Curt Doolittle

Theme: Religion

  • WHY THE PROGRESSIVES FAIL – BUT WE CANNOT LET THEM CREATE ANOTHER LEVANTINE ABRA

    WHY THE PROGRESSIVES FAIL – BUT WE CANNOT LET THEM CREATE ANOTHER LEVANTINE ABRAHAMIC DISASTER IN THE WEST. REVOLT AND SEPARATE.

    —“In functioning Parliamentary Democracies, “loss of supply” is a very rare event that immediately triggers a general election. The equivalent crisis in your tinpot Presidential System may play out quite differently.”— Kieran

    It has however, been a bulwark against the same creeping soviet-ization that has occurred in europe. Our country was designed to prohibit political activism, and demand all change by the private sector empirically by choice rather than ideally by force. A frozen gov’t is a good.

    —“If your premise is “government by the people, but not for the people” maybe”— Renee

    If your premise is, that the people engage in temporal folly that produces intertemporal catastrophe (which is empirically, the case), then, I agree to allow the fools to govern their way (capital consumption), and the rest of us intertemporally (capital accumulation).

    Hence the optimum, and ONLY MORAL proposition is to separate and let consumption run its course, while those of us accumulate capital and watchy you turn the ‘third way’ into the levantine way, just as christianity and islam did, and marxism postmodernism attempt to.

    Ergo, civil war is preferable to being dragged down into the levant, the desert and steppe, southern europe, south america, and india.Some of us prefer (wisely) to take the east asian path to survival and evolution rather than dysgenia. Thanks. It’s all math. And your side loses.

    Empirically, and this is unavoidable, you are headed to mirror brazil, the levant, arabia, and india. There are only two extreme strategies: dysgenia (your model) or eugenia (the northern european model) of many small homogenous polities competing in a market preserving both.

    It is always difficult to debate with the unsophisticated, but those unsophisticated with immoral sensibilities, and dysgenic strategies, are insufficiently rational (meaning evolved human). As such compromise is impossible, and separation necessary.

    The evidence of the 20th century experiment is in. it’s a failure. For the very reason that democracy and socialism have always been failures: the inability to prevent consumption to the point of maximum rents that produces inability to adapt to shocks.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-20 13:41:00 UTC

  • Why The Progressives Fail – But We Cannot Let Them Create Another Levantine Abrahamic Disaster In The West. Revolt And Separate.

    —“In functioning Parliamentary Democracies, “loss of supply” is a very rare event that immediately triggers a general election. The equivalent crisis in your tinpot Presidential System may play out quite differently.”— Kieran It has however, been a bulwark against the same creeping soviet-ization that has occurred in europe. Our country was designed to prohibit political activism, and demand all change by the private sector empirically by choice rather than ideally by force. A frozen gov’t is a good. —“If your premise is “government by the people, but not for the people” maybe”— Renee If your premise is, that the people engage in temporal folly that produces intertemporal catastrophe (which is empirically, the case), then, I agree to allow the fools to govern their way (capital consumption), and the rest of us intertemporally (capital accumulation). Hence the optimum, and ONLY MORAL proposition is to separate and let consumption run its course, while those of us accumulate capital and watchy you turn the ‘third way’ into the levantine way, just as christianity and islam did, and marxism postmodernism attempt to. Ergo, civil war is preferable to being dragged down into the levant, the desert and steppe, southern europe, south america, and india.Some of us prefer (wisely) to take the east asian path to survival and evolution rather than dysgenia. Thanks. It’s all math. And your side loses. Empirically, and this is unavoidable, you are headed to mirror brazil, the levant, arabia, and india. There are only two extreme strategies: dysgenia (your model) or eugenia (the northern european model) of many small homogenous polities competing in a market preserving both. It is always difficult to debate with the unsophisticated, but those unsophisticated with immoral sensibilities, and dysgenic strategies, are insufficiently rational (meaning evolved human). As such compromise is impossible, and separation necessary. The evidence of the 20th century experiment is in. it’s a failure. For the very reason that democracy and socialism have always been failures: the inability to prevent consumption to the point of maximum rents that produces inability to adapt to shocks.

  • Why Did A Black Man Arrest A Fellow Black Man, Put Him In Chains And Give Him To The White Man To Go And Sell Across The Ocean In The 18-19th Centuries?

    For profit. Why do you think? Have you been to africa? Have you seen those cultures? Particularly the Muslim ones? They are the inverse of ours. Stealing on behalf of your family is heroic. The golden rule is not only not admired, but not known, not observed, and antithetical to survival.

    People actually believe this marxist-postmodernist nonsense – it is exasperating. Look. People act rationally at all times which means they are immoral if it is profitable and they can get away with it. It’s just increasingly difficult tog et away with it because consumers are more profitable than slaves, serfs, and the poor.

    The world does not run by moral sentiments, but by caloric returns – just like the rest of the universe. And it must or we would not exist.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-did-a-black-man-arrest-a-fellow-black-man-put-him-in-chains-and-give-him-to-the-white-man-to-go-and-sell-across-the-ocean-in-the-18-19th-centuries

  • Why Did A Black Man Arrest A Fellow Black Man, Put Him In Chains And Give Him To The White Man To Go And Sell Across The Ocean In The 18-19th Centuries?

