Curt Doolittle

Theme: Religion

  • I have spent much of the past year on religion and revolution – what I consider

    I have spent much of the past year on religion and revolution – what I consider practical issues not theoretical ones. And because of current events in world politics I’ve put perhaps too much of my energies there. And I must admit that these subjects are more popular, socially rewarding, and temporally relevant to others than the more fundamental work I have done. But it is the fundamental work I have done that solves the deep problems of philosophy. The rest is the work of mere public intellectuals riding the waves of common sentiment.

    What remains now is to first, string it all together into the shortest work that I can. That part is easy at this point. The hard parts are purely technical: To demonstrate the full testimonial method. To demonstrate how to use strict construction. To suggest various constitutions, and institutions.

    I cannot tell whether I under or overestimate the work. I think a sparse quotable argument, open to contemplation, is better than a long descriptive one pedantically written.

    I will just work until I am done.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-13 00:51:00 UTC

  • The church only cares for itself. It has no truck with Europa. It never did. We

    The church only cares for itself. It has no truck with Europa. It never did. We were but excuse. Labor for the fields. Coin for the tithe. Fools for the book of lies.

    Rule or be ruled.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-10 04:03:00 UTC

  • MUSLIM CONFIDENCE IN THEIR IGNORANCE (you see this kind of stupidity from the le

    MUSLIM CONFIDENCE IN THEIR IGNORANCE

    (you see this kind of stupidity from the left and the muslims)

    —If socialism is the next stage of human society, why bother fighting for it?—

    Socialism is impossible. It cannot be the next stage of human society. So the question is not meaningful.

    –But look at this quote: “…….”—- (moronic sophist drivel that conflates economic and political models, ie: verbalisms.)

    Definitions:

    Socialism: the involuntary organization of investment, production, distribution, and trade and the absence of rational incentives.

    Capitalism: the voluntary organization of investment, production,m distribution and trade, and the presence of rational incentives.

    “Mixed Economy”: the voluntary organization of production distribution and trade, and a ‘fee’ collected by the government for use in the production of commons by legislative means.

    Rule of Law: the market economy in which all actions must be voluntary, fully informed, productive, and free of negative externality

    Democracy: (economic or unitary) the selection of legislation by majority rule.

    Republic: the selection of representatives who determine legislative outputs by majority rule as proxy for citizens.

    Totalitarianism: the choice of commands at the discretion of some elite.

    So whomever is writing what you quote is a very ignorant person.

    I have another question:

    Why do you think you are either smart enough or knowledgeable enough to discuss these topics, and hold an opinion on these topics? This is the interesting question.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-10 02:38:00 UTC

  • I AM ARISTOCRACY —If your God listened to you when you prayed to Him after the

    I AM ARISTOCRACY

    —If your God listened to you when you prayed to Him after the Paris attack,pray to him now after the Lahore attack.And if he does not listen to you then which God are you praying to?—- (A Muslim Critic)

    I am aristocracy. I am a god. My ancestors were gods. I need no false gods. Only the weak need false gods. Only the weak need pray. Successful attacks against my people mean only that my brothers and I have been too lazy in our wealth, and given women too much freedom to act foolishly. And as such My brothers and I must cease our rest and return to rule.

    No more lies.

    No more rest.

    Rule.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-10 01:25:00 UTC

  • The Best Curriculum is Not Ron Paul’s. It’s Pacifist Judeo-Christian – not Aristocratic.

    [T]HE BEST CURRICULUM? —“Curt, would you recommend Ron Paul’s Mises-based homeschool curriculum as the best option out there for parents?”— Megan Cyloneight “Best” I don’t know. Ron Paul’s curriculum is pacifist. It produces good middle class universalist judeo-christians. Good subjects. People who can easily be conquered.

    To create aristocracy I would add to it: 1) Grammar, Logic, Testimony, and Prosecution (including the methods of lying) 2) Propertarian psychology, sociology, group competitive strategy. 3) The methods of legal order: american, british, german, russian, chinese – under which the people create commons while holding a government at bay. 4) The conduct of war by means of immigration, religion/conversion, political means, and economic means, and defense against each. 5) Fitness, Sports, Fighting, tactics, strategy, command and control. Ron Paul makes well informed, docile, employees. Curt Doolittle makes well informed unconquerable sheriffs.

    (later in the day…) Thanks for an interesting question by Megan Cyloneight today, I was able to understand that I had to add ‘prosecution’ to the curriculum, in order to change the student of western civilization from a christian servant to an aristocratic judge. 0) The matters of europa (ancient literature): Fairy Tales, Myths, Histories. 1) Grammar, Rhetoric, Logic, Testimony, Prosecution. 2) Propertarian psychology, economics, sociology, politics, evolutionary strategy, war.

    It is no use reserving prosecution and war for the adults. Enfranchise them all.

    ANOTHER THOUGHT There are three technologies of coercion: violence, economics, and shaming (inclusion/exclusion). I advocate teaching ALL THREE methods of ‘moral’ competition. Ron Paul is advocating only one. Economics is not a panacea. We must cover all the bases so to speak.

  • The Best Curriculum is Not Ron Paul’s. It’s Pacifist Judeo-Christian – not Aristocratic.

    [T]HE BEST CURRICULUM? —“Curt, would you recommend Ron Paul’s Mises-based homeschool curriculum as the best option out there for parents?”— Megan Cyloneight “Best” I don’t know. Ron Paul’s curriculum is pacifist. It produces good middle class universalist judeo-christians. Good subjects. People who can easily be conquered.

