RT @paulg: A huge policy mistake in one graph. https://t.co/JQbtDa0cql

Source date (UTC): 2023-05-09 09:57:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1655874604441694208
RT @paulg: A huge policy mistake in one graph. https://t.co/JQbtDa0cql

Source date (UTC): 2023-05-09 09:57:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1655874604441694208
@verified
SMALL ORGS
1) Thank you for Twitter Verified Accounts.
2) Thank you for Twitter Verified Orgs
3) We agree with the policy and costs for verified orgs.
4) Our org is a small think tank that can’t afford the 1K a month, because we are too small at present. But with Twitter Blue verified accounts, we can use signatures in posts for our own branding.
5) But this doesn’t solve the problem of false representation of our organization. And I don’t really see any option for ‘small accounts’, where individuals pay the fees themselves, but can be included in a group (list) whose members are open to administration, and the group name is published along with the user name (or some equivalent).
I would love to see a solution to that problem, and it doesn’t seem like much more than a twitter circle that adds a tagline to a tweet. But I”m not informed enough to know the UI requirements and limits.
Thanks for all you do.
You’ve changed the discourse for the better.
And made the world a bit better place by doing so.
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-06 18:00:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654909033101262849
Yes. You’re correct. But you’ll notice that I give people the benefit of the doubt by presuming its unconscious. In general I try to remove blame, and focus on reforms.
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-02 04:51:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653260843352576000
Reply addressees: @kerry62189 @TheAutistocrat @WalterIII @Turbo_Flux @StevePender
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653253432961114113
RT @SloanRachmuth: Banking Committee hearing tomorrow for this excellent bill that would outlaw banks from discriminating against customers…
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-27 02:11:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651408729441464320
Revise:
Personal Finance AND Banking and Investment
Add:
Basic Contract Law as Ethics (simple)
Basic Project Management (simple: task, card, gantt)
Basic Behvioral, Micro, Macro econ (graphical only)
Basic Statistics (Graphical only)
(And no it’s not difficult.)
One I had in a private catholic boy’s school that was perhaps the most valuable was:
Friendship, Marriage, and Family (awesome)
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-20 20:50:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1649153568077672479
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648965141776551941
Revise:
Personal Finance AND Banking and Investment
Add:
Basic Contract Law as Ethics (simple)
Basic Project Management (simple: task, card, gantt)
Basic Behvioral, Micro, Macro econ (graphical only)
Basic Statistics (Graphical only)
(And no it’s not difficult.)
One I had in a private catholic boy’s school that was perhaps the most valuable was:
Friendship, Marriage, and Family (awesome)
Reply addressees: @themaxstoic
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-20 20:50:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1649153568006369289
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648965141776551941
Worker safety wasn’t female vote issue.
Child labor laws have resulted in sequential increase in the infantilization of generations.
Higher education has declined such that we are not producing as many outliers per capita as we were in 1963.
Women could own property just fine, but they could not encumber their husbands, because women tend to exacerbate debt, and the family and men were responsible in the end, not women (just as today).
Holding office has been a catastrophe.
Fire safety has nothing to do with women but insurance. Same for consumer products. And the USA has the worst consumer protections in the West.
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-17 04:26:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647818774559571970
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647776516770496514
Worker safety wasn’t female vote issue.
Child labor laws have resulted in sequential increase in the infantilization of generations.
Higher education has declined such that we are not producing as many outliers per capita as we were in 1963.
Women could own property just fine, but they could not encumber their husbands, because women tend to exacerbate debt, and the family and men were responsible in the end, not women (just as today).
Holding office has been a catastrophe.
Fire safety has nothing to do with women but insurance. Same for consumer products. And the USA has the worst consumer protections in the West.
Reply addressees: @ViewLiberty @RealCandaceO
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-17 04:26:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647818774471483393
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647776516770496514
What are the four great failures in legislation or finding of the court that have caused the most decline in education?
From the false premise of equality:
1) forcible integration – destruction of high trust norms
2) education – destruction of education, esp excellence.
3) marriage, divorce, and family – destruction of the family.
4) the failure to stop the marxist-to-woke religion because the supreme court erred in claiming a religion required a god despite the world evidence to the contrary.
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-16 22:02:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647722073324769283
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647721034043346945
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
The reason children have difficulty in the classroom today is that present methods of teaching focus on the teacher, instead of information organized into simulations and games, and places undue burden on attention, working memory, and memorization without any reason to do so other than stress. THey fail because the methods fail, because the methods are either archaic or pseudoscientific.
Group of Ed Masters candidates asked me to opinine on just the impact of court and legislation on the negative results of education despite the infinite money we throw at it.
It wasn’t hard.
Multiple premises teachers operate under, plus the combination of teachers with political or social agendas on one side, parents who disagree with them on the other, the use of the law to negate parental preference, the use of the law as an excuse for mediocrity, and the resulting weakness of the teacher to provide guidance that is competitive rather than ‘non conflict generating’ is another reason for the decline.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1647721034043346945
What are the four great failures in legislation or finding of the court that have caused the most decline in education?
From the false premise of equality:
1) forcible integration – destruction of high trust norms
2) education – destruction of education, esp excellence.
3) marriage, divorce, and family – destruction of the family.
4) the failure to stop the marxist-to-woke religion because the supreme court erred in claiming a religion required a god despite the world evidence to the contrary.
Reply addressees: @goodtroubless @terrilbruce @GregAbbott_TX
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-16 22:02:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647722073219911682
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647721034043346945
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
The reason children have difficulty in the classroom today is that present methods of teaching focus on the teacher, instead of information organized into simulations and games, and places undue burden on attention, working memory, and memorization without any reason to do so other than stress. THey fail because the methods fail, because the methods are either archaic or pseudoscientific.
Group of Ed Masters candidates asked me to opinine on just the impact of court and legislation on the negative results of education despite the infinite money we throw at it.
It wasn’t hard.
Multiple premises teachers operate under, plus the combination of teachers with political or social agendas on one side, parents who disagree with them on the other, the use of the law to negate parental preference, the use of the law as an excuse for mediocrity, and the resulting weakness of the teacher to provide guidance that is competitive rather than ‘non conflict generating’ is another reason for the decline.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1647721034043346945