Curt Doolittle

Theme: Religion

  • THE P PROGRAM AND OUR PURPOSES Bill Joslin has always been as interested in the

    THE P PROGRAM AND OUR PURPOSES

    Bill Joslin has always been as interested in the application of P to personal philosophy, as I have been interested in religion (mindfulness), politics, and law. This division of labor has helped expand our collective reach – and bill’s role as “the Professor” led to the production of our best people.

    Likewise, Luke Weinhagen is exploring another avenue, and we have had people spin off into all sorts of other interests -although it’s humorous at how deterministic their attempts to alternative personal and political agendas have been.

    P is a METHOD. That method completes the spectrum of the sciences because P is to sentient sciences as Math is to Physical sciences: the means of calculation, of constant relations from which we can produce subsequent deduction, inference, abduction, and creativity.

    Using human logical facility, mathematics, and P we we can articulate the social order that’s least divergent from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. The least divergent from physical, natural and evolutionary laws, the more advantage we have in maintaining the optimum quality of life as we continue to calculate by market discovery using continuous trial and error, the means of maintaining our advantage, in our race with the red queen and her evolutionary competition in this brief period of geological and astronomical peace.

    The P-Constitution is constructed by the application of that method, because a universal militia, using sovereignty, reciprocity, rule of law by the common law of tort, and the markets in everything that result, and the production of commons from the surpluses, that was incrementally discovered by accident by our ancestors is the optimum human social order for continuous calculation.

    Although it comes at a price: increasing demand for mindfulness, increasing demand for intolerance, increasing responsibility for commons, and the suppression of those who cannot maintain cadence with our evolution by success in those markets.

    We have to know the reasons for western success in the ancient and modern worlds. Knowing them, we have to use them to defeat the second abrahamic attack on our civilization, and renew our resistance to eastern tyranny, as well as our own vulnerability because of our tolerance. And we have to restore our institutions so that we continue our transcendence into the gods we imagine – and be mindful, fit, and prosperous during our ascent.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-23 09:00:00 UTC

  • “There’s no problem with Christianity. We just don’t want parasites to be able t

    —“There’s no problem with Christianity. We just don’t want parasites to be able to use Christianity to bait into moral hazard like they have before.”—Nate Sutton

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-22 18:23:00 UTC

  • WE DIFFER IN PRIORITY NOT IN PURPOSE My argument is that the faithful cannot aba

    WE DIFFER IN PRIORITY NOT IN PURPOSE

    My argument is that the faithful cannot abandon belief, and the rational cannot adopt faith – and that the tendency in favor of either is demonstrably genetic as well as cultural in origin.

    We cannot legislate belief or unbelief. So all we can do is trade. Traditionally european civilization has practiced trifunctionalism: the militiary-masculine(dominance)-political, and the commercial-judicial, and the religious-feminine(submissive)-familial.

    And as such we can trade loyalty to one another under natural law. The law is empirical and reciprocal and trade is the only possible means of reciprocity between the aristocratic-martial and the noble-faithful.

    The purpose here is to (a) remind both parties that we have always been tri-functional, and it is part of our success, (b) that the difference is priority between Pagan (heroic) martial, heathen(scientific) legal, and christian (subservient) faithful – not a difference but a difference in priority. (c) that we can trade loyalty to one another (d) that this is what we have always done. (e) and that I can only write the law that moderates dominance-force and submission-resistance with scientific law.

    I am a heathen(judicial-nature) first, a pagan(martial-war) second, and a christian(faith-love) third. But I am all three. Because that is my ROLE in civilization.

    Each of us that ‘cares’ fulfills a role in the hierarchy of the three competing groups of elites. We advance a strategy under elites of Martial-Defense, Legal-Scientific, or Faithful-Resistance

    Six Permutations of Priority:

    M=Martial .. L=Legal …. F= Faithful

    M L F …. …. L F M …. …. F L M

    M F L …. …. L M F …. …. F M L

    We divide the labor of our civilization, not by exclusivity but by priority of our three weapons of influence.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-22 18:21:00 UTC

  • Propertarian Society = Western Civilization Prior to our Infection by the second

    Propertarian Society = Western Civilization Prior to our Infection by the second abrahamic undermining of mankind. https://t.co/2SQnqtvRdI

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-22 13:23:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1252951077600755712

  • It wasn’t europeans that developed global religion, global marxism, global socia

    It wasn’t europeans that developed global religion, global marxism, global socialism, global cosmopolitanism, global postmodernism, global hbd-denialism, or europeans that undermined rule of law.

    It was feminine intuition, and people of it, that cannot scale.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-18 20:58:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1251616222082408454

    Reply addressees: @JonHaidt @berggruenInst

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1251615773195411457

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @JonHaidt @berggruenInst Consensus, getting heads together, leadership, these are all village-thinking. The female intuition doesn’t scale. We have institutions and rule of law of tort for a reason – it scales, at the cost of suppressing the reproduction of the underclasses, keeping natural selection.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1251615773195411457

  • Judaism, Christianity, Islam in the old world, Marxism, Socialism, Postmodernism

    Judaism, Christianity, Islam in the old world, Marxism, Socialism, Postmodernism, Denialism in the Modern world – the revolt by the cognitively feminine underclass dysgenic against the cognitively masculine middle and upper class eugenic civilizations of east and west. 2k yr War.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-18 20:24:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1251607632235945986

    Reply addressees: @DuchesneRicardo

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1251583017971331072

  • Games are escapism. That’s the equivalent asking for faith to be taken out of re

    Games are escapism. That’s the equivalent asking for faith to be taken out of religion, or class warfare to be taken out of politics.

