Curt Doolittle

Theme: Religion

  • Don’t Come to A Juridical Scientist and Try to Justify Abrahamic Religions – You Can’t. They’re Frauds.

    Jan 7, 2020, 4:42 PM

    —“Wrong.”—Oussama Dib II

    That’s not an argument. And I pretty much never get it wrong.

    —“What historical facts prove that? And refering Arabs for Dictatorship Wisdom Lit of predation? Did you know well Arabs and their history? The good and bad..?”—Oussama Dib II

    WHAT HISTORICAL FACTS? TRY THESE: 1) What is the source of decidability in islam? (A Supernatural Authoritarian Deity.) 2) Did islam spread by the sword, justifying conquest by the sword, and tax coercion? (Sword, conquest and tax). 3) What was the consequence for north african, egyptian, levantine, greek, byzantine, anatolian, persian, and NW indian cvilizations? What happend to islam after 1200? What are genetic demographics under islam? Literacy? medicine? Science? Engineering? Technology? Why did mesopotamia start first and end last? Why did the levant begin first and was it passed by every other civilization other than africa? (Dysgenia, ignorance, hyperconsumption of all accumulated cultural, institutional, and civilizational capital) …. IS THIS TRUE OR FALSE? CIVILIZATIONAL WISDOM LITERATURES: Author—–Metaphysics——–Grammar—————– Aristotle:….Real/Natural:………….Science (Decidability) Law Plato:………Ideal/Natural:………….Sophistry (Justification) Philo Confucian: Real/Myth-Natural:….~Reason(Harmony) Reason Hindu:……..Unreal/Supernatural..Wisdom (Harmony) Mytho. Persian……Unreal/Supernatural…Wisdom (?) Mytho/Philo. Egyptian….Unreal/Supernatural…Wisdom (Order) Mytho. Semitic:…..Unreal/Supernatural:..Fraud(Authority) Theo. (Grammar: paradigms, vocabulary, logic, grammar) We are forever bound by the grammars of our wisdom literatures. …. IS THIS TRUE OR FALSE? WE INVENTED TRUTH AND THEY INVENTED LYING IN RESPONSE ……Female and Semitic vs Male and European …………………Dysgenics vs Eugenics …………….Consumption vs Capitalization ….Private Consumption vs Commons Production ……………..Undermining vs Order …Approval/Disapproval vs True/False ………….Incrementalism vs zero tolerance …..Plausible Deniability vs Warranty ……………………..GSRRM vs Truth Regardless of Cost ……………………..Critique vs Falsification …………………………Pilpul vs Justification …………….False Promise vs Promise ……..Baiting into Hazard vs Offers of Reciprocity ……………………One Herd vs Many Packs Why was lying (fraud) using supernatural authoritarianism developed in only one place, by one people, and why was it spread by undermining (judaism), deception (christianity), and violence (islam)? Over time, Technology, Economics and Genetics tell the truth where men universally lie. I don’t make errors. Ever. It’s my job.

  • Don’t Come to A Juridical Scientist and Try to Justify Abrahamic Religions – You Can’t. They’re Frauds.

    Jan 7, 2020, 4:42 PM

    —“Wrong.”—Oussama Dib II

    That’s not an argument. And I pretty much never get it wrong.

    —“What historical facts prove that? And refering Arabs for Dictatorship Wisdom Lit of predation? Did you know well Arabs and their history? The good and bad..?”—Oussama Dib II

