Theme: Religion

  • Comments on Weinstein Brothers and Taleb

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XxlVAbc1Vjo THE PROCESS UNDERFOOT IS THE SECOND ABRAHAMIC DESTRUCTION OF CIVILIZATION FROM WITHIN BY FALSE PROMISE OF FREEDOM The “process that’s afoot in the world” is systematic postwar de-Prussianization of sensemaking (European martial, scientific, and technological sense-making), so that advanced technological civilizations are possible for the many who must function in it at all levels. And where those of us who are intellectually exceptional will succeed at innovation anyway, as we have in Europe across all time. What ‘you’ can’t tolerate is the loyalty (and piety) that must be demonstrated to the vast majority who require that Prussian Discipline. It is those people that make the civilization function. It’s those of us who are intellectual elites that give them to tools. Most influential professor I ever said (not that I had many) said to me “The world is not made for us. It is made for them, and it must be. We can only help them.” That was his version of ‘We are but tiny riders on large and willful elephants’. ACADEMY I couldn’t have succeeded in the Academy because there is no advantage to graduate serfdom, and cross-disciplinary research that takes a minimum of ten years to produce a meaningful output is intolerable to the system – the same reason Higgs gave that he wouldn’t survive in the system today. I made a fortune intead and it’s the only reason I can speak the unvarnished truth about every taboo, learn from defeating them, and produce law, policy, and institutions to restore Prussian(martial, duty), Anglo (legal scientific), European(primacy of man, by commons, reciprocal, truthful speech, high trust), sense-making, and Aesthetics (Greco Italian primacy, heroism, and tragedy of man). TALEB What Nassim gets wrong, and what you are getting wrong, is that the solution to the problem of the postwar age is the restoration of the traditional European martial demand for Truthful, Reciprocal, Warrantable, Speech in public, enforced by law. He still can’t face the fact that his project, if he completed it, would require two admissions: (a) that the information necessary for a mathematical estimation of the information necessary to predict a black swan event will require a unit of measurement not achievable without an artificial intelligence to create a standard of computational measure. (b) that the only ‘skin in the game’ possible is warranty of due diligence within the limits of restitutability. In other words: traditional European natural law of tort against interests BOTH private AND common. WHAT’S LEFT OF THE USA What’s left of the US? They’re the Middle America that you despise. They’re still Germanic. They’re still loyal. They still do their duty. They’re still disciplined. They’re everything the postwar Jewish thought leadership brought here to the states has done everything possible to destroy those values. For the same reason, ancestors wouldn’t make a gesture of fealty to Rome. The Undermining of Sense-Making, and Civilization version two: Boaz, Freud, Marx, Mises (yes), Cantor (yes), Bohr (yes), Adorno-Fromm (et all), Gramsci, Derrida, Friedan, Rand-Rothbard, Trotsky-Strauss-Kristol (et all), and yes, the Weinsteins who claim that they are followers of the European tradition rather than the postwar Jewish tradition to destroy it like every other host civilization: The traditional Jewish rebellion against realism, naturalism, decidability, testimony, reason, reciprocity, duty, and commons. Science = Legal Testimony under realism, naturalism, operationalism, and reciprocity. That’s why only Europeans discovered it. THE LEFT’S STRATEGY IS JUST JUDAISM > CHRISTIANITY > MARXISM > NEOMARXISM The strategy in that’s being used is the institutionalization of the female strategy of undermining alphas in the Abrahamic Religions: Jewish, Christian, Islam: Claiming aristocracies are oppressors for discovery, adaptation to, and application of the physical, natural and evolutionary laws, and selling the unwarrantable, plausibly deniable, false promise (seduction), of freedom from oppression by those laws using the deceptions of Pilpul(sophistry, denial, relativism, preference before truth,), Critique(undermining, straw-manning, and heaping of undue praise vs arguing the central premises in pursuit of the truth). They’re repeating the Christianization of the west with the false promise in this life rather than the next, in exchange for destroying the civilization that makes their rebellion possile. And yes I know why everyone is terrified of debating me. I’m even less ‘tolerable’ than Taleb. 😉

