Curt Doolittle

Theme: Religion

  • Market Demand for Systems of Choice

    —“Law for the aristocracy who have power to limit its use, philosophy for the middle have some to use it well, and theology for the bottom, that have least, so that they are not used by others. Limits for the top and bottom and choices for the middle.”– We need all three. This was one of the first concepts I devoted effort to, back in the 1990’s.

  • RELIGION AND WOMEN – AND A VECTOR OF SOLUTION

    RELIGION AND WOMEN – AND A VECTOR OF SOLUTION https://propertarianism.com/2020/03/03/religion-and-women-and-a-vector-of-solution/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-03 13:42:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1234836629984071681

  • RELIGION AND WOMEN – AND A VECTOR OF SOLUTION

    RELIGION AND WOMEN – AND A VECTOR OF SOLUTION by Maria Al Masani Makienko ( FROM CURT: Learn Please. I will delete all counter-signaling.) As a Muslim woman, I have to make a comment about ex Muslim women. My issue is when they leave the faith, they cut their hair short, become rad feminists, sleep with every man they can, then they get into their 30s and want to settle down and men are not interested. My issue with ex Muslim men is they enable this behavior, encourage it, but don’t marry them. I think religion is an excellent tool to manage women and prevent them from eating each other and destroying their marriage marketplace value and policing weak beta males who put them on a pedestal and become their slaves when they know better. Female cognition is highly emotional, made to care for infants – something autistic women such as myself are terrible at. Female cognitives and their emotion-based thinking must be managed not to destroy themselves and society. I think for male cognitive with an IQ 115 and above that are not slaves to women, P is excellent. In a way, P creates a cognitive aristocracy and a traditional masculine religion is the only effective tool for cognitive commoner management. The utility of religion is domesticating the slaves of emotion-based thinking. The aristocracy should use philosophy, logic, and reason for decision making. In leading Orthodox, Catholic and Muslim seminaries, Aristotle is studied a lot – as my husband said, why can’t that be updated with P? — by CurtD: It can be updated with P. But I didn’t think through the universal application of aristotle in doing so until you just mentioned it. (FYI: @adam … wth is Adam’s alias now?) — by Maria Al Masani Makienko They as in ex Muslim women, the men who enable them? As for they can be… my favorite response is Dr Johanthan Haidt on decay. The issue with 6 pronged conservative values is they prevent decay. Every generation of secular women is more degenerate than the next and eats each other. I am a sufi, a moderate who used to go after religious conservatives and moved to Canada .. but then in 15 years I saw the decay of each subsequent generation. Women from when I came to Canada are Audrey Hepburn compared to the blue and green hair tattooed feminist monsters coming out of the schools. And then at 30, they are tired and spent. And the religious immigrant girls who don’t integrate from a patriarchal faith have their pick of men here. If the woman has male cognition and is an ex Muslim autist, she would agree with me about what happens to female cognitive ex Muslim women over time. Female cognition is a problem: if you give them power they ruin everything! And the way you control them is not the way you think for yourself. When one is motivated by logic and reason, they first go to Aristotle for their thinking, Marcus Aurellius … but its so nice to have something modern and even more relevant like P. P for the aristocracy – a traditional religion for the underclass — by CurtD: Smart. Very smart. WOMEN Agreed, but In our culture we must state this differently: “We have had centuries to develop many institutional means of controlling men’s bad behavior when they have gained social, economic, and political freedom, but we have not had time to create institutions to control women’s bad behavior when they have social economic and political freedom – and women, just like men, clearly have many bad behaviors we need institutions to control.” ARISTOCRACY: Agreed .. But in our culture, where the majority is in the middle, not the bottom, we use tri-partism and tri-functionalism, so we must have three: “Law for the aristocracy who have power to limit its use, philosophy for the middle have some to use it well, and theology for the bottom, that have least, so that they are not used by others. Limits for the top and bottom and choices for the middle.” ARISTOTLE I have so many projects I would like to finish: 1) to rewrite all of Aristotle in propertarian prose. 2) to write a tripartite theology for western peoples 3) to try write one book that tries to reform christianity, islam, judaism, buddhism – if not hinduism (i don’t think I can understand it) so that they are rational as well as spiritual, but not in conflict with the natural law. But I think you have given me the right wisdom: that if I start with aristotle then all will follow. @adam (Don Miguel) suggested this last year I just didn’t piece it together until you said it here. I will not live long enough to do all these things. But I’ll do the best I can.

