Curt Doolittle

Theme: Religion

  • THE RULE OF DEGENERACY and ESCAPISM —“Early Hinduism and Buddhism had much of

    THE RULE OF DEGENERACY and ESCAPISM

    —“Early Hinduism and Buddhism had much of the Aryan spirit down. It created aspiration, duty, and sacred hierarchical incentives, though of course, it wasn’t perfect and we can in more detail discuss various things, but it had the heroism and transcendence. …. Many modern bourgeois Westerners mistake something like Buddhism as humanistic, when it was in fact a warrior religion, created when Hinduism was becoming more sacerdotal and less of that warrior religion. …. Zen Buddhism did the same thing when the broader Buddhism was starting to become too doctrinal and not in-the-world. This Aryan spirit for being in-the-world (and thus inherently some kind of warrior) is what’s the real key here, and how I think I can synergize it with science and your scientific system (and that’s of course not an accident, as science is derivative of Aryan morality).— Josh Jeppson

    It would be good for mankind to trace that aryan spirit through the various evolutions and devolutions. It would provide us with additional justification for legal truth, and literary heroism.

    Why? Because I think it is an instance of the *Rule of Escapism*:

    3 – “Anything that is not explicitly conservative will devolve into something progressive”

    2 – “Anything not explicitly rational, will devolve into something magical”

    1 – “Anything that is not explicitly true, will devolve into something false.”

    0 – “Any system of thought that is not explicitly masculine and constructive, will devolve into the feminine and destructive.”

    -1 – “Any system of thought that does not compel action through change will devolve in an excuse to avoid change through justifying inaction.”

    -2 – “Any system of thought that is not explicily eugenic, expansionary, heroic, and hierarchical, will eventually devolve into one that is dysgenic, sedentary, submissive, and equalitarian.”

    (Women and the weak destroy the world if we allow them.)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-17 05:47:00 UTC

  • Does Evolutionary Theory Presuppose A Preceding Grand Design Or Natural Law?

    Natural Law (Empirically Discovered Law) consists of general rules, that are location, demographic, custom, culture, and religion independent methods of providing decidability in matters of conflict.

    • (Law is prohibitive -negative- assertions)
    • Negative ethics of Natural Law are usually reducible to the Silver Rule: do not unto others as you would not have done unto you.

    Natural Rights (Desirable Contract Provisions) consist of those general rules, stated not as negative prohibitions, but as positive aspirations, such that all governments must bring into being – regardles of location, demographic, custom, culture, and religion, as a list of those conditions under which the government will exercise violence in order to resolve conflicts, so that prosperous cooperation can continue – given that the government is the insurer of last resort.

    • (Rights are positive -desirable- assertions).
    • Positive Ethics of Natural Rights are usually reducible to the Golden Rule: do unto others as you would have done unto you.

    By combining Natural Law, and Natural Rights, we produce RIGHTS and OBLIGATIONS of the natural CONTRACT for COOPERATION that is necessary for humans (or any sentient being), to avoid parasitism, predation, conflict, and war.

    SOCIAL CONSEQUENCES
    Natural(Obligations) Law and Natural Rights are consequently reducible to a very simple set of laws:

    1- That in the choice between avoidance (boycott), cooperation (trade), and conflcit (war), it is only rational to avoid war in the absence of parasitism and predation.

    2 – That our moral instincts, which punish cheating even if very costly, are reducible to the prohibition on parasitism in order to preserve the incentive for cooperation, because of the disproportionate rewards of cooperation, and the disproportionate loss of non-cooperation, and that catastrophic loss of conflict.

    3 – That the differences in our moral instincts are reducible to our reproductive differences:

    • Progressive: Mother/Sister: consumption bias: short term. Feed the OFFSPRING regardless of the quality of the child or the cost to the tribe’s defense
    • Libertarian: Brother: trade bias: medium term. Form alliances to build capital until we BROTHERS have resources of our own.
    • Conservative: Father: save/defense/offense bias: long term. Preserve the ability of the TRIBE to fight competitors

    PHYSICAL LAWS
    These laws are then reducible to very simple physical law: that genetic organisms, particularly animals that can move, discover patterns by which they can capture free energy, use it, and export the unusable as waste heat.

    Or put another way: no organism can survive if it is the subject of sufficient parasitism that such parasitism will reduce its reproductive consequences.

    Ergo: there is no altruism in nature, because its suicidal. At best we find kin selection that is not.

    SO IN CLOSING
    Natural law is a consequence of the conservation of energy in physical law and nothing else.

    https://www.quora.com/Does-evolutionary-theory-presuppose-a-preceding-grand-design-or-natural-law

  • Is Liberalism Idealistic As Opposed To Being Realistic?

