technological and legal (Later) rather than agrarian and ‘wisdom lit’ (earlier), and market (unconsolidated power) vs monolithic (consolidated power), but otherwise they are not that different … other than have taken neoteny a lot farther than we have and… well, they have no choice but to wall off the rest of the world.

    The only hard one is Hinduism which isn’t really a religion it’s a wisdom literature that they practice as a way of life.

    Buddhism was a reformation of hinduism, but over time the ‘god thing’ crept back in there and ruined it.

    I’m kind of anti-buddhist because it’s a recipe for inaction (withdrawl) while stoicism is one of empowerment but vulnerable to woo woo, so I’m sticking with the stoick method of self authoring virtues and the epicurean program otherwise.

    That’s the best personal philosophy(means of decidability).

    For social philosophy (means of decidability) it’s hard to beat christianity’s five natural laws.

    For political philosophy (decidability) it’s hard to beat rule of law by natural law, the judge and jury and commons.

    I mean, I’m all up for inventing predatory and parasitic cults – and I”m happy to return to the predation of my ancestors. But if you want cooperation instead, well, we know how to do it.

    Natural law.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:23:07 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508199050221052

  • Render under the gods what is the gods’, and render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s

    Render under the gods what is the gods’, and render unto
    Caesar what is Caesar’s. I am man of Caesar, doing the
    work of Caesar, in the language, currency, and law of Caesar.
    The faithful have priests to appeal to. And priests have their
    gods. And Neither Caesar nor I have time for either. 😉
    -Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:21:16 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508191853943932

  • “We need less religion and more spirituality.”—Francesco Principi Yep. Mindful

    —“We need less religion and more spirituality.”—Francesco Principi

    Yep. Mindfulness > Spirituality > Civic Ritual Thanks and Celebration

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:14:04 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508163521764948

  • “What do you think would happen if Christianity faded from the US?”—Michael D.

    —“What do you think would happen if Christianity faded from the US?”—Michael D. Abbott

    Do you mean religious, philosophical, or secular?

    As a religion, It is fading, It’s dividing into protestant evangelicals (power) and secular christianity with the major decline (Predictably) coming from either leftist protestants or catholics. And the catholic decline is obviously the result of vatican II, the empty chair, the sexual crimes of the churchmen, the church’s failure to do a purge of sexual predators, the failure to allow married priests, the failure to demand well educated priests (psychologists, psychotherapists), and in general her abandonment of the educated.

    Only churchy people think the church is important.
    Our people need a religion in the sense that they need a binding mythos, binding rituals, and means of social and personal mindfulness.

    And we need social sanction of birth, rite of passage, marriage, birth, and death.

    But whatever that system is, the church as we know it is dead in the professional and upper classes.

    We have no great narrative builder in the west OTHER THAN ENEMIES.

    I have to work on Caesar until I”m done. If no one solves Religion by the time I get to it, and assuming I live long enough to get to it, maybe I’ll work on it.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:13:44 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508162209883701

  • YOU WANT A RELIGION? WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? Y’all want a binding narrative. A syst

    YOU WANT A RELIGION? WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?

    Y’all want a binding narrative. A system of belonging that does not require you to adapt to others, but that all others adapt to a third standard. That is the value of these systems of myth, thought, behavior, and rule.

    The west has a system and it is the militia.
    It has a binding narrative and that is our ancient enemy.

    Show up.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:13:21 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508160719372396