  • RELIGION AND WOMEN – AND A VECTOR OF SOLUTION

    RELIGION AND WOMEN – AND A VECTOR OF SOLUTION by Maria Al Masani Makienko ( FROM CURT: Learn Please. I will delete all counter-signaling.) As a Muslim woman, I have to make a comment about ex Muslim women. My issue is when they leave the faith, they cut their hair short, become rad feminists, sleep with every man they can, then they get into their 30s and want to settle down and men are not interested. My issue with ex Muslim men is they enable this behavior, encourage it, but don’t marry them. I think religion is an excellent tool to manage women and prevent them from eating each other and destroying their marriage marketplace value and policing weak beta males who put them on a pedestal and become their slaves when they know better. Female cognition is highly emotional, made to care for infants – something autistic women such as myself are terrible at. Female cognitives and their emotion-based thinking must be managed not to destroy themselves and society. I think for male cognitive with an IQ 115 and above that are not slaves to women, P is excellent. In a way, P creates a cognitive aristocracy and a traditional masculine religion is the only effective tool for cognitive commoner management. The utility of religion is domesticating the slaves of emotion-based thinking. The aristocracy should use philosophy, logic, and reason for decision making. In leading Orthodox, Catholic and Muslim seminaries, Aristotle is studied a lot – as my husband said, why can’t that be updated with P? — by CurtD: It can be updated with P. But I didn’t think through the universal application of aristotle in doing so until you just mentioned it. (FYI: @adam … wth is Adam’s alias now?) — by Maria Al Masani Makienko They as in ex Muslim women, the men who enable them? As for they can be… my favorite response is Dr Johanthan Haidt on decay. The issue with 6 pronged conservative values is they prevent decay. Every generation of secular women is more degenerate than the next and eats each other. I am a sufi, a moderate who used to go after religious conservatives and moved to Canada .. but then in 15 years I saw the decay of each subsequent generation. Women from when I came to Canada are Audrey Hepburn compared to the blue and green hair tattooed feminist monsters coming out of the schools. And then at 30, they are tired and spent. And the religious immigrant girls who don’t integrate from a patriarchal faith have their pick of men here. If the woman has male cognition and is an ex Muslim autist, she would agree with me about what happens to female cognitive ex Muslim women over time. Female cognition is a problem: if you give them power they ruin everything! And the way you control them is not the way you think for yourself. When one is motivated by logic and reason, they first go to Aristotle for their thinking, Marcus Aurellius … but its so nice to have something modern and even more relevant like P. P for the aristocracy – a traditional religion for the underclass — by CurtD: Smart. Very smart. WOMEN Agreed, but In our culture we must state this differently: “We have had centuries to develop many institutional means of controlling men’s bad behavior when they have gained social, economic, and political freedom, but we have not had time to create institutions to control women’s bad behavior when they have social economic and political freedom – and women, just like men, clearly have many bad behaviors we need institutions to control.” ARISTOCRACY: Agreed .. But in our culture, where the majority is in the middle, not the bottom, we use tri-partism and tri-functionalism, so we must have three: “Law for the aristocracy who have power to limit its use, philosophy for the middle have some to use it well, and theology for the bottom, that have least, so that they are not used by others. Limits for the top and bottom and choices for the middle.” ARISTOTLE I have so many projects I would like to finish: 1) to rewrite all of Aristotle in propertarian prose. 2) to write a tripartite theology for western peoples 3) to try write one book that tries to reform christianity, islam, judaism, buddhism – if not hinduism (i don’t think I can understand it) so that they are rational as well as spiritual, but not in conflict with the natural law. But I think you have given me the right wisdom: that if I start with aristotle then all will follow. @adam (Don Miguel) suggested this last year I just didn’t piece it together until you said it here. I will not live long enough to do all these things. But I’ll do the best I can.