    The commons (public), the involuntarily private (broadcast), the private (computer games, the living room, the bedroom, your fantasies.)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-18 20:17:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1251605824130224128

    Reply addressees: @buldursgait @DeguTanya @BepDelta @Dark_TossEX @MarfamSilva @paxchristus0 @ReadLinkola

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1251604788275564545

  • Brandon Hayes sorry to bother you with this but do you have a collection that ag

    Brandon Hayes sorry to bother you with this but do you have a collection that aggregates my anti-philoosphy or anti-theology posts? (Doing that one. Doing Math. Doing AI.)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-17 11:50:00 UTC

  • Just as french write informal universalist secular theology of the feminine, and

    Just as french write informal universalist secular theology of the feminine, and germans write formal universalist philosophy that is secular theology of harmony, the russians write masculine very informal nationalist propaganda as a secular theology of the masculine. These are the result of geographic location and cultural history.

    While yes my implementation of rule of law is pretty intolerant, and I jokingly refer to my work as either rule of law fascism or market fascism, and while I advocate for nationalism, and restoration of the anglosphere – remains of the british empire – to create the scale necessary for preservation of the defense of the sea trade between our continents – my work is also in large part dispassionate.

    So where duggin has his ambitions, writes, speaks, and argues passionately and romantically in what I consider nonsense-propaganda, I write in pretty rigorous analytic argument dispassionately and unromantically. And this lack of romance and passion – my anglo empiricism – is not what the passionate market wants me wo write. What the young passionate male mind wants is an heroic and often esoteric secular-religious vision. Yet I’m just updating the founding fathers, with their formality and martial reserve.

    So in that sense whether french feminine passive aggressive essay, german rational inspirational harmony, russian low trust machismo, and anglo high trust empirical, and chinese face-before-truth authoritarian, or jewish feminine undermining using magical thinking to bait into hazard, we are all arguing for our futures in a world returning to normal after a century of jewish intellectual pseudoscience and sophistry in marxism, syndicalism, postmodernism, feminism, libertarianism, neoconservatism – a sequence of attempts by the jewish counter-revolution against the empirical revolution and it’s darwinian consequences. They sought to capture europa for their ends just as the french, germans, and russians sought to capture it for their ends. They have failed. Or it will be evident shortly that they failed.

    So I see the world differently, that we are all turning to the masculine defense of our peoples and cultures after the undermining and destruction of the leftist feminine attempts to use european wealth, and christian tolerance, to turn the world into another middle eastern equalitarian desert under totalitarian feminine presumption that knitting-circle consensus and harmony is possible, or that continued knitting circle gossip and undermining among usurers of our civilization is possible. It isn’t. It’s Magical thinking.Updated Apr 17, 2020, 7:54 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-17 07:54:00 UTC

  • LOYALTY (from elsewhere) Very smart fellow and intellectually honest. Pleasure d

    LOYALTY

    (from elsewhere)

    Very smart fellow and intellectually honest. Pleasure discussing this with you.

    —“When I brought up the religiosity of the US founders I was referring only to a very basic common principle: that morality, and its subgenre of political law, must be grounded in God by a logical necessity (hence the ‘God-given’ ‘inalienable rights’). This is a philosophical truth that Catholicism specifically built into European civ. and consequently handed down to our Protestant and Deist founders”–

    Well, it’s in our law which predates christianity by over two thousand years.

    Christian: God has given us his son jesus as his prophet, and first among his laws is to live in imitation of jesus and according to his teachings – teachings we call christian morality: to love thy neighbor as thyself,

    Deist: God has given us the evidence of his hand: the physical laws of nature(the physical sciences), the natural law of reciprocity (morality), the law of christian love (christianity), and the law of evolutionary necessity (transcendence).

    Scientist: Whether a god exists or not these are the laws evident in the universe: the physical laws of nature(the physical sciences), the natural law of reciprocity (morality), the law of seduction into reciprocity (christianity), and the law of evolutionary necessity (transcendence).

    The human brain evolved to distribute between feminine and empathic to raise children in small numbers and masculine and systematizing to govern polities in large numbers. Each of us regardless of sex, has a mix of feminine and masculine intuitions. For those of you with more feminine cognition, the empathic is necessary – you must feel the spirituality. For those of us who are in the middle – practical – we must only undrestand that the norm works and imitate it. For those of us who are entirely masculine, we feel nothing, find faith childish, find norms arbitrary, and seek the science in faith and norm – because we cannot feel, we cannot just imitate, we can only calculate.

    Throughout our history we have practiced Trifunctionalism: The martial aristocracy, the Religion of the Faithful, and the Judicial law to resolve our differences. We have always had three leadership groups: violence, law, and faith. Women and the faithful cannot think as men. Men and the empirical cannot think as women and the faithful. But by obeying the judicial law we can still cooperate despite our thinking.

    There is no place for truth in faith or it would not be faith. There is no place for faith in truth or it would not be truth. There is no place for violence in either. As such we are left with the law to judge our differences.

    Men and women can be loyal to one another. Men and women of feminine mind can marry. Men and women of practical mind can marry. Men and women of systematizing mind can marry. And under our law any combination in between – because loyalty is enough.

    Likewise the faithful, judicial, and martial can be loyal to one another.

    As we always have been. And both succeed.

    Or we cannot and both fail.

    And my name is Caesar so to speak. And my job is the law. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-16 21:15:00 UTC