Theme: Religion

  • “Right-wing “bohemians” will never get it. Their sorry attempts at justifying de

    —“Right-wing “bohemians” will never get it. Their sorry attempts at justifying delving into magic idealism, occultism and other forms of filth. They’re clueless donkeys and dumb as a bag of rocks.” — Göran Dahl
  • Zizek is a purveyor of critique (by his own admission) and offers nothing but so

    Zizek is a purveyor of critique (by his own admission) and offers nothing but solace and false hope of insulation from reality to the weak – as did version one of the Abrahamists with the false promise of hope after death. At least the buddhists simply teach you to ignore it.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-06 21:05:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/971129615434600448

    Reply addressees: @HeritageNLegacy @No2Sovereignty @LueYee @JWilliamXIII

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/971128852771569664


    IN REPLY TO:

    @HeritageNLegacy

    @curtdoolittle @No2Sovereignty @LueYee @JWilliamXIII Man, you need some Heidegger or even Žižek. Lay off the vulgar materialism ideology

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/971128852771569664

  • Why Are North Africans And Middle-easterners Not Considered White In America?

    Because ‘white’ is a proxy for “Northern European Christian, for people no longer confined to europe, and no longer particularly christian, but increasingly aristotelian.”

    Even among europeans, we separate mediterraneans (southern europeans of greco-anatolian ancestors, from northern europeans (germanics and nordics). Italy really should divide into greek southern and german northern -except southern italy would then descend into the same poverty as has greece.

    And we separate slavs from germanics and nordics. Technically speaking ‘whites’ (europeans) evolved in poland-ukraine-russia, and evolved into modern ‘whites’ (europeans) on the north and baltic seas. It was only after the roman genocide against the Celts (Gaels) that the north germanic tribes were able to press south into Celtic (central european) lands and attack the empire.

    To some degree the Catholic(poor), protestant (Hajnal line), orthodox (outside hajnal line) map to genetic clades (mediterraneans and partial mediterraneans), germanics-nordics, and slavs.

    The subraces of west eurasia appear to have developed around the black sea. There were at least three major branches of proto-whites. (a) european, (b) balkan, (c) anatolian, (d)iranian and (e) those who evaporated upon entry into india. Some number of these people formed an early civilization on the narrows between what was ethiopia and today’s yemen. This appears to be where todays arabs and jews originated, and the migrated northward.

    The area of lebanon today evolved into a trading center that dominated the mediterranean until the greco-roman era, when rome (unfortunately) conquered that civilization. Some number of these people formed the ancient mesopotamian cities giving rise to the semitic language.

    In the era of nation states and empires we tend to think of territories, but in the early development of civlization, humans evolved near water. All of the dominant peoples developed near bodies of water.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-are-North-Africans-and-Middle-Easterners-not-considered-white-in-America

  • Why Are North Africans And Middle-easterners Not Considered White In America?

    Because ‘white’ is a proxy for “Northern European Christian, for people no longer confined to europe, and no longer particularly christian, but increasingly aristotelian.”

    Even among europeans, we separate mediterraneans (southern europeans of greco-anatolian ancestors, from northern europeans (germanics and nordics). Italy really should divide into greek southern and german northern -except southern italy would then descend into the same poverty as has greece.

    And we separate slavs from germanics and nordics. Technically speaking ‘whites’ (europeans) evolved in poland-ukraine-russia, and evolved into modern ‘whites’ (europeans) on the north and baltic seas. It was only after the roman genocide against the Celts (Gaels) that the north germanic tribes were able to press south into Celtic (central european) lands and attack the empire.

    To some degree the Catholic(poor), protestant (Hajnal line), orthodox (outside hajnal line) map to genetic clades (mediterraneans and partial mediterraneans), germanics-nordics, and slavs.

    The subraces of west eurasia appear to have developed around the black sea. There were at least three major branches of proto-whites. (a) european, (b) balkan, (c) anatolian, (d)iranian and (e) those who evaporated upon entry into india. Some number of these people formed an early civilization on the narrows between what was ethiopia and today’s yemen. This appears to be where todays arabs and jews originated, and the migrated northward.

