A bad happy young christian is still better than a good just about anything else. Just is.
Theme: Religion
-
A bad happy young christian is still better than a good just about anything else
A bad happy young christian is still better than a good just about anything else. Just is. -
by Nick Heywood Watched a show on Queen Elizabeth. And in a particular scene, sh
by Nick Heywood
Watched a show on Queen Elizabeth.
And in a particular scene, she had Rev Graham to the palace after watching a few preachings on TV.
She explained how she felt so lonely. And was wondering if he understood and could offer any advice.
He, naturally, humbled himself. 🙂
And to paraphrase…
You’re the head of the Church of of England. Theres the Church and it’s hierarchy and teaching, then you, then God. How is it possible to not feel lonely? It’s not possible for me to empathize. I’m just a Man.
I thought that a brilliant explanation of what a monarchy is supposed to be. Some sort of wise archetype. Decider of last resort. etc etc.
And yes. That’d be f’n lonely! And bloody good reasoning for a monarchy.
Still don’t like the idea. But I think that’s just me hanging onto “Rebel” 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2018-01-07 11:48:00 UTC
-
by Nick Heywood Watched a show on Queen Elizabeth. And in a particular scene, sh
by Nick Heywood Watched a show on Queen Elizabeth. And in a particular scene, she had Rev Graham to the palace after watching a few preachings on TV. She explained how she felt so lonely. And was wondering if he understood and could offer any advice. He, naturally, humbled himself. 🙂 And to paraphrase… You’re the head of the Church of of England. Theres the Church and it’s hierarchy and teaching, then you, then God. How is it possible to not feel lonely? It’s not possible for me to empathize. I’m just a Man. I thought that a brilliant explanation of what a monarchy is supposed to be. Some sort of wise archetype. Decider of last resort. etc etc. And yes. That’d be f’n lonely! And bloody good reasoning for a monarchy. Still don’t like the idea. But I think that’s just me hanging onto “Rebel” 🙂 -
by Nick Heywood Watched a show on Queen Elizabeth. And in a particular scene, sh
by Nick Heywood Watched a show on Queen Elizabeth. And in a particular scene, she had Rev Graham to the palace after watching a few preachings on TV. She explained how she felt so lonely. And was wondering if he understood and could offer any advice. He, naturally, humbled himself. 🙂 And to paraphrase… You’re the head of the Church of of England. Theres the Church and it’s hierarchy and teaching, then you, then God. How is it possible to not feel lonely? It’s not possible for me to empathize. I’m just a Man. I thought that a brilliant explanation of what a monarchy is supposed to be. Some sort of wise archetype. Decider of last resort. etc etc. And yes. That’d be f’n lonely! And bloody good reasoning for a monarchy. Still don’t like the idea. But I think that’s just me hanging onto “Rebel” 🙂 -
Why Is The Middle East So Mystic?
If I told you the correct answer I’d probably be banned for ‘unpleasant but true speech’, but
1) it has a significant genetic component,
2) as well as demographic,
3) as well as cultural .
But let’s say it always has been this way.If I ask you to look up IQ by country. And then ask you to look up literacy by country. And then look up the number of books translated in that country. And then look up academic publications by country. And then if I ask you to look up the IQ demographics for religious, moral, legal, western-philosophical, and scientific classes. And then ask you to look up the content of the language, laws, narratives, and marital structures.
What you can’t (readily) look up is the distribution of (psychotic)female-to-male(autistic) brain structures and therefore personality traits by IQ, Nation, Race, Subrace, and Class. What is harder to look up is the degree of neoteny or its reversal by race and subrace. And it’s somewhat difficult to look up how neoteny or its opposite, can work in both male and female directions. Because it will take you months to put together all the research from all the different sources.
And what you might find is that:
a) small things in large numbers make vast differences.
b) that IQ and industriousness pretty much produce deterministic distributions.
c) countries have to govern for the middle of the population and the further than number is below IQ105 the worse it gets.
d) The underclasses (below 105) are 5 to 6 times as costly as the upper classes are productive(above 120), and are an outright burden as the number decreases.
e) That the middle east has the worst of all conditions, which is high population density of many competing tribes with high genetic ‘clannishness’ through centuries of inbreeding, as well as pervasive poverty, as well as centuries of ignorance, a justification of ignorance, the habituation of impulsiveness, none to little concept of objective scientific truth as we understand it, a primitive poetic language lacking operational grammar and semantics.Just how it is.
https://www.quora.com/Why-is-the-middle-east-so-mystic
-
Why Is The Middle East So Mystic?
