Curt Doolittle

Theme: Reform

  • And no I don’t want to hear your anti-jewish nonsense. I’m working toward a posi

    And no I don’t want to hear your anti-jewish nonsense. I’m working toward a positive solution for our people. I had to ‘science’ the problem of the present age and it was decades of hard work at great personal cost. Some of that cost was psychological and some of it ended up being physical. Becuause ‘slumming’ with malcontents at every corner of the political spectrum was painful. And I’m done with that research and development. And I just don’t want to go ‘slumming’ any longer.

    The result is updating our law, prohibiting all uses of the female strategy of undermining, critique, conflict generation, sedition, baiting into hazard, victim positioning, hiding behind plausible deniability, by everyone and anyone. With our modifications, the courts will once again allow us to prosecute those who are seditionists – ending the state’s ability to disintermediate the people from political actors. We will end ‘cancel culture’ which is another female expression that is a violation of the common law.

    Yes the abrahamic religions use this strategy, as do the marxist pseudoscientific religions. But it’s the female strategy applied as an institutional means of civilizational warfare. Mean girls and those who proxy them are just following their instincts – rebelling because they are undesirable.

    We are just as responsible for tolerating it as they are for using it. But we’re all bots. We are until we ‘science’ the subject. Now that we’ve scienced it we know it’s genetic, instinctual, a cognitive differencde and wrapped in cultural dogman and justification – and it’s ancient.

    But your whining is pathetic, tiresome, annoying and I’ll just block you. So don’t bother to respond.

    Thanks.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-08 21:24:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1711130557122265088

  • No the people have been disintermediated from the courts by the left. It’s rathe

    No the people have been disintermediated from the courts by the left. It’s rather easy to restore the power to the poor in the courts, if we, as in the past, and as is common in europe, create and administrative court.
    While in the past you had access to the Manor (nobility) and in our constitution should have access to your representative both local, state, and federal – as an escalation path. This is no longer possible becuase of legal activism.
    We can restore these rights and restore people to defense and access – and we can do it without the most vulnerable and gullible sectors of the polity enabling bad legislation and law whose promise is impossible to fulfill and produces the opposite of the claimed ends.

    Reply addressees: @Chargerfryar @ThruTheHayes @randomal974199 @NatLawInstitute

    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-06 21:59:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710414503391711232

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710412227931742429

  • I assume you mean Georgism, not the economics of Georgia. I think it was an inte

    I assume you mean Georgism, not the economics of Georgia.

    I think it was an intelligent even if failed attempt to find a radically different yet simple solution to the post-agrarian age. However, it relies on arbitrary valuation, causes capital flight, is administratively challenging if not impossible, and while we have implemented it widely in the USA as property tax, and it produces insufficient revenue for almost any purpose at all, and is continously contentious.

    The problem is better understood as density aborbs all increases in value by transfers to owners of property and real estate. And that problem is better understood as a failure of the state to finance housing at no interest to families within the range of that density.

    The only ‘fair’ taxes are sales and income tax – and we hate them. We only hate income tax because it is too complicated instead of proportional and consistent without exceptions or deductions. And we hate sales tax because it isn’t included in the price, and too many things are taxed.

    The most unfair ‘tax’ is interest on consumer credit applied to durable goods, and semi-durable goods, when we are only borrowing against our future selves, and these goods then expire over the time we have borrowed the money from – it makes no sense and it’s predatory on our people. There is no reason for interest on homes, autos, boats, appliances, durable furniture, and really, even clothes.

    Likewise there is no reason for intergenerational transfer of income instead of the singapore model of individual savings with contributions by the state, which are invested by the state ( or some agents ) for retirement, medical care, and unemployment.

    Reply addressees: @MathPolice

    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-06 21:05:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710400861782831104

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710391092481581346

  • Another… The only federal devolution necessary is to return to the original co

    Another…
    The only federal devolution necessary is to return to the original constraints of the constitution, maintaining the guarrantee of a rpublican government, and (clarified) rights, while restoring social and economic policy to the states (and city states), and constraining the government to its original limits. Britain and the USA were not separated from Germanic civilization until after 1830. The USA was constructed on the same model as the Holy Roman Empire which at that time was a thousand years old. They merely use the english invention of the modern rule of law state, and blackstone’s natural law as the legal framework. If it were not Jefferson’s (foolish) fascination with the french, and Washington’s refusal to ascend to monarch, we would very likely have bypassed most of our crises. And our attempt to integrate prussian bureaudracy failed because we did not bulid bureaucdracy out of prussian military discipline.

    I’m thrilled by your piece, although you avoid that it’s rather obvious from the science that we are simply going through the process of integrating women into the polity – which turns out is far harder than the working and laboring classes in the industrial revolution, and the middle classes under the enlightenment. Because women evade responsibility at all costs. So they are not compatible with a high trust society and the burden it placesupon all of us for the defense of private and common, physical and behavioral.

