RT @curtdoolittle: @Bearcat50 @Xene1042 @whatifalthist Religions. New age religions. All are just another fictionalism (story) to satisfy t…
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-10 14:58:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1788946628646158700
Religions. New age religions. All are just another fictionalism (story) to satisfy the neuroticism that arises with the emergence of consciousness among social creatures, unable to obtain mindfulness given the alienation of post tribal life, and and the uncertainty of life. The only non-false religion is individual and group debt to the universe, nature, one’s people, one’s ‘polity’, ancestors, and heroes. Everything else is quite literally a self induced, socially constructed, opiate. “Checking out” and abandoning responsibility for every single thing possible.
Reply addressees: @Bearcat50 @Xene1042 @whatifalthist
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-10 14:58:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1788946602243084288
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1788867450429161701
RT @AutistocratMS: @Areez22 @DwightExMachina @curtdoolittle In so far deities correspond to real stable relations, they’re emergent from co…
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-10 14:43:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1788942879848538547
All of these hypothesis are attempts to attribute a single origin or cause, when we’re very well aware of the various origin stories that were folded into the jesus mythos in an attempt to attribute greater ‘cosmic’ legitimacy to a minor figure who had returned to the region (we don’t know where he was), wanted to imitate john the baptist, and was a bit of a revollutionary as much against how jews treated one another as against the romans.
They had about two hundred years of my-bulding to put together the four versions of the narrative, and then even longer to elaborate on it.
Reply addressees: @demontage2000 @DwightExMachina
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-09 20:46:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1788671799934214144
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1788670990459047961
–“Judaism wasn’t a reaction to Christianity, it already existed, if not for as long as they claim, and rabbinical Judaism was merely an adaptation for becoming diasporic and in opposition to Christianity, just like Reform Judaism was a reaction to enlightenment and liberalism and Holocaustianity and Open Society were reactions to nationalism and fascism. Same pattern over and over again. But the key points of the strategy are all in the Tanakh and have remained unchanged.”– Martin Stepan
Well, technically, judaism’s implementation of the Torah, was a reaction to the greeks. So it’s always been a sequence of reactions. But so has the middle east always reacted against the indo europeans, and islam against everyone it encounters that requires higher trust and contribution to the commons making a stable government possible.
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-09 20:14:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1788663954685726720
RT @LukeWeinhagen: Why in the Four Horsemen of the Apocolypse are Conquest and War represented separately?
Because the authors and interpr…
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-09 03:34:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1788412236194594841
You are correct. Although I would argue, that it’s women and christianity in combination with postwar jewish migration and advancement of the feminine > jewish > abrahamic > marxist sequence that provided the justification for the aberrant behavior.
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-07 04:16:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787697891370205278
Reply addressees: @d6w8wxdxm6
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787677094774010321
So now we have discovered the consistently between Wolfram (physics) and Doolittle (behavior), and Werrell is attempting to explain Jones’ analysis of catholic doctrine (religion) with it.
Well this is pretty good evidence that Wolfram’s generalization and Doolittle’s operationalism are consistent and that they provide the explanatory power necessary to even explain christian metaphysics in scientific and operational terms. (And that’s unexpected and a bit, well, wierd.) 😉
Reply addressees: @WalterIII @WerrellBradley
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-06 14:32:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787490697697792000
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787481266989998377
–“Advance the right ideas: 1. Ethnonationalism, 2. Ancestor Worship, 3. The Natural law.”—@SurragoMichael https://twitter.com/SurragoMichael/status/1787086013934018930
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-05 18:02:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787181146721198231
https://twitter.com/SurragoMichael/status/1787086013934018930
RT @87Brandonr: @curtdoolittle Also look at the history of Christianity in Europe. It spread the same way Islam does today. The Christians,…
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-05 18:01:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787180713063731503