1. END MANAGED DECLINE.
2. RESTORE WESTERN CIVILIZATION.
3. CREATE THE NEXT RENAISSANCE!
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-23 15:26:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1153687820931948544
Theme: Reform
-
1. END MANAGED DECLINE. 2. RESTORE WESTERN CIVILIZATION. 3. CREATE THE NEXT RENA
-
END MANAGED DECLINE RESTORE WESTERN CIVILIZATION BRING ABOUT A RENAISSANCE
END MANAGED DECLINE
RESTORE WESTERN CIVILIZATION
BRING ABOUT A RENAISSANCE
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-23 15:24:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1153687385886121984
-
You mean I’m the only on who has produced a solution, a set of demands, a plan o
You mean I’m the only on who has produced a solution, a set of demands, a plan of transition, a means of revolution – rather than sentimental drivel, right? And morons like you want more rogue shooters. Revolutions are built by ideas, plans, organization of men – and timing.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-19 12:10:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1152189080207319040
Reply addressees: @bobgallows234
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1152187821907726339
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1152187821907726339
-
Untitled
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-18 15:09:50 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102463084299851386
-
WHY DEMOCRACY ISN”T THE LEFT’S PATH TO POWER (and what we are going to do about
WHY DEMOCRACY ISN”T THE LEFT’S PATH TO POWER
(and what we are going to do about it)
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-18 15:00:03 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102463045819849064
-
@TomKawczynski So you are of the opinion, and pursuing the strategy, that it is
So you are of the opinion, and pursuing the strategy, that it is possible to solve the problem of the age, using the democratic process, and the existing political system, by means of inspiration of a body of the populace, on potential futures we might obtain, rather than any particular course of action, to achieve any specific ends.
That is what I was trying to discern. Whether you had a strategy or plan, how that strategy or plan differs from anyone else’s, what criteria you were using to determine whether it could succeed, and how such policy might be implemented given the demographic distribution of voters in the country.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-17 15:15:50 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102457445573704755
-
@TomKawczynski Purchased Kindle edition. Scanned. Long on sympathizing, empathiz
@TomKawczynski Purchased Kindle edition. Scanned. Long on sympathizing, empathizing, and moralizing – limited in policy themes and missing implementation details. Those Themes you put forward are those already widely discussed. Most significant candidates get to the point where they offer a set of distinct policy recommendations. Certainly conservatives and libertarians do. Do I need to go thru the book and bullet point them? Do you have that somewhere?
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-16 19:42:18 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102452830803223216
-
@TomKawczynski Do you have a strategy or a plan or an outline, or any list of po
@TomKawczynski Do you have a strategy or a plan or an outline, or any list of policies?
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-16 19:21:21 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102452748697033006
-
@Jetsgurl46 we aer going to end all refugee benefits within two years if we have
@Jetsgurl46 we aer going to end all refugee benefits within two years if we have to roll heads to do it. And frankly I can’t wait…
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-15 20:26:06 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102447341004743860
-
“Is there data out that suggests what our numbers would *actually* be?”—Johnny
—“Is there data out that suggests what our numbers would *actually* be?”—Johnny Kelly
a) tell me why you care?
b) do you mean how many will not resist our solution?
c) how many will advance or assist?
d) how many will show up?
e) how many will fight?—“how many will show up?”—
There are something on the order of 25m who will fight.There are at least 6m who will show up – that’s about right.
We can only use a percentage of those.Logistically we only want so many. Because you have to supply them all. Logistics begins to outweigh additional numbers rather quickly.
Speed of movement matters.
It’s more whether they publicly demand implementation of the new constitution, …
…. and will they ‘clean house’ locally.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-15 00:33:26 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102442651213001575