Curt Doolittle

Theme: Reform

  • This will de-politicize the polity, and convert the entirety of government to ci

    This will de-politicize the polity, and convert the entirety of government to citizen jury approving or vetoing, instead of politicians. We are no longer geographically constrained. The means of assent or veto varies from equi-representation, to class, to proportional$ to direct$

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-26 16:50:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188135860816039937

    Reply addressees: @directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188135266030149633

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays For europeans I propose Judiciary, Monarchy as judge of last resort (veto, swiss method), Houses for Classes and Genders as Juries, Universal Petition of the Government with Proposed Contracts of the Commons. Restores jury (veto) and eliminates politicians. Much much more….

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188135266030149633

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays For europeans I propose Judiciary, Monarchy as judge of last resort (veto, swiss method), Houses for Classes and Genders as Juries, Universal Petition of the Government with Proposed Contracts of the Commons. Restores jury (veto) and eliminates politicians. Much much more….

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188135266030149633

  • IF YOU WANT TO LEARN P Propertarianism is like aristotelianism – it is a huge pr

    IF YOU WANT TO LEARN P

    Propertarianism is like aristotelianism – it is a huge project that reforms much human thought especially logic, language, epistemology (knowledge), psychology, sociology, ethics, law, and politics.

    1. You can learn about our proposed constitution and it’s policies (it’s a lot, and you might have to learn a bit bout economics and the justice system but you can do it.)

    2. You can learn the Big History of the competition between civilizations and in particular between european and semitic.(easy)

    3. You can learn why europeans evolved faster than the rest, and developed the only truth telling, high trust, wealthy, advanced, technological, civilization in so short a span in the bronze, ancient, and modern worlds – except for our period of failure during the abrahamic dark age. (relatively easy)

    4. You can learn a whole suite of the propertarian arguments (Takes some work)

    5. You can learn how to conduct propertarian arguments

    You can learn how to use the p-methodology (Not easy)

    6. And you can if you want to get into the foundations of the P-methodology, the completed scientific method, and logic and epistemology. (Hard)

    SO IF YOU WANT TO LEARN ANY OF THAT

    1) you can use the site and read it.

    2) you can follow along.

    3) you can use my friends list to contact and catch the attention of a mentor by asking for help:

    alain, stepan, bill, luke, brandon, erik, steve, eli, …(thera are a lot more)

    4) you can take our course (if you are patient enough for me to slowly release content – and I mean slowly).

    The other folks are better teachers than I am. Really. By far.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-25 17:27:00 UTC

  • The economics of consumption has replaced morality in politics, but it is possib

    The economics of consumption has replaced morality in politics, but it is possible to restore consumption-with-tests-of-changes-in-the-state-of-capital possible under commodity money, localized capital, regional markets, and social homogeneity and abandon simple volume of consumption under conditions of paper money, social heterogeneity, world capital, and worldwide markets, thereby ending hyperconsumption, including of genetic, social, institutional, cultural and civilizational capital.

    In other words we lost the ability to test the changes in civilizational capital, by failing to measure them as trade moved from regional to national to civilizational to world scope – and in doing so our failure to include measurements of, and tools for measuring, human, cultural, institutional, genetic, etc capital was exposed and exploited, just as was our local tolerance for information stated with european law norm, christian values, and aristotelian reason.

    I keep saying this but the problem of the 20th was a failure of our institutions to produce systems of measurement and incentives to defend capital in parallel with the commercial and monetary expansion.

    The beauty of the western common law under which the first court finding that resolves a dispute over an innovation in means of irreciprocity, is that it responds the fastest to inventions of irreciprocity forcing us to continually innovate in means of competition under reciprocity.

    The problem is that our law failed to modernize particularly in two areas (1) measurement of the very capital that provides our civilizational means of competition (human , informal institutional and formal institutional capital), and (2) expanding our law to cover innovations in deception for the purpose of irreciprocity and obscuring that very capital consumption, made possible by the industrialization of false speech, and the reformation of abrahamic supernaturalism, sophism and denial, into abrahamic pseudoscience sophism and denial: marxism, boazianism, freudianism, feminism, postmodernism, and political correctness: denialism.

    We aren’t unique. It destroyed every empire i know of. Because what is accumulated rent seeking other than a failure to measure all capital transformation, and to create new incentives under the law to suppress newly available forms of parasitism that consume rather than produce human capital.

    All civilizations collapse because they have exhausted the capital available to use in the reorganization of a pareto distribution of influences, and a nash equilibrium of rewards for preserving that new system of organization, in response to scarcities, shocks, changes in trade routes, conflcit, war (Physical, Ideological, religious, economic), and variations in the environment (drought, climate, water and river changes, continuous quakes, world volcanic activity – which aside from very large asteroids is the most dangerous of all.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-25 16:29:00 UTC

  • If you are an intellectual, activist, or evangelist, anywhere along the centrist

    If you are an intellectual, activist, or evangelist, anywhere along the centrist, libertarian, constitutionalist, conservative, christian, or even fascist spectrum and you aren’t following me, then you’re missing out on the only people who have a constitutional solution to NOW.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-25 00:30:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187526774583955456

  • WE ARE GOING TO NATIONALIZE THE FED WITHIN TWO YEARS. No. Really. We are. … Pr

    WE ARE GOING TO NATIONALIZE THE FED WITHIN TWO YEARS. No. Really. We are. … Promise.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 14:36:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187377204205887488

    Reply addressees: @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187373187820130306

    IN REPLY TO:

    @realDonaldTrump

    The Federal Reserve is derelict in its duties if it doesn’t lower the Rate and even, ideally, stimulate. Take a look around the World at our competitors. Germany and others are actually GETTING PAID to borrow money. Fed was way too fast to raise, and way too slow to cut!

