TYR = TIWAZ = SKY FATHER
God of: War, Sky, Thang (Council)
Ruler god: solar deity, god of war, justice, religion
Dayus Pitar
Dayus
Zeus
Jupiter
Dia
Dei
Tyr “Lord”, “God”
Tiw, Tig
Tiwaz
Christian priests were responsible for confusing Tyr and Odin, Odi… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MdjMGB_UPbw&fbclid=IwAR2AAMMki5STcAigp606Ej8MqqSnSMQ3BUqaopp9uGOjgk9OpGB3BpEJ8Tg
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 23:48:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232089936108703744
Judaism, Christianity and Islam using the supernatural, and Marxism-Socialism, Postmodernism,Feminism, and Denial of Human Biodiversity are not primitive frauds. They all rely on Abrahamic(Rabbinical) Deceit – which is just as advanced as are the Greek techniques of truthfulness.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 20:42:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232043096298442753
LOKI
by Anne Summers
Loki is everything degenerate. An immigrant (frost giant who is “related” only by a blood oath to Odin), is trans (mother of slipner; via an act of subversion so the gods could get a wall without paying for it), a thief and kidnapper (Idunn and the life giving apples), a liar (various ref.) and beta male practicer of GRRSM… Holds an important societal place… He’s the father of all that will literally destroy the world through consumption (Fenrer) and poison and hugs (Midgard Serpent). Seems like the myths are replaying themselves out.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 18:40:00 UTC
re: Jackson Crawford, Tyr vs. Odin as Chief God
In order to suppress controversy you’re overstating your case. You’re representing sources, because under the defensive protection of the scientific method, we don’t hypothesize without evidence. Meanwhile I think Dumezil and the rest of us are interested in the evolution of european natural religion over time. To claim we can’t use etymology which is about as close to genetic evidence that we come, is rather unscientific, and to claim we can’t apply the same method of analysis to mythology is also. And to claim the popularity of the farmer’s god over the ruling class’ god in a tripartite hierarchical society given the difference in those demographics isn’t scientific either. Every mythos we know of evolved like every political and legal technology and every narrative technology by rules similar to language. Every mythic tradition is subject to the same forensics.
So you’re creating conflict where there isn’t any. It is very hard to argue that Odin didn’t rise to prominence some time between the IE expansion and first testimony (roman). That would mean that european natural religion had a deus ex machina moment and Odin came out of nowhere in contrast to the entire cross civilizational IE pantheon. In the context of all those european mythologies, Odin is a pretty clear rotation into prominence. And Odin is the ‘odd man out’ in european religion. Of the european iranic and indo-iranic branches, each group evolved deities to fulfill the needs of a survival narrative given geographic and cultural competition. Europeans gods are are interesting because conquering (and replacing) early neolithic farmers was easier than the more advanced civilizations of the indus and mesopotamian regions. They were under less adaptive pressure. Yet still we have Odin.
Why? That’s the interesting question. How did he rotate into prominence and why? So to say Odin is the primary germanic god – well of course he is by the thirteenth century record. That doesn’t tell us anything interesting. It doesn’t provide explanatory power. It doesn’t tell us why and where he came from. What change or pressure or advantage caused the germanic branch of the european expansion to rotate a psychopomp into the primary god (all father) to replace sky father? What drove the germanic adaptation (rotation) of a psychopomp into the god of the aristocracy?
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 16:29:00 UTC
Where are aristotle, plato, socrates, zeno, epicurus, roman law, greek mathematics, and the christian destruction of the ancient world in your narrative?
The talmud and the bible an koran are not an enlightenment but simply the marxism-socialism- postmodernism-feminism of the ancient world: the coutner-revolution against reason.
The revolution in the ancient world was democritus’ atomism, socratic skepticism (failure), platonic idealism(failure), and the success of aristotelian reason, empiricism, proto-science, stoic and epicurean replacement of conflationary religion, and roman law and administration, creating markets for all peoples – but the semites (the equivalent of ghettos) couldn’t grasp that ‘uncontrolled vision’ and sought to restore controlled (feminine) monopoly and conflation using female methods of deceit, and the female method of undermining from within.
Weak minds need certainty.
