Theme: Religion

  • There are very good reasons that Justinian and Constantine, from the safety of B

    There are very good reasons that Justinian and Constantine, from the safety of Byzantium, used Syrian and Judaic thought to attack the Greek and Roman Institutions of learning.

    They did it with malice, intent, and forethought, and while it is true that islam caused the ECONOMIC dark age, the SOCIAL AND INTELLECTUAL dark age is impossible to divorce from the rise and fall of Christianity. That’s just the evidence. I don’t see any ‘good’ in christianity that was not in roman and greek thought prior to christianity: Aryanism.

    Lies: false promises of utopia in an afterlife, like false promises of economic and status equality, are cheap means of government and parasitism.

    Rule, using Rule of Law by Natural Law, under the promise of violence, in exchange for taxation (commissions) for the creation of increasingly profitable markets is about as truthful as one can get, for the simple reason that it contains no via-positiva promises, and leaves choice of pursuits to the ruled.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-28 17:26:00 UTC

  • In evaluating our medieval religion, we need to separate the strategy, the philo

    In evaluating our medieval religion, we need to separate the strategy, the philosophy, the mythology, the administration, and the rule.

    And then we must compare it to the alternatives developed in the ancient world, and our traditional religions prior to their destruction by the ancient world.

    The christian religion was a source of ignorance by providing a false high context narrative that impeded the advancement of knowledge, and imposing the ability to rule by deceit.

    The church was a source of (weak) administration.

    The church’s philosophy was adequate for uniting european tribes. But it was not in any way a replacement for greco-roman civilization, or the megalithic-pagan civilization that both so diligently exterminated.

    The church was not in fact all that hostile to science.

    The state was an advocate, and investor in technology.

    The state and the people were more dependent upon law and technology than religion and the church.

    The church informational monopoly then as the academy/media/state monopoly now, tended to produce all the narratives – almost all of which are false histories.

    The restoration of our ancient civilization provided the restoration of our technological knowledge (low context high precision), but what we struggle with today, is providing the narrative (high context low precision) by which we identify and seize opportunities.

    Demonstrably our ancient religion (super-normalism), philosophy (stoicism and epicureanism), epistemology (science, reason, naturalism), cooperation(natural, common, law of torts), and virtues (heroism, truth, goodness and beauty), were superior to the medieval church’s.

    Demonstrably they are superior to all other cultural portfolios.

    Unfortunately, our technology needs a narrative. And the one provided by the cosmopolitans is … to put it bluntly… “Evil”.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-28 16:14:00 UTC

  • NOT JUST ISLAM BUT ABRAHAMISM: THE INFORMATION DISEASE: THE SOURCE OF IGNORANCE

    NOT JUST ISLAM BUT ABRAHAMISM: THE INFORMATION DISEASE: THE SOURCE OF IGNORANCE AND DECIET

    Um. No. Islam’s destroyed almost all the works of the greeks and romans that they could find. And the reintroduction of greek and roman literature into europe occurred as the academics who were about to be persecuted by the muslims fled to the west for safety.

    Islam, the Black Blague from China, are followed by communism, the mongol golden horde, as the greatest dealers of death. That means that between Abraham’s Judaism, Christianity, and Islamism, and Abraman’s new religion: the Cosmopolitianism of the Ashkenazi (Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, the Frankfurt School, and) that Abrahamism is the most deadly plague every to face humanity. Even MORE SO than the black plague.

    A disease of the mind – from ‘polluted minds’, and a disease of the body (‘from polluted lands’), together are more deadly than any combination of wars in history.

    If we can struggle to end physical diseases, why do we not equally struggle to end informational diseases?

    We can. Natural Law’s Testimonial Truth.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-28 13:21:00 UTC

  • As a few have noticed. I was making a fairly serious statement. Not the least of

    As a few have noticed. I was making a fairly serious statement. Not the least of which was de-christianizing the translation of the original quote (which, if I remember correctly was spoken in mongolian, written down phonetically using *chinese* characters, translated into persian, translated into german, and then translated into english. I’m not positive but most of the ‘secret history’ followed that route. )

    Now, in the context in which I made this post, I was trying to illustrate a few things at once:

    1) That hunting man and animal *is* his preferred profession. And that man is not Rousseauian. It is not surprising that all other variations of the semi-sentient apes were exterminated upon our arrival. Nor why the only competition the great plagues have had is Islam first and communism second.

    2) That we have spent a great deal of effort ‘regulating’ man’s preferred profession. And that the many achievements of man were made by suppressing that profession

    3) **BUT**, that to CHOOSE the method of suppressing that profession requires we preserve that profession: hunting, killing, destroying, and taking – we can construct many orders from enslavement on one end to markets on the other.

    4) And to preserve that profession such that we create the advanced order that we have in the ancient and modern worlds requires the Aryan (markets) and the Christian (the extirpation of hatred from the human heart.)

