Theme: Religion

  • 1) I’ve written about it and you can find it online. It’s largely that he’s tryi

    1) I’ve written about it and you can find it online. It’s largely that he’s trying to restore a version of stoicism that’s free of new age woo-woo, but he’s still incorporating the non-european (semitic) myths which consist of primitive age woo-woo. That’s why he fails.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-09 14:34:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270363746515537921

    Reply addressees: @party_blanket

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270358687140503552

  • RT @curtdoolittle: I mean, that’s the real conflict right? We dragged you all ou

    RT @curtdoolittle: I mean, that’s the real conflict right? We dragged you all out of endemic warfare, superstition, ignorance, hard labor,…

  • RT @curtdoolittle: I mean, that’s the real conflict right? We dragged you all ou

    RT @curtdoolittle: I mean, that’s the real conflict right? We dragged you all out of endemic warfare, superstition, ignorance, hard labor,…


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-09 11:46:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270321337945460736

  • African Americans, Jews, Muslims, can never have the right to self determination

    African Americans, Jews, Muslims, can never have the right to self determination in European Civilization because Abrahamists are by definition universalists – their mission is to deprive us of self determination. African americans cannot compete for economic and social status.

    Reply addressees: @jj_caroll @Weimar61369949

  • African Americans, Jews, Muslims, can never have the right to self determination

    African Americans, Jews, Muslims, can never have the right to self determination in European Civilization because Abrahamists are by definition universalists – their mission is to deprive us of self determination. African americans cannot compete for economic and social status.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-09 11:45:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270321038749044736

    Reply addressees: @jj_caroll @Weimar61369949

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270316036391424001


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @jj_caroll @Weimar61369949 If anything it’s the trauma of proximity of blacks and browns to whites, and the impossibility of competitive advantage, sexual, social status, and their resulting position as a permanent underclass.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1270316036391424001

  • Controversial Opinion: Romans (Europeans) Were Gods The roman emperors were prom

    Controversial Opinion: Romans (Europeans) Were Gods

    The roman emperors were promoted as gods since gods were all group’s (peoples) proxies for the group, and devotion to the gods was a devotion to the anthropomorphization of the people: it was the expression of loyalty. The roman demand was for loyalty to the empire, and teh roman way of life, that so man wished to join – just as people wish to join the european way of life yet again today. But at some point lesser peoples want the benefits of roman-european way of life without the demand for loyalty in exchange. This is for very simple reasons: they and their traditional methods are unable to compete for income, sexual, social, and political status – so they refuse loyalty and undermine that civilization despite wanting its benefits.

    Truth is – compartively?

    The romans were gods.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-09 09:15:00 UTC

  • A scientist testifies A philosopher opines A theologian recites Testimony: The s

    A scientist testifies

    A philosopher opines

    A theologian recites

    Testimony: The secret of western civilization.

    ===

    Andrew M Gilmour So what are the prerequisites for honest/truthful testimony?

    Ontic: Realism (Domain, Category, property/quality, Genea)

    Epistemic: Empirical (external verification)

    Logical: correspondent (comparison, relational)

    Grammatical: Etymologically consistent

    Rhetorical: Honesty (witnessing, due diligence)

    I think i’m getting closer.

    ===

    Andrew ; you’re getting stuck because you’re trying to map law (realism, action ) to philosophy (idealism, words) and philosophy is insufficient for the task.

    TRY THIS:

    Metaphysics: Premises (Action, Actionability)

    … Ontology: realism/naturalism, soft determinism, three faculties: physical, intuition, and reason, and mind as motion (no name for it in philosophical terms: experience consists of continuous recursive hierarchical temporal memory – memory of memory continuously constructed by continuous prediction from sequences of sense perception.) the problem is getting people from the observer to perception consisting of change (action) not state.

    Grammars: Communication, Speech: (Actions)

    … Meaning,

    … Stories, Explanation, Justification,

    … [List: Deflationary, Descriptive, Inflationary Grammars]

    Epistemology: Adversarialism (Actions)

    … Falsification, Due Dilligence

    … Three phases,

    … … 1 – discovery,

    … … 2 – due diligence,

    … … 3 – testimony:

    … 1. Epistemology – Discovery process):

    … Free association > Test ( Reason) > NextOrFail

    … … Hypothesis > Test (Calculation) > NextOrFail

    … … … Theory > Test (Action) > NextOrFail

    … … … … Theory > Test (Market) > NextOrFail

    … … … … … Law > Fail

    … 2. Epistemology – Due Diligence process)

    … Adversarial Survival by tests of

    … … Complete Sentences

    … … In promissory form

    … … In operational vocabulary (as actions)

    … … absent the verb to-be (is, are, was, were…)

    … … including all changes in state

    … … including all consequences of change in state

    … … from an observer’s point of view

    … … producing a series of testable transactions.

