Curt Doolittle

Theme: Religion

  • @GeneralJackDRipper @Graphic Quite the opposite. The evidence has spoken. The wo

    @GeneralJackDRipper@Graphic Quite the opposite. The evidence has spoken. The world economy has spoken. Evolution has spoken. Jesus gave you a gift by which to tolerate being left behind by your betters. 😉

    If there is a devil, we know his name. His hame is Abraham. He was from Ur. The Jews were his servants. The gift he gave them was the Lie. And they have lived by the use of lies for thousands of years.

    The lie of mothers to children.

    And you are the devil’s allies.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-02 01:57:09 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105817717467443700

  • @Graphic I don’t have ‘faith’. I have skepticism – the opposite. Why? I have age

    @Graphic I don’t have ‘faith’. I have skepticism – the opposite. Why? I have agency. I don’t need opportunity to be, do, or bring about ‘good’ results. So I don’t have to sedate myself with a faith. That’s what the simple, weak, and incompetent need. So where the weak have faith the strong have will. We don’t need gods. We are gods – at least by comparison to the faithful. 😉

    Only weak, stupid, cowardly people need anything other than the simple, testifiable, truth by tests of realism, naturalism, identity, internal consistency, operational possibility, external correspondence, rationality, reciprocity, parsimony, completeness, warrantability, and liability.

    The universe must produce entropy, a small percent of recombinations resist entropy, producing symmetries at stable states. The first evolution of those symmetries produced subatomic states. The second evolution of those subatomic states produced the third simple elements and produced suns. The death of suns produced the fourth set of states, and the seeding of the universe with their metals. The fifth evolution required planets, producing molecules. The sixth evolution produced biomolecules. The seventh evolution produced mutatable life. The eighth evolution produced recombinant life. And we are the result of recombinant life. The consequences of billions of years of all but infinite trial and error. Man, or at least european man, in becoming gods he imagined, is just beginning his childhood.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-02 00:07:53 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105817287782525453

  • @Graphic I don’t have ‘faith’. I have skepticism – the opposite. Why? I have age

    @Graphic I don’t have ‘faith’. I have skepticism – the opposite. Why? I have agency. I don’t need opportunity to be, do, or bring about ‘good’ results. So I don’t have to sedate myself with a faith. That’s what the simple,weak, and incompetent need. So where the weak have faith the strong have will. We don’t need gods. We are gods – at least by comparison to the faithful. 😉

    Only weak, stupid, cowardly people need other than the simple, testifaible, truth by tests of realism, naturalism, identity, internal consistency, operational possibility, externa correspondence, rationality, reciprocity, parsimony, completeness, warrantability, and liability.

    The universe must produce entropy, a small percent of recombinations resist entropy producing symmetries at stable states. The first evolution of those symmetries produced subatomic states. Those evolution of those subatomic states produced the third simple elements and produced suns. The death of suns produced the third set of states, and the seeding of the universe with their metals. The fourth evolution required planets, producing molecules. The fifth evolution produced biomolecules. The sixth evolution produced mutatable life. The seventh evolution produced recombinant life. And we are the result – of an all but infinite trial and error. Man, or at least european man, in becoming gods he imagined, is just beginning his childhood.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-02 00:02:52 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105817268071626447

  • @Graphic Can you testify to such “obvious truth” when all of our history climbin

    @Graphic Can you testify to such “obvious truth” when all of our history climbing out of the abrahamic dark age, consists of generation after generation of falseifying every single claim? No you can’t testify. Can you equate faith with a truth claim? No. you can’t. Can you claim faith despite the inability to testify? Yes you can. Are you using faith as a pretense of knowledge? Yes. Are you using your choice of faith as a pretence of competency? Yes. These are all abrahamic lies. Proving my point.

    If you want to live a lie and it makes you happy then I am happy to trade loyalty on ends despite your rather childlike means. That said, my opinino stnads, is that fundamenatlism is for stupid folk, and that it’s a good tool for stupid folk. Because it gives stupid folk confidence enough to behave by eradicating impulise, especially envy, aggression and retaliation. Jesus’ philosophy (wisdom literature) was a solution for stupid folk. But that the stupid folk’s false confidence (which you are demonstrating) made the stupid folk useful idiots for the enemy of mankind, just as wokeness is a useful tool for making stupid folk useful idiots for the enemy of mankind.