  • Tolerating the Truth of Physical, Natural, Evolutionary Laws

    TOLERATING THE TRUTH OF PHYSICAL, NATURAL, EVOLUTIONARY LAWS We need:

    1. The Aristotle/Law (Truth) to know it;
    2. The Epic cycle/Paganism/Tragedy (Strong) to fight for it,
    3. The Arthurian/chivalry(Middle) to govern under it;
    4. and Christianity(Meek) to suffer it.
    The meek are left out of the European pagan pantheon – they are the slaves – those to be conquered, domesticated like animals, and used like animals, to advance the aristocracy that advances the laws of nature and nature’s god. Christianity provides the meek with honor and status and virtue.
  • Tolerating the Truth of Physical, Natural, Evolutionary Laws

    TOLERATING THE TRUTH OF PHYSICAL, NATURAL, EVOLUTIONARY LAWS We need:

    1. The Aristotle/Law (Truth) to know it;
    2. The Epic cycle/Paganism/Tragedy (Strong) to fight for it,
    3. The Arthurian/chivalry(Middle) to govern under it;
    4. and Christianity(Meek) to suffer it.
    The meek are left out of the European pagan pantheon – they are the slaves – those to be conquered, domesticated like animals, and used like animals, to advance the aristocracy that advances the laws of nature and nature’s god. Christianity provides the meek with honor and status and virtue.
  • CHRISTIANITY IN EUROPE WAS A RELIGION OF, FOR, AND BY THE ELITE. (Christianity =

    CHRISTIANITY IN EUROPE WAS A RELIGION OF, FOR, AND BY THE ELITE.

    (Christianity = Marxism-Postmodernism)

    “All roads lead to Rome.

    Christianity in Europe was a religion of, for, and by the elite. For example Catholic Mass was given in Latin until 1963. Did peasants speak, read or understand Latin? Not 12th century french peasants that is for damn sure. The elite nature of the church goes back to the original legitimacy of kings. When the Roman Empire collapsed there was a huge power vacuum in the conquered territories. The very small and very young Catholic Church held onto its dominance in Europe by holding onto the power of the ancient Pontiff Maximus. Kindling the ancient legitimacy and glory of Rome the Pope was the origin of authority in Christendom.

    Here we have to interject a distinction between the Eastern and western Roman empires. In the Orthodox and Eastern Church the High Priest did not trump the authority of the Kings/Emperors. But, in the West the Pontiff (Pope) did trump the authority of kings. This traditional distinction between the two could go back to Caesar being Pontiff Maximus before being Emperor. And later Constantine being King who appointed priests.

    Remember when Napoleon crowned himself Emperor? This was to signify that he stands over the authority of the pope. First off what we know today as France was not completely unified during the Middle Ages. It was actually a diverse place with a Normans, Franks, Goths, Anglo-Germanic peoples, and who could forget the Swiss.

    If we start with the two hundred years between Charlemagne and the Norman invasion of Great Britain (East Anglia) in 1066 as a measure we can be assured that peasants in Europe were still very pagan. Charlemagne (crowned by the Pope) spread the authority of the Holy Roman Empire with a sword. Charlemagne is basically the ultimate Christian warrior king for Christ. If you do some digging you will find much of his kingship was spent on horseback spreading the word by spilling blood. He traveled collected taxes and asserted his and the Churches legitimate authority.

    In Early Christian France alone there is a very very diverse group of peoples living together. So basically the average peasant would only know what they are told by the Church i.e. the divine nature of the king, the dominance of the Christ, the meaning of the divine birth, and the meaning of Christ’s death. What is interesting is the degree of which the early church in Europe actually adapted the rituals and practices of the people in Europe.

    For exapmle we even today still celebrate, May first (Beltaine), Christmas (Saturnalia), Easter(Roman New Year), and Holloween (Samhaine). Have you ever played around a May Pole? Have you ever kissed under Holly? What about drinking at the modern New Year? All of these holidays (Holy Days) were originally pagan holy days. Is it not interesting how we still celebrate them? Did you know the puritan colony of Massachusetts had laws prohibiting all of the aforementioned Holy Days on the grounds that they were in fact Pagan!

