That’s the demarcation between European and Semitic civilization. A Semitic religion of the primacy of god versus a European religion of the primacy of man. It’s not like you have a choice in the matter, or if it’s an opinion. Jews made and brought Christianity into the empire with the primacy of god over the primacy of man. Now, given the behavior of Nero et all at the time it made sense. That does not alter the fact that jews used the primacy of God and the primacy of THEIR god, as a means of denying the primacy of man, and the primacy of reality, and the joy of life in reality practiced by European man, rather than the hatred of life in the present and promise of joy in the afterlife of the jews. Everything was done in order to justify and provide incentives. Everything is explicable in natural law. Man lies to claim moral his strategy. It’s not complicated.
Theme: Religion
-
Overstatement. A minor contribution to it as the rights and methods of the arist
Overstatement. A minor contribution to it as the rights and methods of the aristocracy were slowly drawn down-class as the economy increased in complexit
Capitalism Is an abrahamic term. Instead, we have practticed corporatism rather than tribalism for five thousand years.
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-19 23:10:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1307457123266289673
Reply addressees: @bierlingm
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1307337419457548288
-
Overstatement. A minor contribution to it as the rights and methods of the arist
Overstatement. A minor contribution to it as the rights and methods of the aristocracy were slowly drawn down-class as the economy increased in complexit
Capitalism Is an abrahamic term. Instead, we have practticed corporatism rather than tribalism for five thousand years.
Reply addressees: @bierlingm -
The Revolutionary Spirit Is a Revolt Against Nature by “Undermining”
THE REVOLUTIONARY SPIRIT IS A REVOLT AGAINST NATURE BY “UNDERMINING”
E Michael Jones is perhaps the best Christian thinker working today. So he frames the Jewish revolt as against Christianity.
So change logos for laws of nature, and Christianity for indo-European discovery adaptation to, and application of laws of nature to accelerate our evolution, and that’s the difference in our positions.
Theological Christianity(Feminine, Submission) vs Scientific Aryanism (Masculine, Dominance).
The secret of European civilization, even above the Iranic and Indian, branches – both of which failed to transcend the superstitious, is the retention of the primacy of man (not god), the primacy of physical, natural, and evolutionary laws (not harmony, or peace, or dysgenics), and the primacy of the industrialization of agency at the cost of those who are unfit.
The difference between Christian and Aryan then is reducible to the Aryan treatment of the underclasses and aliens as another semi-domesticated animal to be used as necessary to transform man into gods – and the Christian treatment of the underclasses as docile workers who generate income for them and the aristocracy.
Christians don’t give up on the bottom.
Aryans do.
Both are right in their way.
The bottom has value to the transcendence of man.
The problem is Christian universalism(globalism) rather than nationalism (kin).The Jewish spirit isn’t revolutionary it’s devolutionary: the defeat of the Indo-European project to transcend man into gods – and instead to maintain and if possible reverse evolution, so that man is a domesticated animal that can be manipulated and extracted from by priests.
https://www.fidelitypress.org/book-products/the-jewish-revolutionary-spirit?
-
The Revolutionary Spirit Is a Revolt Against Nature by “Undermining”
THE REVOLUTIONARY SPIRIT IS A REVOLT AGAINST NATURE BY “UNDERMINING”
E Michael Jones is perhaps the best Christian thinker working today. So he frames the Jewish revolt as against Christianity.
So change logos for laws of nature, and Christianity for indo-European discovery adaptation to, and application of laws of nature to accelerate our evolution, and that’s the difference in our positions.
Theological Christianity(Feminine, Submission) vs Scientific Aryanism (Masculine, Dominance).
The secret of European civilization, even above the Iranic and Indian, branches – both of which failed to transcend the superstitious, is the retention of the primacy of man (not god), the primacy of physical, natural, and evolutionary laws (not harmony, or peace, or dysgenics), and the primacy of the industrialization of agency at the cost of those who are unfit.
The difference between Christian and Aryan then is reducible to the Aryan treatment of the underclasses and aliens as another semi-domesticated animal to be used as necessary to transform man into gods – and the Christian treatment of the underclasses as docile workers who generate income for them and the aristocracy.