    It’s Utopian, dysgenic, devolutionary, and entirely false, which is why it sells.

    You don’t think religions sell because they’re realistic or true? Neither do political ideologies.

    Here is some humbling and painful truth:

    1) Those civilizations that were most successful in preventing from access to food, delaying reproduction, preventing access to reproduction, enslaving, starving, killing, sending to war, or abandoning to the elements, the largest number of their lower classes, consistently produce the highest standards of living.

    Why? It’s pretty simple math: productive people are only so productive. The very best only a bit more productive, and they are small in number. The person at the bottom is six times more damaging than the person at the top is beneficial. SIX TIMES. (Or at least, like Pareto’s rule, that it’s the inverse of, it’s a very good rule of thumb.)

    2) Western Civilization, from the corded ware (Kurgan) people onward, (the european branch of the Aryan Invasions) out of Ukraine and what is now southern Russia, adopted these eugenic practices and redistributed resources upward increasing the rates of the middle class reproduction. Beginnig with the church’s ban on intermarriage, and the adoption of Bipartite Manorialism in Frisia, and the aggressive hanging of 1/2 to 1% of the population per year, until by the late middle ages – almost everyone living in Europe was a descendent of the genetic if not economic and social middle class.

    3) american puritans recruited people of ‘character’ and the original at least puritan colonies were intended to be a eugenic experiment. This only ended with the marxist, socialist, bolshevik, and soviet cooption of the university and media as an overwhelming counter-enlightenment to that provided by Darwin and Spencer. The pseudosciences of Boaz, Marx, Freud, and even Cantor were propagated to restore the underclass to some level of political control now that they had the economic means available that were provided by the industrial revolution, and the somewhat foolish enfranchisement of non-property owners and women. Meritocracy after all, is a eugenic strategy.

    4) Western civilization, beginning with the separation of western empirical, common, judge discovered law (law), from celebrations, festivals, and education (religion), has always been empirical. Our greek reason and british empiricism that we call ‘science’ today evolved from this legal tradition. To attack this empiricism, particularly after Darwin and Maxwell’s revelations, and Nietzche’s attempt to resurrect greek religion just as bacon, lock, smith, and hume had resurrected greek reason – the left invented multiple layers of progressive falsehoods:

    The myth of oppression of the equal underclasses rather than the necessity of domestication of the inferior underclasses.

    The Utopian vision of a world run by the underclasses (marxism). Despite the evidence that the world universally sorts by iq and genetic class except for rotations in and out of the middle class due to mating and economic lottery effects.

    The great lies of social science: Marxian history, Boazian Anthropology, Freudian Psychology.

    WHEN THESE FAILED to produce a revolution the left turned to “Scientific Socialism”.

    The great lies of economic pseudoscience: managed economies, central planning, world socialism.

    The Great Lies of Political science: That democracy was a good, rather than a luxury. That democracy was possible for the resolution of disputes in heterogeneous polities rather than the prioritization of wants in homogenous polities. That majoritarian monopoly was desirable, or produced beneficial ends. That

    The Great Lies of Law: that rule of law was not determined by the natural properties of mankind that we could enumerate to allow each other to cooperate, but that these laws were arbitrary, discretionary commands that could be followed like the rules of a corporation.

    WHEN THESE FAILED the left turned to the Culture of Critique (attack on culture).

    The Frankfurt school’s false criticisms of art, of western civilization, of white men, of western history.

    WHEN THESE FAILED the left turned to it’s only remaining option:

    1) to immigrate underclasses in order to obtain power through invasion and displacement.

    2) to switch from criticism to political correctness and the enfranchisement not o productive labor and families but of every fringe group possible

    3) to switch from rational argument to simply repeating messages and lies. (alinsky etc).

    THE RESULT is what we live with today:

    1) the destruction of the family that was the condition of enfranchisement into the american eugenic order.

    2) the destruction of the rule of law so that the constitution is no longer a document of the science of cooperation but a justification for war against western civilization.

    3) the destruction of the Whig History of the continuous evolution of western civilization.

    4) the devolution of the parties into married whites, and unmarried white women and the underclasses.

    5) The big sort, where people are nationally relocating to be near people like them.

    6) We are on the brink of civil war (and frankly I’m working to start it)

    https://www.quora.com/Is-liberalism-idealistic-as-opposed-to-being-realistic

  • Is Liberalism Idealistic As Opposed To Being Realistic?

    It’s Utopian, dysgenic, devolutionary, and entirely false, which is why it sells.

