Theme: Reform

  • GOOD ADVICE FROM A CHRISTIAN From Anon (via pm) (CD: See. If you get enough of a

    GOOD ADVICE FROM A CHRISTIAN

    From Anon (via pm)

    (CD: See. If you get enough of a solution the people help you. A “Discernment Movement”. “Christisim, Churchianity, and Orthodoxy”. Hmmm… that sets up Jesus vs political religion vs social religion nicely like the conflict between Science-Law vs philosophy(political) vs Faith, as the MONOPOLY position in both series failed. This helps a great deal. )

    From Anon;

    Curt. Read your piece – the first sermon. You’re doing quite a good job. I call it a Discernment Movement!

    On the piece, I have shared similar view about Christianity and I have for long, distance myself from the church and often avoid confrontation with dogma-infused people I know.

    I think you could do so much better by getting more people on your side by either:

    1. Developing on these themes: Christism or Christology (you could find better name) to promote the exact teachings and practice of Jesus – the ‘first sermon’ captures it well – as again current Christianity which is a dogma. Present Christianity is to be deservingly attacked as’ ‘Churchianity,’ your accurate construct. Both approaches are better to maximise benefits. It may be difficult to reform Christianity as it is, reason for the new approach.

    2. Do a propertarian interpretation of the Bible – which could on its be a bestseller. I think it could potentially knock down struggling Churchianity and a special propertarian biblican account of Jesus and how he should be understood, followed and a standard to determine those who pervert, undermine, and manipulate his brand for other purposes can be identified. This could be a potential canon in the making to liberate all under the effective control of churchian leaders.

    (CD: We would need to do Aristotle, The Epic Cycle, The Bible, and the Germanic-nordic) Cycle. I understand the need for the first two I didn’t think of really doing over the bible but i certainly am beginning to get there…. hmmm. very smart.)

    You can see, I already like the construct, churchian.

    3. 1 and 2 to go together. This is where the mass body of Christianity could be forced to rethink and also pay attention to propertarianism.

    Finally, if you’re to consider this suggestion, observe this as well, while promoting propertarian Christism (let’s that be a dummy name), refrain from using attacking current Christian community as a whole for rhetorical reason – let people, the audience concentrate on the message ONLY.

    However, for the them on attacking Churchianity, you critique limit it to critique and moderate use of strong words at this outset.

    Reasonable, decent people, those who want to be Christ-like, I think, will pay attention if it’s devoid of strong language and attack.

    Again, the consideration here is rhetoric.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-11 14:39:00 UTC

  • Apr 6, 2020, 11:39 AM

    https://sign.moveon.org/petitions/separate-nyc-from-upstate-and-central-ny?bucket&source=facebook-share-button&time=1586044210&utm_campaign&utm_source=facebook&share=ae2f5dcb-aa02-4b07-8bf4-13640170ed1cUpdated Apr 6, 2020, 11:39 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-06 11:39:00 UTC

  • I didn’t say there is an end to history or to law. I am merely adapting the law

    I didn’t say there is an end to history or to law. I am merely adapting the law to the present to suppress new known harms, the same way we update all sciences. There is no end to innovation – either in knowledge, good, or irreciprocity(harm). Law is just another science.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-28 19:07:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243978110581780480

    Reply addressees: @LorenzaTL @JFGariepy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243975451829207042

  • WHY IS CURT DOOLITTLE SO HOSTILE IN REFORMING LIBERTARIANISM INTO SOVEREIGNTARIA

    WHY IS CURT DOOLITTLE SO HOSTILE IN REFORMING LIBERTARIANISM INTO SOVEREIGNTARIANISM?

    —“UPB It’s built on non-contradiction. Making it’s epistemology rationalism; thereby ignoring: natural law, game theory, prisoner’s dilemma, etc.”—Andrew M Gilmour

    —“UPB is Kantianism (Hoppeanism) for fever-level IQs. It is the language of an adolescent just learning to venture beyond his mother’s purview. This has been his project from the outset (DEFOOing). He never completed the developmental arc. … Man requires information, not imperative.”—James Krieger

