Curt Doolittle

Theme: Religion

  • Good and Evil Is a Middle Eastern Not European Concept

    —-“Good and evil were invented in the middle east to facilitate cultural warfare between the middle east and the indians. European religion used chaos and mischief vs order, and our gods were ‘real people’ with real frailties.” – Curt Doolittle —“The concepts “good” and “evil” are actually Indo-European in origin. Etymology dictionaries are useful. Better perhaps to say that our misconceptions about what exactly those terms mean are influenced by Middle Eastern philosophy…”—AunMarie Grooms

    Indo european a language and cultural family of genetically west eurasians of the proto-European, proto-Caucasian, proto-Iranic but NOT proto-turkic post glacial maximum peoples. The proto-caucasians and anatolians appear to have been lost to us. As far as I know, good and evil are indo-iranic not indo european. It’s unlikely that I err. The division between European, iranic, indo-iranic results in European (aristocratic egalitarian and martial), Persian(aristocratic authoritarian and martial), and Hindu( caste, duty-role, and ‘priestly’) pantheons. The argument put forth by others which I got from Karen Armstrong, was that it appears that the north and west europeans developed more so in the corded ware culture(material), and the iranics more in the vedas (spiritual), and that this is largely because etherial religion as we understand it evolved in what we call Mesopotamia-Anatolia or, more precisely, along the euphrates. It’s most likely that religious pantheons developed differently due to differences in indo european ethnicities, and strategies. The west pretty much killed everyone they came in contact with (or at least the males) because the neolithic farmers were not developed enough to resist them. But as the iranic people migrated east to india, then south of the caspian, then west back into Mesopotamia they encountered developed peoples that they had to conquer. So, iranics and indo iranics used hierarchy to rule an compete with others like the indus valley people and the Mesopotamians while europeans maintained aristocratic egalitarianism and didn’t develop authoritarianism until the late roman empire – and even then – they would have been more successful if they’d been much more authoritarian and much less tolerant.

  • Civilizations Develop Persuasive Strategies

    The Aristotelian – Truth – Reason proper – Market Tripartism between aristocracies. The Confucian – Wisdom – Reasonableness – Kinship Hierarchy below Aristocracy The Vedic – Wisdom – Explanation of Harmony – Myth  –  Aristocracy imposes Classes The Zoroastrian – The Ideal – Wisdom – Aspirational Myth – Surrender to Aristocracy The Abrahamic – The Great Deceit – Authoritarian Lies – Resist Aristocracy Truth: Europeanism Wisdom: Sinism Myth: Hinduism Ideals: Zoroastrianism Lies: Abrahamism

  • Civilizations Develop Persuasive Strategies

    The Aristotelian – Truth – Reason proper – Market Tripartism between aristocracies. The Confucian – Wisdom – Reasonableness – Kinship Hierarchy below Aristocracy The Vedic – Wisdom – Explanation of Harmony – Myth  –  Aristocracy imposes Classes The Zoroastrian – The Ideal – Wisdom – Aspirational Myth – Surrender to Aristocracy The Abrahamic – The Great Deceit – Authoritarian Lies – Resist Aristocracy Truth: Europeanism Wisdom: Sinism Myth: Hinduism Ideals: Zoroastrianism Lies: Abrahamism

  • Closer to A Church than A System of Education

    —“The sentiments about the education system you have shared lately, Curt, of said system being closer to a Church than a system of education, are similar to an analysis done by YouTuber Sargon of Akkad a few years ago. His analysis came during a major incursion of Progressivist ideology in the realm of Video Games (GamerGate), where he worked to identify the source of the incursion. While Sargon (Carl Benjamin) was not as concise as you, and hasn’t visited the subject for some time, your latest posts on the subject have rekindled a personal desire for him to grant you an interview. I’m not sure if you’re on his radar (or vise verse prior to my reply here), but his platform and politics would work in your favor and would give him some more content for his channel. Thoughts?”— A Follower

    Thinking…. My analysis is that of Hilbert(1920s) Hayek (1970’s) and Thomas Sowell (1980’a) combined with Kevin Macdonald(1990’s) and Stephen Hicks (2010’s).

    • Hicks explains the evolution of leftist (jewish) thought.
    • Macdonald documents it in detail.
    • I articulate the methodology of (abrahamic) leftist thought and how to expand our law to outlaw and suppress it. In doing so I was able to document western group strategy in precise economic and scientific terms.

