THE DISEASE GRADIENT ANALOGY
Postmodernism is like Syphilis
Christianity is like Tuburculosis,
Judaism is like the Plague.
Islam like Cancer
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-20 09:22:00 UTC
THE DISEASE GRADIENT ANALOGY
Postmodernism is like Syphilis
Christianity is like Tuburculosis,
Judaism is like the Plague.
Islam like Cancer
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-20 09:22:00 UTC
http://www.adriennecastellon.com/2018/05/18/why-we-need-wise-spiritual-leaders-in-a-secular-age/
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-19 22:58:00 UTC
Truth benefits all, at the expense of those who lie. All abrahamism is a lie. All people under abrahamism declined.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-18 13:56:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/997475987549016064
Reply addressees: @naifadham @Fourth_stage
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/997475193244307460
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/997475193244307460
–“Everything in this Era causes the Imams to Dance. I think the whole world is ready to deal with Devil so long as it is in his interest. Or even fighting God so long as it is in his interest.”—
Truth benefits all, at the expense of those who lie. All abrahamism is a lie. All people under abrahamism declined. There is no difference between drugs, alcohol, cigarettes, abrahamic religion, and buddhist religion: It is all to create an environment of lies.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-18 10:11:00 UTC
how the chinese deal with islam
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-18 07:10:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/997373906834124800
how the chinese deal with islam
https://apnews.com/6e151296fb194f85ba69a8babd972e4b/Chinese-mass-indoctrination-camps-evoke-Cultural-Revolution
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-18 03:10:00 UTC
without commensurable categories you can literally make a sensible argument for anything. Thats’ why Pllpul worked, and why it spread to christian theology, then to continental philosophy, and now to marxism-postmodernism.
Grammars matter.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-18 01:27:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/997287421653016576
THE PROBLEM OF SACRILIZATION
by Bill Anderson
A value system is a fundamental building block of cooperation, it must be shared by all members of the cooperative group.
Religion = sacralized value system.
The US Constitution was an attempt to sacralize a value system integrated with a market system.
That experiment failed.
Conclusion: markets are incapable of maintaining a sacralized value system. Market systems are too easily subverted, thus the value system is easily subverted.
A “pope” is a king (sheriff) whose job is to defend a sacralized value system. The shared and sacralized value system is a necessary but insufficient precondition for civilization, and markets are a necessary but insufficient precondition of western civilization.
A king is a sheriff whose job is to defend the extended family, known as the nation, and their collective assets (commons).
Merchant, King, Pope.
Western civilization depends on the Pope and the King cooperating to defend the commons, while allowing the Merchant to produce unmolested, except where his production consumes the shared value system or the nation’s commons.
The Merchant must never be freed, he must always be a servant. He must be chained to the Family and to God.
There can be no “market government”, where the Merchant is King.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-17 18:10:00 UTC
—“”Religion causes war”—
by Bill Anderson
You have the causality backwards. Males form tribes so that they can control a breeding population of women. Males who fail to do so will be conquered and their genes displaced, so violent conflict is unavoidable. These breeding populations will produce survival behaviors based on their genetic inclinations and their environment. These behaviors will be prioritized, or valued differently in each population, thus distinct value systems emerge (say monogamy vs polygamy for example). These distinct survival strategies are often incommensurate, and thus conflict is the result of their proximity. Some values are the result of “black swan events” which cannot be predicted or are multi generational processes which have catastrophic results. Pre-literate peoples communicated these lessons via myth, and sacralized (made static) those values as God given commandments.
So, religions don’t cause war, competing survival strategies cause war. Religion is the result of a value system (survival strategy), not the cause of it.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-17 18:07:00 UTC
—“Politics and religion are different and are extremely hard to mix together”—James Portocarrero Judaism and islam do it. The church was too weak to do it. Chinese never had the problem. WHY: homogeneity = reason. Heterogeneity = Religion. THAT’S THE REASON The problem is heterogeneity (diversity). Religion = Stagnation to create homogeneity that doesn’t exist. Law = Adaptation to change in homogeneity that does exist. REALLY. THAT’S IT. There is a reason for ‘demand’ for religion There is a reason for ‘demand’ for socialization.