    WHAT HISTORICAL FACTS? TRY THESE: 1) What is the source of decidability in islam? (A Supernatural Authoritarian Deity.) 2) Did islam spread by the sword, justifying conquest by the sword, and tax coercion? (Sword, conquest and tax). 3) What was the consequence for north african, egyptian, levantine, greek, byzantine, anatolian, persian, and NW indian cvilizations? What happend to islam after 1200? What are genetic demographics under islam? Literacy? medicine? Science? Engineering? Technology? Why did mesopotamia start first and end last? Why did the levant begin first and was it passed by every other civilization other than africa? (Dysgenia, ignorance, hyperconsumption of all accumulated cultural, institutional, and civilizational capital) …. IS THIS TRUE OR FALSE? CIVILIZATIONAL WISDOM LITERATURES: Author—–Metaphysics——–Grammar—————– Aristotle:….Real/Natural:………….Science (Decidability) Law Plato:………Ideal/Natural:………….Sophistry (Justification) Philo Confucian: Real/Myth-Natural:….~Reason(Harmony) Reason Hindu:……..Unreal/Supernatural..Wisdom (Harmony) Mytho. Persian……Unreal/Supernatural…Wisdom (?) Mytho/Philo. Egyptian….Unreal/Supernatural…Wisdom (Order) Mytho. Semitic:…..Unreal/Supernatural:..Fraud(Authority) Theo. (Grammar: paradigms, vocabulary, logic, grammar) We are forever bound by the grammars of our wisdom literatures. …. IS THIS TRUE OR FALSE? WE INVENTED TRUTH AND THEY INVENTED LYING IN RESPONSE ……Female and Semitic vs Male and European …………………Dysgenics vs Eugenics …………….Consumption vs Capitalization ….Private Consumption vs Commons Production ……………..Undermining vs Order …Approval/Disapproval vs True/False ………….Incrementalism vs zero tolerance …..Plausible Deniability vs Warranty ……………………..GSRRM vs Truth Regardless of Cost ……………………..Critique vs Falsification …………………………Pilpul vs Justification …………….False Promise vs Promise ……..Baiting into Hazard vs Offers of Reciprocity ……………………One Herd vs Many Packs Why was lying (fraud) using supernatural authoritarianism developed in only one place, by one people, and why was it spread by undermining (judaism), deception (christianity), and violence (islam)? Over time, Technology, Economics and Genetics tell the truth where men universally lie. I don’t make errors. Ever. It’s my job.

  • The Dissident Right Split between Abrahamists, Platonists, and Aristotelians

    Jan 8, 2020, 8:04 AM

    —“The dissident right wing is split on Aristotle and Plato. You being an Aristotelian and someone like Richard Spencer being a Platonist. Save the West with science and law for the Aristotelian vs Save the West with justification and idealism for the Platonist.”—Clown Baby @ClownBa73413423

    Correct.

    Aristotelian < Platonist < Theologian. The three grammars of cognitive development.

    1. Empathic, Narrative, Theological > 2. Rational, Ideal, Platonist > 3. Empirical Measurement Aristotelian. The brain evolves in that order. It’s not a mystery why we preserve the use all three. But why don’t other civ’s?

    1. Feel – Drag (Comfort) – Empathic, Narrative, Theological … 2. Reason – Sell (Explain) – Rational, Ideal, Platonist … … 3. Empirical – Tell (Decide) – Empirical Measurement Aristotelian

  • The Dissident Right Split between Abrahamists, Platonists, and Aristotelians

    Jan 8, 2020, 8:04 AM

    —“The dissident right wing is split on Aristotle and Plato. You being an Aristotelian and someone like Richard Spencer being a Platonist. Save the West with science and law for the Aristotelian vs Save the West with justification and idealism for the Platonist.”—Clown Baby @ClownBa73413423

    Correct.

    Aristotelian < Platonist < Theologian. The three grammars of cognitive development.

    1. Empathic, Narrative, Theological > 2. Rational, Ideal, Platonist > 3. Empirical Measurement Aristotelian. The brain evolves in that order. It’s not a mystery why we preserve the use all three. But why don’t other civ’s?

    1. Feel – Drag (Comfort) – Empathic, Narrative, Theological … 2. Reason – Sell (Explain) – Rational, Ideal, Platonist … … 3. Empirical – Tell (Decide) – Empirical Measurement Aristotelian

  • Fool Us Twice, Shame on Us.

    Jan 9, 2020, 3:54 PM Why did they invent lying? And why are we susceptible to it? Abrahamic deceit is not backward. It is an advanced technology that like viruses or cancer, that takes advantage of a natural cognitive vulnerability to empathy and suggestion to bypass reason and create addiction. The vast majority of humans have trivial agency and are merely gene machines that imitate others around them. Institutions, Myth, Tradition, Norms are all means of training extremely adaptive domesticated animals to work as a group. European Civilization Institutions: Competition between 1. Military(Duty – Hierarchy), 2. Traditional Law(Markets Meritocracy), 3. Faith (Piety – Equality) UNDERMINING 1. Darwin Undermines faith 2. Postwar Jewish Intellectuals Undermine all three. 3. Successful Disintermediation of the Military from Politics. 4. Immigration prevents reformation The West has maintained a market (not monopoly) between all three Military, Law(Markets), Faith. And they attacked all three. Everyone thinks their ‘discipline(class)’ was the core of european civilization, but it was the balance of powers between them. Like everything in the West, once we have sovereignty we have markets, and tripartism: Military, Law (market), and Faith. We would have made it without immigration. Just like Rome. But this is how the (((christians))) destroyed rome. It’s a repeat of the attack on rome by the same people. Fool us once, shame on them. Fool use twice shame on us.