Christians don’t give up on the bottom.
Aryans do.
Both are right in their way.
The bottom has value to the transcendence of man.
The problem is Christian universalism(globalism) rather than nationalism (kin).The Jewish spirit isn’t revolutionary it’s devolutionary: the defeat of the Indo-European project to transcend man into gods – and instead to maintain and if possible reverse evolution, so that man is a domesticated animal that can be manipulated and extracted from by priests.
https://www.fidelitypress.org/book-products/the-jewish-revolutionary-spirit?
-
—“Curt: Is there a connection between capitalism and religiosity?”—
—“Curt: Is there a connection between capitalism and religiosity?”— https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/09/19/curt-is-there-a-connection-between-capitalism-and-religiosity/
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-19 16:44:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1307359876696465409
-
—“Curt: Is there a connection between capitalism and religiosity?”—
—“Curt: Is there a connection between capitalism and religiosity?”— https://t.co/8Tc1KDvnbt
-
—“Curt: Is there a connection between capitalism and religiosity?”—
“Q: Is there a connection between capitalism and religiosity?”
Great question.
There is a relationship between the military, empiricism, rule of law, and markets that tend to favor capitalism since once you have those influence capitalism is all that one can do. That’s why Europeans invented empiricism, rule of law, markets testimony in all walks of life, and high trust: european civilization was, at least, among the aristocracy, an “army of everyone” for 5000 years. And moving up the status economic and political hierarchy meant integration into that set of values – so much so that we practiced it until 1918 without ever even writing it down as our ‘bible’ of western civilization.
There is a relationship between empiricism and atheism – which is what you would expect. Whether you mean ‘capitalism’ in the ‘free trade’ regardless of local costs, or rule of law, which produces markets within the limits of local costs, determines your understanding of it. In other words, rule of law of reciprocity will produce a mixed economy. Weak (limited) rule of law with a capitalist bias will produce the bad effects of capitalism.
There is a relationship between Christianity and building a large middle class so that one can have a modern, self-organizing economy that will function by incentives – which is the more general name of capitalism. This is why Christian countries tend to become wealthy and Islamic countries tend to become poorer and poorer. Christianity treats everyone as family and customer and treats customers as necessary to keep in order to stay in business.
However, this behavior doesn’t require religiosity. Because post-theological peoples retain those ethics. It’s only been postwar immigrants from ‘less moral’ cultures that have undermined it.
So like many ‘skills’ (arithmetic > math > geometry > calculus > analysis) or (grammar> logic > rhetoric )(physics > chemistry > biology > sentience) or (stories > novels > biographies > histories ) christian ethics appears to be a ‘stage’ through which groups must pass in order to develop an equal to high trust western civlization.
Unfortunately, that very same Christianity and high trust creates a vulnerability because it normalizes trust to a degree that individuals polities, nations, and civilizations are vulnerable to false promises and seditious behavior, as we have seen over the past seventy years.
GIVEN:
Anarchism| < – Capitalism < -… Rule of Law … -> Socialism -> |Communism
………Individual Priority…………….Equilibrium……………..Group Priority…………….
Non-Coercion…Private Corruption……………..Public Corruption… Coercion.AND GIVEN:
Masculine Strategy: Capitalism requires adversarialism (market competition).
Science, law, economics, war require costly personal responsibility for physicality.-Versus-
Feminine Strategy: Communism requires submission (absence of competition)
Religion, philosophy, public popularity, politics are cheap and the absence of physical (material) responsibility.Religiosity is determined by the following factors:
EXPERIENCE
1 – Familial, Social, Institutional indoctrination
2 – Saturation of the environment with ‘falsehoods’ by social constructionENVIRONMENT
3 – The Utility of Religiosity in the local social-political economic environment.
4 – The Utility of Religion as an organization for political resistance or change.MINDFULNESS
5 – Mindfulness(self): (a) sedating powerlessness in the world, (b) evading responsibility for the world, ( c) imaging false power in the world.
