Theme: Religion

  • Well, the platonists were wrong, always have been wrong, and they’re the source

    Well, the platonists were wrong, always have been wrong, and they’re the source of every horror from Christian Chuchianity to French moralizing, German Phenomenalism to Marxism, to Postmodernism.

    Philosophy is pseudoscience.
    It’s therapy for those unable to handle sciences. ๐Ÿ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-09 18:40:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633900605335846921

    Reply addressees: @demosphachtes @CharlesL1902 @KetaIDFBabe

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633899350358147080

  • (Strange Consequences) –“AMERICAN LIBERALISM, OUR CIVIC RELIGION, HAS TURNED ON

    (Strange Consequences)
    –“AMERICAN LIBERALISM, OUR CIVIC RELIGION, HAS TURNED ON US.”–
    Fascinating article, references the decline in Jewish representation across formerly overrepresented positions, due to DIE and Woke liberalism. Why? For Whites, Jews are a minority. To the other minorities, Jews are White. So the ‘be careful what you wish for’ lesson applies. Why? No take-backs.

    Original Article by Jacob Savage:
    https://t.co/FBYJfSYj6k
    Review of the Article by Steve Sailer
    https://t.co/1H0slhxgBq

    (My take: Once you depart from meritocracy, there is no good end. It’s failed everywhere else over time. It will here too. And it is already. You wanna know the reason for fastest development of any civilization? Standardized testing, demonstrated competency, and meritocratic promotion. )


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-09 04:27:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633685850285305856

  • (Strange Consequences) –“AMERICAN LIBERALISM, OUR CIVIC RELIGION, HAS TURNED ON

    (Strange Consequences)
    –“AMERICAN LIBERALISM, OUR CIVIC RELIGION, HAS TURNED ON US.”–
    Fascinating article, references the decline in Jewish representation across formerly overrepresented positions, due to DIE and Woke liberalism. Why? For Whites, Jews are a minority. To the other minorities, Jews are White. So the ‘be careful what you wish for’ lesson applies. Why? No take-backs.

    Original Article by Jacob Savage:
    https://t.co/FBYJfSYj6k
    Review of the Article by Steve Sailer
    https://t.co/1H0slhxgBq

    (My take: Once you depart from meritocracy, there is no good end. It’s failed everywhere else over time. It will here too. And it is already. You wanna know the reason for fastest development of any civilization? Standardized testing, demonstrated competency, and meritocratic promotion. )


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-09 04:27:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633685850172055554

  • No. It’s just behavioral science. now you could say that the principle tenet of

    No. It’s just behavioral science.
    now you could say that the principle tenet of christianity is the elimination of hatred from the human heart. And I would respond, yes, that’s true, but that can mean the elimination of hatred so you tolerate your victimhood, or elimination of hatred so you can reason with clarity at how to obtain victory.
    Given that my opinion of the right is a bunch of cowards virtue signaling morals virtues and convictions they don’t demonstrate by their actions, I’m clearly trying to reinforce that running to emotions is running away from actions.
    I don’t hate the enemy. I just take responsibility for defeating them. And I have a clearer mind to defeat them with because of it.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-08 23:28:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633610747681943553

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633609428392976384

  • No. It’s just behavioral science. now you could say that the principle tenet of

    No. It’s just behavioral science.
    now you could say that the principle tenet of christianity is the elimination of hatred from the human heart. And I would respond, yes, that’s true, but that can mean the elimination of hatred so you tolerate your victimhood, or elimination of hatred so you can reason with clarity at how to obtain victory.
    Given that my opinion of the right is a bunch of cowards virtue signaling morals virtues and convictions they don’t demonstrate by their actions, I’m clearly trying to reinforce that running to emotions is running away from actions.
    I don’t hate the enemy. I just take responsibility for defeating them. And I have a clearer mind to defeat them with because of it.

    Reply addressees: @NorseJarl


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-08 23:28:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633610747610537984

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633609428392976384

  • THE DEMARCATION BETWEEN RELIGION, PHILOSOPHY, AND SCIENCE WAS COMPLETED BY THE C

    THE DEMARCATION BETWEEN RELIGION, PHILOSOPHY, AND SCIENCE WAS COMPLETED BY THE COMPUTATIONAL REVOLUTION. WHY?