  • Fool Us Twice, Shame on Us.

    Jan 9, 2020, 3:54 PM Why did they invent lying? And why are we susceptible to it? Abrahamic deceit is not backward. It is an advanced technology that like viruses or cancer, that takes advantage of a natural cognitive vulnerability to empathy and suggestion to bypass reason and create addiction. The vast majority of humans have trivial agency and are merely gene machines that imitate others around them. Institutions, Myth, Tradition, Norms are all means of training extremely adaptive domesticated animals to work as a group. European Civilization Institutions: Competition between 1. Military(Duty – Hierarchy), 2. Traditional Law(Markets Meritocracy), 3. Faith (Piety – Equality) UNDERMINING 1. Darwin Undermines faith 2. Postwar Jewish Intellectuals Undermine all three. 3. Successful Disintermediation of the Military from Politics. 4. Immigration prevents reformation The West has maintained a market (not monopoly) between all three Military, Law(Markets), Faith. And they attacked all three. Everyone thinks their ‘discipline(class)’ was the core of european civilization, but it was the balance of powers between them. Like everything in the West, once we have sovereignty we have markets, and tripartism: Military, Law (market), and Faith. We would have made it without immigration. Just like Rome. But this is how the (((christians))) destroyed rome. It’s a repeat of the attack on rome by the same people. Fool us once, shame on them. Fool use twice shame on us.

  • Yeah. But.

    —“Colonial Slavery was Cultural Appropriation from Islam”–

  • Yeah. But.

    —“Colonial Slavery was Cultural Appropriation from Islam”–

  • The Ten Commandments vs European Traditional Law Demonstrate the Abrahamic Metho

    The Ten Commandments vs European Traditional Law Demonstrate the Abrahamic Method of Deceit. https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/25/the-ten-commandments-vs-european-traditional-law-demonstrate-the-abrahamic-method-of-deceit/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-25 21:39:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265034787745681419

  • The Ten Commandments vs European Traditional Law Demonstrate the Abrahamic Method of Deceit.

    Jan 17, 2020, 10:25 AM Notice that the ten commandments say one may not steal. It does not say one may not free-ride, externalize costs, or steal. But european traditional law is complete not ‘convenient’: it says one may not free ride, externalize, or steal. Notice that the ten commandments say one may not bear false witness. They do not say one may not lie. But European traditional law is complete, not ‘convenient’: it says one may not lie – period. Notice that the ten commandments say nothing about withholding or obscuring information, about “cheating”, about “baiting into hazard”. But european traditional law is complete, not ‘convenient’: it says one must warranty one’s words and deeds against withholding or obscuring information, “cheating”, and “baiting into hazard”. Notice that the ten commandments say nothing about preventing others from free riding, externalizing, fraud, lying, thieving, harm. But european traditional law is complete, not ‘convenient’. It requires we insure by defense, of both the private and common, or we are equally to blame. Notice that Jewish law says one must treat jews reciprocally but may treat non-jews ir-reciprocally. Notice that islamic law says one may only treat muslims reciprocally but may treat non-jews ir-reciprocally. But european traditional law is complete – it grants everyone the same sovereignty. It grants local control to locals. And It prevents externalizing of costs. Non-itegration is a cost. Evangelism and conversion is a crime. Practice that externalizes no costs is no one’s business. So, this is how the Abrahamic method of deceit operates on high trust european minds, by stating very clear half truths that prohibit the obvious and trivial, but by doing so license the subtle, and egregious – it’s moral hand-waving to distract you. The Abrahamic technique of false promise, hiding behind moral pretense, under cover of plausible deniability, defended by sophistry is as ADVANCED a method of DECEPTION against high trust european people, as REASON, EMPIRICISM, and SCIENCE are a method of falsification of the ignorance, error, bias, and deceits of low trust non-european people Once you see it you can’t unsee it. You see it everywhere. In ever sentence. Everything the enemy says is that sounds anything like truth is always and everywhere a half truth obscuring a lie – or it wouldn’t be said. The only problem we face is our own religion is still infected with pilpul and dogma when imitating Jesus’ love and presuming god’s love is all that is necessary. There is nothing else to be said. Christianity asks us to create a universal family by extending familial love to all that we can possibly do so in good conscience. In doing so, we create the optimum extended high trust, and trustworthy family. This is the common person’s version of Hellenic, Italic, Germanic civilization’s political strategy in the language of the weak, women and children.