  • Explaining Anti-Abrahamism

    Explaining Anti-Abrahamism https://propertarianism.com/2020/03/03/explaining-anti-abrahamism/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-03 13:12:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1234828982375370752

  • Explaining Anti-Abrahamism

    EXPLAINING ANTI-ABRAHAMISM (controversial post warning) (explanation of social bias) 1) P-Law and its Logic are universally decidable, because testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence) are universally decidable. (Let that sink in a moment.) 2) Any people can eventually enjoy the benefits of a high trust civlization like europeans if they adopt P-Law, Logic, and Constitution – including market (via-negativa) soft eugenics. 3) While ethnocentrism is the optimum strategy at the local, state and civilizational level – because it decreases genetic, kinship, social, economic and political competition and decreases resistance to trust, reciprocity, and mutual insurance and care; so is heterogeneity polities, producing a market of commons because it allows moral and cognitive biases to play out at the cost, and to the benefit, of those who do it. 4) But groups whose competitive strategy requires successful practice of deceit, irreciprocity, and devolution(demographic decline), must convert from predatory and parasitic means of survival and competition to productive means of survival and competition. And groups that practice any and every strategy habituate, specialize in, and transfer between generations, the strategy, mythology, traditions, values, norms, habits, means of education, and especially means of communication, collaboration and argument that advances that strategy. 5) As such groups need incentives to adapt from destructive, predatory, and parasitic means of survival and competition to productive means. To do so requires reformation of mythology, traditions, values, norms, habits , means of education, communication, collaboration, and argument, to suit new the new productive strategy. 6) To produce those incentives we can outlaw the expression of those strategies, and use social, economic, and political alienation to cause deprivation of opportunity – and cause them to adapt their mythology, traditions, values, norms, habits , means of education, communication, collaboration, and argument. 7) The Purpose of Muslim, Christian, and Jewish religious monopoly monotheism and religious identitarianism; and of Boasianism-and-Freudianism ( pseudo-sociology and psychology), marxism(pseudo-economics), neo-marxism (cultural marxism, undermining), postmodernism (relativism), feminism (undermining the family), and human biodiversity denialism (science denial), were constructed by design to deny and undermine the universal decidability of testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence).

    —“In response to the post of the Institute regarding Jewish participants [in the Propertarian Movement], I understand the desire to have universal appeal across all groups, but… A feminine argumentative strategy paired with a parasitic evolutionary strategy knowingly employed to the detriment of European-descended peoples is the Jewish Group strategy, to which anti-Semitism is therefore a logical and natural reaction. The frame of anti-Semitism in my judgement provides the greatest immunity from resistance to, reversal of, and prevention of, the threats mentioned in the post, all of which originate primarily from those of Jewish descent.”— Reece Haynes via Facebook

    Correct. Complaints of anti-semitism, whether that semitism is in jewish, christian, or muslim group strategies, are expressions of the attempt to prevent the use of testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence), in universal decidability, and to preserve the competitive strategy requires successful practice of deceit, irreciprocity, and devolution(demographic decline), against people who practice testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence), and the high trust, productive, evolutionarily successful nations that they parasitically depend upon. Quod Erat Demonstrandum. Thus Endeth The Lesson

