Theme: Religion

  • It took me longer to figure out what the germans had done to try to create secul

    It took me longer to figure out what the germans had done to try to create secular relligion than I think any other problem of religion. but the minute you have secular mindfulness, an… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=496030050993890&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 16:03:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189573545136922624

  • Gods don’t exist. Addicts do defend their suppliers tho. ;)-CD —“The effect of

    Gods don’t exist. Addicts do defend their suppliers tho. ;)-CD

    —“The effect of Gods discounts the necessity of the existence of gods.”—Jim Snyder

    ^the correct answer.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 16:02:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189573292237168641

  • Really really simple. Deliver unto Law the Law – you have no choice, Deliver unt

    Really really simple. Deliver unto Law the Law – you have no choice, Deliver unto Faith, Faith – you have a choice. And don’t confuse them.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 16:02:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189573273987801088

  • YOU HAVE IT BACKWARDS – CHRISTIANS DO NOT PROFESS P-LAW A Christian does not pro

    YOU HAVE IT BACKWARDS – CHRISTIANS DO NOT PROFESS P-LAW
    A Christian does not profess P. A christian professes Christianity, and assists the implementation of a P-constitution, Because p is… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=496027914327437&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 16:00:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189572695744241664

  • NO, P-LAW IS NOT ‘SUPERIOR’ TO CHRISTIAN FAITH P-Law is not ‘superior’ to Christ

    NO, P-LAW IS NOT ‘SUPERIOR’ TO CHRISTIAN FAITH

    P-Law is not ‘superior’ to Christian Faith – we have no say over such things. P-Law is compatible with Christian ethics and morality, and… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=496027664327462&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 15:59:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189572573782261761

  • THE MARKET DEMAND FOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY RELIGION 1. The market demand for per

    THE MARKET DEMAND FOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY RELIGION

    1. The market demand for personal mindfulness (Spiritualism) whether empathic-femining (theological), moral-masculine(rational), or analytic-masculine(scientific) exists, and all three demands exist for most of us. The question is, given how the various religions solved mindfulness (Stoicism-epicureanism, buddhism, hinduism, abrahamism) which produces agency (stoicism), which produces optimism (hinduism), which produces withdrawal from reality (buddhism) and which denies and escapes reality (abrahamism).

    2. Religions must provide interpersonal mindfulness by creating a standard dialog, set of signals, and manners that are costly to learn and practice, but that by practicing display to others you are worthy of honest cooperation on the same terms.

    3. Religions must also provide social mindfulness (limitation of fear and comfort in the ethical, and moral. These are moral rules that serve the group’s competitive strategy – and all reflect the environmental challenges of the age of transformation in which men invented religions.,

    4. Religions must also provide political mindfulness (limits on political action and on rulers actions). I won’t cover each of them here.

    5. Religions must also provide a group strategy – gypsy parasitism, jewish parasitism, muslim parasitism, predation and conquest, christian undermining of the truth, knowledge, reason, law, property, aristocracy by rallying the peasantry and women and slaves against all and being as expansionary as islam – to counter islam. Buddhist submission and obedience Hindu class duty and function in the ‘harmony’. Chinese hierarchical family (bureaucracy). Anglo aristocratic egalitarianism (entrepreneurship and corporation).

    So 1. personal mindfulness (peace of mind), 2. interpersonal, 3. social, 4. political, 5. strategic.

    All of these are served by training in stoicism and epicureanism(realism, naturalism, reciprocity, living within your means, surrounding yourself with family and friends, and insulation from competitive status signaling), training interpersonal reciprocity, social reciprocity, training in political reciprocity, and training in group strategic reciprocity.

    The fact that we train people in reading, writing, arithmetic, mathematics, and the sciences, and indoctrinate them into falsehoods of marxism (class undermining), feminism(male undermining), and postmodernism (group undermining), but DON”T train them in stoic mindfulness, epicurean happiness, basic money, household finance, and accounting, basic law of contract and reciprocity, the testimony, the grammars, logics, rhetoric, and produce holidays that celebrate our seasons and heroes, thinkers, and saints is just a choice.

    The only addiction christianity adds is the transformation of western paternalism of masculine aristocracy, to the feminine submission to a false god, the pretense of equality of all, and the one good thing: the feminine emulation of jesus in the extension of forgiveness instead of semitic hypersensitivity to insult and slight – we call this christian love. It’s just self virtue signaling in exchange for immunity from offense by petty people endemic among the desperate, poor and ignorant.

    The real reason people rely on abrahamic religion is to disintermediate themselves from others status signals so that they can preserve mindfulness and self image despite continuous rejection. The reason we want to live in the christian world is because we are not subject to continuous rejection but continuous tolerance and forgiveness (love).

    The program of the marxists, feminists, and postmodernists, is to UNDERMINE christian love from within. Undermine the faith. Undermine the ethics Generate envy and hatred between genders, classes, and identity groups, in order to sew discord that creates demand for an authoritarian state which can extract almost unlimited income from the population to resolve the conflicts that the government created.

