(a) as ability declines demand for intuitionistic fictions increases, and conversely as ability increases demand for rationally decidable criteria increases. Meaning those of lesser ability require we appeal to intuitions, and those of greater ability require we appeal to reason. This is because those of lower ability have not been sufficiently domesticated (produced agency) by those of greater ability. (b) literary analogy using archetypes and archetypal story lines (we can list both archetypes and story lines) can be decomposed into rational terms and tested. Literary analogy allows loading and framing so that individuals can learn by intuition rather than reason (ie: by suggestion). But if we cannot decompose these analogies to scientific statements we do not know if they are false, or harmful or ‘evil’ as abrahamism has been. (d) people require a means of calculating (reasoning, thinking) in the broadest sense, and the most simple units of measure are anthropological. In the absence of tribal feedback they need what we call mindfulness but is better thought of a means of selecting and ignoring impulses (some of us call this agency). and in the absence of tribal community and dependence we need festivals and feasts. And to establish the limits we need an oath. All civilizations address this spectrum of mindfulness to oath, to feast, to festival to compensate for the competition produced by production, and the hierarchy that evolves form that division of knowledge, labor, and advocacy involved in the production of private, commercial, and public goods. This is because too few of us are evolved enough to survive without institutions that provide help to our remaining animal intuitions. We teach certain skills but what we do not teach is ‘sacredness of the commons’ that churches did, and we do not teach mindfulness or norms in a rational fashion. Religion is dying everywhere. ANd it is being replaced with things that are almost as bad. The question is how we provide the necessary services of religions in a manner not constituted by lies that do not decompose in to scientifically testable, and therefore indisputable prose.
Theme: Religion
-
Understanding Our Varied Mythos
Our myths split north of the black sea. The western (eventually odin), and eastern (eventually vedic). Then crossed over (shared) again south of the black sea (greek,anatolian, semitic, persian). But the differences remain the same. Authoritarian semitic, I don’t know how to cast persian except ‘like chinese’ as wisdom literature, the indic/vedic, and then the ‘rational’ germanic, roman, greek. So the spectrum of empirical to authoritarian to supernatural works eastward. I don’t know why other than to assume it’s a demographic necessity since we know the anatolians were working on religion as we understand it 8000bc. Even before the british isles were … 3000bc. So it s likely that the henge culture was informed of the anatolian culture. at least by story if not by experience. I assume that the semitic (fertile crescent) peoples had longer to work with the anatolian religion, and so that the persians (east) and the anatolians (west) and the greeks (far west), and the romans (farthest west), were all less affected given the distance. Unfortunately the fertile crescent meant food and that meant underclasses, and that mean authoritarianism. Hunters don’t need that stuff. 😉
-
Understanding Our Varied Mythos
Our myths split north of the black sea. The western (eventually odin), and eastern (eventually vedic). Then crossed over (shared) again south of the black sea (greek,anatolian, semitic, persian). But the differences remain the same. Authoritarian semitic, I don’t know how to cast persian except ‘like chinese’ as wisdom literature, the indic/vedic, and then the ‘rational’ germanic, roman, greek. So the spectrum of empirical to authoritarian to supernatural works eastward. I don’t know why other than to assume it’s a demographic necessity since we know the anatolians were working on religion as we understand it 8000bc. Even before the british isles were … 3000bc. So it s likely that the henge culture was informed of the anatolian culture. at least by story if not by experience. I assume that the semitic (fertile crescent) peoples had longer to work with the anatolian religion, and so that the persians (east) and the anatolians (west) and the greeks (far west), and the romans (farthest west), were all less affected given the distance. Unfortunately the fertile crescent meant food and that meant underclasses, and that mean authoritarianism. Hunters don’t need that stuff. 😉
-
UNDERSTANDING OUR VARIED MYTHOS Our myths split north of the black sea. The west
UNDERSTANDING OUR VARIED MYTHOS
Our myths split north of the black sea.
The western (eventually odin), and eastern (eventually vedic).
Then crossed over (shared) again south of the black sea (greek,anatolian, semitic, persian).
But the differences remain the same. Authoritarian semitic, I don’t know how to cast persian except ‘like chinese’ as wisdom literature, the indic/vedic, and then the ‘rational’ germanic, roman, greek. So the spectrum of empirical to authoritarian to supernatural works eastward. I don’t know why other than to assume it’s a demographic necessity since we know the anatolians were working on religion as we understand it 8000bc. Even before the british isles were … 3000bc. So it s likely that the henge culture was informed of the anatolian culture. at least by story if not by experience.