    You don’t think religions sell because they’re realistic or true? Neither do political ideologies.

    Here is some humbling and painful truth:

    1) Those civilizations that were most successful in preventing from access to food, delaying reproduction, preventing access to reproduction, enslaving, starving, killing, sending to war, or abandoning to the elements, the largest number of their lower classes, consistently produce the highest standards of living.

    Why? It’s pretty simple math: productive people are only so productive. The very best only a bit more productive, and they are small in number. The person at the bottom is six times more damaging than the person at the top is beneficial. SIX TIMES. (Or at least, like Pareto’s rule, that it’s the inverse of, it’s a very good rule of thumb.)

    2) Western Civilization, from the corded ware (Kurgan) people onward, (the european branch of the Aryan Invasions) out of Ukraine and what is now southern Russia, adopted these eugenic practices and redistributed resources upward increasing the rates of the middle class reproduction. Beginnig with the church’s ban on intermarriage, and the adoption of Bipartite Manorialism in Frisia, and the aggressive hanging of 1/2 to 1% of the population per year, until by the late middle ages – almost everyone living in Europe was a descendent of the genetic if not economic and social middle class.

    3) american puritans recruited people of ‘character’ and the original at least puritan colonies were intended to be a eugenic experiment. This only ended with the marxist, socialist, bolshevik, and soviet cooption of the university and media as an overwhelming counter-enlightenment to that provided by Darwin and Spencer. The pseudosciences of Boaz, Marx, Freud, and even Cantor were propagated to restore the underclass to some level of political control now that they had the economic means available that were provided by the industrial revolution, and the somewhat foolish enfranchisement of non-property owners and women. Meritocracy after all, is a eugenic strategy.

    4) Western civilization, beginning with the separation of western empirical, common, judge discovered law (law), from celebrations, festivals, and education (religion), has always been empirical. Our greek reason and british empiricism that we call ‘science’ today evolved from this legal tradition. To attack this empiricism, particularly after Darwin and Maxwell’s revelations, and Nietzche’s attempt to resurrect greek religion just as bacon, lock, smith, and hume had resurrected greek reason – the left invented multiple layers of progressive falsehoods:

    The myth of oppression of the equal underclasses rather than the necessity of domestication of the inferior underclasses.

    The Utopian vision of a world run by the underclasses (marxism). Despite the evidence that the world universally sorts by iq and genetic class except for rotations in and out of the middle class due to mating and economic lottery effects.

    The great lies of social science: Marxian history, Boazian Anthropology, Freudian Psychology.

    WHEN THESE FAILED to produce a revolution the left turned to “Scientific Socialism”.

    The great lies of economic pseudoscience: managed economies, central planning, world socialism.

    The Great Lies of Political science: That democracy was a good, rather than a luxury. That democracy was possible for the resolution of disputes in heterogeneous polities rather than the prioritization of wants in homogenous polities. That majoritarian monopoly was desirable, or produced beneficial ends. That

    The Great Lies of Law: that rule of law was not determined by the natural properties of mankind that we could enumerate to allow each other to cooperate, but that these laws were arbitrary, discretionary commands that could be followed like the rules of a corporation.

    WHEN THESE FAILED the left turned to the Culture of Critique (attack on culture).

    The Frankfurt school’s false criticisms of art, of western civilization, of white men, of western history.

    WHEN THESE FAILED the left turned to it’s only remaining option:

    1) to immigrate underclasses in order to obtain power through invasion and displacement.

    2) to switch from criticism to political correctness and the enfranchisement not o productive labor and families but of every fringe group possible

    3) to switch from rational argument to simply repeating messages and lies. (alinsky etc).

    THE RESULT is what we live with today:

    1) the destruction of the family that was the condition of enfranchisement into the american eugenic order.

    2) the destruction of the rule of law so that the constitution is no longer a document of the science of cooperation but a justification for war against western civilization.

    3) the destruction of the Whig History of the continuous evolution of western civilization.

    4) the devolution of the parties into married whites, and unmarried white women and the underclasses.

    5) The big sort, where people are nationally relocating to be near people like them.

    6) We are on the brink of civil war (and frankly I’m working to start it)

    https://www.quora.com/Is-liberalism-idealistic-as-opposed-to-being-realistic

  • you could posses a super power, what would it be? “Sending people to Hell.”

    https://t.co/Z1M043W0SaIf you could posses a super power, what would it be?

    “Sending people to Hell.”