    There is no courage in faith. Faith is an act of cowardice. Buying the pretense of comprehension, to assuage the panic of one’s ignorance, lack of agency, and powerlessness. Conversely There is courage in the truth.
    Thats why so few people practice the truth. Because few of us have courage.

    Your use of the abrahamic method of lying, to defend faith, to obtain mindfulness, by the pretense of understanding, and the pretense of competency, when you really are fit for nothing other than folllowing is just a lie. It’s a comforting lie. All addicts defend their addictions with comforting lies.

    The right loses because christians pretend competence, pretend undersetanding, pretend virtue, pretend courage, but really are just a bunch of cowardly little women which is exactly why christianity was invented.

    Quod Erat Demonstrandum.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-28 16:35:28 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105809846495390423

  • @Graphic You are demonstrating my criticism of christians correct for using the

    @Graphic You are demonstrating my criticism of christians correct for using the jewish method of deceit (pilpul). What is the definition of Universe? What is the context I used it in? That one. Where did pilpul originate? Scriptural interpretation (excuse making). Where did reason originate? Tort Debate In Court (truth finding). Why did jews develop excuse making? (to claim their law was perfect and given by inviolable authority). Why did europeans develop truth? (adversarial markets in everything and continuous adaptation.)

    No more lies. No more jewish method of lying. No more use of jewish lying to try to defend jewish (christian) lies (dogma). Whats the difference between Aesop’s Fables and the Illiad and The Old and New Testament?

    They are both stories that we use to impart wisdom.

    The difference is that Aesop and Homer were truful that they were using wisdom and the jews and chrsitians were liars in in that they claimed they were stating history.

    NO MORE LIES

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-28 16:07:02 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105809734685417725

  • Never happen 😉 Deceit … … sophistry(Philosophy) > pseudoscience(magic) > ..

    Never happen 😉

    Deceit
    … … sophistry(Philosophy) > pseudoscience(magic) >
    … … (Fictionalism) > occult(Theology) >
    … Intuition ->/
    -> Paradigm[Metaphysics] ->
    … Reason ->\
    … … (Fiction) > Mythology > Literature >
    … … … History > Science > Testimony >
    Truth

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-27 17:13:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365711664369311749

    Reply addressees: @Anthroposcenics @MindTrained @BernardoKastrup

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365703363099320325

  • Having learned the biological basis of what we intuit when we refer to the soul,

    Having learned the biological basis of what we intuit when we refer to the soul, it’s possible to say ‘pretty much yes’. But unfortunately, 99% of idiots will run with that saying I’m confirming the supernatural rather than the intuition. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-26 21:53:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365419756581445638

    Reply addressees: @jskayfshd

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365411496742645760

  • Choices: 1. We are the gods in the making, and gods are stories we use to preten

    Choices:
    1. We are the gods in the making, and gods are stories we use to pretend to understand.
    2. We anthropomorphize the universe as an organism, give it the name of god, and all is emergent.
    3. Deism – the uninvolved god-universe
    4. Panetheism (Cosmotheism) beyond the universe
    5. The activist (interfering god)
    6. The many gods of various peoples
    7. The gods as supermen
    8. The animistic gods
    9. Spirits

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-26 17:36:30 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105798761893909561

  • Well, as for the foundation of a vision of the future it’s wonderful. As a found

    Well, as for the foundation of a vision of the future it’s wonderful. As a foundation of a ‘religion’ it’s beautiful. I don’t know anything about him. So I don’t know what ‘approval’ of this particular speech would infer, so I dont imply anything else.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-26 15:24:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365321727845220354

    Reply addressees: @SammySc44817825 @NonFakeNews3

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365321296729411589

  • Choices 1. We are the gods in the making, and gods are stories we use to pretend

    Choices
    1. We are the gods in the making, and gods are stories we use to pretend to understand.
    2. We anthropomorphize the universe as an organism, give it the name of god, and all is emergent.
    3. Deism – the uninvolved god-universe
    4. Panetheism (Cosmotheism) beyond the universe

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-26 14:16:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365304849286447106

    Reply addressees: @teortaxesTex @njdigregorio

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365295358713208836