    And no, I don’t like knowing this. It means the problem that could have easily been solved in the last century is not nearly impossible to solve. 🙁

    Reply addressees: @EvanMantri

    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-06 02:29:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710120168452431872

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710094142246941095

  • Typo: You wanna talk about this? Because I can understand why people might have

    Typo:
    You wanna talk about this?
    Because I can understand why people might have thought that when we were trying to convert the ‘lost boys’ from riotous malcontents that kept getting beaten into a political movement. And look where that got us…. canceled.

    My goal all along, since I started in the early 90s, has been “A civil war is a deterministic outcome and due within a certain date range. So I am trying to produce a solution that will either prevent it, or allow us to settle it, or allow us to reconstruct after it.” That’s what I work on. The law is just the means of engineering that solution – for the benefit of all.

    The fact that I started to use social media is only because it is an exceptional vehicle for performing research on human behavior by provoking people’s moral instincts, and recording how they offensively promote, or defensivly justify their moral instincts – because almost none if it is reason. Just instinct justified by words.

    The fact that the Right picked up on my work first was likely simply because I was addressing the taboos, because taboos are a means of civilizational denial of the truth that is uncomfortable or harmful given the group’s evolutionary strategy.

    I’m about as straight a talker as you’ll find. There are very few things I can’t or won’t tell you – just to protect others.

    But I’ve spent enough time with the FBI in my house that it should be clear that they are concerned that if I wanted to kick off a civil war, that I could, and they want me to ‘behave sensibly’ (not inspire anyone to do anything foolish), and that I don’t pay attention to the paranoid lost boys because of the harm they did to us already. So we moved on to mainstream folk with families and responsibilities.

    And I don’t give up because the stakes are … well. Higher than at any time since the fall of rome.

    So for me this is a moral ambition that I’ve given my life to.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @EsLebeFreiheit @whatifalthist

    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-06 01:05:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710098927284891648

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710096055365226697

  • I have no good advice. Because the academy progresses with gravestones, and we n

    I have no good advice. Because the academy progresses with gravestones, and we need a lot of people to die off in the academy or resign or whatever before we can fix this.

    And given that women have taken over the academy (and church) it means there is very little cance of…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-04 16:38:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1709608967641448735

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1709592854748672246

  • Old but solid posts on mises, rothbard, and Hoppe. I have a draft of a book on t

    Old but solid posts on mises, rothbard, and Hoppe.
    I have a draft of a book on this subject but I didn’t want it to anchor me as a libertarian or such so we never produced a final draft and submitted it for publication.

    I might be willing to share that draft with the right…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-02 22:02:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1708965814542512524

    Reply addressees: @LudwigArisleib @StephaneGeyres @FromKulak @ViandeTiede666 @paulericblanrue @arthurhomines

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1708926085239312729

  • When you have such an idea: Try to write it down, the law or policy needed to pu

    When you have such an idea: Try to write it down, the law or policy needed to put it into place, the means putting that policy into place, and a plan for bringing it about.

    One thing I learned in writing a reformed constitution is how absolutely painfully difficult it is. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-02 00:23:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1708638858286415926

    Reply addressees: @NWEurasian @nym0_speaks @_MrNational

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1708597894641569946

  • RT @curtdoolittle: (Announcement) THE NATURAL LAW INSTITUTE’S FALL 2023 CONVENTI

    RT @curtdoolittle: (Announcement)
    THE NATURAL LAW INSTITUTE’S FALL 2023 CONVENTION
    “From Theory To Practice: Pivoting to Activism”

    When a…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-01 14:06:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1708483643046334562

  • As far as I can tell, education, mindfulness training, outlawing female antisoci

    As far as I can tell, education, mindfulness training, outlawing female antisocial behavior as thoroughly as we have male, and either a separate house for women, or limiting women to married mothers of for, or pulling women from the voting roles is required.

    And don’t blame me. I am trying to solve the issue. And I’m not happy it needs solving or that I’m stuck working on it. 🙁

    We all have instincts. It’s just that men are dangerous and so we are forced to self regulate. For reasons we don’t fully understand both men and women coddle women. We
    understand sex differences. But women’s inability to place outcome reason over immediate experience doesn’t appear to be possible except for a tiny fraction. Religion helped a lot Marxism and feminism has reversed it.

    The principle difference other than empathizing in time vs systematizing over time, is women cannot self regulate and avoid responsibility for the commons at all times. It’s the latter that makes women incompatible with democratic institutions.

    Reply addressees: @mishf1sh

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-30 01:55:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707937213583929344

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707932621291106792