    To create aristocracy I would add to it: 1) Grammar, Logic, Testimony, and Prosecution (including the methods of lying) 2) Propertarian psychology, sociology, group competitive strategy. 3) The methods of legal order: american, british, german, russian, chinese – under which the people create commons while holding a government at bay. 4) The conduct of war by means of immigration, religion/conversion, political means, and economic means, and defense against each. 5) Fitness, Sports, Fighting, tactics, strategy, command and control. Ron Paul makes well informed, docile, employees. Curt Doolittle makes well informed unconquerable sheriffs.

    (later in the day…) Thanks for an interesting question by Megan Cyloneight today, I was able to understand that I had to add ‘prosecution’ to the curriculum, in order to change the student of western civilization from a christian servant to an aristocratic judge. 0) The matters of europa (ancient literature): Fairy Tales, Myths, Histories. 1) Grammar, Rhetoric, Logic, Testimony, Prosecution. 2) Propertarian psychology, economics, sociology, politics, evolutionary strategy, war.

    It is no use reserving prosecution and war for the adults. Enfranchise them all.

    ANOTHER THOUGHT There are three technologies of coercion: violence, economics, and shaming (inclusion/exclusion). I advocate teaching ALL THREE methods of ‘moral’ competition. Ron Paul is advocating only one. Economics is not a panacea. We must cover all the bases so to speak.

  • Judaism=Desire to Exclude Christianity=Desire to Include Islam=Desire to Dominat

    —

    Judaism=Desire to Exclude

    Christianity=Desire to Include

    Islam=Desire to Dominate

    —Casey Carroll

    Aristocracy = Desire to ????

    Defend?

    Accumulate Strength?

    Deny Others Access?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-09 12:30:00 UTC

  • (The degree to which I trust my god, and do what my god tells me to do, would se

    (The degree to which I trust my god, and do what my god tells me to do, would seem irrational to others. Because while my god is not directly observable through introspection, I can still communicate with that god, and obtain direction and insight. I can hypothesize the many forms in which this god may exist. But I need not do so to obtain his advice and direction. Our gods command obedience from slaves, deliver rules for managers, and advice to aristocracy. I take my gods advice, and it is rarely if ever wrong. )

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-08 06:28:00 UTC

  • Islam: Somos competidores, no somos ni aliados, ni amigos, ni semejantes

    Texto original de Curt Doolittle, traducido por Alberto R. Zambrano U. Disponible en: http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2016/04/06/islam-we-are-competitors-not-allies-not-friends-not-kin/   [N]osotros somos competidores, no somos ni aliados, ni amigos ni semejantes

    1. Somos competidores, no aliados, en el sentido de que cooperamos económicamente para ganancia mutua. Pero si la cooperación requiere que nos sacrifiquemos para aumentar los números de nuestros competidores entonces eso es beneficioso sino parasitario y suicida.
    2. Usted no entiende de economía. Para mover a todo ser humano en una red, se requiere de la aplicación de diferencias mínimas en incentivos. Esto requiere de un vasto capital. Es por medio de ese vasto capital aplicado como incentivos que nosotros podemos producir la organización voluntaria de la producción.
    3. Los errores que usted comete son los siguientes:
      a. Creer que somos semejantes en vez de competidores
      b. Que es posible organizarse por otros medios
      c. Que el mundo pobre no nos genera pobreza contínua de forma perpetua.
      d. Que el objetivo que debemos perseguir es la prevención reproductiva de los pobres.
    4. El Islam es un cáncer que la civilización occidental, los rusos, africanos, hindúes y los asiáticos orientales necesitan erradicar de la faz de la tierra. Los musulmanes son el único pueblo no civilizado de la tierra – y – fuera de los buenos cristianos africanos, son los más tontos del planeta.
      Es necesario ponerle fin al Islam. Para siempre.

      ¿Así o más claro?

  • Islam: Somos competidores, no somos ni aliados, ni amigos, ni semejantes

    Texto original de Curt Doolittle, traducido por Alberto R. Zambrano U. Disponible en: http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2016/04/06/islam-we-are-competitors-not-allies-not-friends-not-kin/   [N]osotros somos competidores, no somos ni aliados, ni amigos ni semejantes

    1. Somos competidores, no aliados, en el sentido de que cooperamos económicamente para ganancia mutua. Pero si la cooperación requiere que nos sacrifiquemos para aumentar los números de nuestros competidores entonces eso es beneficioso sino parasitario y suicida.
    2. Usted no entiende de economía. Para mover a todo ser humano en una red, se requiere de la aplicación de diferencias mínimas en incentivos. Esto requiere de un vasto capital. Es por medio de ese vasto capital aplicado como incentivos que nosotros podemos producir la organización voluntaria de la producción.
    3. Los errores que usted comete son los siguientes:
      a. Creer que somos semejantes en vez de competidores
      b. Que es posible organizarse por otros medios
      c. Que el mundo pobre no nos genera pobreza contínua de forma perpetua.
      d. Que el objetivo que debemos perseguir es la prevención reproductiva de los pobres.
    4. El Islam es un cáncer que la civilización occidental, los rusos, africanos, hindúes y los asiáticos orientales necesitan erradicar de la faz de la tierra. Los musulmanes son el único pueblo no civilizado de la tierra – y – fuera de los buenos cristianos africanos, son los más tontos del planeta.
      Es necesario ponerle fin al Islam. Para siempre.

      ¿Así o más claro?