Theme: Reform

  • Maybe you should just put your emphasis on constitutional amendments and policy

    Maybe you should just put your emphasis on constitutional amendments and policy rather than stacking the court with jurists who circumvent the constitution.The constitution is a transactional document, just like an accounting system. We are ending left-legislation from the bench.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-15 15:11:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217464368536965121

    Reply addressees: @Celeste_pewter

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217351342601072640


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217351342601072640

  • Who else has those things? You’re studying the wrong successful revolutions. Mak

    Who else has those things?
    You’re studying the wrong successful revolutions.
    Make a list of ALL the successful revolutions.
    Then say ‘which ones methods will work’?
    This isn’t going to be centrally led.
    But many coalitions looking for a solution.
    I use Founders, Mao, IRA.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-15 12:58:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217430753446957057

    Reply addressees: @RabbitScythian @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217338371741188096


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217338371741188096

  • Heimdallr Aldafaðir This is how the winning right needs to organize, capture the

    https://youtu.be/0-N5-GWwYgUby Heimdallr Aldafaðir

    This is how the winning right needs to organize, capture the center, isolate city states, etc all with legitimacy and legal effect. Antifa organizes in a leftist chimp out way, the winning right doesn’t need to and it goes against our nature because we are orderly and want domestication. This is the wayUpdated Jan 10, 2020, 6:46 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-10 18:46:00 UTC

  • No opinions. Simple pragmatism. Conflict is in the interest this year if we want

    No opinions. Simple pragmatism. Conflict is in the interest this year if we want to ‘enact change’.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-07 16:10:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1214580004299907072

    Reply addressees: @NewParadigm7

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1214571679994777600


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1214571679994777600

  • THE END OF DEMOCRACY? We can save democracy in some form if we modify the franch

    THE END OF DEMOCRACY?

    We can save democracy in some form if we modify the franchise and create houses for the classes again, and give women a separate house. But (as Samuel Huntington warned) democracy cannot survive Islam. Between (1) granting women the franchise, (2) postwar jewish marxism-socialism-postmodernism-feminism-denialism and (3) Islamic religion-of-continuous-war-and-conquest by continuous undermining, without Monarchy as a judge of last resort and without our traditional law of sovereignty in ‘Inviolable Book’ form, and without a Civilization’s State religion we are not able to resist (defeat) the ease at which women’s intuition for undermining, the jewish and muslim strategy of undermining can be combined to destroy the only civilization to drag mankind out of the perpetual dark age of Abrahamic Ignorance and Deceit. Judaism, Islam, and Christianity cost us all the great civilizations of the ancient world: North African, Egyptian, Levantine, Persian, Byzantine, Roman, Greek, The Indus region of India, And was stopped only because it consumes whatever people adopt it, and reduces them to perpetual externalization of inner conflict through blame of others, whereas every other religious system provides mindfulness within the self.

    Western civilization uniquely created continuous innovation and adaptation by the direction of dominance expression to the production of commons: Heroism, Excellence, Truth, Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity before Self all favor others (the polity) in exchange for status, and status produces mindfulness by existential, demonstrated, evidentiary, constructive means.

    Sovereignty requires reciprocity, reciprocity requires the natural law of tort, jury, and court of peers, and cooperation is limited to markets in every domain of life regardless of station. Markets in every domain of life produce the most rapid means of adaptation. Adaptation of the law by continuous competition in court produces the most rapid means of political adaptation. material heroism by the use of technology, contract and maneuver, produce the most rapid means of technological adaptation.

    It is this heroism and sovereignty that came west into europe with the indo-european expansion. It’s that heroism and sovereignty that made Greece and rome.

    It was semitic false promise of a monopoly underclass desirable for women and slaves, and the forcible imposition of superstition, by a priesthood selling lies that replaced a martial aristocracy demonstrating truth, and a failure to constrain roman expansion to the rate at which people could be civilized into a martial and middle class society that created the opportunity for a dark age, and the vast numbers of muslim raiders that destroyed civilizations, arts, knowledge, and trade routes that produced the First Semitic Dark age.

    But it is our failure to learn from that experience and to change from western market tolerance to western monopoly warfare against these enemies that threatens a second semitic dark age.

    The Group’s Strategy was to replace science with pseudoscience(Marx,Freud,Boas), Math with pseudo-mathematics (Cantor, Bohr), reason with sophistry(Derrida), class and gender cooperation with conflict(Adorno, Friedan), Heroism with Victimization(Frankfurt), and Law with Politics. Just as they had replaced the west’s ‘book’ of Homer, Our Aristocratic Hero of Achilles, our Family of the Gods, and our rational law, empiricism, and reason with the semitic ‘books’, the victim-hero of jews and jesus persecution, the family of jewish heroes, the apostles and saints, supernatural law, supernaturalism, and the great semitic deceit using false promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul (sophistry to avoid argument and truth), critique (disapproval, straw manning, and poisoning the well to avoid argument and truth), hiding under voluntary choice, plausible deniability for the hazard and unfalsifiability of promises to create not innovation and production, evolution and transcendence, but devolution, ignorance, submission, consumption, destruction and and dysgenia. Their group strategy like the female’s is Anti-civilization: Their Pursuit of a Second Dark Age.

