As Far as I Know Iām Trying to Save Christianity https://propertarianism.com/2019/11/02/as-far-as-i-know-im-trying-to-save-christianity-2/
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-02 01:55:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190447238960570368
[T]he quote “Deliver Each Unto God and Caesar” is a compromise between the male political-empirical and the female emotional-faithful, just as marriage is a compromise between male and female – under which neither obtains their ideal, but both achieves the optimum possible. Otherwise we must go to war between the truthful and the faithful, and while the faithful can undermine, and resist, they poorly war, and this is not only because they are poorer, but because they are more feminine in composition and cognition.
[T]he quote “Deliver Each Unto God and Caesar” is a compromise between the male political-empirical and the female emotional-faithful, just as marriage is a compromise between male and female – under which neither obtains their ideal, but both achieves the optimum possible. Otherwise we must go to war between the truthful and the faithful, and while the faithful can undermine, and resist, they poorly war, and this is not only because they are poorer, but because they are more feminine in composition and cognition.
The Economics and Ethics of Abrahamic Religions https://propertarianism.com/2019/11/02/the-economics-and-ethics-of-abrahamic-religions/
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-02 01:50:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190446098529312768
(this one is going to hurt. hold on to something) [T]here is no god. Only the god imagined by the faithful such that they preserve the peace between them by prohibition on variation in strategy, and prohibition on debate, and prohibition on learning, and prohibition on innovation and evolution. It’s a contract with one another written in fiction. I agree that there is value to the faithful in the production of psychological mindfulness from certainty, conformity, under this contract written in fiction. It re-creates the safety of the herd for those who lack agency, by casting submission, conformity, stagnation as heroic. I also understand that there is value in the freedom from emotional burden, intellectual burden, that the rest of us bear on behalf of Christians, who are nothing but free-riders – Christians ‘free ride’ on our emotional, and mental hard labors. The feminine christian perpetuates the female reproductive strategy of worrying only about the safety of her nest, while the men do the hard labor of transforming reality into safety and resources which she can spend on her nest, herself, her offspring. Yet as christians daily demonstrate, she maintains utility in hostility to his breaking of her illusion, because then she would have to acknowledge the debt, and provide something in trade. Y’all are parasites, liars, and thieves unless you fight – hard, and soon. Just parasites. Why do you think islamism, marxism, feminism, and postmodernism, make the same promise of equality, in exchange for the same contract written in fiction, that the will work together to live parasitically upon the emotional and intellectual efforts of ‘men’: The Aristocracy. So pay your way.
(this one is going to hurt. hold on to something) [T]here is no god. Only the god imagined by the faithful such that they preserve the peace between them by prohibition on variation in strategy, and prohibition on debate, and prohibition on learning, and prohibition on innovation and evolution. It’s a contract with one another written in fiction. I agree that there is value to the faithful in the production of psychological mindfulness from certainty, conformity, under this contract written in fiction. It re-creates the safety of the herd for those who lack agency, by casting submission, conformity, stagnation as heroic. I also understand that there is value in the freedom from emotional burden, intellectual burden, that the rest of us bear on behalf of Christians, who are nothing but free-riders – Christians ‘free ride’ on our emotional, and mental hard labors. The feminine christian perpetuates the female reproductive strategy of worrying only about the safety of her nest, while the men do the hard labor of transforming reality into safety and resources which she can spend on her nest, herself, her offspring. Yet as christians daily demonstrate, she maintains utility in hostility to his breaking of her illusion, because then she would have to acknowledge the debt, and provide something in trade. Y’all are parasites, liars, and thieves unless you fight – hard, and soon. Just parasites. Why do you think islamism, marxism, feminism, and postmodernism, make the same promise of equality, in exchange for the same contract written in fiction, that the will work together to live parasitically upon the emotional and intellectual efforts of ‘men’: The Aristocracy. So pay your way.
There Is No Theological Sophism that I Cannot Falsify and Translated Into an Attempted Fraud or Theft. https://propertarianism.com/2019/11/02/there-is-no-theological-sophism-that-i-cannot-falsify-and-translated-into-an-attempted-fraud-or-theft/
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-02 01:45:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190444821682491393
DON’T BOTHER. AT PRESENT THERE IS NO THEOLOGICAL SOPHISM THAT I CANNOT FALSIFY AND TRANSLATED INTO AN ATTEMPTED FRAUD OR THEFT.