I assume that the semitic (fertile crescent) peoples had longer to work with the anatolian religion, and so that the persians (east) and the anatolians (west) and the greeks (far west), and the romans (farthest west), were all less affected given the distance.
Unfortunately the fertile crescent meant food and that meant underclasses, and that mean authoritarianism.
Hunters don’t need that stuff. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-15 17:24:00 UTC
-
“Side note: the original legal use of the word curse meant ‘land annexed by the
—“Side note: the original legal use of the word curse meant ‘land annexed by the church’. Land lost and given to the church was cursed land. JBP by faming European achievement as contingent on Christianity is “cursing” the property that is European identity.”— Bill Joslin
(elegant)
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-15 12:54:00 UTC
-
End (((Their))) Influence
Russia has chosen Orthodoxy to end (((their))) influence – because they never succeeded in developing the militia order – and therefore, never rule of law. As a member of northern european civilization, I prefer to end (((their))) influence with the militia order, rule of law, and a religion of man, nature, and history. Because of the fervency of the protestant members of the church, this can only be done by persisting the church in some form, by retaining it’s assets, but expanding it’s myths, the oath, and the feast, back into the ‘grove’ where failures of diligence in the garden are immediate and obvious.
-
End (((Their))) Influence
Russia has chosen Orthodoxy to end (((their))) influence – because they never succeeded in developing the militia order – and therefore, never rule of law. As a member of northern european civilization, I prefer to end (((their))) influence with the militia order, rule of law, and a religion of man, nature, and history. Because of the fervency of the protestant members of the church, this can only be done by persisting the church in some form, by retaining it’s assets, but expanding it’s myths, the oath, and the feast, back into the ‘grove’ where failures of diligence in the garden are immediate and obvious.
-
Russia has chosen Orthodoxy to end (((their))) influence – because they never su
Russia has chosen Orthodoxy to end (((their))) influence – because they never succeeded in developing the militia order – and therefore, never rule of law. As a member of northern european civilization, I prefer to end (((their))) influence with the militia order, rule of law, and a religion of man, nature, and history. Because of the fervency of the protestant members of the church, this can only be done by persisting the church in some form, by retaining it’s assets, but expanding it’s myths, the oath, and the feast, back into the ‘grove’ where failures of diligence in the garden are immediate and obvious.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-15 10:28:00 UTC
-
Once you understand that our ‘bible’ was the works of Homer – the tragedy of ach
Once you understand that our ‘bible’ was the works of Homer – the tragedy of achilles – and the greek myths as parables, and finally aristotle as our equivalent of a prophet, it becomes very clear that the easterners who were not of our line and who invented the great lies of abrahamism did so with the same intuitionistic conspiracy as women undermine their males, and the (((opposition))) undermined the scientific, romantic, and economic revolution.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-15 09:37:00 UTC
-
Understanding Odin and His Companions
by Bill Joslin The optimum number of wolves for hunting is two. However, when factoring in meat lost to scavenging crows and ravens, plus the time and effort in chasing these corvids off the kill, the optimum rises to six. On the other hand, crows and ravens form bonds with wolves and wolves follow crow calls to find game. They have a symbiotic, cooperative relationship. The corvids help the wolves find game and in turn the corvids gain carcasses to scanvenge. This relationship deepens to the point that crows and wolves form play bonds. And the population of wolves per square mile depends on the corvid population. Crows created the wolf pack. There exists a strong theory that wolves domesticated themselves. They did so by following human hunting parties and lingering on the edge of human settlements. The wolves who were less proximity sensitive (a proto-domestication trait) remained around humans for an easy meal, and those who were higher in proximity sensitivity returned to the crows. Over time wolves which stayed near humans and shared the low proximity sensitivity trait mated and thus began the biological domestication of wolves. Wolves demonstrating domestication traits (smaller teeth, floppy ears, shorter snouts, curly tails) dates back nearly 20,000 years prior to human and dogs living together. With out the domestication of dogs, man most likely would not have domesticated other animals (all domestic animals : cows, goats etc are not likely candidates for domestication compared to other available choices). Without domestication of animals and then plants, man may not have evolved advanced social systems. Wolves created man. Crows, wolves, man – Odin with his crow and wolf companions. It might seem like mythological nonsense but it is not based in metaphysical lies institutionalized as law like other religions