    The area of lebanon today evolved into a trading center that dominated the mediterranean until the greco-roman era, when rome (unfortunately) conquered that civilization. Some number of these people formed the ancient mesopotamian cities giving rise to the semitic language.

    In the era of nation states and empires we tend to think of territories, but in the early development of civlization, humans evolved near water. All of the dominant peoples developed near bodies of water.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-are-North-Africans-and-Middle-Easterners-not-considered-white-in-America

  • by Bill Joslin –“Seems to me the recent arguing for myth, fiction etc stems fro

    by Bill Joslin –“Seems to me the recent arguing for myth, fiction etc stems from its power to persuade. Why I see it as an arguing for power. Sure fictions and myths, archetypes and transcendent ideal motivate and guide human behaviour, but so does law. Advocacy as mean to effect change (a spin or assumption from living in democracies and markets) logically leads to persuasion by information opposed to persuasion by force. A civilization doesn’t require fictions, it requires rule of law.”–
  • by Bill Joslin –“Seems to me the recent arguing for myth, fiction etc stems fro

    by Bill Joslin

    –“Seems to me the recent arguing for myth, fiction etc stems from its power to persuade. Why I see it as an arguing for power. Sure fictions and myths, archetypes and transcendent ideal motivate and guide human behaviour, but so does law. Advocacy as mean to effect change (a spin or assumption from living in democracies and markets) logically leads to persuasion by information opposed to persuasion by force.

    A civilization doesn’t require fictions, it requires rule of law.”–


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-05 09:09:00 UTC

  • by Bill Joslin –“Seems to me the recent arguing for myth, fiction etc stems fro

    by Bill Joslin –“Seems to me the recent arguing for myth, fiction etc stems from its power to persuade. Why I see it as an arguing for power. Sure fictions and myths, archetypes and transcendent ideal motivate and guide human behaviour, but so does law. Advocacy as mean to effect change (a spin or assumption from living in democracies and markets) logically leads to persuasion by information opposed to persuasion by force. A civilization doesn’t require fictions, it requires rule of law.”–
  • 2 – And Trotsky was the progenitor of the neoconservatives. Abrahamism version t

    2 – And Trotsky was the progenitor of the neoconservatives. Abrahamism version two came in the classes: feminists, postmodernists, marxists, libertarians, neocons. with aristocracy (meritocracy, sovereignty, reciprocity, evidentiary truth) as the target of their undermining.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-04 15:30:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/970320703563149312

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/970319506013872130


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Lord_Keynes2 I did answer. 1) The left (secular priesthood) pursued power by its historical means: moral fictionalism. The right (aristocracy) has practiced it by their usual means (law) since at least 700ad (bipartite manorialism and aggressive hanging), if not 2300bc. (land constraints).

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/970319506013872130


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @Lord_Keynes2 I did answer. 1) The left (secular priesthood) pursued power by its historical means: moral fictionalism. The right (aristocracy) has practiced it by their usual means (law) since at least 700ad (bipartite manorialism and aggressive hanging), if not 2300bc. (land constraints).

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/970319506013872130

  • The Abrahamic Deceits of The Supernatural Ancient World vs Pseudoscientific Mode

    The Abrahamic Deceits of The Supernatural Ancient World vs Pseudoscientific Modern World were fabricated and spread by gossip for the sole purpose of undermining Truth, Reciprocity, Markets, and Meritocracy. ie: Left dysgenics vs Right Eugenics. #Trump


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-04 12:54:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/970281355136393217

  • There is no difference between the Abrahamic deceits of Judaism, Christianity, a

    There is no difference between the Abrahamic deceits of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, and the Abrahamic deceits of Marxism, Postmodernism, and Feminism other than semantics. The Supernatural Ancient World vs Pseudoscientific Modern World. Both are just Outright Lying. #Trump


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-04 12:52:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/970280897521111040