Curt Doolittle

Theme: Religion

  • photos_and_videos/your_posts/35628790_10156437406062264_279548915806633984_o_101

    photos_and_videos/your_posts/35628790_10156437406062264_279548915806633984_o_10156437406052264.jpg END ABRAHAMISM IN ALL ITS FORMS FOREVER.Giego CaleiroAs I always say… know your enemy.Jun 19, 2018 8:19amJames BrittinghamLevels of Abrahamism that shouldn’t be possible.Jun 19, 2018 8:34amHunter DuncanWhen a sick disgusting people can openly discuss how to destroy you and all that you love but you’re not allowed to hate them lolJun 19, 2018 8:56amCharlie DeltaPeak even.Jun 19, 2018 9:12amRick HdTarik HnichJun 19, 2018 9:17amAnne SummersCurt am I understanding correctly that you are saying Abrahamism is Marxism+God?Jun 19, 2018 9:26amCurt DoolittleAbrahamism = Pilpul(positiva) + Critique(negativa) = (undermining, loading, framing, overloading, suggestion, obscurantism, propagandism, fictionalisms) = Gossip = Female Group Strategy of Undermining Alphas = Female reproductive strategy of advancing her high-investment offspring regardless of merit.Jun 19, 2018 9:36amNick BoerWhat would we be like in a post abrahamism age?Jun 19, 2018 11:08amColin HigginsAbrahamism, as expressed here and elsewhere, leads to neurosis in the western psyche.Jun 19, 2018 2:59pmAndrew ClaytonThe ideas of the Frankfurt School are incredibly pervasive in academia, yet if you bring up something like the Kalergi plan you’re called a nut or worse. It’s actually quite impressive how many people have been kept completely in the dark on this stuff.Jun 19, 2018 7:00pmMichael D. AbbottI’m confused. You agree with Derrida????Jun 20, 2018 10:10pmCurt Doolittleno. i agree he was a cancer.Jun 21, 2018 5:48amEND ABRAHAMISM IN ALL ITS FORMS FOREVER.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-19 08:17:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/35628790_10156437406062264_27954891

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/35628790_10156437406062264_279548915806633984_o_10156437406052264.jpg END ABRAHAMISM IN ALL ITS FORMS FOREVER.Giego CaleiroAs I always say… know your enemy.Jun 19, 2018 8:19amJames BrittinghamLevels of Abrahamism that shouldn’t be possible.Jun 19, 2018 8:34amHunter DuncanWhen a sick disgusting people can openly discuss how to destroy you and all that you love but you’re not allowed to hate them lolJun 19, 2018 8:56amCharlie DeltaPeak even.Jun 19, 2018 9:12amRick Hd@[100000926435843:2048:Tarik Hnich]Jun 19, 2018 9:17amAnne SummersCurt am I understanding correctly that you are saying Abrahamism is Marxism+God?Jun 19, 2018 9:26amCurt DoolittleAbrahamism = Pilpul(positiva) + Critique(negativa) = (undermining, loading, framing, overloading, suggestion, obscurantism, propagandism, fictionalisms) = Gossip = Female Group Strategy of Undermining Alphas = Female reproductive strategy of advancing her high-investment offspring regardless of merit.Jun 19, 2018 9:36amColin HigginsAbrahamism, as expressed here and elsewhere, leads to neurosis in the western psyche.Jun 19, 2018 2:59pmAndrew ClaytonThe ideas of the Frankfurt School are incredibly pervasive in academia, yet if you bring up something like the Kalergi plan you’re called a nut or worse. It’s actually quite impressive how many people have been kept completely in the dark on this stuff.Jun 19, 2018 7:00pmMichael D. AbbottI’m confused. You agree with Derrida????Jun 20, 2018 10:10pmCurt Doolittleno. i agree he was a cancer.Jun 21, 2018 5:48amEND ABRAHAMISM IN ALL ITS FORMS FOREVER.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-19 08:17:00 UTC

  • “Some of the most obvious ways to ensure opacity of competition rules are religi

    —“Some of the most obvious ways to ensure opacity of competition rules are religion, moral, Keynesianism, and legal monopolies. (Production of public goods, a very obnoxious way of slavery for costumers aka people)”—José Francisco Mayora

