Theme: Religion

  • Germanic religion, in so far it can be called that, wasn’t in any way centralize

    Germanic religion, in so far it can be called that, wasn’t in any way centralized. https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/29/germanic-religion-in-so-far-it-can-be-called-that-wasnt-in-any-way-centralized/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 23:15:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266508588777955330

  • Germanic religion, in so far it can be called that, wasn’t in any way centralized.

    Feb 26, 2020, 12:42 PM Martin Štěpán Germanic religion, in so far it can be called that, wasn’t in any way centralized. There was no organization and no book every tribe would have. Every tribe’s version could slowly evolve and diverge, especially if they didn’t come into contact. What we have comes from Iceland written after Christianity was already in place. Even though the gods were shared and Odin does appear to be the head of the pantheon everywhere (Tacitus – central European Germanics, Geoffrey of Monmouth – Saxons) but who knows how the personalities and the stories might have differed. Bill Joslin fight fire with fire, and psychopomp with psychopomp. P, in clarifying the reality of the socio-economic world, turns the wheel of gods, one more rotation back to tyr. law, born of martial culture which domesticates .. a natural response to Fenrir breaking his chains to race across the sky undoing the domestication of our animal nature. Bill Smith This. This is good. Curt. Yeah, Bill has a thing there. That’s a good thing.

  • Germanic religion, in so far it can be called that, wasn’t in any way centralized.

    Feb 26, 2020, 12:42 PM Martin Štěpán Germanic religion, in so far it can be called that, wasn’t in any way centralized. There was no organization and no book every tribe would have. Every tribe’s version could slowly evolve and diverge, especially if they didn’t come into contact. What we have comes from Iceland written after Christianity was already in place. Even though the gods were shared and Odin does appear to be the head of the pantheon everywhere (Tacitus – central European Germanics, Geoffrey of Monmouth – Saxons) but who knows how the personalities and the stories might have differed. Bill Joslin fight fire with fire, and psychopomp with psychopomp. P, in clarifying the reality of the socio-economic world, turns the wheel of gods, one more rotation back to tyr. law, born of martial culture which domesticates .. a natural response to Fenrir breaking his chains to race across the sky undoing the domestication of our animal nature. Bill Smith This. This is good. Curt. Yeah, Bill has a thing there. That’s a good thing.

  • What Is A Non False Religion?

    —“What is a non-false religion?— from twitter.

    One that is not in conflict with Laws of Nature, Natural Law, or continued evolution of man (the Law of Transcendence), into omniscience, omnipotence, and immortality, written in the language of those laws – math, science, natural law – that teaches us debt to nature, our ancestors, their heroes, those laws, and adherence to those laws. That is the perfect, non false, religion. The Pursuit of Non-False Religion P-Law is compatible with religion. It’s that (a) Abrahamic religion is incompatible with testimonial truth; (b) testimonial truth is necessary to suppress de-civilization, destruction, and conquest by islam, judaism, and jewish marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and evolutionary science denialism – the purpose of which is to prevent continued transcendence of many into gods with european understanding of the language and words of the gods: math, science, the laws of nature, and the natural law of man; (c) nature thanks, ancestor thanks, civilizational-hero thanks, archetype thanks, the stoic method of virtue and mindfulness, and the epicurean philosophy, invented by europeans, constitute the only non-false religion we know of other than east asian ancestor worship, buddhist mindfulness, confucian wisdom, and ethnocentrism: self-love. We cannot produce a body of law free of falsehood, and that restores unification of church and state, with a religion compatible with the physical, natural, and transcendent laws, that closes the door to another body of undermining with the Abrahamic, female method of destruction of civilization by false promise of unwarrantable freedom from laws of nature, natural law of man, and necessity of evolutionary transcendence of man, baiting into hazard, creating conflict between the elites, classes, genders, and generations, destroying the informational, institutional, civil, familial, commons upon which our high trust civilization depends – and profiting from the managed decline. The only difficulty in this process is that christians resist the final reformation of their religion out of abrahamic deceit and into the imitation of Jesus – the invention of the feminine god of those who suffer – compatible with european civilization’s masculine gods, regardless of their names: Washington, Caesar, Jupiter, Dius, Zeus, Ziu, Tyr, Tiwaz, Dayus Pitar “sky father”; Alexander, Mercury, Thor; And the rest – “the gods of those who joy”.

