Aesthetics is a Science of Beauty. Moral Fictionalism Is Just Secular Religion for the Weak.
By Bill Joslin
–“the ‘ m’uh aesthetic thus your philo sucks’ is a variation of the Nirvana Fallacy. we’ve hammered out the first main branches of philos (metaphysics, epistemology, rhetoric and three of the four subbranches (politics, ethics, law).
IMO the privileging of aesthetics is an age thing – a young man’s complaint. After a few years of running a crew, business, or family (engaging with real consequences which extend beyond the personal domain) rectifies such notions… the flavour of the wine remains secondary to its ability to sustain the body”—
Brilliant.
Theme: Religion
-
Aesthetics is a Science of Beauty. Moral Fictionalism Is Just Secular Religion f
Aesthetics is a Science of Beauty. Moral Fictionalism Is Just Secular Religion for the Weak. By Bill Joslin –“the ‘ m’uh aesthetic thus your philo sucks’ is a variation of the Nirvana Fallacy. we’ve hammered out the first main branches of philos (metaphysics, epistemology, rhetoric and three of the four subbranches (politics, ethics, law). IMO the privileging of aesthetics is an age thing – a young man’s complaint. After a few years of running a crew, business, or family (engaging with real consequences which extend beyond the personal domain) rectifies such notions… the flavour of the wine remains secondary to its ability to sustain the body”— Brilliant. -
Aesthetics is a Science of Beauty. Moral Fictionalism Is Just Secular Religion f
Aesthetics is a Science of Beauty. Moral Fictionalism Is Just Secular Religion for the Weak.
By Bill Joslin
–“the ‘ m’uh aesthetic thus your philo sucks’ is a variation of the Nirvana Fallacy. we’ve hammered out the first main branches of philos (metaphysics, epistemology, rhetoric and three of the four subbranches (politics, ethics, law).
IMO the privileging of aesthetics is an age thing – a young man’s complaint. After a few years of running a crew, business, or family (engaging with real consequences which extend beyond the personal domain) rectifies such notions… the flavour of the wine remains secondary to its ability to sustain the body”—
Brilliant.
Source date (UTC): 2018-02-01 13:41:00 UTC
-
(Yep. It’s in jewish law and always has been.)
(Yep. It’s in jewish law and always has been.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-01-28 21:16:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/957724098876067840
Reply addressees: @h_pufnstuf @ReformJudaism @TheRAC
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/957722612699942914
IN REPLY TO:
@h_pufnstuf
@curtdoolittle @ReformJudaism @TheRAC The jewish moral intuition has two sides: one intuition for themselves and another for everyone else. But I learned this from you, I think.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/957722612699942914
-
“There is no God but Faust, and Darwin is his prophet.”— Simon Ström (genius)
—“There is no God but Faust, and Darwin is his prophet.”— Simon Ström (genius) -
“There is no God but Faust, and Darwin is his prophet.”— Simon Ström (genius)
—“There is no God but Faust, and Darwin is his prophet.”— Simon Ström (genius) -
“There is no God but Faust, and Darwin is his prophet.”— Simon Ström (genius)
—“There is no God but Faust, and Darwin is his prophet.”— Simon Ström
(genius)
Source date (UTC): 2018-01-24 09:46:00 UTC
-
1 – Generally, debates are a waste of time – in general, people are sufficiently
1 – Generally, debates are a waste of time – in general, people are sufficiently rational but insufficiently scientific, which is the purpose of pilpul->theology->rationality – to avoid it. I don’t know Insula’s abilities, Tom is probably sophisticated enough. I don’t know.
Source date (UTC): 2018-01-22 15:11:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/955458019176968192
Reply addressees: @Rewwgh @InsulaQui @TrueDilTom
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/955417881172471808
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/955417881172471808
-
The purpose of Pilpul, Abrahamism, Theology, and Philosophical Justificationism
The purpose of Pilpul, Abrahamism, Theology, and Philosophical Justificationism is to avoid Empiricism by which we demonstrate our imaginings and our reason are not falsified by reality .) -
The purpose of Pilpul, Abrahamism, Theology, and Philosophical Justificationism
The purpose of Pilpul, Abrahamism, Theology, and Philosophical Justificationism is to avoid Empiricism by which we demonstrate our imaginings and our reason are not falsified by reality .)
Source date (UTC): 2018-01-22 10:46:00 UTC