(FB 1547998199 Timestamp) OBJECTIVES —“Curts objective is civil war”– Curts objective is constitutional reform, in order to save our people and our civilization, and quite possibly mankind. The threat of civil war is the only means to bring it about, just as the threat of civil war in the 60’s, and 30’s were the only means to bring it about. The more certain the war, the more rapid the capitulation of the state. The point is to make a war so certain and so frightening that the state capitulates and we implement the changes to the constitution restoring natural law.
Theme: Reform
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1547998199 Timestamp) OBJECTIVES —“Curts objective is civil war”– Curts objective is constitutional reform, in order to save our people and our civilization, and quite possibly mankind. The threat of civil war is the only means to bring it about, just as the threat of civil war in the 60’s, and 30’s were the only means to bring it about. The more certain the war, the more rapid the capitulation of the state. The point is to make a war so certain and so frightening that the state capitulates and we implement the changes to the constitution restoring natural law.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1548132106 Timestamp) —“The idea of applying the scientific method to law is so foreign to this toxic political climate, the ideologues will undoubtedly try and burn you as a heretic for this.”— Kevin Wu
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1548132106 Timestamp) —“The idea of applying the scientific method to law is so foreign to this toxic political climate, the ideologues will undoubtedly try and burn you as a heretic for this.”— Kevin Wu
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1548260937 Timestamp) “PROPERTARIANISM” –> “CRITICAL NATURALISM”? —-“Would you consider renaming Propertarianism to “Critical Naturalism”?”— Kash That’s Very Smart. I Never thought of that. Hmm…. That would change it from a legal category of name to a philosophical category of name. Hmm… Well it’s true right? In philosophical terms it would be categorized as “critical naturalism”. Although, what is the difference between the law and critical naturalism? I ‘m not sure there is any. So why are critical naturalism and the law of tort not identical? I mean, that’s my underlying argument: that the west differs from the rest because across the ages of political-philosophical-religious propaganda, the law of “sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, and duty” remained constant. So I would call the Law a discipline that relies on critical naturalism. I would call propertarianism the natural law that relies on critical naturalism. So yes. I think the brand name has stuck, but yes I’d (a) accept that as a truthful description of the philosophical category (b) use the term myself as a philosophical category, (c) maintain the position that the law is the only complete and parsimonious category, and that the attempt to produce science is a long term attempt to unify western law (our civilizational cult) with western philosophy (middle class propaganda).
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1548260937 Timestamp) “PROPERTARIANISM” –> “CRITICAL NATURALISM”? —-“Would you consider renaming Propertarianism to “Critical Naturalism”?”— Kash That’s Very Smart. I Never thought of that. Hmm…. That would change it from a legal category of name to a philosophical category of name. Hmm… Well it’s true right? In philosophical terms it would be categorized as “critical naturalism”. Although, what is the difference between the law and critical naturalism? I ‘m not sure there is any. So why are critical naturalism and the law of tort not identical? I mean, that’s my underlying argument: that the west differs from the rest because across the ages of political-philosophical-religious propaganda, the law of “sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, and duty” remained constant. So I would call the Law a discipline that relies on critical naturalism. I would call propertarianism the natural law that relies on critical naturalism. So yes. I think the brand name has stuck, but yes I’d (a) accept that as a truthful description of the philosophical category (b) use the term myself as a philosophical category, (c) maintain the position that the law is the only complete and parsimonious category, and that the attempt to produce science is a long term attempt to unify western law (our civilizational cult) with western philosophy (middle class propaganda).
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549036184 Timestamp) PROPERTARIAN LAW AND THE NEW “ABORTION STANDARD” The purpose of the proposed law is to restore euthanasia to babies under the pretense of calling it ‘abortion’. This prevents having to take euthanasia through the court system. Hence operational language. This abuse of the law, would not be possible under Propertarian Law.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549395801 Timestamp) COURSE UPDATE: LAW 103 The bugs seem mostly out of the system now. We have people paying for the class already. Seems like there is a lot of interest. Late comers or the cautious can start late if they want. I will drip the course material out on a weekly basis. So, Well be starting LAW 103 on FEB 25th. Cheers
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549527916 Timestamp) —“DIVORCE THE LEFT”— Revolt. Separate. Prosper. Speciate.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549527916 Timestamp) —“DIVORCE THE LEFT”— Revolt. Separate. Prosper. Speciate.