    Undermining and conflict generation is the instinctive female strategy and that their (((Elites))) are the antithesis – mirror image – of western civilization’s Creation, Innovation, Cooperation by Markets, Reciprocity, Rule of Law, Heroism, Truth.

    There is no difference between jewish invention of false promises in ancient world, christian destruction of the the european ancient world, and islamic destruction of the rest of the civilizations of the ancient world, and the jewish invention of false promises of denial, sophistry, and pseudoscience in Marxism in economics, fruedianism in psychology, boasianism in anthorpology, cantorian-bohr math, freankfurt in cultural marxism, postmodern relativism and denialism, in adademy, undermining rule of law in the courts, and marxist, feminist, postmodern identitarian conflict generation under pretense that markets are not the only possible means of cooperation. They literally have tried to destroy truth, reason, and reason and cooperation by exchange in every possible dimension of human reason, knowledge, and cooperation.

    The hindus produced wisdom literature in myth. Chinese produced wisdom literature and reason. The europeans produced wisdom literature in empiricism. But the semites produced a wisdom literature of lies. Why? Hermes and the cart of lies. Why did Semites invent lying? Likely Because professional (huckster) religion started in Anatolia-Mesopotamia, and it ameliorated the differences between very different tribes at the intersection of trade routes across four continents.

    The cure of course is to produce our own ‘Book’ that canonizes the group strategy of western civilization’s continuous innovation and adaptation – the civilization that dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, tyranny, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early, death, and the status of victims of a nature all but deliberately hostile to human life.

    That book would state our history, our strategy, our law, and our method of reasoning in the language of our Natural Religion: Heroism, Excellence, Truth, Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity before Self, and markets in all aspects of life: association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, polities, and war. And it would, as do all books, set the terms by which none may trespass in thought, display, word, or deed – regardless of rank, nation, race or excuse. Heroism and Man for the Aristocracy, Stoicism and Nature for the able, Christianity for the vulnerable.

    That is the end purpose of the P-law project. And a revolution and restoration and renaissance of our civilization. And an end to semitic dark ages in European alliance with Sinic, Hindu, and African civilizations will bring it about.

    Truth can win if men choose.

    It is just our choice.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-07 09:48:00 UTC

  • MARKETS NOT MAJORITARIANISM by Martin Štěpán Why do people keep assuming we only

    MARKETS NOT MAJORITARIANISM

    by Martin Štěpán

    Why do people keep assuming we only want to make slight changes to universal suffrage? The optimum outcome is scraping the whole thing and putting in several houses for classes with different interests that have to negotiate.

    They have been indoctrinated into the fallacy of the good of democracy’s majoritarian tyranny, and made ignorant of the market as a means of calculating optimums despite differences.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-04 12:07:00 UTC

  • NOTES ON CORP OWNERSHIP REFORM Legal Perspective True: “The purpose of the corpo

    NOTES ON CORP OWNERSHIP REFORM

    Legal Perspective

    True: “The purpose of the corporation is to do anything lawful.” And “Corporations are real, shareholders are a fiction.” In other words, shareholders are not owners. Companies do not work to maximize shareholder value. That is a fiction to sell investors.

    A management team balances brand awareness, market share, customers, employees, bankers, investors, and vendors, each of which is competing to maximize their take of the profits if their are any.

    Thoughts: (a) Owners ‘invest’ to obtain income and appreciation but lack liquidity.

    (b) Shareholders function as lenders who purchase liquidity and opportunity for dividends and appreciation – they are not owners, that is the myth.

    (c) From the company’s perspective, dividends and appreciation are the cost of maintaining borrowing capacity in capital markets so that opportunities can be seized by rapid appeal to capital markets.

    (d) Boards of other than owners are a wast of time money and energy – a kabuki theater – and instead, companies should be, and are, insured to act in the interest of their contract with the shareholders. The very best you can say about boards is (i) you can pay people for relationships, assistance, and information. (ii) when you are unsure and want to bounce ideas off peers rather than employees but be sure it won’t leak, they’re useful. (iii) preparing for board meetings makes sure that you and your team are on the same page and understand your own business. (iv) I use my boards exclusively to test my ideas and rarely do anything if I can’t convince them unanimously. This tempers my too-high risk tolerance. It gives me political cover with the staff and others if I make a mistake.

    (e) It’s not even clear that financial reports other than to auditors and insurers are of any value other than in selling to lenders (shareholders). Randomly select financial reports from your favorite companies. You will learn far more from analyst calls.