6 – Mindfulness (others): (a) resisting influence of others, (b) common non-conflict protocol for interacting with others, ( c) method of expressing dominance against others.EMOTION
7 – Empathic vs Analytic: personality trait : those people who have a higher intuition, want, or neeed, for a conflict-free (relatively) framework with others
8 – Experiential(closed) vs Intellectual(openness): personality trait: those people for whom abiilty, desirability, and status find greater security in regularity than novelty whether mental, emotional, or social. -
—“Curt: Is there a connection between capitalism and religiosity?”—
“Q: Is there a connection between capitalism and religiosity?”
Great question.
There is a relationship between the military, empiricism, rule of law, and markets that tend to favor capitalism since once you have those influence capitalism is all that one can do. That’s why Europeans invented empiricism, rule of law, markets testimony in all walks of life, and high trust: european civilization was, at least, among the aristocracy, an “army of everyone” for 5000 years. And moving up the status economic and political hierarchy meant integration into that set of values – so much so that we practiced it until 1918 without ever even writing it down as our ‘bible’ of western civilization.
There is a relationship between empiricism and atheism – which is what you would expect. Whether you mean ‘capitalism’ in the ‘free trade’ regardless of local costs, or rule of law, which produces markets within the limits of local costs, determines your understanding of it. In other words, rule of law of reciprocity will produce a mixed economy. Weak (limited) rule of law with a capitalist bias will produce the bad effects of capitalism.
There is a relationship between Christianity and building a large middle class so that one can have a modern, self-organizing economy that will function by incentives – which is the more general name of capitalism. This is why Christian countries tend to become wealthy and Islamic countries tend to become poorer and poorer. Christianity treats everyone as family and customer and treats customers as necessary to keep in order to stay in business.
However, this behavior doesn’t require religiosity. Because post-theological peoples retain those ethics. It’s only been postwar immigrants from ‘less moral’ cultures that have undermined it.
So like many ‘skills’ (arithmetic > math > geometry > calculus > analysis) or (grammar> logic > rhetoric )(physics > chemistry > biology > sentience) or (stories > novels > biographies > histories ) christian ethics appears to be a ‘stage’ through which groups must pass in order to develop an equal to high trust western civlization.
Unfortunately, that very same Christianity and high trust creates a vulnerability because it normalizes trust to a degree that individuals polities, nations, and civilizations are vulnerable to false promises and seditious behavior, as we have seen over the past seventy years.
GIVEN:
Anarchism| < – Capitalism < -… Rule of Law … -> Socialism -> |Communism
………Individual Priority…………….Equilibrium……………..Group Priority…………….
Non-Coercion…Private Corruption……………..Public Corruption… Coercion.AND GIVEN:
Masculine Strategy: Capitalism requires adversarialism (market competition).
Science, law, economics, war require costly personal responsibility for physicality.-Versus-
Feminine Strategy: Communism requires submission (absence of competition)
Religion, philosophy, public popularity, politics are cheap and the absence of physical (material) responsibility.Religiosity is determined by the following factors:
EXPERIENCE
1 – Familial, Social, Institutional indoctrination
2 – Saturation of the environment with ‘falsehoods’ by social constructionENVIRONMENT
3 – The Utility of Religiosity in the local social-political economic environment.
4 – The Utility of Religion as an organization for political resistance or change.MINDFULNESS
5 – Mindfulness(self): (a) sedating powerlessness in the world, (b) evading responsibility for the world, ( c) imaging false power in the world.
6 – Mindfulness (others): (a) resisting influence of others, (b) common non-conflict protocol for interacting with others, ( c) method of expressing dominance against others.EMOTION
7 – Empathic vs Analytic: personality trait : those people who have a higher intuition, want, or neeed, for a conflict-free (relatively) framework with others
8 – Experiential(closed) vs Intellectual(openness): personality trait: those people for whom abiilty, desirability, and status find greater security in regularity than novelty whether mental, emotional, or social. -
Path Dependence
—“I’ve just realized “path dependence” is a term also applicable to the kind of civilization that evolves based on the order of development of law, state and religion.”—Martin Stépan