    This is all you need to understand about (a) religion, (b) christianity in politics (c) how we can state christianity in legal terms, (d) how we can teach stoicism and epicureanism and history and truth rather than semitic lies, and (e) how we are undermined because christians will not fight the enemy.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:26:00 UTC

  • (humor) LittleOldLady: “You’re going to rot in hell.” Me: “No chance. They’re go

    (humor)

    LittleOldLady: “You’re going to rot in hell.”

    Me: “No chance. They’re gonna keep me working so hard on you folk I’ll be fit as a fiddle.”

    (She’s falling apart at the seams but she’s still got spunk.)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:24:00 UTC

  • THE CONTINUOUS GERMANIZATION OF CHRISTIANITY —“Protestantism happened because

    THE CONTINUOUS GERMANIZATION OF CHRISTIANITY

    —“Protestantism happened because christianity was never a perfect fit for us. The normal evolution of our civilization was disrupted when we encountered civilizations more developed. We had writing and metallurgy, but our stories and myths hadn’t become a codified law and spiritual system. It’s time for us to do this; it’s long overdue.”— Andrew M Gilmour


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:24:00 UTC

  • ARGUMENTUM AD THEOLOGICUM (yes it’s possible. it’s just almost impossible) We al

    ARGUMENTUM AD THEOLOGICUM

    (yes it’s possible. it’s just almost impossible)

    We all defend our investments. it’s irrational to think we won’t defend our investments. As long as that’s what we’re doing, it’s not ir-reciprocal.

    In my understanding, theology is just one of the grammars. it’s both conflationary, and fictionalist, using the supernatural fictionalism, but that doesn’t mean statements within it can’t be disambiguated, de-fictionalized, operationalized, and converted to statements of physical and natural law.

    We only come into conflcit when the disambiguated, defictionalized, operationalized, and tested for reciprocity exposes an involuntary transfer.

    When disambiguating, defictionalizing, nd operationalizing we take for granted we can test for:

    (a) identity (b) internal consistency, (c) rational choice, (d) and reciprocal rational choice, and possibly (e) full accounting …

    … Even if we cannot test for (f) external correspondence, (g) operational possibility, and (h) parsimony.

    … And within reciprocity we may test for (j) productivity, (k) voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests, and (l) involuntary transfer by externality, (m) and whether one has performed that due diligence, and (n ) whether one can perform restitution.

    So it’s not like we can’t largely test theological words. It’s mostly whether any argument demanding deduction that is dependent upon theological terms is possible. In other words, it may be possible to make ethical statements in theology it is however, extremely difficult to make arguments from them. It’s not impossible. It just appears very uncommon.

    There are many true and reciprocal statements in theology.

    There are very few if any true and reciprocal arguments.

    That’s the nature of the problem of fictional premises.

    Not much to do about it.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:23:00 UTC

  • I love christian manners: “god bless you” et all. I am equally happy with ‘the g

    I love christian manners: “god bless you” et all. I am equally happy with ‘the gods’ instead of ‘god’, and equally unhappy and hostile to the other semitic gods. I love christian ethics. and I love christian behavior. And I love the church experience. And i love its role in birth, adulthood, marriage, care-taking, suffering, and death. I wish it still retained juris over the matters of the family.

    And My experience with education by the church was far superior to that of the state – by orders of magnitude. Personally I would prefer a military experience more suitable to males. And I know some would value sports, or arts, or commercial experiences. And I know I would prefer to find old gods, heroes, artists, scientists, and saints in my Church with Jesus but one among them. And I would find prayer to them more valuable than to those I find feminine. And yes I would prefer the stoic method of discipline rather than submission to a semitic god. I would prefer we celebrate love our heathen(nature) and pagan(masculine) as well as christian (feminine) holidays.

    But that said, while there are many good social and personal consequences of the religion, christianity failed us politically – it had to – the church could not survive the restoration of aristotelianism and its consequences no matter how hard the theologians tried.

    And worse, the church failed to reform. And the catholic church’s pope has now our declared the church our enemy. Orthodoxy is too weak in the west. Protestantism thankfully has evolved into a folk religion, especially with the advent of American evangelicals. I think I understand where this will lead and it is beautiful.

    But first we must solve real problems that are unavoidable: ending another conquest by hostile alien political systems masquerading as religions. Ending the destruction of our civilization by the second attempt at undermining us using the abrahamic methods of deceit – this time in secular prose, as well as fundamentalist semitic prose. And second we must solve the failure of our religion to merge the aristotelian-legal, moral-rational-political, masculine religion, and feminine religion.

    I can only describe the problem I do not have the skill or talent or mind to provide a solution other than the incentives for others with appropriate skills and talents, to bring a religious system across that spectrum into fruition. Although maybe if I live long enough it will be possible.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:23:00 UTC