Theme: Reform

  • Q: Curt: –“I don’t see capitalism surviving the technological singularity.”– C

    Q: Curt: –“I don’t see capitalism surviving the technological singularity.”–
    Capitalism didn’t survive 2008. But rule of law did and we’re in the era of restoring ‘reciprocity’ in trade – which is the difference between capitalism and rule of law.

    So, the end of capitalism per say is probably not true. The industrial age has produced an absence of the hand of man and the resulting aesthetics. I suspect those of us who are arguing in favor of working for the commons rather than the private sector will shift.

    In other words, more of the scope of work in exchange for income will come from various levels of government. Not exactly the depression era WPA but a little more ‘soviet’ than I think most of us might wish.

    But europe pre-war was a vast open air museum. And there is no reason we won’t return to that. Otherwise, Sitting around means idle hands make ill will.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-20 03:02:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881175466503200768

  • RT @KevinKileyCA: My plan for Newsom-proofing California: End the Sanctuary Stat

    RT @KevinKileyCA: My plan for Newsom-proofing California: End the Sanctuary State. Stop Medi-Cal for Illegal Immigrants. Kill High-Speed Ra…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-19 19:07:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881055940214178225

  • Probably not, without separating the houses as one of the remedies we’ve suggest

    Probably not, without separating the houses as one of the remedies we’ve suggested.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-16 16:49:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1879933921032544664

    Reply addressees: @WalterIII @AutistocratMS @LukeWeinhagen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1879933396039979132

  • LINDSAY’S “WOKE CENTER” By his own criteria, by his own demonstrated argument, J

    LINDSAY’S “WOKE CENTER”
    By his own criteria, by his own demonstrated argument, James Lindsay @ConceptualJames represents the “Woke Center”: Meaning all is well, and don’t change anything, we’re all doing fine here. Elite overproduction. Credentialism, Financialism, Labor arbitrage, and parasitic extraction from the middle, working, and lower classes is not happening.” James engages in verbal hand waving in order to criticize the right and left while demonstrating he’s using the same techniques invented by the left, copied and used by the right against the left, and by lindsay to claim some sort of privileged insight, ridiculing both, without providing a single solution to the crisis of the age – and in doing so, persisting the crisis of the age. The only reason he gains any attention is his imitation of Trump to accuse and provoke moral outrage for attention while contributing nothing to the solution to the very real problems we’ve produced by the combination of the progressive and marxist and neoliberal economic ideologies.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-13 03:24:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1878644225837068288

  • Am I crazy to repatriate my tech company to the USA and incorporate NLI’s work i

    Am I crazy to repatriate my tech company to the USA and incorporate NLI’s work into its AI? I mean, do I want to actually go back to running a company instead working of full time on a think tank? 😉 Do I really want to take these fellow nerds and build a ‘truth and reciprocity’…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-09 19:51:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1877443168377122966

  • “DEI set us back twenty to thirty years, because they destroyed our entire educa

    –“DEI set us back twenty to thirty years, because they destroyed our entire education system through the department of education. And students were taught absolutely nothing. And now we’re seeing them come into the workforce as gen Z and they’re the unemployable, unhirable people, because they’re activists, lazy, self entitled, they don’t do work and they don’t know anything – and they don’t know STEM. Our entire education system needs to be revamped.”–
    https://t.co/2S0AIyalEp


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-07 17:54:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1876688760198610944

  • “DEI set us back twenty to thirty years, because the destroyed our entire educat

    –“DEI set us back twenty to thirty years, because the destroyed our entire education system through the department of education. And students were taught absolutely nothing. And now we’re seeing them come into the workforce as gen Z and they’re the unemployable, unhirable people, because they’re activists, lazy, self entitled, they don’t do work and they don’t know anything – and they don’t know STEM. Our entire education system needs to be revamped.”–
    https://t.co/2S0AIyalEp


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-07 17:54:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1876682528993746944

  • Correct. But we need you to continue your work (and work with us if possible) si

    Correct. But we need you to continue your work (and work with us if possible) since at some point we will either convince enough of the necessary people (the majority middle), forcibly impose it to restore it and our civilization, or our civilization will pass from the earth. And…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-06 22:26:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1876395042329493958

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1876392842941345794

  • ADVICE FOR CANADA: Our organization suggests the following. 1) The Canadian cons

    ADVICE FOR CANADA:
    Our organization suggests the following.

    1) The Canadian constitution made the parliament not the people sovereign – the same mistake made in the rest of the anglosphere. The American constitutions makes the people sovereign over the parliament. This simple failure to preserve the sovereignty of the people is the origin of the undermining of Canadian people.

    2) The people and the parliament are limited by three properties rarely understood, and almost never understood in the States: That the constitution is EMPIRICAL:
    (a) Natural Law (Citizenship as mutual guarantee of Self determination by self determined means, sovereignty in demonstrated interests, reciprocity in display word and deed: tort) as the basis and enumerated rights as enforcement of natural law,
    (b) Concurrency across regions and classes – not majority – in voting and Legislation.
    (c) Common Law: commonality in findings of the court, under natural law and concurrent legislation, producing a government that does not rule, but that serves as a market for the production of commons between states(provinces) and classes.
    If you do not have both popular sovereignty, natural law, concurrency and commonality the people are subjects not sovereigns. They are RULED. Not Governed.

    3) In an information age, there is no value to representatives – they merely create a vehicle for ideology, conspiracy against the people, purchase by special interests, a race to the bottom (tyranny), and corruption. Direct democracy eliminates this vulnerability. Yet direct democracy still requires houses for the classes (Senate(provinces), Upper House (contributors), and a lower house (dependents).)

    4) Please do not give up the Monarchy. Despite centuries of propaganda the solution to government is expansion of the division of labor of governing, not replacement of it. The British Crown requires reinforcement not debasement or elimination. “The purpose of monarchy is to function as a judge of last resort, and above parliament (houses) and legislation in restoration of constitution, natural law, concurrency, and commonality. Our monarchies are constitutionally too weak to protect us from the failings of democratic and government and it’s capture by ideology and credentialism and corruption. And as we have seen overwhelmingly, democratic institutions always fail at the margins. Canada is an example. The USA is an example. Every postwar government outside of liechtenstein and switzerland has been an example.

    5) As many participants in today’s X Space have stated, you must fully integrate and conform and demonstrate loyalty to that culture (informal institutions) and its formal institutions. Or they must exit. As such skepticism to immigrants and skepticism to seditionists (take Quebec for example) must be defended against through education, formal, and informal institutions.

    Affections
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Reply addressees: @JohnnyNash77


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-06 22:25:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1876394573687300096

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1876365732109312017

  • Let me translate: Elon is saying that Reform needs someone that can make use of

    Let me translate: Elon is saying that Reform needs someone that can make use of social media to bypass the mainstream (dying) media. I don’t see this as replacing Nigel. I see this as we need more voices acting on behalf of reform so that we reach new media as well as old.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-05 18:47:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1875977558510145988

    Reply addressees: @JuliaHB1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1875914587859812429