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187373187820130306

  • WHY DO ANGLO GOVERNMENTS LAST SO LONG? It’s just much easier to reform a contrac

    WHY DO ANGLO GOVERNMENTS LAST SO LONG?

    It’s just much easier to reform a contract (constitution) that is adjudicated by an independent judiciary, than it is to reform a dictatorship, oligarchy, bureaucracy, or theocracy that lacks an independent judiciary and constitutional means of decision making given a division of powers, and fundamental rights especially to property.

    Most of western history is the difficulty in maintaining our rule of law from attempts to usurp it by the aristocracy, the theocracy, the burghers, and now the underclass communists, devoted, and socialists.

    A constitution if well written is an algorithm for the operation of a polity under falsification, tested before judges who are not involved in the operations of whatever function is in conflict.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 18:25:00 UTC

  • All: The group Christianity and Propertarianism is intended for historically and

    All: The group Christianity and Propertarianism is intended for historically and theologically knowledgeable christians seeking to advance christianity in a future and reverse it’s current stresses. What is it that we can do to preserve the good in christianity, remasculinize it, and find compatibility with ‘moral’ christians and scientific christians, so that we can formalize it in the constitution as a state religion.

    I don’t include people who are just ‘interested’ or want to opine.

    That said I think we have settled on the solution which is equally successful but equally unsatisfactory to all parties, and it’s … somewhere between disappointing and frustrating that this is the most common means of ruling under the law.

    Thanks.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-22 19:32:00 UTC

  • WHAT ‘TRADITIONAL’ MEANS, WHAT TO SAY INSTEAD, AND HOW TO RESTORE RECIPROCITY BE

    WHAT ‘TRADITIONAL’ MEANS, WHAT TO SAY INSTEAD, AND HOW TO RESTORE RECIPROCITY BETWEEN GENDERS.

    Advice to Libertarian(ideology), Constitutional (rule of law), Right(normative tradition), and… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=490420804888148&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-22 17:11:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186691447656828929

  • WHAT ‘TRADITIONAL’ MEANS, WHAT TO SAY INSTEAD, AND HOW TO RESTORE RECIPROCITY BE

    WHAT ‘TRADITIONAL’ MEANS, WHAT TO SAY INSTEAD, AND HOW TO RESTORE RECIPROCITY BETWEEN GENDERS.

    Advice to Libertarian(ideology), Constitutional (rule of law), Right(normative tradition), and Religious(theological tradition): Avoid “Traditional” as it’s indefensible. (FWIW; it means ’empirically successful in pre technological history because of the division of labor necessary under intergenerational agrarianism.’)

    Better argument is “Biological gender roles constitute the optimum Nash equilibrium under which all of us do the best we can even if none of us or few of us do as well as we’d wish, without imposing irreciprocal hardship upon one another.”

    This is why we evolved paring off and serial monogamy, and only developed long term monogamy as (a) we lived longer (b) we developed property and productivity and (c) were able to perform intergenerational care in exchange for intergenerational inheritance.

    Because of the narrower distribution of desirable men, and the wider distribution of desirable women and the increase in the division of labor such that women are freed from manual household labor like men are (largely)freed from manual environmental labor, we can no longer expect postwar rates of marriage, and will return to pre-industrial rates of marriage – preserving it more commonly among the better classes who have greater interests in property and its returns, and the working and laboring classes who possess sufficient in-class sexual social market value, and sufficient conscientiousness and reciprocity, and returning to serial or parallel relations around maternal households living on the edge of self sufficiency.

    However, we can eliminate ir-reciprocity for MEN in the current era, by (a) ending marriage to the state (redistribution); (b) ending community property, alimony, child support, (c) restore liability for interference in a marriage; (e) restore voluntary disassociation so that men can reform paternal institutions of reciprocal support in lieu of marriage; and (d) forcible savings for retirement that is unattachable by anyone and everyone as insurance by and for the polity from your moral hazard of self insufficiency.

    In other words, we can restore reciprocal interest in the returns on investment in a partnership, by restoring the disincentive to parasitically live off others permitted by their intuition of reciprocity against moral hazard.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-22 13:10:00 UTC

  • “I think only that the constitution and the law can be restored to pre-postmoder

    —“I think only that the constitution and the law can be restored to pre-postmodern, pre-marxist, pre-civil war terms, as a federal government limited to the defense of the states, and to the adjudication of differences in material property between the states, and where hostile cities are involuntarily converted to city states, and where all local norm, custom, and tradition is determined by at the local level, and only investment at the state. … And I absolutely positively without question know how to do it – because the alternative for the “Left” is so terrible they will agree rather than risk it. That is why have confidence – I am very slow and deliberate and thorough, but I am very, very, good at what I do. It will take 1/3 of 1% of our males to make it happen, and it will happen quickly. And frankly we will hope the enemy resists – because …. “— Curt

    (worth repeating)Updated Oct 22, 2019, 12:39 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-22 12:39:00 UTC