    I think were people differ is whether (a) it is possible to make abrahamism illegal, (b) whether it is possible to reform the academy using that law (c) or whether people must be ostracized from the polity because they are irredeemable. I think that fixing the universities is rather easy. It’s a money problem and ending the money problem will fix the problem. I don’t feel the need to have help with publicity but I would of course talk to the man and enjoy it.

  • Closer to A Church than A System of Education

    —“The sentiments about the education system you have shared lately, Curt, of said system being closer to a Church than a system of education, are similar to an analysis done by YouTuber Sargon of Akkad a few years ago. His analysis came during a major incursion of Progressivist ideology in the realm of Video Games (GamerGate), where he worked to identify the source of the incursion. While Sargon (Carl Benjamin) was not as concise as you, and hasn’t visited the subject for some time, your latest posts on the subject have rekindled a personal desire for him to grant you an interview. I’m not sure if you’re on his radar (or vise verse prior to my reply here), but his platform and politics would work in your favor and would give him some more content for his channel. Thoughts?”— A Follower

    Thinking…. My analysis is that of Hilbert(1920s) Hayek (1970’s) and Thomas Sowell (1980’a) combined with Kevin Macdonald(1990’s) and Stephen Hicks (2010’s).

    • Hicks explains the evolution of leftist (jewish) thought.
    • Macdonald documents it in detail.
    • I articulate the methodology of (abrahamic) leftist thought and how to expand our law to outlaw and suppress it. In doing so I was able to document western group strategy in precise economic and scientific terms.

    I think were people differ is whether (a) it is possible to make abrahamism illegal, (b) whether it is possible to reform the academy using that law (c) or whether people must be ostracized from the polity because they are irredeemable. I think that fixing the universities is rather easy. It’s a money problem and ending the money problem will fix the problem. I don’t feel the need to have help with publicity but I would of course talk to the man and enjoy it.

  • Ownership of the Name Aryan… sigh

    In the scholarly literature aryanism refers to the culture of the indo european expansion from russia-ukraine, using militaristic, expansionist, hierarchical, paternal, sky worshipping, horse riding peoples consisting of the european and iranic branches, resulting in the european, armenian, iranic, indo-iranic peoples. europeans and indians want to appropriate this name exclusively, but as far as I know all of use evolved from the two or three different subraces that adopted this culture.

  • Ownership of the Name Aryan… sigh

    In the scholarly literature aryanism refers to the culture of the indo european expansion from russia-ukraine, using militaristic, expansionist, hierarchical, paternal, sky worshipping, horse riding peoples consisting of the european and iranic branches, resulting in the european, armenian, iranic, indo-iranic peoples. europeans and indians want to appropriate this name exclusively, but as far as I know all of use evolved from the two or three different subraces that adopted this culture.

  • We Know the Devil – His Name Was Abraham

    We Know the Devil – His Name Was Abraham https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/25/we-know-the-devil-his-name-was-abraham/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 14:13:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232307686919868417

  • We Know the Devil – His Name Was Abraham

    —“The entire libertarian ideology is baiting into hazard via suggestion.”—Chris Moyer

    Yes. christianity, islam, marxism, postmodernism, feminism, libertarianism and neoconservatism are all baiting into hazard – so are freudianism, boasianism, cultural marxism, political correctness, and human-biodiversity-denialism. Europeans speak in the language of the gods written in the hands of the gods, math, science, natural law, and testimony. If you are a devil what language would you speak? What does our foundational myth of the blacksmith and the demon tell us? The devils bait you into hazard with false promise. We know the name of the devil.His name was Abraham.He was from Ur.

  • We Know the Devil – His Name Was Abraham

    —“The entire libertarian ideology is baiting into hazard via suggestion.”—Chris Moyer

    Yes. christianity, islam, marxism, postmodernism, feminism, libertarianism and neoconservatism are all baiting into hazard – so are freudianism, boasianism, cultural marxism, political correctness, and human-biodiversity-denialism. Europeans speak in the language of the gods written in the hands of the gods, math, science, natural law, and testimony. If you are a devil what language would you speak? What does our foundational myth of the blacksmith and the demon tell us? The devils bait you into hazard with false promise. We know the name of the devil.His name was Abraham.He was from Ur.