Curt Doolittle

Theme: Reform

  • (Thinking: I’ve been rolling this over for a while, and I think filing a class a

    (Thinking: I’ve been rolling this over for a while, and I think filing a class action lawsuit against fb might be a great for the country, the movement, and our publicity. Especially when the remedy is fairly simple and and current govt is hostile. And I think we might have a fair chance of prevailing. I certainly think it should be quite easy to collect signatures from people to join this case.)

    https://propertarianism.com/2017/06/04/its-time-for-a-class-action-against-facebook-to-force-remedies-the-government-has-not/

    Source date (UTC): 2017-10-26 16:28:00 UTC

  • Just as progressives demonstrate caution in the face of artificial intelligence,

    Just as progressives demonstrate caution in the face of artificial intelligence, progressives(dysgenicists) fear conservatives(eugenicists). Because if we are successful in restoring our eugenic personal, social, economic, and political order, we will leave them behind. Just as they fear the mechanical social, economic, and political order, will leave them behind. This is the intuition of the feminine: that her offspring, the vast majority of which are dead weight on the man, earth, and universe, will not survive competition with their betters, and therefore here genes will not persist. Her emotions are precognitive genetic impulses to favor the child regardless of it’s lack of merit. The intuition of the masculine: that the genes of the family, clan, tribe and nation must survive competition with other men’s genes through the use of female hosts – despite the fact that women choose mates poorly, that they undermine the alphas, and the polity in pursuit of equality for those who are dead weight to our genes. That they advocate against their men (“sh_t testing”) and that they destroy loyalty and cohesion through gossip.

  • Just as progressives demonstrate caution in the face of artificial intelligence,

    Just as progressives demonstrate caution in the face of artificial intelligence, progressives(dysgenicists) fear conservatives(eugenicists). Because if we are successful in restoring our eugenic personal, social, economic, and political order, we will leave them behind. Just as they fear the mechanical social, economic, and political order, will leave them behind. This is the intuition of the feminine: that her offspring, the vast majority of which are dead weight on the man, earth, and universe, will not survive competition with their betters, and therefore here genes will not persist. Her emotions are precognitive genetic impulses to favor the child regardless of it’s lack of merit. The intuition of the masculine: that the genes of the family, clan, tribe and nation must survive competition with other men’s genes through the use of female hosts – despite the fact that women choose mates poorly, that they undermine the alphas, and the polity in pursuit of equality for those who are dead weight to our genes. That they advocate against their men (“sh_t testing”) and that they destroy loyalty and cohesion through gossip.

  • Just as progressives demonstrate caution in the face of artificial intelligence,

    Just as progressives demonstrate caution in the face of artificial intelligence, progressives(dysgenicists) fear conservatives(eugenicists). Because if we are successful in restoring our eugenic personal, social, economic, and political order, we will leave them behind. Just as they fear the mechanical social, economic, and political order, will leave them behind.

    This is the intuition of the feminine: that her offspring, the vast majority of which are dead weight on the man, earth, and universe, will not survive competition with their betters, and therefore here genes will not persist. Her emotions are precognitive genetic impulses to favor the child regardless of it’s lack of merit.

    The intuition of the masculine: that the genes of the family, clan, tribe and nation must survive competition with other men’s genes through the use of female hosts – despite the fact that women choose mates poorly, that they undermine the alphas, and the polity in pursuit of equality for those who are dead weight to our genes. That they advocate against their men (“sh_t testing”) and that they destroy loyalty and cohesion through gossip.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-10-23 11:59:00 UTC

  • Why not both (a) take the high right position, and (b) openly advocate for a rev

    Why not both (a) take the high right position, and (b) openly advocate for a revolution that devolves the federal government so that regions, or states, or even counties can produce their own normative commons leaving the federal government responsible only for defense, central bank clearing, and insurer of last resort (disasters, old age, etc?)

    In other words, why not make revolutionary change a core tenet of the institute. Not just for America, but for all peoples in the world?

    The restoration of truth to the public discourse, politics, markets, and law, the restoration of self determination for all peoples. And the production of commons most suitable to the transcendence of individual polities.

    Openly discuss revolution on behalf of everyone.

    ( I want to keep the moral high ground until revolutionary action is necessary. There is no value in burning myself on the right’s pyre of self sacrifice. I don’t need the personal confirmation. )

    Source date (UTC): 2017-10-07 13:44:00 UTC

  • BOOK UPDATE Over the past three days I’ve separated out the libertarian-reformat

    BOOK UPDATE

    Over the past three days I’ve separated out the libertarian-reformation content into a separate book. I found it distracted from the main argument, which is western restoration. So I have a separate book on reforming libertarianism into sovereignty. It includes all the criticism of Mises, Rothbard, and Hoppe etc. It’s a more manageable 150 pages or so.

    And this allows me to shorten the main work. Which is enormous.

    So Major book “Truth”

    Minor book “From Libertarian to Sovereign”

    And no, it’s not a big deal. From pretty much every standpoint, multiple books are better. And it takes less effort this way.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-28 14:03:00 UTC

  • THE CLASS ACTION AGAINST GOOGLE… (that is how it is done) One suit at a time.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-08-23/ex-google-engineer-james-damore-hires-harmeet-dhillon-as-lawyerBUILDING THE CLASS ACTION AGAINST GOOGLE…

    (that is how it is done)

    One suit at a time. Break the culture of ‘inevitability’.

    (a) hiring, (b) consumer data and tracking (c) paying for position.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-23 21:28:00 UTC

  • But when to revolution morals bend their will, how soon they find fit instrument

    But when to revolution morals bend their will, how soon they find fit instruments of ill.

    Revel in our Time!

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-23 12:21:00 UTC

  • IT CANNOT BE FIXED FROM WITHIN —“Trump’s presidency is the test we were lookin

    IT CANNOT BE FIXED FROM WITHIN

    —“Trump’s presidency is the test we were looking for. Now we know it can’t be fixed from inside, can’t be fixed from the top. Morally validates efforts to *deal with this mess* from the outside.”— Benny Bultman

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-19 19:06:00 UTC

  • HOW TO RUN A REVOLUTION – WHAT SMART REVOLUTIONARIES DO IN THE REST OF THE WORLD

    HOW TO RUN A REVOLUTION – WHAT SMART REVOLUTIONARIES DO IN THE REST OF THE WORLD.
    propertarianism.com/2017/08/18/what-smart-rev

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-18 16:36:32 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/5148939210887071