    … Where the Criteria for Truthful Speech Is:

    … Coherence Across the Dimensions Testifiable by Man,

    … in The Series:

    … … Categorically Consistent (Non-conflationary, Differences)

    … … Internally Consistent (Logical)

    … … Externally Correspondent (Empirical)

    … … Operationally Consistent (Consisting of Operational Terms that are Repeatable and Testable)

    … … Rational Choice (Consisting of Rational choice, in available time frame)

    … … Reciprocal (Consisting of Reciprocally Rational Choice)

    … With Stated Limits and Fully Accounted (Defense against cherry picking and inflation)

    … Warrantied

    … … (i)as having performed due diligence in the above dimensions;

    … … (ii)where due diligence is sufficient to satisfy the demand for infallibility;

    … … (iii)and where one entertains no risk that one cannot perform restitution for.

    As a Defense Against the Series:

    … Ignorance and Willful Ignorance;

    … Error and failure of Due Diligence;

    … Bias and Wishful Thinking;

    … And the many Deceits of:

    … … (a) Loading and Framing;

    … … (b) Suggestion, Obscurantism, and Overloading and Propaganda;

    … … (c) Fictionalisms of Sophisms, Pseudorationalisms, Pseudoscience, and Supernaturalism;

    … … (d) and outright Fabrications (fictions).

    … In Defense or Advocacy Of:

    … Any transfer that is not reciprocal, the tests of:

    … … (a) productive

    … … (b) fully informed, fully accounted

    … … (c) warrantied and within the limits of liability

    … … (d) voluntary

    … … (e) free of externality of the same criteria

    … Including but Not Limited To

    … The Series of:

    … … (a) murder,

    … … (b) harm, damage, theft,

    … … (c) fraud, fraud by omission, fraud by indirection,baiting into hazard

    … … (d) free riding, socialization of losses, privatization of commons,

    … … (e) rent seeking, monopoly seeking, conspiracy, statism/corporatism,

    … … (f) conversion(religion/pseudoscience),

    … … (g) displacement(immigration/overbreeding),

    … … (h) conquest (war).

    … 3. Epistemology – Testimony process.

    … … Adversarial competition between Search and Test.

    … … Search Criteria

    … … … Narrative

    … … Test Criteria

    … … … Operationalism: Actions

    … … … … Testimony in operational terms (one continuous consistent commensurable system of falsifiable measurement, consisting of a fully accounting, of a series of transactions (stories) of changes in state.)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-08 15:19:00 UTC

  • So again, joyce meyer goes through all sorts of therapy to get over a horrific c

    So again, joyce meyer goes through all sorts of therapy to get over a horrific childhood, becomes a preacher, and I listen to her preach now and then, and it’s just cognitive behavioral therapy using christian prose and god’s love, and it’s fking brilliant. IMO that’s perfect. most people I listen to are appealing to authority. They’re either mindless parrots, shallow pretenders, seeking attention. status, power. They’re horrible or even evil. Listening to this woman I never have the ‘cringe’ feeling that my people are being lied to or made ignorant – they’re being encouraged, educated, and emotionally empowered, in the very simple language of jesus in modern theraputic mode.

    Now, talking to a friend the other day who is working on a reformed stoicism-epicureanism with aurelius as teh figure head, and I hope it works. Because that’s what the mainstream need.

    Those of us able and willing to take on the world, and bend it to our will in the aryan tradition – we don’t need anything other than knowledge. We already have agency.

    UPDATE:

    I’m making the SINGLE POINT that the fundamental purpose of rligion is mindfulness and mindfulness is produced by cognitive behavioral therapy, and that we have discovered a range of CBT, and that submissive religion is ONLY one of them. The differnce is that the jesus character was revolutionary and provided the submissive and the underclasss a means of heroic virtue which as a consquence increased trust. The problem was the jews converted a perfect underclass religion to a political weapon to undermine the empires, and church converted that wapong to an institution that destroyed empirical european sense making, and greek and roman thought. The question I have is how to presereve the good and eliminate the bad, and what I see in this kind of ‘preacher’ is that. If you have enough agency to go without a submissive religion then the natural religions of teh euopean peoples are vastly superior – particularly stoicism-epicureanism, and aristotalianism-aryanism.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-08 09:04:00 UTC

  • THE MASCULINE: Homer, Alexander(Achilles), Aristotle, THE MIDDLE: Aurelius( Stoi

    THE MASCULINE: Homer, Alexander(Achilles), Aristotle,

    THE MIDDLE: Aurelius( Stoicism, Epicurus), Ancestors, and Heroes,

    THE FEMININE Jesus and Saints

    THE CHILDREN: The Animistic Myths, the Prince-Princess Myths, The Celtic-Germanic-nordic-english-slavic fairy tales and myths, The greek heroic myths.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-08 08:57:00 UTC

  • A scientist testifies A philosopher opines A theologian recites Testimony: The s

    A scientist testifies

    A philosopher opines

    A theologian recites

    Testimony: The secret of western civilization.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-08 07:07:00 UTC