Theme: Religion

  • What will change is a restoration of difficulty in finding employment (income).

    What will change is a restoration of difficulty in finding employment (income). There is an interesting field of possibilities, from the very good to the very bad. Islam takes care of the very bad (bottom). The question is whether we can separate and create the very good.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-21 18:08:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352317120160423938

    Reply addressees: @JarvisWitts

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352316845764784130


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @JarvisWitts Well, you cant put the genii back in the bottle. What we think of traditional society evolved under agrarianism to keep the peace by redistributing Land, Labor, and Reproduction. Children are serfs and married women got some. Each age change ALL relationships.

    Farmers are gone.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1352316845764784130

  • IMO france, spain, southern italy (catholic traditional) vs north italy, germani

    IMO france, spain, southern italy (catholic traditional) vs north italy, germanic peoples (protestant martial), vs intermarium (catholic traditional slavic) vs russian (Orthodox martial traditional slavic) works fine.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-21 17:56:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352314206666829826

    Reply addressees: @JarvisWitts

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352310462994472960

  • like the jews they rely on ‘intellectuals’ for the production of laws, not natur

    like the jews they rely on ‘intellectuals’ for the production of laws, not natural law, with the only difference being the jews use a market competition attacking every institution tradition and norm indirectly, the french use the judicial academy to direct the population.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-21 17:54:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352313511771312129

    Reply addressees: @JarvisWitts

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352310462994472960

  • France is cognitively and strategically feminine, a secular version of the catho

    France is cognitively and strategically feminine, a secular version of the catholic church uses and the closest to the Abrahamic method, is the least honest and most hostile negotiating partner, the source of as many bad ideas as the Jews, and the enemy of germanic-Prussian civ.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-21 17:52:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352313111081058306

    Reply addressees: @JarvisWitts

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352310462994472960

  • The Q phenom was ridiculous, but even questioning it was akin to heresy – and br

    The Q phenom was ridiculous, but even questioning it was akin to heresy – and brought as torrid a reaction as criticizing the faith.

    Interesting in that conservatives can’t ally easily to a real person that isn’t a mirror image, but can an imaginary person.

    Same as Religions.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-21 14:24:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352260865513431044

    Reply addressees: @PeterZeihan

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1351894540509192200

  • Notes on a speech by Yual Harari

    “We limit ourselves to Property(Permission) and Range(Duty,Responsibility)” “Fictions or Narratives create a paradigm (system of measurement) of property(permission) and range(duty), creating a system of cooperative rules” “Human rights are a fiction” … that’s not really true. Those Human rights that are Natural Rights are an extension of life and phenotype. They are in fact a universal paradigm and measure. We can separate out natural rights (true) from fantasies (false). “everybody believes in money” not really true. everyoe believes in acquisition and money is the most frictionless resource for use in acqusition. “Money has no objective value”. That’s not really true. Money has no resource (commodity) value that can be directly consumed without exchange for a resoucre(commodity) that can be consumed or transformed. What does Liberalism mean: “Individualsm”… No. its self determination. the philosophy and strategy of aristoracy, and the west promised everyone the opporutnity to join it – because the west has been eugenic for its entire history. So no, it’s not individualistic. It’s rapid evolution by rapid meritocratic adaptation – and equal suppression of reproduction. It’s not liberty (permission) but self determination (reciprocity0. We believed our own promise of an aristocracy of everyone was made possible by the industrial ervolution. It wasn’t. We opened the franchise without completing the project of an aristocracy of everyone. No he doesn’t understand liberal politics. Instead if forces continuous empirical adaptation for forcing thepeople to make choices, and gain the benefits or consequences. OMG this guy is a liar or an idiot. No the highest authority is’t the customer, it’s that making erros forces changethroughut the polity. It’s continuing natural selection.  Note how he keeps making use of the word authority – showing he does not understand it. OMG he talks about duchamp. But duchamp was forcing the jewish marxist revolt against western aesthetic. that’s not liberlism. That’s jewish marxists attack on western aesthetics. Ethics: the priest determines ethics – as an authority. No that individualism judgement of aesthetics was jewish marxist introduction, not a ueropean one. “Edcaton”… the student is the highest authority. No. we are forcng them to  adapt to the laws of the universe. “Human rights a religion” No. human rights were invented to constrain postwar states to self improvement in order to prevent another world war. “China has little to offer the world” – no only jews try to offer the world with idoelogy and religion. The europeans try to EVOLVE the world materially. There are only two elites and jews are only elites because of european tolerance. “Islam has no alternative to liberalism.” No. There is no evidence that islam cannot go through a protestant reformation as they develop a middle class. I could do it. THey can do it. they have to have the NEED to do it.  