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-17 14:27:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1008355347516526592

  • “Some of the most obvious ways to ensure opacity of competition rules are religi

    —“Some of the most obvious ways to ensure opacity of competition rules are religion, moral, Keynesianism, and legal monopolies. (Production of public goods, a very obnoxious way of slavery for costumers aka people)”—José Francisco Mayora

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-17 10:26:00 UTC

  • “The blood of the heroes is closer to God than the ink of the philosophers and t

    “The blood of the heroes is closer to God than the ink of the philosophers and the prayers of the faithful.”
    ― Julius Evola, Revolt Against the Modern World

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 22:12:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1008110086525456386

  • an example of a natural and purposeful ritual for religion, in the sense the rom

    an example of a natural and purposeful ritual for religion, in the sense the romans used it.

    behavior that binds a people together, without addressing nonsensical mysticism.

    another great example comes from “Speaker for the Dead” by Orson Scott Card. https://www.facebook.com/bbc/videos/2226882743993579/

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 20:46:00 UTC

  • Is Natural Law a Cult?

    (Literally, the one ‘true’ religion?) —“Propertarianism and Testimonialism are made up religions.”— Joseph Kane Um…. Testiness aside… You might argue that putting the Natural Law of reciprocity of Sovereign Men above all other considerations is just science, or you might say that choosing that science is equivalent to a religion. I wouldn’t disagree with you too much if you cast it as a religion. – It provides an ultimate goal (transcendence), – It provides a group evolutionary strategy (rapid adaptations through markets), – It provides a moral ethical, and legal code (reciprocity), – It puts limits on the actions of government, – it requires a continuously born cost of truth telling, an oath, and the ritual of oath taking, the practice of military rituals and feasts. – And for the western people, our history provides a non-false mythos of continuous success at the transformation of self and man into gods. So as such *it would be one one true religion* for the simple reason that it would be the one religion without falsehood. The Cult of The Law is the Religion of Men As Gods. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine.

  • Is Natural Law a Cult?

    (Literally, the one ‘true’ religion?) —“Propertarianism and Testimonialism are made up religions.”— Joseph Kane Um…. Testiness aside… You might argue that putting the Natural Law of reciprocity of Sovereign Men above all other considerations is just science, or you might say that choosing that science is equivalent to a religion. I wouldn’t disagree with you too much if you cast it as a religion. – It provides an ultimate goal (transcendence), – It provides a group evolutionary strategy (rapid adaptations through markets), – It provides a moral ethical, and legal code (reciprocity), – It puts limits on the actions of government, – it requires a continuously born cost of truth telling, an oath, and the ritual of oath taking, the practice of military rituals and feasts. – And for the western people, our history provides a non-false mythos of continuous success at the transformation of self and man into gods. So as such *it would be one one true religion* for the simple reason that it would be the one religion without falsehood. The Cult of The Law is the Religion of Men As Gods. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine.

  • “The blood of the heroes is closer to God than the ink of the philosophers and t

    “The blood of the heroes is closer to God than the ink of the philosophers and the prayers of the faithful.”

    ― Julius Evola, Revolt Against the Modern World

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 18:12:00 UTC

  • Christians Call It “testifying” Because It Sounds Better than “lying.”

    Eli Harman June 14, 2017 · Christians call it “testifying” because it sounds better than “lying.” But words actually mean things. And properly speaking one can only “testify” about what is in one’s personal, first hand, knowledge, which never includes stories about life after death and rarely includes those about supposed events, miraculous or mundane, thousands of years ago. Conflating storytelling with testimony is just lying about testifying, and probably lying about the contents of those stories as well. If one says “I believe that virtue in this life will be rewarded in another, in these particular ways” then one is simply testifying about the *beliefs* that motivate ones actions But if one says, as if it is a matter of fact, “Virtue in this life is rewarded in another, and in these particular ways” then one is simply conflating theory with fact. There is no problem with ADOPTING a theory and using it, with or without evidence, as long as the facts available do not contradict it (and sometimes even if they do.) But passing it off as fact, when it is not fact, is to make more of it than one honestly may.