    —“I can only unite the libertarian, conservative, and religious if I restore responsibility of the militia of every able bodied man to bear the cost of the organized use of violence to enforce our demand for sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, excellence and beauty, jury and law, family and kin, commons and capitalization as the central objects of social organization and political policy. To do that we require an intellectual vanguard. The classical libertarians have always been our intellectual wing, the conservatives decidedly anti-intellectual, and the religious conservatives hostile to the intellectual. I have to deprive the libertarian intellectual class of false promise of freedom from the cost of organized violence in a universal militia of kin, and to together we must bear the cost of depriving the left of freedom from the cost of hyper-consumption and dysgenic reproduction and the hedonism of the individual’s maximization of consumption as the central object of policy and social organization. The left is cancerous growth of man on both this planet, mankind, man’s future, and the possibility of the transcendence of man into the gods we might yet be.”— Curt Doolittle

    Sovereignty = Responsibility.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-27 16:38:00 UTC

  • Judges aren’t the problem. The problem is (a) the holes in the constitution (fou

    Judges aren’t the problem. The problem is (a) the holes in the constitution (foundations of the law, and resulting rights), (b) the 20th ((())) undermining of the constitution by those holes (c) the holes in the construction of law (strict construction), (d) legislature.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-27 13:48:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243535397210202113

    Reply addressees: @EricLiford

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243532078744043525

  • No. It’s doing the obvious. Stay home, borrow to save biz and jobs, lower regula

    No. It’s doing the obvious. Stay home, borrow to save biz and jobs, lower regulation, shift production, repatriate industries, let the market find a therapy and then a cure. Only crisis was b/c chinese data. chinese labor infecting italy, spreading it via elder & health care.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-26 20:18:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243271108763226120

    Reply addressees: @Ganduin @paulkrugman

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243269355804200960

  • CONSTITUTION STATUS. The most important reformations in the constitution have to

    CONSTITUTION STATUS.

    The most important reformations in the constitution have to do with the law and rights. The rest of it decreases power distance as intended by the framers. Or the various political, economic, commercial, and educational reforms.

    If I keep at it for another few weeks I can get the constitution done enough for public debate. I just have to keep at it. And take a break just to do a course video. The topics are pretty much there. I find TINY holes still. But mostly I have to fill in topics and plug holes.

    Today I discovered a few holes: (a) didn’t handle the distinction between political disassociation for the production of commons, and political and territorial disassociation that would put the federation (empire) at risk. (b) that i didn’t define each of the markets in the ‘man’ (article 1) section.

    Now, the constitution is wrapped in a ‘book’. That book is a prosecution, judgement, and set of restitutions. The constitution is one of the restitutions. That will take longer. I should be able to get the constitution to edit-ready form during the crisis. The book is now ‘the big book’ because I have moved even the logics over into it. That has more holes. And unfortunately, I still can only work that hard a few hours a day without getting exhausted and having to work on something else.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-26 18:37:00 UTC

  • I cannot, have no interest in, and no time to, inspire the theological, or secul

    I cannot, have no interest in, and no time to, inspire the theological, or secular theological (meaning emotional) with sophistry. There is only one way out of our condition and only three choices: conquest, separatism, or defeat.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-26 16:13:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243209433703944194

    Reply addressees: @DarkHor80884493 @RichardBSpencer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243208918853181443


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @DarkHor80884493 @RichardBSpencer What’s necessary for action is for the theological, secular theological, and pragmatic leaderships to recognize that they can only act on the ACTIONABLE rather than the intuitive and inspirational – and those incentives are material, familial, social, and political.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1243208918853181443

  • What’s necessary for action is for the theological, secular theological, and pra

    What’s necessary for action is for the theological, secular theological, and pragmatic leaderships to recognize that they can only act on the ACTIONABLE rather than the intuitive and inspirational – and those incentives are material, familial, social, and political.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-26 16:11:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243208918853181443

    Reply addressees: @DarkHor80884493 @RichardBSpencer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243208602007076866


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @DarkHor80884493 @RichardBSpencer The failure of the theological and secular theological programs are obvious. We are in the process of seeing the failure of the civnat belief system. So that leaves the provision of material incentives and an operational means of achieving them by non-majoritarian means.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1243208602007076866

  • The failure of the theological and secular theological programs are obvious. We

    The failure of the theological and secular theological programs are obvious. We are in the process of seeing the failure of the civnat belief system. So that leaves the provision of material incentives and an operational means of achieving them by non-majoritarian means.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-26 16:10:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243208602007076866

    Reply addressees: @DarkHor80884493 @RichardBSpencer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243208150842593281


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @DarkHor80884493 @RichardBSpencer The faithful use the feminine theological demand, Richard uses the masculine secular-theological demand, Greg uses the pragmatic intuitive, the civnats the pragmatic, and the executive use the empirical military and law. These are rough class diffs reflecting power structures.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1243208150842593281