    For profit. Why do you think? Have you been to africa? Have you seen those cultures? Particularly the Muslim ones? They are the inverse of ours. Stealing on behalf of your family is heroic. The golden rule is not only not admired, but not known, not observed, and antithetical to survival.

    People actually believe this marxist-postmodernist nonsense – it is exasperating. Look. People act rationally at all times which means they are immoral if it is profitable and they can get away with it. It’s just increasingly difficult tog et away with it because consumers are more profitable than slaves, serfs, and the poor.

    The world does not run by moral sentiments, but by caloric returns – just like the rest of the universe. And it must or we would not exist.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-did-a-black-man-arrest-a-fellow-black-man-put-him-in-chains-and-give-him-to-the-white-man-to-go-and-sell-across-the-ocean-in-the-18-19th-centuries

  • Judaism, Christianity And Islam Are Civilization Destroyers

    Todd E. Magnusson Read one of his short little primer books on Sharia Law. It is probably the least understood and most important as its a political system and not just religious. Generally speaking, Islam is a civilization destroyer. Christianity is in its own right is a civilization destroyer as well, but by means of excessive mercy in the face of destruction.

  • JUDAISM, CHRISTIANITY AND ISLAM ARE CIVILIZATION DESTROYERS Todd E. Magnusson Re

    JUDAISM, CHRISTIANITY AND ISLAM ARE CIVILIZATION DESTROYERS

    Todd E. Magnusson

    Read one of his short little primer books on Sharia Law. It is probably the least understood and most important as its a political system and not just religious. Generally speaking, Islam is a civilization destroyer. Christianity is in its own right is a civilization destroyer as well, but by means of excessive mercy in the face of destruction.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-19 13:20:00 UTC

  • Judaism, Christianity And Islam Are Civilization Destroyers

    Todd E. Magnusson Read one of his short little primer books on Sharia Law. It is probably the least understood and most important as its a political system and not just religious. Generally speaking, Islam is a civilization destroyer. Christianity is in its own right is a civilization destroyer as well, but by means of excessive mercy in the face of destruction.

  • COMMON FEATURES: Gen 1: CHRISTIANITY, JUDAISM, ISLAM, Gen 2: COMMUNISM, MARXISM,

    COMMON FEATURES: Gen 1: CHRISTIANITY, JUDAISM, ISLAM, Gen 2: COMMUNISM, MARXISM, SOCIALISM, POSTMODERNISM, FEMINISM by Simon Ström There are many common features – both started out as Jewish minority movements centered around one or a few rogue rabbis, trapped inside aristocratic, European hegemonic states (Roman Empire/Russia, Germany etc), preaching egalitarian universalism for some unspecified reason (…you might speculate about pre-cognitive group interests at play…), moving on to rally women, slaves and the proles against established but perplexed and ill-equipped aristocratic regimes and narratives, resulting in the formation of highly centralized priesthood or party bureaucracies ripe with contempt for the preceding order, and a totalitarian propensity to set unchallengeable dogma about all things little and big.

  • COMMON FEATURES: Gen 1: CHRISTIANITY, JUDAISM, ISLAM, Gen 2: COMMUNISM, MARXISM,

    COMMON FEATURES: Gen 1: CHRISTIANITY, JUDAISM, ISLAM, Gen 2: COMMUNISM, MARXISM, SOCIALISM, POSTMODERNISM, FEMINISM

    by Simon Ström

    There are many common features – both started out as Jewish minority movements centered around one or a few rogue rabbis, trapped inside aristocratic, European hegemonic states (Roman Empire/Russia, Germany etc), preaching egalitarian universalism for some unspecified reason (…you might speculate about pre-cognitive group interests at play…), moving on to rally women, slaves and the proles against established but perplexed and ill-equipped aristocratic regimes and narratives, resulting in the formation of highly centralized priesthood or party bureaucracies ripe with contempt for the preceding order, and a totalitarian propensity to set unchallengeable dogma about all things little and big.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-19 13:18:00 UTC

  • COMMON FEATURES: Gen 1: CHRISTIANITY, JUDAISM, ISLAM, Gen 2: COMMUNISM, MARXISM,

    COMMON FEATURES: Gen 1: CHRISTIANITY, JUDAISM, ISLAM, Gen 2: COMMUNISM, MARXISM, SOCIALISM, POSTMODERNISM, FEMINISM by Simon Ström There are many common features – both started out as Jewish minority movements centered around one or a few rogue rabbis, trapped inside aristocratic, European hegemonic states (Roman Empire/Russia, Germany etc), preaching egalitarian universalism for some unspecified reason (…you might speculate about pre-cognitive group interests at play…), moving on to rally women, slaves and the proles against established but perplexed and ill-equipped aristocratic regimes and narratives, resulting in the formation of highly centralized priesthood or party bureaucracies ripe with contempt for the preceding order, and a totalitarian propensity to set unchallengeable dogma about all things little and big.