—“You are going to have a bad time giving a materialist account for logical absolutes”—
[N]o I am no going to have any difficulty. You are going to be horrified that I am not. š Man can sense by nerves, disambiguate, categorize, perceive categories, and associate them, reinforce them by rehearsal, and recall them, hold one or combination or a prediction from a combination in his attention, recursively modify it, and in that order, because of his neurological ability to identify constant ad inconstant relations between stimuli over time. That’s all neurons do: on off, faster, slower.
Man can name those patterns of constant-inconstant relations (general rules)
Man is capable of language using ‘continuous recursive disambiguation over time.
Man can invent a grammar (rules of continuous recursive disambiguation) for any paradigm of constant relations (dimensions) he chooses. For example, counting, accounting, linear geometry, curvalinear geometry, multi-dimensional geometry. Or testimony, narrative, story, fiction, fictionalism, lie. Or physics, chemistry, biochemistry. one of the grammars he developed we call logic: the tests of constant relations in state between statements.
Man can use a grammar of any one of the logics, the most simple being first order logics, to describe the constant relations or failure of constant relations between any two or more references that he is capable of imagining, or which, by some instrumentation we can reduce to perceivable differences.
The brain is a very simple thing it turns out. It does only one thing really. focus attention on successful prediction of from patterns of stimulation.
DON’T BOTHER. AT PRESENT THERE IS NO THEOLOGICAL SOPHISM THAT I CANNOT FALSIFY AND TRANSLATED INTO AN ATTEMPTED FRAUD OR THEFT.
—“You are going to have a bad time giving a materialist account for logical absolutes”—
[N]o I am no going to have any difficulty. You are going to be horrified that I am not. š Man can sense by nerves, disambiguate, categorize, perceive categories, and associate them, reinforce them by rehearsal, and recall them, hold one or combination or a prediction from a combination in his attention, recursively modify it, and in that order, because of his neurological ability to identify constant ad inconstant relations between stimuli over time. That’s all neurons do: on off, faster, slower.
Man can name those patterns of constant-inconstant relations (general rules)
Man is capable of language using ‘continuous recursive disambiguation over time.
Man can invent a grammar (rules of continuous recursive disambiguation) for any paradigm of constant relations (dimensions) he chooses. For example, counting, accounting, linear geometry, curvalinear geometry, multi-dimensional geometry. Or testimony, narrative, story, fiction, fictionalism, lie. Or physics, chemistry, biochemistry. one of the grammars he developed we call logic: the tests of constant relations in state between statements.
Man can use a grammar of any one of the logics, the most simple being first order logics, to describe the constant relations or failure of constant relations between any two or more references that he is capable of imagining, or which, by some instrumentation we can reduce to perceivable differences.
The brain is a very simple thing it turns out. It does only one thing really. focus attention on successful prediction of from patterns of stimulation.
DON’T BOTHER. AT PRESENT THERE IS NO THEOLOGICAL SOPHISM THAT I CANNOT FALSIFY AND TRANSLATED INTO AN ATTEMPTED FRAUD OR THEFT.
—“You are going to have a bad time giving a materialist account for logical absolutes”—
No I am no going to have any difficulty. You are going to be horrified that I am not. š
Man can sense by nerves, disambiguate, categorize, perceive categories, and associate them, reinforce them by rehearsal, and recall them, hold one or combination or a prediction from a combination in his attention, recursively modify it, and in that order, because of his neurological ability to identify constant ad inconstant relations between stimuli over time. That’s all neurons do: on off, faster, slower.
1. Man can discover and identify (categorize) and name (give name to) sets of constant relations (an identity, referent,).
2. Man can invent patterns of testing constant-inconstant relations(relations)
3. Man can name those patterns of constant-inconstant relations (general rules)
4. Man is capable of language using ‘continuous recursive disambiguation over time.
5. Man can invent a grammar (rules of continuous recursive disambiguation) for any paradigm of constant relations (dimensions) he chooses. For example, counting, accounting, linear geometry, curvalinear geometry, multi-dimensional geometry. Or testimony, narrative, story, fiction, fictionalism, lie. Or physics, chemistry, biochemistry. one of the grammars he developed we call logic: the tests of constant relations in state between statements.
6. Man can use a grammar of any one of the logics, the most simple being first order logics, to describe the constant relations or failure of constant relations between any two or more references that he is capable of imagining, or which, by some instrumentation we can reduce to perceivable differences.
The brain is a very simple thing it turns out. It does only one thing really. focus attention on successful prediction of from patterns of stimulation.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 13:15:00 UTC