  • Explaining Anti-Abrahamism

    EXPLAINING ANTI-ABRAHAMISM (controversial post warning) (explanation of social bias) 1) P-Law and its Logic are universally decidable, because testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence) are universally decidable. (Let that sink in a moment.) 2) Any people can eventually enjoy the benefits of a high trust civlization like europeans if they adopt P-Law, Logic, and Constitution – including market (via-negativa) soft eugenics. 3) While ethnocentrism is the optimum strategy at the local, state and civilizational level – because it decreases genetic, kinship, social, economic and political competition and decreases resistance to trust, reciprocity, and mutual insurance and care; so is heterogeneity polities, producing a market of commons because it allows moral and cognitive biases to play out at the cost, and to the benefit, of those who do it. 4) But groups whose competitive strategy requires successful practice of deceit, irreciprocity, and devolution(demographic decline), must convert from predatory and parasitic means of survival and competition to productive means of survival and competition. And groups that practice any and every strategy habituate, specialize in, and transfer between generations, the strategy, mythology, traditions, values, norms, habits, means of education, and especially means of communication, collaboration and argument that advances that strategy. 5) As such groups need incentives to adapt from destructive, predatory, and parasitic means of survival and competition to productive means. To do so requires reformation of mythology, traditions, values, norms, habits , means of education, communication, collaboration, and argument, to suit new the new productive strategy. 6) To produce those incentives we can outlaw the expression of those strategies, and use social, economic, and political alienation to cause deprivation of opportunity – and cause them to adapt their mythology, traditions, values, norms, habits , means of education, communication, collaboration, and argument. 7) The Purpose of Muslim, Christian, and Jewish religious monopoly monotheism and religious identitarianism; and of Boasianism-and-Freudianism ( pseudo-sociology and psychology), marxism(pseudo-economics), neo-marxism (cultural marxism, undermining), postmodernism (relativism), feminism (undermining the family), and human biodiversity denialism (science denial), were constructed by design to deny and undermine the universal decidability of testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence).

    —“In response to the post of the Institute regarding Jewish participants [in the Propertarian Movement], I understand the desire to have universal appeal across all groups, but… A feminine argumentative strategy paired with a parasitic evolutionary strategy knowingly employed to the detriment of European-descended peoples is the Jewish Group strategy, to which anti-Semitism is therefore a logical and natural reaction. The frame of anti-Semitism in my judgement provides the greatest immunity from resistance to, reversal of, and prevention of, the threats mentioned in the post, all of which originate primarily from those of Jewish descent.”— Reece Haynes via Facebook

    Correct. Complaints of anti-semitism, whether that semitism is in jewish, christian, or muslim group strategies, are expressions of the attempt to prevent the use of testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence), in universal decidability, and to preserve the competitive strategy requires successful practice of deceit, irreciprocity, and devolution(demographic decline), against people who practice testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence), and the high trust, productive, evolutionarily successful nations that they parasitically depend upon. Quod Erat Demonstrandum. Thus Endeth The Lesson