  • What Is A Non False Religion?

    —“What is a non-false religion?— from twitter.

    One that is not in conflict with Laws of Nature, Natural Law, or continued evolution of man (the Law of Transcendence), into omniscience, omnipotence, and immortality, written in the language of those laws – math, science, natural law – that teaches us debt to nature, our ancestors, their heroes, those laws, and adherence to those laws. That is the perfect, non false, religion. The Pursuit of Non-False Religion P-Law is compatible with religion. It’s that (a) Abrahamic religion is incompatible with testimonial truth; (b) testimonial truth is necessary to suppress de-civilization, destruction, and conquest by islam, judaism, and jewish marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and evolutionary science denialism – the purpose of which is to prevent continued transcendence of many into gods with european understanding of the language and words of the gods: math, science, the laws of nature, and the natural law of man; (c) nature thanks, ancestor thanks, civilizational-hero thanks, archetype thanks, the stoic method of virtue and mindfulness, and the epicurean philosophy, invented by europeans, constitute the only non-false religion we know of other than east asian ancestor worship, buddhist mindfulness, confucian wisdom, and ethnocentrism: self-love. We cannot produce a body of law free of falsehood, and that restores unification of church and state, with a religion compatible with the physical, natural, and transcendent laws, that closes the door to another body of undermining with the Abrahamic, female method of destruction of civilization by false promise of unwarrantable freedom from laws of nature, natural law of man, and necessity of evolutionary transcendence of man, baiting into hazard, creating conflict between the elites, classes, genders, and generations, destroying the informational, institutional, civil, familial, commons upon which our high trust civilization depends – and profiting from the managed decline. The only difficulty in this process is that christians resist the final reformation of their religion out of abrahamic deceit and into the imitation of Jesus – the invention of the feminine god of those who suffer – compatible with european civilization’s masculine gods, regardless of their names: Washington, Caesar, Jupiter, Dius, Zeus, Ziu, Tyr, Tiwaz, Dayus Pitar “sky father”; Alexander, Mercury, Thor; And the rest – “the gods of those who joy”.

  • The Problem

    Feb 28, 2020, 12:00 PM by Predmetsky Rosenborg

    You don’t have to be an atheist (I’m not) to see that it is impossible to produce a Christian constitution from Christian doctrine because it is impossible to produce Christian doctrine from Christian scriptures. A constitution requires clarity, which is impossible to accomplish with the religious texts of any religion.

  • The Problem

    Feb 28, 2020, 12:00 PM by Predmetsky Rosenborg

    You don’t have to be an atheist (I’m not) to see that it is impossible to produce a Christian constitution from Christian doctrine because it is impossible to produce Christian doctrine from Christian scriptures. A constitution requires clarity, which is impossible to accomplish with the religious texts of any religion.

  • Possibilities Under the Law

    One cannot legislate belief (thought) One cannot legislate unbelief (thought) One can legislate public speech (display, word, and deed) One can legislate proselytizing (sale and distribution) One can legislate against organized crime (undermining, social construction, addiction)

  • Possibilities Under the Law

    One cannot legislate belief (thought) One cannot legislate unbelief (thought) One can legislate public speech (display, word, and deed) One can legislate proselytizing (sale and distribution) One can legislate against organized crime (undermining, social construction, addiction)

  • All I see are women whining so that men will protect them.

    Feb 28, 2020, 6:01 PM

    –“Christians. Really, just take the reigns and rule already. I really don’t care how you do it if you’re trying. But you don’t seem to want to. So stop begging others to do it for you in the manner more to your liking without contributing to rule.”— Ospin88

    This is my underlying complaint about christians. I don’t believe them. All I see are women whining so that men will protect them. There was a reason it took the viking invasion and viking warriors to conduct the crusades. There was a reason the french couldn’t resist them. Christianity has only been strong when it wailing women handkerchief that inspires and licenses aryanism (heroic, expansionist, entrepreneurial, militarism). I am not the only person to say that christianity is a means of keeping the peasants pliable and working so that the aristocracy can afford expensive weaponry. Or that the only time christian banners fly is to legitimize aryanism. I mean, what separates a christian monarchy from a kingdom? The license of the church to use violence. If christianity s strong then christian men would be the first in line rather than constitutionalists and pagans, while docile christians show up and wave flags when the hard work is done. Give me a pope who defense europen civilization not the faith. Christianity is a third world religion.