Curt Doolittle

Theme: Reform

  • Q: IS MARRIAGE IN THE WEST “BAITING INTO HAZARD?” (yes but it’s fixable) Right n

    Q: IS MARRIAGE IN THE WEST “BAITING INTO HAZARD?”
    (yes but it’s fixable)
    Right now it sure does. However, that’s due to “positive law” that violated natural law, the common law, concurrent legislation, and all evidence across all of human history. if we are going to permit divorces then we have to restore liability for interference in a marriage, and end no-fault divorce, child support, and alimony. And AFAIK that will all end this decade.

    Reply addressees: @Chris29819258

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-20 18:05:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637878159646261249

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637869080366440450

  • I stated the postwar strategy. That strategy ended in 2001. There is no ‘strateg

    I stated the postwar strategy.
    That strategy ended in 2001.
    There is no ‘strategy’ at present.
    The deep state won’t let us reform it.
    Most of the time a war is required to reform a state.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 22:58:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635777513439006722

    Reply addressees: @SaitouHajime00

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635709087177658368

  • BAILOUTS FOR BANKS STUDENT LOANS AND .. TAXES? JC, (all); How would you feel if

    BAILOUTS FOR BANKS STUDENT LOANS AND .. TAXES?

    JC, (all);
    How would you feel if we said, ok, it’s unfair to bail out existing student loans back to X year, and so instead we paid student loans back to X year, and we refunded student loans way back to Y year?

    That would be… https://t.co/4iegXKIpj0

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 15:49:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635669447154319361

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635363009517486080

  • Why is understanding a problem and tyring to solve it ‘complaining’. It’s not fo

    Why is understanding a problem and tyring to solve it ‘complaining’. It’s not for me to decide. Instead, there are a field of possibilities we can list, and the people can choose.

    I didn’t write the reforms to the law, constitution and all the policies as commands, but as a set…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 03:02:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635476354320814081

    Reply addressees: @AuthorCreekmore @FrailSkeleton

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635474660757237760

  • It’s concepts from the reforms, yes

    It’s concepts from the reforms, yes.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-12 01:55:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634734927550853121

    Reply addressees: @Hail__To_You

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634730994250006528

  • THE NECESSITY OF ONE STRATEGIC CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM: HAZARDING. The hardest lim

    THE NECESSITY OF ONE STRATEGIC CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM: HAZARDING.
    The hardest limitation to place on legislators when we reform our law and constitution consists of two parts: the prohibition on a) creating a moral hazard, and b) baiting into hazard to promote it.

    For this reason we have had to outlaw the PROPOSAL of legislation that violates the natural law, and in particular baiting into hazard by advocating a moral hazard. And punishment for doing so.

    All leftism consists of promoting a moral hazard, baiting into hazard, social construction of falsehoods to advocate it. Every leftist ambition is an effort to deny immutable laws of the universe: physical scarcity, behavioral amoral acquisitiveness, evolutionary load and selection, and the logic we used to describe those laws.

    All leftism is crime. Why? The evasion of responsibiilty and resulting hierarchy of standing for carrying the burdent of that responsibilty for incraesing numbers over increasing time frames.

    The law is ready to add to the constitution.
    Y’all just have to show up and make it happen.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Instittue

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-11 15:22:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634575491746213891

  • THE NECESSITY OF ONE STRATEGIC CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM: HAZARDING. The hardest lim

    THE NECESSITY OF ONE STRATEGIC CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM: HAZARDING.
    The hardest limitation to place on legislators when we reform our law and constitution consists of two parts: the prohibition on a) creating a moral hazard, and b) baiting into hazard to promote it.

    For this reason we have had to outlaw the PROPOSAL of legislation that violates the natural law, and in particular baiting into hazard by advocating a moral hazard. And punishment for doing so.

    All leftism consists of promoting a moral hazard, baiting into hazard, social construction of falsehoods to advocate it. Every leftist ambition is an effort to deny immutable laws of the universe: physical scarcity, behavioral amoral acquisitiveness, evolutionary load and selection, and the logic we used to describe those laws.

    All leftism is crime. Why? The evasion of responsibiilty and resulting hierarchy of standing for carrying the burdent of that responsibilty for incraesing numbers over increasing time frames.

    The law is ready to add to the constitution.
    Y’all just have to show up and make it happen.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Instittue

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-11 15:22:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634575491662266371

  • (lame critics) FIXING THE BANKING PROBLEM FROM GAMBLING TO MEASURING RE: Silicon

    (lame critics)
    FIXING THE BANKING PROBLEM
    FROM GAMBLING TO MEASURING
    RE: Silicon Valley Bank

    Now, look at the parade of me-too’s blaming the president, administration, treasury, and fed for another massive failure. I think this is the second or third worst administration in our history. But lay blame where it’s due, not where it isn’t.

    Let me clue you in.
    Banks are in a market.
    The government creates rules of that market – the rules of the ‘game’.
    The rules of the game force competitors to the limits of the rules.
    The government can’t act in opposition to the rules it creates – unless the do it equally to all.
    They can’t do it equally to all. Why?
    The compound debt system does not work.
    Fixing the compound debt system is disruptive.
    The transparency necessary by fixing that system would handcuff politicians and terrify the public.
    So no one is going to fix this until it’s so bad that there are no alternatives. (that’s gonna happen)
    But (a) we absolutely positively know how to fix it. And (b) it’ll be disruptive. So we can only fix it during a crisis where we’re curing that disruption by fixing it with another.
    Economics and finance is not complicated if you’re measuring instead of gambling.
    Our system of world credit is based on gambling not measuring.
    FIxing it’s possible.
    And it’s eventually necessary.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 21:16:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634302164230127620

  • (lame critics) FIXING THE BANKING PROBLEM FROM GAMBLING TO MEASURING RE: Silicon

    (lame critics)
    FIXING THE BANKING PROBLEM
    FROM GAMBLING TO MEASURING
    RE: Silicon Valley Bank

    Now, look at the parade of me-too’s blaming the president, administration, treasury, and fed for another massive failure. I think this is the second or third worst administration in our history. But lay blame where it’s due, not where it isn’t.

    Let me clue you in.
    Banks are in a market.
    The government creates rules of that market – the rules of the ‘game’.
    The rules of the game force competitors to the limits of the rules.
    The government can’t act in opposition to the rules it creates – unless the do it equally to all.
    They can’t do it equally to all. Why?
    The compound debt system does not work.
    Fixing the compound debt system is disruptive.
    The transparency necessary by fixing that system would handcuff politicians and terrify the public.
    So no one is going to fix this until it’s so bad that there are no alternatives. (that’s gonna happen)
    But (a) we absolutely positively know how to fix it. And (b) it’ll be disruptive. So we can only fix it during a crisis where we’re curing that disruption by fixing it with another.
    Economics and finance is not complicated if you’re measuring instead of gambling.
    Our system of world credit is based on gambling not measuring.
    FIxing it’s possible.
    And it’s eventually necessary.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 21:16:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634302164058120193

  • (mathiness in econ) WHY ISN’T BANK REGULATION WORKING? (The short, or sorta-shor

    (mathiness in econ)
    WHY ISN’T BANK REGULATION WORKING?
    (The short, or sorta-short answer, and what it would require to fix it.)

    It’s obvious really. But you know, they promised the vox populi never-ending growth, ever-increasing irresponsibility, and democracy requires… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1634284552276398088

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 20:13:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634286337498009631