  • The Propertarian Question

    (core) [W]hy is western civilization successfully undermined by the marxist, postmodernist, feminist, politically correct, science-denialist ant-western, anti-christian, anti-white, anti-male sequence of movements? Who created those movements? Why are europeans vulnerable to it, but why are Indians and east asians not vulnerable to it? Why is europe’s traditional system of development by incremental suppression of falsehood, free riding, and underclass reproduction, culminating in Darwin and the american eugenics movement so antithetical to the left? Why did the left invent a hierarchy of pseudosciences and lies to deny western civilization and the darwinian explanation for it? Why is the left’s strategy disapproval of truth, undermining through gossiping rallying shaming, moralizing, psychologizing, shrilling, outraging, and reputation destruction? Why is the truth so dangerous? And why has the thought leadership of each of these movements been Jewish? And why don’t Jews, like europeans, stop their own from undermining by creating distributing and reinforcing falsehoods? What do Boas, Freud, Marx, Adorno-Fromm, Derrida-Lyotard, Friedan all share in common? And why do they so successfully produce falsehoods: pseudoscience, sophism, denial, and deceit? Answer: groups evolve strategies, and genes adapt relatively rapidly to those strategies, and myths, traditions, and methods warfare and methods of argument replicate, reinforce, and express that strategy: in other words, we don’t know what we’re doing. So, incrementally suppress the female means of undermining and as we have incrementally suppressed all other forms of criminal activity as it has been invented, applied, and discovered. It is possible to construct the law so that the left’s means of undermining lying are illegal – and it turns out to be relatively easy. The only problem is that christianity, judaism, and islam are propagated by the same false means, which is why marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and denialism were produced by the same group strategy as the abrahamic religions. Why aren’t members of the group that claim innocence stopping the members of their group from destroying the host civilization? EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION’S EUGENIC, DARWINIAN, STRATEGY The European peoples have been able to evolve genetically, culturally, economically, technologically and scientifically faster than all other peoples in the ancient and modern worlds because of our traditions of: … self determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence, heroism, rule of law and jury, and markets in all aspects of life; WHERE … the market for suppression of parasitism we call the law, and the market for reciprocity in the production of goods, services, and information, evolve as rapidly as possible, THEREBY … advancing productive innovations in each other’s interests, and suppression innovations in parasitism against others interests, in exchange for softly suppresses the rates of reproduction of the underclasses, THEREBY … allowing us to divert proceeds from our production to the commons, and the higher returns for all from those commons, the most important of which are truth before face, trust, artistic, scientific, technological, economic adaptive and and innovative velocity, and the prosperity, joy, and peace of mind that results from it. THEREFORE Western civilization is not the first, but it is the fastest, in the prehistoric, ancient, and modern worlds, sovereignty expands human ability most rapidly for the simple reason that market rule, limited by natural law. creates both the most incentive to innovate and change, and the least resistance to innovation and change, that are possible at any given moment. THE RESTORATION OF EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION AND THE RESISTANCE MOVEMENTS I – The restoration of Aristotle, the restoration of writing, and the Re-separation of Germanic from Latin Civilization. … 1. 1100-1300- The turn of islam to fundamentalism, the flight of islamic scholars, the return of Aristotle by muslim scholars, their translation into latin, … 2. The European Re-Conquest of spain. … 3. The Evolution of the Hansa and the completion under the Holy Roman Empire of the Rule of Law project, contractualism, individual sovereignty, mobile labor, capital concentration, the corporation. … 3. The Ottoman conquest of Byzantium, fall of Constantinople, the muslim blockade, the search for alternate trade routes, the age of sail, the age of muslim piracy, the age of exploration, the age of colonization. II – The First British Scientific Revolution 1600’s+ … 1. Newton 1660, Locke, Smith, Hume. … 2. The defeat of the ottomans, and the final constraint of islam after a thousand years of raids, slaving, piracy, conquest and subjugation. III – The Continental Secular Theological Counter-Revolution … 1. The French Counter-Revolution Rousseau (1700’s) … 2. The German Counter-Revolution Kant et al (1800’s) IV – The Second Anglo-German Scientific Revolution 1830+ (Menger, Darwin, Spencer, Maxwell, Hilbert…)

    1. The Jewish Pseudoscientific Counter- Revolution 1850
      … The anglo enfranchisement of the jews
      … (a) The Marxist and Jewish undermining of the HRE.
      … (a) The Bolshevik overthrow of Russian civilization
      … (b) The Communist Undermining of Germanic civilization
      … (c) The Communist seizure of power in France.
      … (d) The Communist, marxist, postmodernist, invasion and undermining of America.