  • Notes on a speech by Yual Harari

    “We limit ourselves to Property(Permission) and Range(Duty,Responsibility)” “Fictions or Narratives create a paradigm (system of measurement) of property(permission) and range(duty), creating a system of cooperative rules” “Human rights are a fiction” … that’s not really true. Those Human rights that are Natural Rights are an extension of life and phenotype. They are in fact a universal paradigm and measure. We can separate out natural rights (true) from fantasies (false). “everybody believes in money” not really true. everyoe believes in acquisition and money is the most frictionless resource for use in acqusition. “Money has no objective value”. That’s not really true. Money has no resource (commodity) value that can be directly consumed without exchange for a resoucre(commodity) that can be consumed or transformed. What does Liberalism mean: “Individualsm”… No. its self determination. the philosophy and strategy of aristoracy, and the west promised everyone the opporutnity to join it – because the west has been eugenic for its entire history. So no, it’s not individualistic. It’s rapid evolution by rapid meritocratic adaptation – and equal suppression of reproduction. It’s not liberty (permission) but self determination (reciprocity0. We believed our own promise of an aristocracy of everyone was made possible by the industrial ervolution. It wasn’t. We opened the franchise without completing the project of an aristocracy of everyone. No he doesn’t understand liberal politics. Instead if forces continuous empirical adaptation for forcing thepeople to make choices, and gain the benefits or consequences. OMG this guy is a liar or an idiot. No the highest authority is’t the customer, it’s that making erros forces changethroughut the polity. It’s continuing natural selection.  Note how he keeps making use of the word authority – showing he does not understand it. OMG he talks about duchamp. But duchamp was forcing the jewish marxist revolt against western aesthetic. that’s not liberlism. That’s jewish marxists attack on western aesthetics. Ethics: the priest determines ethics – as an authority. No that individualism judgement of aesthetics was jewish marxist introduction, not a ueropean one. “Edcaton”… the student is the highest authority. No. we are forcng them to  adapt to the laws of the universe. “Human rights a religion” No. human rights were invented to constrain postwar states to self improvement in order to prevent another world war. “China has little to offer the world” – no only jews try to offer the world with idoelogy and religion. The europeans try to EVOLVE the world materially. There are only two elites and jews are only elites because of european tolerance. “Islam has no alternative to liberalism.” No. There is no evidence that islam cannot go through a protestant reformation as they develop a middle class. I could do it. THey can do it. they have to have the NEED to do it.  

  • Look, if you reframe Christianity as solving a terrible problem for backward peo

    Look, if you reframe Christianity as solving a terrible problem for backward people who were modernized by the roman empire, just as we modernized so many people in the colonial age, the jefferson bible is enough. it’s elegant.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-21 00:40:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352053343443709952

  • Christians hated and still hate me venomously, for my work on the Abrahamic reli

    Christians hated and still hate me venomously, for my work on the Abrahamic religions. My attempt to remove Abrahamic deceit from Christianity. And to discover how to reform Christianity and reunite it with the European Aryan tradition. Jefferson did. I have – by writing proofs. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1351701565074243585

  • You’re looking for “Truth before Face vs Face before Truth, vs Face regardless o

    You’re looking for “Truth before Face vs Face before Truth, vs Face regardless of Truth”.
    ie: west, asia, islam

    Lawyering is a good vernacular term for “the rhetorical pretense of knowledge not demonstrated” Fraud by Suggestion not yet fraud by omission or declaration.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-20 02:46:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1351722779217952768

    Reply addressees: @BillCor26578964

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1351713742862622733