If I told you the correct answer I’d probably be banned for ‘unpleasant but true speech’, but
1) it has a significant genetic component,
2) as well as demographic,
3) as well as cultural .
But let’s say it always has been this way.If I ask you to look up IQ by country. And then ask you to look up literacy by country. And then look up the number of books translated in that country. And then look up academic publications by country. And then if I ask you to look up the IQ demographics for religious, moral, legal, western-philosophical, and scientific classes. And then ask you to look up the content of the language, laws, narratives, and marital structures.
What you can’t (readily) look up is the distribution of (psychotic)female-to-male(autistic) brain structures and therefore personality traits by IQ, Nation, Race, Subrace, and Class. What is harder to look up is the degree of neoteny or its reversal by race and subrace. And it’s somewhat difficult to look up how neoteny or its opposite, can work in both male and female directions. Because it will take you months to put together all the research from all the different sources.
And what you might find is that:
a) small things in large numbers make vast differences.
b) that IQ and industriousness pretty much produce deterministic distributions.
c) countries have to govern for the middle of the population and the further than number is below IQ105 the worse it gets.
d) The underclasses (below 105) are 5 to 6 times as costly as the upper classes are productive(above 120), and are an outright burden as the number decreases.
e) That the middle east has the worst of all conditions, which is high population density of many competing tribes with high genetic ‘clannishness’ through centuries of inbreeding, as well as pervasive poverty, as well as centuries of ignorance, a justification of ignorance, the habituation of impulsiveness, none to little concept of objective scientific truth as we understand it, a primitive poetic language lacking operational grammar and semantics.Just how it is.
https://www.quora.com/Why-is-the-middle-east-so-mystic
-
THE HISTORY OF THE ENDING OF THE ABRAHAMIC DARK AGE MADE POSSIBLE BY THE EMPIRIC
THE HISTORY OF THE ENDING OF THE ABRAHAMIC DARK AGE MADE POSSIBLE BY THE EMPIRICAL ENLIGHTENMENT.
Of the English revolution,
The American revolution
The French Revolution
The The German Revolution
The Jewish Revolution
And the Russian Revolution …
And the Indian Revolution
And the Chinese Revolution….
And the South American Revolution….
And now the muslim revolution….
How long did the ‘change’ take?
What were the consequences both good and bad?
What ‘century’ have we just finished.
If you simply take a timeline, and stack those time periods, what you’ll see is that we endure from very short periods of peaceful change (German) to civil wars (English and American and Indian) to destructive but not bloody( south American) to bloody (Russian and French), to devastatingly bloody and persistent (Jewish), to extraordinarily bloody (Chinese and Muslim).
Source date (UTC): 2018-01-06 15:14:00 UTC
-
The History Of The Ending Of The Abrahamic Dark Age Made Possible By The Empirical Enlightenment.
Of the English revolution, The American revolution The French Revolution The The German Revolution The Jewish Revolution And the Russian Revolution … And the Indian Revolution And the Chinese Revolution…. And the South American Revolution…. And now the muslim revolution…. How long did the ‘change’ take? What were the consequences both good and bad? What ‘century’ have we just finished. If you simply take a timeline, and stack those time periods, what you’ll see is that we endure from very short periods of peaceful change (German) to civil wars (English and American and Indian) to destructive but not bloody( south American) to bloody (Russian and French), to devastatingly bloody and persistent (Jewish), to extraordinarily bloody (Chinese and Muslim). -
The History Of The Ending Of The Abrahamic Dark Age Made Possible By The Empirical Enlightenment.
Of the English revolution, The American revolution The French Revolution The The German Revolution The Jewish Revolution And the Russian Revolution … And the Indian Revolution And the Chinese Revolution…. And the South American Revolution…. And now the muslim revolution…. How long did the ‘change’ take? What were the consequences both good and bad? What ‘century’ have we just finished. If you simply take a timeline, and stack those time periods, what you’ll see is that we endure from very short periods of peaceful change (German) to civil wars (English and American and Indian) to destructive but not bloody( south American) to bloody (Russian and French), to devastatingly bloody and persistent (Jewish), to extraordinarily bloody (Chinese and Muslim).