    V – The Anglo American Technological Revolution (Turing, Edison-N, Telecom, Radio, Transistors, Computers,) 1930+ … (a) (Ongoing.) THE CENTURY OF THE JEWISH COUNTER-REVOLUTION AGAINST DARWIN AND DARWINIAN CIVILIZATION

    1. Marxism(1850+): To cast jewish condition as a universal condition. To undermine cooperation between the classes. To undermine white ascent into capital concentration.
    2. Freudianism(90′-20’s): To undermine Darwin and Instincts
    3. Boasianism(10-20’s): To undermine Darwin and integration
    4. Cantor and Bohr: To undermine mathematical realism.
    5. Neo-Marxism(50’s+): To undermine Darwinian Cultural Homogeneity.
      (Max Horkheimer, Theodor W. Adorno, Erich Fromm, and Herbert Marcuse, Antonio Gramsci)
    6. Feminism(60’s+): To undermine Darwin and the Family.
    7. Postmodernism(70’s+): To undermine Darwin,Truth, Science, Reason.
    8. HBD-Denialism(80’s+): To blatantly deny Darwin and Evolution
    9. Identitarianism(90’s+): To undermine the Darwinian White Peoples

    THE GROUP STRATEGY OF THE LEFT: DEFEAT DARWIN TO FACILITATE SEPARATISM. The entire ideology of the left is to resist integration, to preserve their parasitic group strategy, to preserve their female means of undermining, to deny the Darwinian revolution and the necessity of paternal, hierarchical, market meritocratic consumption and reproduction. All political conflict is reducible to this question The right practices markets in everything: darwinian evolution. The ideological left denies evolutionary pressure exists. The theological right only debates its cause. This is why the right is ‘right’ even if for the wrong reason. LEFT: Maternal, equalitarian, dysgenic devolutionary -vs- RIGHT: Paternal, meritocratic, eugenic evolutionary. Revolt. Separate. Continue to Speciate. or Return to our ancestral means of conquest, rule, and darwinian domestication of man by markets.THE PURSUIT OF NON-FALSE RELIGION P-Law is compatible with religion. It’s that (a) Abrahamic religion is incompatible with testimonial truth; (b) testimonial truth is necessary to suppress de-civilization, destruction, and conquest by islam, judaism, and jewish marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and evolutionary science denialism – the purpose of which is to prevent continued transcendence of many into gods with european understanding of the language and words of the gods: math, science, the laws of nature, and the natural law of man; (c) nature thanks, ancestor thanks, civilizational-hero thanks, archetype thanks, the stoic method of virtue and mindfulness, and the epicurean philosophy, invented by europeans, constitute the only non-false religion we know of other than east asian ancestor worship, buddhist mindfulness, confucian wisdom, and ethnocentrism: self-love. We cannot produce a body of law free of falsehood, and that restores unification of church and state, with a religion compatible with the physical, natural, and transcendent laws, that closes the door to another body of undermining with the Abrahamic, female method of destruction of civilization by false promise of unwarrantable freedom from laws of nature, natural law of man, and necessity of evolutionary transcendence of man, baiting into hazard, creating conflict between the elites, classes, genders, and generations, destroying the informational, institutional, civil, familial, commons upon which our high trust civilization depends – and profiting from the managed decline. The only difficulty in this process is that christians resist the final reformation of their religion out of abrahamic deceit and into the imitation of Jesus – the invention of the feminine god of those who suffer – compatible with european civilization’s masculine gods, regardless of their names: Washington, Caesar, Jupiter, Dius, Zeus, Ziu, Tyr, Tiwaz, Dayus Pitar “sky father”; Alexander, Mercury, Thor; And the rest – “the gods of those who joy”.