    5) Because there is a vast difference between predation and parasitism of the khan, and the conquest and rule of people by the production of markets through which they transcend the beast, the slave, the serf, the freeman, the civilian, the sovereign – and the god.

    What we have failed to learn (which I am so glad someone reminded me of yesterday) is that having conquered from spain to china, and from the arctic circle to egypt, and having tried to create markets in each of those region, that we failed among all but our own.

    Therefore the evidence suggests that there is something special about our kin group, tribe, and race that makes markets possible.

    But if we must preserve the Aryan and the Christian to rule by natural law, we must also preserve the warrior to obtain and hold the condition of natural law. And we must preserve the warrior hunter’s joy and lust in Aryan and Christian forms, so that those that cannot transcend cannot harm us. If they can harm must they can be weakened. If they cannot be weakened they can be exterminated.

    Not with hatred, and not for profit, but for defense.

    Not for defense of us alone. But for the defense of human kind.

    And the transcendence we are inspired to achieve.

    So as Allan Hernandez said above,

    (a) I want to cause you to attempt to disagree with this statement by stating it provocatively, (remember, this is the purpose of hyperbole that conservatives rely upon. the Asians use contradictions to cause you to think. Aristocracy uses hyperbole to cause you to think.

    (b) I want to force you to face a necessary truth: that violence is just a resource that we can use to create good by the incremental suppression of all means of parasitism – and that to incrementally suppress means of parasitism among hunters, requires that we maintain exceptional skill in hunting, killing, taking, destroying.

    (c) we created this world by mastering, professionalizing, and using violence to obtain and hold rule, through which we imposed markets, and the extirpation of hatred from the human heart.

    I experiment a lot. I run tests. All my arguments are tests. Each test constitutes an attempt to construct a proof. When they are complete (closed), parsimonious, and clear my tests are complete, and a proof constructed.

    But you should not dismiss the difference between an analytic list and an emotive or poetic bit of inspiration. They are attempts to make you (and i) think about those assumptions we hold, beliefs we hold, justifications we feel, and arguments we practice.

    So that not only are markets created, and not only is hatred extirpated, but that ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, pseudorationalism, and pseudoscience, are removed from our thoughts.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-28 08:12:00 UTC

  • “Judaism functions as fictional moralism by suggestion that enables systemic cre

    —“Judaism functions as fictional moralism by suggestion that enables systemic creation of hazards that can be exploited under the cover of that moral pretense.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-27 19:34:00 UTC

  • “Islam functions as weaponized hedonism for primitive low-agency males.”– Austy

    –“Islam functions as weaponized hedonism for primitive low-agency males.”– Austyn Pember


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-27 19:33:00 UTC

  • ISLAM IS AN ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY You’re stupid if you think islam is primitive. I

    ISLAM IS AN ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY

    You’re stupid if you think islam is primitive. It is an advanced technology by which the people of lowest intellectual, emotional, and physical ability, can impose costs through raiding, parasitism, over-reproduction, immigration, conversion, and informational, social, cultural, economic, and institutional devolution. Islam is an informational virus that provides the worst genetic pool possible with psychological rewards while demanding the least physical, emotional, and mental discipline. Islam is the ultimate psychological, and intellectual hedonism.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-27 17:11:00 UTC

  • VIA-NEGATIVA OF GODS Rome was pagan all along, and christians were a tiny minori

    VIA-NEGATIVA OF GODS

    Rome was pagan all along, and christians were a tiny minority, The emperor’s emphasis on the SI cult was somewhat of an attempt to bring unity (monotheism) to the empire, by expanding the cult of mithras. Its fairly obvious that the christians basically attempted to defeat the martial cult of the western roman empire by appropriating mithraism, the sol invictus cult, and the submission demanded of the jewish and persion and egyptians gods, and then justified it later with the biblical readings and instittions. So the army was infected by exposure to the persians from alexander onward. We already practice polytheism today. The question is not which gods we will all follow, but WHICH GODS WE WILL OUTLAW AND DESTROY.

    Let me say that again. Via Negativa: We destroy the false gods, the false rationalism, and the false sciences, and only the true gods, the true rationalisms, and the true sciences remain.

    WE NEED NOT INVENT NEW GODS TO FOLLOW BUT DEFEAT ALL GODS THAT ARE INCOMPATIBLE WITH NATURAL LAW


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-25 17:22:00 UTC

  • YOUR HISTORY: SOL INVICTUS : THE UNDEFEATED

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sol_InvictusKNOW YOUR HISTORY: SOL INVICTUS : THE UNDEFEATED


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-25 16:30:00 UTC

  • KNOW YOUR HISTORY: UNDER STRESS THE ROMANS REVERTED TO “SOL INVICTUS”

    KNOW YOUR HISTORY: UNDER STRESS THE ROMANS REVERTED TO

    “SOL INVICTUS”


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-25 16:28:00 UTC