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-16 16:15:00 UTC

  • Conservatism must speak in historical, moral, allegorical, and religious languag

    https://www.quora.com/Why-is-neo-progressivism-so-reliant-upon-the-re-appropriation-of-Marxist-doctrine-and-Critical-Theory/answer/Curt-Doolittle?srid=u4Qv&share=aafd25ea1) Conservatism must speak in historical, moral, allegorical, and religious language because if stated ratio-scientifically it’s reducible to ‘eugenics in everything’, just as all of western civilization has been since the Kurgan invasions. So conservatives do not lie they just do not speak the truth.

    2) Neo-Liberalism is just an attempt to turn america into the levant or south america so that an upper managerial caste can form and profit from administration of a vast underclass, just as the cosmopolitans did in eastern Europe before migrating to the states. They cannot say this. And there is no way to speak truthfully. Since they failed at pseudo-rational marxist religion, pseudoscientific economics and social science, and just gave up advocacy and started attacking western civilization at every level (cultural marxism / postmodernism / the frankfurt school).

    Democracy creates incentives to lie. Rule of law (constitutionalism) creates incentives to tell the truth. But conservatives don’t tell the truth, and neo-liberals just lie.

    Humans are vastly unequal and our evolution has been 5x that of the difference between humans and chimpanzees over the past 30k years alone. These differences are largely visible as differences in rates of maturity, depth of maturity, and sexual dimorphism, and the relative sizes of the lower and upper classes.

    This means that conservatism is true but a large domestic empire is impossible. It means that progressivism is false, and that a large domestic empire will produced colored casts very much like india with little or no rotation.

    Everyone lies.

    The only solution is to break up the empire and continue the BIG SORT.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-16 16:15:00 UTC

  • OUR NEW CHURCH: LETS FRAME THIS QUESTION OF THE CHURCH CORRECTLY (important) Myt

    OUR NEW CHURCH: LETS FRAME THIS QUESTION OF THE CHURCH CORRECTLY

    (important)

    Myths(greek, roman, nordic, german, french, british), Festivals, Plays(church), Judges (gods), Role Models (heroes), Virtues, Stoicism, Rhetoric, logic and grammar are highly paternal and aristocratic frameworks that generate high quality (eugenic). Christianity provided feminine and lower class virtues Insurance, charity, caretaking, compassion. To which later Christianity added a middle-class signal economy: chivalry, whereby a man could signal status by other than as a warrior, nobility, politician, lawyer, philosopher or household owner (businessman). But where the middle and even working classes, could demonstrate fitness through SERVICE. (I live in eastern Europe and it’s obvious it’s missing.)

    There is no reason that we cannot RATIONALLY praise (worship) and remember (ritualize) these heroes both pagan and aristocratic, and Christian and proletarian, and chivalrous and middle class, in our churches, rather than submitting to the authoritarian dominance that is antithetical to our western civilization’s aristocratic origins.

    I have argued that the forcible Christianization of the west is one of the worst crimes in history, right behind the roman extermination of the prehistoric religion of the British isles, by the systematic slaughter of its wise men. And these crimes probably pale in comparison to the forcible closure of the stoic schools – the west’s personal religion and a rational competitor to mystical buddhism,

    That we needed a church, a federal government and administrative literacy is no question. That we had to sell a series of Egyptian, Babylonian and Hebrew lies to provide those practical services is very hard to sustain given the conditions we lived under using greek and British thought, and the conditions we lived under fertile crescent authoritarian mystical thought.

    Perhaps it is too much to ask how we could replicate the experience of our churches, with the rational and historical lessons of our history. But it is not hard to imagine that church, inspiring awe over those who came before us, presenting us with festivals, readings, plays, hymns and debates, would not provide the binding experience that we found under Christianity, while in the current state not having to pretend to listen to scripture as lessons more relevant to our day than would be the collected great minds of western civilization.

    The church functioned as media provider, and teacher, counselor, and judge. For the church to have meaning other than sentimental references to our childhood any such church must return to its central position as educator(information), counselor(emotional), advisor(financial), registrar (births, weddings, and deaths), judge(of family conflict and divorce) and ceremonial leader (festivals, celebrations, plays, and rituals) that provide the only existentially possible environment under which we throw down our weapons of war, of wealth, of status, of fitness, of health, when we enter the chamber, and greet each other as kin.

    It is this experience – the invocation of the safety of the pack response – that we call spirituality, and it’s exploration and mastery we call transcendence.

    This is a future church we can make. Live under, Evolve under, and persist for millennnia.

    Because within such a church there are no lies to be disproven by new discoveries, and we shall never likely see a time where we do not wish the services that such a church would provide for us.

    Western man, despite existing on the edge of the bronze age, in smaller numbers, and poorer, with worse climate, advanced FASTER than every other civilization on this earth in both the ancient and the modern worlds, because we discovered, and made use of truth.