    (f) Trying to maintain or improve shareholder value, is a terrible practice because investment cycles (capital requirements necessary for returns) have been increasing, and the division of production distribution and trade fragmenting, but lifespan of companies are decreasing – for this very reason. Innovators dilemmas everywhere. No one tries to maximize shareholder value. That’s nonsense. You try to preserve it. the objective of nearly every business is to preserve it’s existence as a going concern for all those involved: customers, employees, owners, vendors, investors. It is very hard to build a business that produces a durable income stream because the customer vendor employee network is the most difficult organization to produce.

    (g) There is no reason whatsoever that companies should direct resources to ‘charities’ or ‘movements’, instead of requiring such donations come from individuals. Social responsibly is a code word for rent-seeking because the government is incapable of providing results. The current condition is that companies are frequently blackmailed if they don’t contribute to certain causes. That’s an injustice. That one shall do no harm is the best an organization can do and is the best therefore we can ask them to do.

    Lastly unless you’ve run a company of at least say, 50M, and preferably over 100M you have no idea just how difficult it is to produce a profit. (i) My primary complaint is that companies do not themselves maintain accounting for operations (cash: profit and loss from operations), management (ops plus overhead), owners (ops, overhead, assets, and yes, market share ), lenders (EBITDA), and the state (taxes, amortization, and depreciation).

    Most executives I’ve consulted, companies I’ve acquired, or accounting departments I’ve fought with, have too poor a grasp of operations and obscure it by conflating accounting data so to obscure normal volatility and variation in risk from investors and lenders, and to minimize taxes.

    Drive employee quality, operations, marketshare, and leave everything else to finance and accounting. Money is just another resource provided by vendors.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-01 20:47:00 UTC

  • We need to eradicate liberalism

    We need to eradicate liberalism.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-26 13:26:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1210190248275271680

    Reply addressees: @JohnNune1 @galt_the

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1210190159347671040


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @JohnNune1 @galt_the We don’t need russia or asia. On the other hand. All top theorists are certain russia will not survive the century, and will lose the east to china.

    Russia needs us. We don’t need russa.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1210190159347671040


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @JohnNune1 @galt_the We don’t need russia or asia. On the other hand. All top theorists are certain russia will not survive the century, and will lose the east to china.

    Russia needs us. We don’t need russa.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1210190159347671040

  • LIKE INTERFERON ON A CANCER by James Santagata As depressing as they may all see

    LIKE INTERFERON ON A CANCER
    by James Santagata

    As depressing as they may all seem, P Constitution and Law would literally be like interferon on a cancer. All of these issues not just man… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=538466320083596&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-26 01:24:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1210008385678123008

  • WHY THE AUTO INDUSTRY? by James Santagata Here is a simply application of the P

    WHY THE AUTO INDUSTRY?

    by James Santagata

    Here is a simply application of the P macro Framework (parasite suppression, denial of cost shifting/externalities, markets in everything).

    As I pointed out earlier, 60% of the US deficit was vehicles, vehicle parts, oil/energy products.

    Why? US automakers got slammed three way in the 1970s – first was the oil crisis – which really was retaliation by Arabs for the US supporting Israel’s pre-emptive attacks on Arabs during the Yom Kippur war – Arabs tanks were about to overrun Israel but US military supplies kept the Israelis armed – in response OPEC and the US consumers paid over $1 trillion at the pumps.

    If you adjust for opportunity cost and present dollars, it is around $2 to $2.5 trillion impact on the US. At the same time, this killed our beloved muscle car industry over night. And put all automakers at risk. Because this was not a normal, long term cost shifting but short term hits against capital intensive industries with major tooling costs and lead time needed for new cars.

    So at that time, US auto makers started to make adjustments, and were also hit with government regulations, DOT, CAFE, and NRLA for unions. they were squeezed dry but rather than fight back, they figured, we will just cost shift onto the backs of consumers – and that worked, until the US consumers found better cars at at fraction of the operating cost in terms of reliability and operation – gas. Japanese.

    By then automakers couldn’t responds, some Honda’s like CVCC were selling for 2x and 3x sticker price! And our energy industry couldn’t respond as environmentalists blocked all the domestic drilling and nuke plants. This resulted in the destruction of Detroit, Ohio, Penn, for cars, car parts, suppliers, and steel. Beyond that, any other industry would back fill – like in silicon valley.

    Ashton Tate to IBM DBs, to Informix, to Siebel to FoxPro to Oracle, competitors swarm, winners win, only to evolve or get replaced themselves – but the US stays on top of those markets – databases, CRM, semiconductors, etc. etc.

    But not in automotive. Super high barriers due to government parasitism and cost shifting. DOT, NTSB, CAFE, NLRA, etc. crush all that industry by industry.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-25 21:03:00 UTC