Theme: Religion

@GoyJester@GrrrGraphics I was going to ignore you but again, how does that claim affect anything I’ve said? They have demonstrated this behavior all along. is the religion a product of their behavior, or their behavior aprorduct of the religion. Is there natural selection recent or ancient. AFAIK the jews were an undesirable group on the fring, and the egyptians used them precisely because they were fringe, so that they could be trusted to act in the egyptian interest. That’s why they learned to script.

Biology can change in four to six generations (look it up) selection pressure in population genetics in relatively small insular groups is absurdly rapid. So my point is that you’re blaming the religion when the evidence is the behavior (bia) persists for generations after outbreeding and host integration.

Now, we can tell your morals if youi’re european ancestry by knowing what crop your ancestors farmed. Is that genetic or cultural or both? It appears to be both. Although twin studies suggest it might retain genetic components.

Myargument is that ending the religion is not enough. Either one has to export a hostile gene pool, or one has to institutionailze defenses against the behaviors of the hostile gene pool.

Genetic differences are small but large over time and larger over population, and amplified by proximity to people with those same ‘differences’ between group and outgroup.