    So basically the early church appealed to the native religions of Europe by adapting their practices. Because remember, Europeans were the first conquest of the cross they had to be slowly integrated because there were far to many pagans to kill.

    So in a TLDR answer to your question a peasant in early christian France would most likely still know about the ancient religion of their forefathers. They would be practicing Christians but the practices of villages across France would be markedly different. If you ever visit France you will notice village saints or church relics across the country. The peasants would know relatively know nothing outside of their small worlds. Being illiterate and with feudal system laws in place tying people to the land there was little opportunity for people to learn much about the world out side of what the local authority figures said. Those saints were once either pagan gods or heroes now forgotten and adapted by the Church. Those relics therein were once pagan relics. This was the only way the early church was able to survive in the Pagan stronghold of Europe. Through a conquest of integration built off of the once Omnipotent authority of the Roman Empire.

    Remember Beowulf was written down in the 11th century the line between pagan and christian was still fairly thin well into the renascence. There are some, like Colin, who have even theorized that the Druids, and Pagan Kings went underground joining the church in an attempt to keep their ancient traditions alive.”

    Edit: sources:

    Viola, Frank and Greg Barna: Pagan Chritianity (2008)

    González, Justo L. (1984). The Story of Christianity: Vol. 1: The Early Church to the Reformation. San Francisco: Harper.

    Grabar, André (1968). Christian iconography, a study of its origins. Princeton University Press.

    Morris, Colin (1989). The papal monarchy : the western church from 1050 to 1250. Oxford: Clarendon.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-20 18:37:00 UTC

  • Thomas sowell taught me that the reason the catholic church succeeds in producin

    Thomas sowell taught me that the reason the catholic church succeeds in producing intellectuals is that it forces you to think in terms greater than yourself, about human organization – it’s like a military discipline against the forces of nature rather than against man.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-20 17:45:00 UTC

  • TOLERATING THE TRUTH OF PHYSICAL, NATURAL, EVOLUTIONARY LAWS We need: The Aristo

    TOLERATING THE TRUTH OF PHYSICAL, NATURAL, EVOLUTIONARY LAWS

    We need:

    The Aristotle/Law (Truth) to know it;

    The Epic cycle/Paganism/Tragedy (Strong) to fight for it,

    The Arthurian/chivalry(Middle) to govern under it;

    and Christianity(Meek) to suffer it.

    The meek are left out of the European pagan pantheon – they are the slaves – those to be conquered, domesticated like animals, and used like animals, to advance the aristocracy that advances the laws of nature and nature’s god.

    Christianity provides the meek with honor and status and virtue.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-20 17:24:00 UTC

  • Understanding the universe does not make it less wondrous. Understanding gods do

    Understanding the universe does not make it less wondrous. Understanding gods does not make them less wondrous. Understanding mankind does not make us less wondrous. I can simply bear the truth: we are alone but for the simulation of others with us in our minds.

    Reply addressees: @sharpentheacts

  • Understanding the universe does not make it less wondrous. Understanding gods do

    Understanding the universe does not make it less wondrous. Understanding gods does not make them less wondrous. Understanding mankind does not make us less wondrous. I can simply bear the truth: we are alone but for the simulation of others with us in our minds.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-19 22:01:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1284971660634988544

    Reply addressees: @sharpentheacts

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1284968596486131715

  • I don’t think my religion, if you want to call it that means much, because while

    I don’t think my religion, if you want to call it that means much, because while I talk to my god every day, and I absolutely love multiple ‘gods’ I understand their existential composition, and don’t need woo woo to explain it any more than any other experience. I understand.

    Reply addressees: @sharpentheacts

  • I don’t think my religion, if you want to call it that means much, because while

    I don’t think my religion, if you want to call it that means much, because while I talk to my god every day, and I absolutely love multiple ‘gods’ I understand their existential composition, and don’t need woo woo to explain it any more than any other experience. I understand.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-19 21:59:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1284971222741274625

    Reply addressees: @sharpentheacts

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1284968596486131715