    It was under our dark ages that we master and lived under lies.

    The cosmopolitan enlightenment reaction was to attempt another expression of the devil named Jehovah that the Gnostics warned us about. And having succeeded in imprisoning us in ignorance for nearly a thousand years, we broke free.

    Then Boaz, Freud, Marx, Cantor, Keynes, Rand and Rothbard, and Leo Strauss created three versions of utopian lies using same techniques of suggestion, propaganda using new pulpits of the media, and saturation by repetition, and ridicule of dissent, to sell women and our underclasses the second defeat of the west.

    No you may feel that we should return to the last set of lies that they sold to our people under the cover of our youth and ignorance. But this is to remain in the Devil Jehova’s trap.

    Our god is truth: the god of physical law, the god of nature, the god of natural law. If you wish to restore a church to the true god, our god, then that is simple enough to do. We have captured his words for over two thousand five hundred years, in the words of a thousand profits in every field of endeavor.

    The only god that would demand we believe falsehoods is no god, but a devil. The only god that will save us from that devil’s lies, is the one who gave birth to us: truth.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute, Kiev.

    ( Aaron Kahland Josh Jeppson )

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-16 13:32:00 UTC

  • Why Is Neo-progressivism So Reliant Upon The Re-appropriation Of Marxist Doctrine And Critical Theory?

    1) Conservatism must speak in historical, moral, allegorical, and religious language because if stated ratio-scientifically it’s reducible to ‘eugenics in everything’, just as all of western civilization has been since the Kurgan invasions. So conservatives do not lie they just do not speak the truth.

    2) Neo-Liberalism is just an attempt to turn america into the levant or south america so that an upper managerial caste can form and profit from administration of a vast underclass, just as the cosmopolitans did in eastern Europe before migrating to the states. They cannot say this. And there is no way to speak truthfully. Since they failed at pseudo-rational marxist religion, pseudoscientific economics and social science, and just gave up advocacy and started attacking western civilization at every level (cultural marxism / postmodernism / the frankfurt school).

    Democracy creates incentives to lie. Rule of law (constitutionalism) creates incentives to tell the truth. But conservatives don’t tell the truth, and neo-liberals just lie.

    Humans are vastly unequal and our evolution has been 5x that of the difference between humans and chimpanzees over the past 30k years alone. These differences are largely visible as differences in rates of maturity, depth of maturity, and sexual dimorphism, and the relative sizes of the lower and upper classes.

    This means that conservatism is true but a large domestic empire is impossible. It means that progressivism is false, and that a large domestic empire will produced colored casts very much like india with little or no rotation.

    Everyone lies.

    The only solution is to break up the empire and continue the BIG SORT.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-is-neo-progressivism-so-reliant-upon-the-re-appropriation-of-Marxist-doctrine-and-Critical-Theory

  • If You Could Posses A Super Power, What Would It Be?

    Sending people to Hell.

    https://www.quora.com/If-you-could-posses-a-super-power-what-would-it-be

  • Why Is Neo-progressivism So Reliant Upon The Re-appropriation Of Marxist Doctrine And Critical Theory?

    1) Conservatism must speak in historical, moral, allegorical, and religious language because if stated ratio-scientifically it’s reducible to ‘eugenics in everything’, just as all of western civilization has been since the Kurgan invasions. So conservatives do not lie they just do not speak the truth.

    2) Neo-Liberalism is just an attempt to turn america into the levant or south america so that an upper managerial caste can form and profit from administration of a vast underclass, just as the cosmopolitans did in eastern Europe before migrating to the states. They cannot say this. And there is no way to speak truthfully. Since they failed at pseudo-rational marxist religion, pseudoscientific economics and social science, and just gave up advocacy and started attacking western civilization at every level (cultural marxism / postmodernism / the frankfurt school).

    Democracy creates incentives to lie. Rule of law (constitutionalism) creates incentives to tell the truth. But conservatives don’t tell the truth, and neo-liberals just lie.

    Humans are vastly unequal and our evolution has been 5x that of the difference between humans and chimpanzees over the past 30k years alone. These differences are largely visible as differences in rates of maturity, depth of maturity, and sexual dimorphism, and the relative sizes of the lower and upper classes.

    This means that conservatism is true but a large domestic empire is impossible. It means that progressivism is false, and that a large domestic empire will produced colored casts very much like india with little or no rotation.

    Everyone lies.

    The only solution is to break up the empire and continue the BIG SORT.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-is-neo-progressivism-so-reliant-upon-the-re-appropriation-of-Marxist-doctrine-and-Critical-Theory