Mindfulness doesn’t.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 12:17:00 UTC
GETTING TO YOUR PERSONAL EPIPHANY
—“I feel you are missing the archetypal experience description. I get that that could be included in testimonial but feel empirical science/lawful testimony and mystical testimony are two different functions.”—Bill Smith
Try again. I can sense something there and I probably know how to answer it but I’m not sure.
—“Scientific experience is summarized in scientific testimonial which leads in the direction of expressions of empirical natural law. … Mystical experience is expressed in poetry, the development of religious structures that send one down a destination-less path and manifestations of the ephemeral like the Runes. … I believe they are different things requiring different metrics and modes of expression and experience.”—Bill Smith
Correct. The question is, must they be coherent compatible and commensurable even if they are expressed in different grammars: deflationary-scientific vs inflationary-poetic. And my answer is yes. There is no reason for conflict. And it is this conflict that undermines our civlization from within.
—“If you’re saying what I think you’re saying I’m about to tear up due to the truth you’re conveying… as I’ve never known anyone else who did or even could communicate that fundamental lack intrinsic to our culture.
That was a powerful experience.
Actually I think you might have broken me. At least … I hope you did.”—Bill Smith
Broken means bad? lol.
What does that mean?
I’m scared.
—“Broken as in the change in conscious experience of reality due to a distinguishable event or experience but is dependent on previous works or studies.”—
Ok. “a moment of sudden revelation or insight.” Revelation, Epiphany, Paradigm Shift.
(Good. I don’t have to feel guilty all day now. lol -hugs.)
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 11:21:00 UTC
THE CONSISTENCY OF EUROPEAN NATURAL RELIGIONS
—“The transition in Hesiod’s theogony from primordial forces of nature (Titans) through the Titanomachy where the immortals gain mastery over these forces is the same sequence found in the Scandinavian transition from the older Vanir nature gods to the Aesir.”—Scott De Warren
OUR DESTINY IS GOD HOOD
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 10:45:00 UTC
RELIGION WITHOUT LIES IS POSSIBLE:
The alternative is european, history, stoicism (mindfulness), epicureanism (living within your means), ancestor worship (recognition of debts of intergenerational transfer), the play (tragedy), sport(hunt) and festival (feast).
No more lies.
My exploration of paganism is reducible to the ethnocentric advantage of ancestor worship, the raising of ancestors to archetypes, and the market adaptability of the pantheon of archetypes without the need for altering the group strategy or narrative.
In other words, it facilitates the natural hierarchy of abilities, and it eliminates the need for lying that produces anchoring.
Like many things our greco roman ancestors had most of the institutions correct – they overextended into civilizational diversity and encountered anceitn primitive people bent on lying.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 10:35:00 UTC
ABRAHAMISM AS LYING TO DISTRACT FROM EVOLUTIONARY DENIALISM
by Martin Štěpán and Curt Doolittle
Stephen J Gould was posing as an evolutionary biologist where in reality, he was an evolutionary denialist.
Liars all: Gould, Boas, Freud, Marx, Adorno-Fromm, Friedan, Derrida, Cantor-Bohr.
These people are all evolutionary denialists. Every single one of them. That’s what separates them from the european intellectual tradition, and why they were wrong about everything.
Why do you think they evolved at the same time as Darwin, Spencer, and Nietzsche?
Why do you think you have control over the lies your telling now, or that any of these people had control over the lies they were telling?
In order to prevent falsehood, we categorize lying as not trying to lie, but as not performing due diligence against lying.
If you try to justify a prior – you’re lying. What science did these people do: Gould, Boas, Freud, Marx, Adorno-Fromm, Friedan, Derrida, Cantor-Bohr.
The scientific method exists to stop you from a justifying a prior, a cognitive bias – or a group’s mythology.
They didn’t do any science. They made it up.
Abrahamism = Evolutionary Denialism.
Why?
Female group strategy.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 10:13:00 UTC
EUROPEAN AND EAST ASIAN GODS VS DESERT GODS
European titans or giants ( the distant unknown past), gods(immortals with powers) demigods(mortal with powers) and heroes(mortal with exceptional talents) are unlike semitic and iranic gods (omniscient and omnipotent) they are more akin to ancestor spirits.
To declare one’s self a god was to personify the state, and demand loyalty to the people, the state, and the emperor, as one did the gods. Sacrifice was a demonstration of loyalty just as immaterial prayer, belief in a falsehood, ritual, is a cost as a demonstration of loyalty).
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 09:57:00 UTC