Theme: Religion

NLI members and friends. You’re in the list.
I don’t think you’re a candidate for the other list.
Even that list I’m going to pare down.

@HAARETZcom, All;
The european ‘aristocratic’ interpretation of the ‘jewish problem’ was that the culture and religion of an insular diaspora prohibited the formation of a sufficient state that would force the primacy of the behavior of masculine realism in politics rather than jewish feminine idealism in social orders.

The jewish ethic favors feminine consensus by pilpul seeking agreement, instead of the western logical and empircal discovery of truth as a means of consensus. The difference is that the responsibility of diasporic separatists reliant on feminine consensus or agreement rather than landed state-creating warriors reliant on evidentiary and material truth, and responsibiilty for private and common before self and family.

So this feminine ethic allowed claims of pretense of innocence and victimhood despite the irreciprocal means of profiting from host populations.

So, at least among our learned class, our ‘hope’ has been, at least since we proposed the ‘relocation of the jews to their homeland’, that once responsible for a state, the jewish self identity, ethic, morals, politics, and ‘laws’ would reform to reflect the necessity of self preservation of autonomy in a modern rule of law state, thus ending the “problem of jewish asymmetric ethics and specialization in rent seeking and baiting into hazard.”

It’s very hard to build and hold a state by the social construction of ideas, philosophies, ethics, morals, laws and scripture that for all intents and purposes violate the laws of the universe.

There are no feminine states for a reason.
And there never will be.
And frankly an assertive israel, that achieves the population of the netherlands, will dominate the region for obvious reasons too impolitic to state here in this forum.
And that would better the jewish people, repair their deserved reputation for parasitism and sedition, and make themselves, the middle east, and the rest of the world by externality, a better place for all of us.

@HAARETZcom, All;
The european ‘aristocratic’ interpretation of the ‘jewish problem’ was that the culture and religion of an insular diaspora prohibited the formation of a sufficient state that would force the primacy of the behavior of masculine realism in politics rather than jewish feminine idealism in social orders.

The jewish ethic favors feminine consensus by pilpul seeking agreement, instead of the western logical and empircal discovery of truth as a means of consensus. The difference is that the responsibility of diasporic separatists reliant on feminine consensus or agreement rather than landed state-creating warriors reliant on evidentiary and material truth, and responsibiilty for private and common before self and family.

So this feminine ethic allowed claims of pretense of innocence and victimhood despite the irreciprocal means of profiting from host populations.

So, at least among our learned class, our ‘hope’ has been, at least since we proposed the ‘relocation of the jews to their homeland’, that once responsible for a state, the jewish self identity, ethic, morals, politics, and ‘laws’ would reform to reflect the necessity of self preservation of autonomy in a modern rule of law state, thus ending the “problem of jewish asymmetric ethics and specialization in rent seeking and baiting into hazard.”

It’s very hard to build and hold a state by the social construction of ideas, philosophies, ethics, morals, laws and scripture that for all intents and purposes violate the laws of the universe.

There are no feminine states for a reason.
And there never will be.
And frankly an assertive israel, that achieves the population of the netherlands, will dominate the region for obvious reasons too impolitic to state here in this forum.
And that would better the jewish people, repair their deserved reputation for parasitism and sedition, and make themselves, the middle east, and the rest of the world by externality, a better place for all of us.

Reply addressees: @haaretzcom