RT @HumbleFlow: The Crusades were completely justified—a necessary response to Muslim invasion. The Christian West, and the world, benefite…
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-03 00:32:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1874977028006703514
RT @ill_Scholar: I used to think the Crusades were Evil
Bloodthirsty Christians killing for religion
But learning beyond what I was taugh…
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-03 00:31:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1874976881898053870
You are correct. Well done. Attached are the foundations.
Female Cognition > female behavior > abrahamism as a strategy > marxism as a reformation > feminism as an explicit articulation.
More available if you can use it.
Cheers
CD https://t.co/f4NqarmtG8
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-01 00:25:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1874250524117393522
Reply addressees: @Babygravy9
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1862843426544214182
@Babygravy9 You are correct. Well done. Attached are the foundations.
Female Cognition > female behavior > abrahamism as a strategy > marxism as a reformation > feminism as an explicit articulation.
More available if you can use it.
Cheers
CD
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-01 00:25:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1874250524033445888
It has no bearing on the claim of god.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-30 01:59:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873549350040953233
Reply addressees: @njalbertini
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873549212631367999
Again. While you’re using more detailed explanation, this is just another version of the same argument made by Chris Langan, and god knows how many people before him.
More specifically, assuming the sequence of arguments are true (which are assumptions but not unworthy assumptions) this merely states that there are fundamental laws of deterministic behavior in this (or any) universe that result in some analogy to operational computation.
In other words, yes, the universe very likely follows a fixed set of categories (entities), dimensions, and operations. In fact we have no evidence otherwise.
But, any attempt to anthropomorphize this is just that: fictionalism (lying). One cannot testify to it.
As such you could make the argument that the universe contains laws and that as such we can anthropomorphize the universe for human mental consumption. Which was one of the permutations I listed. But it is just a convenient fiction for providing false legitimacy to children and the dim, until they can master all the subsequent abstractions to make non-fictional claims and conclusions.
There is no demand (outside the universe) for external organization of these rules since pressure, spin, polarity, harmonics and quanta that result, produce all resulting categories and operations. (which is precisely what I argue in our forthcoming book on the logic of evolutionary computation.). And there is no reason to imagine (see Wolfram) that any other set of rules would survive evolutionary computation. Those that exist are those that survive. It doesn’t appear that variations in pressure (energy) would alter those properties.
So, assuming all the theorized physical processes you listed are correct, that conveys no truth value in any dimension on the claim of god.
Reply addressees: @njalbertini
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-30 01:42:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873545139941195776
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873541458453533002
Is biblical christianity what jesus created or is it the work of those who came after him? Read the jefferson bible. It’s not propaganda.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-29 23:44:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873515347011330107
Reply addressees: @CBlairforRealz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873514925798379890
A PAGAN, A CHRISTIAN, AN ARYAN, A WARRIOR, A MAN TRANSCENDENT
(The Oath)(Repost from 2017)
I am a pagan if 1) I accept the laws of nature as binding on all of existence; and 2) if I treat nature as sacred and to be contemplated, protected and improved; and 3) I treat the world as something to transform closer to an Eden in whatever ways I can before I die; and 4) if I deny the existence of a supreme being with dominion over the physical laws, and treat all gods, demigods, heroes, saints, figures of history, and ancestors as characters with whom I may speak to in private contemplation in the hope of gaining wisdom and synchronicity from having done so. And 5) if I participate with others of my society in repetition of oaths, repetition of myths, repetition of festivals, repetition of holidays, and the perpetuation of all of the above to my offspring. And 6) if I leave open that synchronicity appears to exist now and then, and that it may be possible that there is a scientific explanation for it, other than just humans subject to similar stimuli producing similar intuitions and therefore similar ends.
As far as I know this is all that is required of me to be a Pagan.
I am a Christian if I have adopted the teaching of Christianity: 1) The eradication of hatred from the human heart. 2) The extension of kinship love to all receptive of it. 3) The requirement for personal acts of charity to those deserving of it. 4) The extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war
As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Christian.
I am an Aryan if 1) I proudly display my excellences so that others seek to achieve or exceed them; 2) I seek competition to constantly test and improve myself so I do not weaken; 3) I swear to speak no insult and demand it; 4) I speak the truth and demand it; 5) I take nothing not paid for and demand it; 6) I grant sovereignty to my kin and demand it; 7) I insure my people regardless of condition, and demand it; and in doing so leave nothing but voluntary markets of cooperation between sovereign men; and to discipline, enserf, enslave, ostracize or kill those who do otherwise; 8) to not show fear or cowardice, abandon my brothers, or retreat, and 9) to die a good death in the service of my kin, my clan, my tribe and my people.
As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be an Aryan.
I am a warrior in that 1) we will prepare for war so perfectly that none dare enter it against us. 2) Once we go to war, we do so with *joy*, with eagerness, and with passion, and without mercy, without constraint, and without remorse; And 3) before ending war, we shall defeat an enemy completely such that no other dares a condition of our enemy, and the memory of the slaughter lives a hundred generations.
As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Warrior.
As far as I know, if I succeed as a Pagan, as a Christian, as an Aryan, as a Warrior, then I have transcended the animal man, and earned my place among the saints, heroes, demigods, gods, in the memories, histories, and legends of man.
And that is the objective of heroes. We leave the rest for ordinary men.
Curt Doolittle
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-29 23:35:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873513305467469825
CORRECT ANSWER:
Regardless of the existence of, or form of existence of god or gods, the laws of the universe, and as a product of those laws, the natural law of cooperation remains constant.
If one does not deny the inviolability of those natural laws of cooperation, then regardless of god(s) existence or form, the laws remain the same.
As such universal morality – or at least, universal immorality that we must avoid, serve those laws of cooperation, of nature, and of nature’s god if he exists.
Insure the self determination by self determined means of others by insurance of their sovereignty in demonstrated interest, by insurance of reciprocity in display word and deed. This is the only means by which not to provoke retaliation such that we live and cooperate in peace and prosperity with one another.
As such it’s the laws of the universe that determine morality – because they exist independent of our claim of god’s existence or form.
However, the laws of the universe which tell us do not commit the immoral – tell us what not to do. These laws forced us to discover the derivation of those laws, to encourages us to cooperate as well as non-conflict -and the only philosopher or prophet to do so was Jesus of Nazareth, who gave us four more laws to promote cooperation (morality) rather than prevent conflict (immorality).
Those laws are:
1) The eradication of hatred from the human heart.
2) The extension of kinship love to all receptive of it.
3) The requirement for personal acts of charity to those deserving of it.
4) The extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.
Affections
CD
Reply addressees: @philosophytweet
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-29 23:25:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873510624728326144
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873430269530874039
THE CORRECT ANSWER
(a) none of us an testify to the existence of god so we cannot claim god exists without lying, we can only say we believe or have faith that a god exists.
(b) There are five possible conditions
– i) God(s) exist outside the universe
– ii) God(s) and the universe are synonymous
– iii) God(s) exist inside the universe
– iv) God(s) exist as a product of the mind of man.
– v) God(s) do not exist except as a useful fiction for man to suggest the means by which we cooperate.
(c) As long as the laws of the universe exist and are universal, and as a consequence the laws that man must obey to cooperate at scale and obtain the benefits of cooperation at scale, then it does not matter which of the five possible conditions is true.
(d) Instead the only difference is who can lie about what laws we must obey to cooperate at scale and obtain the benefits of cooperation at scale.
Nothing else can be said.
Affections
CD
Reply addressees: @philosophytweet
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-29 19:11:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873446832141197312
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873430534803820800