    Demarcation is complete: science for truth, philosophy for choice. If you try to do anything else, you’re either going to fail, or end up lying. The record ofโ€ฆ https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1633522010469875713


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-08 17:57:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633527342537555968

  • Trying to speak about anything ‘true’ in philosophical terms is nearly as bad as

    Trying to speak about anything ‘true’ in philosophical terms is nearly as bad as speaking in theological terms. While philosophy and natural philosophy existed the demarcation is complete, and science is reducible to testimony (truth) and philosophy reducible to preference (not truth).

    There is no point in attempting to push on a string. Philosophy can’t do the job. It’s insufficient. Likewise, the truth cannot tell us what we should prefer. Only what consequences result from the choice of our preferences.

    Even then, it’s pretty easy to science preferences, and then develop a set of rules of preference.

    Reply addressees: @CharlesL1902 @demosphachtes @KetaIDFBabe


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-08 17:36:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633522010348290048

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633512842799480833

  • Trying to speak about anything ‘true’ in philosophical terms is nearly as bad as

    Trying to speak about anything ‘true’ in philosophical terms is nearly as bad as speaking in theological terms. While philosophy and natural philosophy existed the demarcation is complete, and science is reducible to testimony (truth) and philosophy reducible to preference (not truth).

    There is no point in attempting to push on a string. Philosophy can’t do the job. It’s insufficient. Likewise, the truth cannot tell us what we should prefer. Only what consequences result from the choice of our preferences.

    Even then, it’s pretty easy to science preferences, and then develop a set of rules of preference.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-08 17:36:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633522010469875713

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633512842799480833

  • How odd. Rights are a term of law, developed before the Christian religion by a

    How odd. Rights are a term of law, developed before the Christian religion by a very long time. Churchies tried to claim they did everything in their search for power.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-08 09:48:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633404423564312576

    Reply addressees: @BertFlirt @StevePender @ConceptualJames

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633371404560134145

  • DO WE HAVE A SOUL? IF SO, HOW? I should ‘science’ the concept of the soul in a v

    DO WE HAVE A SOUL? IF SO, HOW?

    I should ‘science’ the concept of the soul in a video.

    Like many intuitions of the ancients, they simply had no means of describing an experience other than in supernatural terms. Yet, there is a biological process and resulting intuition and behavior that is analogous to the soul. 1) A low level persistence of your behavior in time. 2) Others memories of you over time, that do somewhat play out. 3) And there is some merit to the soul/karma concept in demonstrable outcomes because of them.

    These three concepts can be expressed as derivations of the laws of the universe. But, just as you need legs to run, and running is a potential only until you do run, and running comes into existence only as you are running. Likewise, a soul needs a nervous system, and it needs biological processes, and mental processes to come into existence.

    Humans, whose primary competitive value comes from specializing in adaptation itself, and the utility of returns on cooperation over time, are very good at subconsciously ‘computing’ debts owed and credits issued, with status as the means of increasing opportunities, and decreasing costs of debts owed and credits issued.

    One of the universe’s unpleasant truths is that the brain is an acquisition engine, and cooperation can vastly improve cooperation, and status vastly improves the number and quality of opportunities to cooperation with increasingly successful returns. We humans try to paint a nice picture of ourselves, but we are just an extension of the physical universe. We dissipate energy (entropy) and we counter it by capturing energy (negative entropy). And as Adam smith demonstrated, many hands make for far lighter work than you’d expect by orders of magnitude.

    But we’re still just doing what every animal, plant, molecule, element, particle, proto particle are doing: trying to maintain enough energy to persist (exist) before we dissipate back into the quantum background.

    Your soul is your internal chart of accounts of harms(debts) and contributions (credits) and your status is something you face every day in the mirror. It’s very hard to lie to ourselves. And other people often keep very good accounting of us too. With the record of both often written in the expressions on our faces.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-07 20:57:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633210285115731970