  • The Propertarian Question

    (core) [W]hy is western civilization successfully undermined by the marxist, postmodernist, feminist, politically correct, science-denialist ant-western, anti-christian, anti-white, anti-male sequence of movements? Who created those movements? Why are europeans vulnerable to it, but why are Indians and east asians not vulnerable to it? Why is europe’s traditional system of development by incremental suppression of falsehood, free riding, and underclass reproduction, culminating in Darwin and the american eugenics movement so antithetical to the left? Why did the left invent a hierarchy of pseudosciences and lies to deny western civilization and the darwinian explanation for it? Why is the left’s strategy disapproval of truth, undermining through gossiping rallying shaming, moralizing, psychologizing, shrilling, outraging, and reputation destruction? Why is the truth so dangerous? And why has the thought leadership of each of these movements been Jewish? And why don’t Jews, like europeans, stop their own from undermining by creating distributing and reinforcing falsehoods? What do Boas, Freud, Marx, Adorno-Fromm, Derrida-Lyotard, Friedan all share in common? And why do they so successfully produce falsehoods: pseudoscience, sophism, denial, and deceit? Answer: groups evolve strategies, and genes adapt relatively rapidly to those strategies, and myths, traditions, and methods warfare and methods of argument replicate, reinforce, and express that strategy: in other words, we don’t know what we’re doing. So, incrementally suppress the female means of undermining and as we have incrementally suppressed all other forms of criminal activity as it has been invented, applied, and discovered. It is possible to construct the law so that the left’s means of undermining lying are illegal – and it turns out to be relatively easy. The only problem is that christianity, judaism, and islam are propagated by the same false means, which is why marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and denialism were produced by the same group strategy as the abrahamic religions. Why aren’t members of the group that claim innocence stopping the members of their group from destroying the host civilization? EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION’S EUGENIC, DARWINIAN, STRATEGY The European peoples have been able to evolve genetically, culturally, economically, technologically and scientifically faster than all other peoples in the ancient and modern worlds because of our traditions of: … self determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence, heroism, rule of law and jury, and markets in all aspects of life; WHERE … the market for suppression of parasitism we call the law, and the market for reciprocity in the production of goods, services, and information, evolve as rapidly as possible, THEREBY … advancing productive innovations in each other’s interests, and suppression innovations in parasitism against others interests, in exchange for softly suppresses the rates of reproduction of the underclasses, THEREBY … allowing us to divert proceeds from our production to the commons, and the higher returns for all from those commons, the most important of which are truth before face, trust, artistic, scientific, technological, economic adaptive and and innovative velocity, and the prosperity, joy, and peace of mind that results from it. THEREFORE Western civilization is not the first, but it is the fastest, in the prehistoric, ancient, and modern worlds, sovereignty expands human ability most rapidly for the simple reason that market rule, limited by natural law. creates both the most incentive to innovate and change, and the least resistance to innovation and change, that are possible at any given moment. THE RESTORATION OF EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION AND THE RESISTANCE MOVEMENTS I – The restoration of Aristotle, the restoration of writing, and the Re-separation of Germanic from Latin Civilization. … 1. 1100-1300- The turn of islam to fundamentalism, the flight of islamic scholars, the return of Aristotle by muslim scholars, their translation into latin, … 2. The European Re-Conquest of spain. … 3. The Evolution of the Hansa and the completion under the Holy Roman Empire of the Rule of Law project, contractualism, individual sovereignty, mobile labor, capital concentration, the corporation. … 3. The Ottoman conquest of Byzantium, fall of Constantinople, the muslim blockade, the search for alternate trade routes, the age of sail, the age of muslim piracy, the age of exploration, the age of colonization. II – The First British Scientific Revolution 1600’s+ … 1. Newton 1660, Locke, Smith, Hume. … 2. The defeat of the ottomans, and the final constraint of islam after a thousand years of raids, slaving, piracy, conquest and subjugation. III – The Continental Secular Theological Counter-Revolution … 1. The French Counter-Revolution Rousseau (1700’s) … 2. The German Counter-Revolution Kant et al (1800’s) IV – The Second Anglo-German Scientific Revolution 1830+ (Menger, Darwin, Spencer, Maxwell, Hilbert…)

    1. The Jewish Pseudoscientific Counter- Revolution 1850
      … The anglo enfranchisement of the jews
      … (a) The Marxist and Jewish undermining of the HRE.
      … (a) The Bolshevik overthrow of Russian civilization
      … (b) The Communist Undermining of Germanic civilization
      … (c) The Communist seizure of power in France.
      … (d) The Communist, marxist, postmodernist, invasion and undermining of America.

    V – The Anglo American Technological Revolution (Turing, Edison-N, Telecom, Radio, Transistors, Computers,) 1930+ … (a) (Ongoing.) THE CENTURY OF THE JEWISH COUNTER-REVOLUTION AGAINST DARWIN AND DARWINIAN CIVILIZATION

    1. Marxism(1850+): To cast jewish condition as a universal condition. To undermine cooperation between the classes. To undermine white ascent into capital concentration.
    2. Freudianism(90′-20’s): To undermine Darwin and Instincts
    3. Boasianism(10-20’s): To undermine Darwin and integration
    4. Cantor and Bohr: To undermine mathematical realism.
    5. Neo-Marxism(50’s+): To undermine Darwinian Cultural Homogeneity.
      (Max Horkheimer, Theodor W. Adorno, Erich Fromm, and Herbert Marcuse, Antonio Gramsci)
    6. Feminism(60’s+): To undermine Darwin and the Family.
    7. Postmodernism(70’s+): To undermine Darwin,Truth, Science, Reason.
    8. HBD-Denialism(80’s+): To blatantly deny Darwin and Evolution
    9. Identitarianism(90’s+): To undermine the Darwinian White Peoples

    THE GROUP STRATEGY OF THE LEFT: DEFEAT DARWIN TO FACILITATE SEPARATISM. The entire ideology of the left is to resist integration, to preserve their parasitic group strategy, to preserve their female means of undermining, to deny the Darwinian revolution and the necessity of paternal, hierarchical, market meritocratic consumption and reproduction. All political conflict is reducible to this question The right practices markets in everything: darwinian evolution. The ideological left denies evolutionary pressure exists. The theological right only debates its cause. This is why the right is ‘right’ even if for the wrong reason. LEFT: Maternal, equalitarian, dysgenic devolutionary -vs- RIGHT: Paternal, meritocratic, eugenic evolutionary. Revolt. Separate. Continue to Speciate. or Return to our ancestral means of conquest, rule, and darwinian domestication of man by markets.THE PURSUIT OF NON-FALSE RELIGION P-Law is compatible with religion. It’s that (a) Abrahamic religion is incompatible with testimonial truth; (b) testimonial truth is necessary to suppress de-civilization, destruction, and conquest by islam, judaism, and jewish marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and evolutionary science denialism – the purpose of which is to prevent continued transcendence of many into gods with european understanding of the language and words of the gods: math, science, the laws of nature, and the natural law of man; (c) nature thanks, ancestor thanks, civilizational-hero thanks, archetype thanks, the stoic method of virtue and mindfulness, and the epicurean philosophy, invented by europeans, constitute the only non-false religion we know of other than east asian ancestor worship, buddhist mindfulness, confucian wisdom, and ethnocentrism: self-love. We cannot produce a body of law free of falsehood, and that restores unification of church and state, with a religion compatible with the physical, natural, and transcendent laws, that closes the door to another body of undermining with the Abrahamic, female method of destruction of civilization by false promise of unwarrantable freedom from laws of nature, natural law of man, and necessity of evolutionary transcendence of man, baiting into hazard, creating conflict between the elites, classes, genders, and generations, destroying the informational, institutional, civil, familial, commons upon which our high trust civilization depends – and profiting from the managed decline. The only difficulty in this process is that christians resist the final reformation of their religion out of abrahamic deceit and into the imitation of Jesus – the invention of the feminine god of those who suffer – compatible with european civilization’s masculine gods, regardless of their names: Washington, Caesar, Jupiter, Dius, Zeus, Ziu, Tyr, Tiwaz, Dayus Pitar “sky father”; Alexander, Mercury, Thor; And the rest – “the gods of those who joy”.

  • “You’re Confusing Anti-Semitism (genetics) with Anti-Abrahamism (‘argument’)”

    “You’re Confusing Anti-Semitism (genetics) with Anti-Abrahamism (‘argument’)” https://propertarianism.com/2020/03/03/youre-confusing-anti-semitism-genetics-with-anti-abrahamism-argument/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-03 12:58:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1234825545575256065